On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do
I have to do devious things to eventually find it?
# cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42
# make install clean
--
Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** [ Busy
Chris Hill wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the URL where I can get gcc42 and is it easy to get or do
I have to do devious things to eventually find it?
# cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc42
# make install clean
Or install FreeBSD 7.0 and do nothing else.
# g++ -v
At 12:29 AM 3/17/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 15, 2008, at 05:59, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
On Mar 15, 2008, at 05:59, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar
At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
through using the gdb n command. Here is the
At 12:02 PM 3/15/2008, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped
through using the gdb n command. Here is the output:
(gdb)
215 c.rmonths = (edate -
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out
why c.rmonths was always zero
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to
On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there
waiting for me to enter a gdb command.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:19:28 -0500
Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rod Person wrote:
/usr/bin/ld cannot find -lgcc_s
ls /lib/gcc*
You should have:
ls libgcc*
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 43K Nov 4 01:23:20 2007 libgcc_s.so.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:01:26 -0500
Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rod Person wrote:
I seem to have really hosed up my system somehow and I'm not sure
what I did. I'm running FreeBSD 7 Beta 1 i386.
I was going to upgrade to Beta 2,
Rod Person wrote:
I seem to have really hosed up my system somehow and I'm not sure what
I did. I'm running FreeBSD 7 Beta 1 i386.
I was going to upgrade to Beta 2, but when ever I compile anything it
fails and the last line is always:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool, but
that also fails with the same error.
Can you paste the config.log from the port's work source directory
(where configure is located)?
Can you try the following and
Josh Carroll wrote:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool, but
that also fails with the same error.
Can you paste the config.log from the port's work source directory
(where configure is located)?
Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:31:39 -0800
Josh Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
I googled for awhile and found the suggestion to reinstall libtool,
but that also fails with the same error.
i complete my software engineering degree.
PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
for me it's just funny thing that needs several megs of RAM to display the
current date ;)
but as being treated as technology instead of just tool, it's used
everythere without
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:53:00 +0100
James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also if anyone wants to recommend any other books on C++ feel free.
For beginners, I'd highly recommend C++ Primer / Fourth Ed.
by Stanley B. Lippman et. al.
But if you're starting to learn programming from scratch,
it's
a lot of pitfalls and gotchas that you won't experience
elsewhere (not so much with C itself, but with C++). And
that's why it's good to start with C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
James Jeffery wrote:
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:13:56PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:53:00PM +0100, James Jeffery wrote:
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:07:59AM +, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
system that happens to be able to use extensions that can provide C
style linkage. That said, I laude you for your desire to learn a real
programming
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:08:58AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i complete my software engineering degree.
PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
for me it's just funny thing that needs several megs of RAM to display the
current date ;)
but as being
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:33:12AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
In the Unix world (such as with FreeBSD), I'd recommend C before C++,
too -- though probably long after Ruby or Perl.
Too right. But it should be noted that both C and C++ give you enough
rope to hang yourself with.
My preference
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:08:30 +0200
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My preference for doing things is;
1) Can it be done with a shell-script? (esp. one-time hacks)
2) Else use Perl, Octave, Ruby, but
3) If speed is key, use C. :-)
Yup, exactly. In Python, that's what extension modules
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:53:00 +0100
James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im using Borland C++ compiler on XP and was wondering what compilers
there are for FreeBSD that would allow me to compile and execute some
of the examples i will practise from the book.
gcc, the system C compiler, is a
James Jeffery wrote:
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:53:00PM +0100, James Jeffery wrote:
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level
Hi all, thanks for the fast replys, much appreciated.
Manolis: Yep, its the book by Jesse, i never believe them when they say
in 24 hours, its a snag for them to sell the book, they just split it up
into 24 sections to make it look like its possible.
Roland: Ive been working with PHP over the
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no knowledge
of any lower level languages, so i do need to be spoon fed the basics.
so you should start from lower level first - learn C first :)
C is easy. it's
On 2007-10-06 20:53, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evening to you all (or morning in some parts of the world).
Im learning C++ from Sams Teach Yourself C++, now many will call this
a dumb method, and the books pointless and stupid, but i have no
knowledge of any lower level
On 2007-10-06, James Jeffery top-posted.
[ please don't do that, it makes it very difficult to format responses
correctly and makes it just about as hard to read and understand them ]
Hi all, thanks for the fast replys, much appreciated.
Manolis: Yep, its the book by Jesse, i never believe them
PHP isn't really a programming language. It's more a fancy templating
system that happens to be able to use extensions that can provide C
style linkage. That said, I laude you for your desire to learn a real
programming language, and agree with the recommendation that you start
with something
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile options, but it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile options,
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program compiled
to linux. I checked several compile
On Oct 4, 2004, at 3:18 PM, Josh Hansen wrote:
[ ...5.2.1 being slower than Linux... ]
I really don't think the problem is that simple. How about either
giving him a real answer or none at all?
Sigh. The malloc debugging options in 5.2.1 really will slow down
userland programs which heavily
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50%
Quoting Josh Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I´ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD programs spent almost 50% more time than the same program
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0600, Josh Hansen wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I?ve installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my PC machine. I compiled my own
programs and started to running them. For my surprise, I checked that
FreeBSD
Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm looking for some quick help with the 5.2.1 C compiler. In FBSD 4.x
I could write multi-line printf() statements with embedded new-lines
such as:
printf(
hello,
this
is
a
42 matches
Mail list logo
