Joel Hatton wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:15:14 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
The phrase Upgrade your vulnerable system implies performing the full
upgrade as per handbook, which means kernel and world.
No, it doesn't. It means upgrade as much as is necessary to get the
sendmail
with the sendmail patch that came out today, i ask this:
when in installed this machine as 6.1-RELEASE, i did a buildworld and
buildkernel and updated to 6.1-STABLE.
question: if i choose Patch Solution 1 from
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:17.sendmail.asc, do i
need
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:15:14 -0500, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the sendmail patch that came out today, i ask this:
when in installed this machine as 6.1-RELEASE, i did a buildworld and
buildkernel and updated to 6.1-STABLE.
question: if i choose Patch Solution 1 from
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:15:14 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
question: if i choose Patch Solution 1 from
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:17.sendmail.asc, do i
need to build a new kernel to go with this, or can i just build the world and
be done with it?
The phrase Upgrade
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 19:56, Joel Hatton wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:15:14 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
question: if i choose Patch Solution 1 from
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:17.sendmail.asc, do i
need to build a new kernel to go with this, or can i just build
Sean Murphy wrote:
[ ... ]
Ok I just did the make restart. Everything is good but the version
number did not change. How do I know the patch was applied? Is there
some command I can use to check?
Running sendmail -d0.1 ought to tell you the exact version of the sendmail
binary. Because the
do I download it ASCII or Binary?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-03-31 10:00, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do I download it ASCII or Binary?
Patches are, in general, text-only files.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-03-31 10:00, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do I download it ASCII or Binary?
Patches are, in general, text-only files.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2006-03-31 10:23, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-03-31 10:00, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do I download it ASCII or Binary?
Patches are, in general, text-only files.
Ok I installed the patch and did the make and install according to the
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-03-31 10:23, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-03-31 10:00, Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do I download it ASCII or Binary?
Patches are, in general, text-only files.
Ok I installed the patch and did the make and
Steve Bertrand wrote:
bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD web6.tls.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE
#0: Mon Feb
23
20:45:55 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I did,
bash-2.05b# cvsup standard-supfile
bash-2.05b# cd /usr/src
bash-2.05b# patch /path/to/patch
On Mar 23, 2006, at 16:06, DAve wrote:
bash-2.05b# make
/usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile, line 11: Malformed conditional
(${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} != no)
/usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile, line 13:
if-less endif /usr/src/lib/libsm/Makefile, line 13: Need
an operator
make: fatal errors encountered --
! This should not be this difficult. Updating an entire server seems
like a bit of overkill for a Sendmail patch. Though it is an opportunity
to go back to 4.X.
Dave
--
This message was checked by forty monkeys and
found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever.
Your monkeys may vary
.
Arrg! This should not be this difficult. Updating an entire server seems
like a bit of overkill for a Sendmail patch. Though it is an opportunity
to go back to 4.X.
Dave
I'll look at the port which is already updated.
Thanks,
DAve
--
This message was checked by forty monkeys and
found
Uh oh,
bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD web6.tls.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23
20:45:55 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I did,
bash-2.05b# cvsup standard-supfile
bash-2.05b# cd /usr/src
bash-2.05b# patch /path/to/patch
bash-2.05b# cd
DAve wrote:
Uh oh,
bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD web6.tls.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23
20:45:55 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I did,
bash-2.05b# cvsup standard-supfile
bash-2.05b# cd /usr/src
bash-2.05b# patch /path/to/patch
bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD web6.tls.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE
#0: Mon Feb
23
20:45:55 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I did,
bash-2.05b# cvsup standard-supfile
bash-2.05b# cd /usr/src
bash-2.05b# patch /path/to/patch
Who do I contact if I received errors while applying a sendmail patch
(SA-03:11) to my FreeBSD v4.8 system?? I get errors when compiling from
the following directory:
# cd /usr/src/lib/libsmutik
# make obj make depend make
These are the last few lines from the error after executing the above
The correct way of applying it for 8.11.x is:
# cd /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
# patch -p1 /PATH/TO/sendmail.8.11.6.security.cr.patch
This worked like a charm... HOWEVER, I now have to recompile sendmail and install the
new binary, which I haven't the first clue how to do
On 2003-03-06 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The correct way of applying it for 8.11.x is:
# cd /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
# patch -p1 /PATH/TO/sendmail.8.11.6.security.cr.patch
This worked like a charm... HOWEVER, I now have to recompile
sendmail and install the new
On 2003-03-04 22:38, taxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:08 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: A couple of quick questions...
:
: I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from sendmail.org, and used the
:
At 12:27 05.03.2003 +0200, you wrote:
On 2003-03-04 22:38, taxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:08 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: A couple of quick questions...
:
: I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from
On 2003-03-05 12:00, Andreas Wider?e Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:27 05.03.2003 +0200, you wrote:
On 2003-03-04 22:38, taxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, sorry for the confusion. I didn't read the patch carefully.
The correct way of applying it for 8.11.x is:
# cd
Errr... If you are not currently running Sendmail (IE It's not installed)..
Then there's nothing to patch
Peter
At 10:38 PM 3/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:08 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: A couple of
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 05:27 am, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 22:38, taxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:08 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: A couple of quick questions...
:
: I've
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
PS: You can always upgrade to RELENG_4. Gregory Neil Shapiro, the
maintainer of Sendmail on FreeBSD, has already merged the latest
Sendmail version (8.12.8) to the RELENG_4 branch.
Actually, according to what I can see in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:20 AM Matthew Seaman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
PS: You can always upgrade to RELENG_4. Gregory Neil Shapiro, the
maintainer of Sendmail on
Step by step instructions
ftp sendmail.org
login anonymously
cd pub/sendmail
get sendmail-8.12.8.tar.gz
quit
tar xvzf sendmail-8.12.8.tar.gz
cd sendmail-8.12.8
./Build
./Build install
kill -1 (SIGHUP) sendmail
You're now upgraded
At 08:53 PM 3/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003
Hello,
A couple of quick questions...
I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from sendmail.org, and used the
instructions they provided
[patch -p0 /PATH/TO/sendmail.8.11.6.security.cr.patch], which then
prompts me for 'which file to patch.' I'm not clear on which file I
_need_ to patch? Or where it
Phillip -
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Phillip Smith (mailing list) wrote:
I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from sendmail.org, and used the
instructions they provided
[patch -p0 /PATH/TO/sendmail.8.11.6.security.cr.patch], which then
prompts me for 'which file to patch.' I'm not clear on which file
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:14:49AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:20 AM Matthew Seaman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:22:49AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
PS: You can always upgrade to RELENG_4. Gregory Neil Shapiro, the
On 2003-03-03 21:15, Terry Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:53:26PM -0600, Terry Todd wrote:
I'm also running 8.11.6. I installed the correct patch from
sendmail.org but haven't figured out how to get it to compile.
The README says:
*
!! DO
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: A couple of quick questions...
:
: I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from sendmail.org, and used the
: instructions they provided
: [patch -p0 /PATH/TO/sendmail.8.11.6.security.cr.patch], which then
: prompts me for 'which file to
I would like to upgrade sendmail from the ports collections. However, I have been using sendmail 8.12.6 from the base install of freebsd 4.6.2 release and I believe that installing sendmail from the ports collection will add files to
/usr/local rather then /usr where sendmail is currently
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:08 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-03-04 10:02, Phillip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: A couple of quick questions...
:
: I've downloaded the 8.11.6 patch from sendmail.org, and used the
: instructions they provided
: [patch -p0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just applied the patch to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
I'm running sendmail 8.11.6
1. Is this the correct location for the patch?
2. Do I need to do a `make world' or can I just do a make install from with the
/usr/src/contrib/sendmail
On 2003-03-03 17:49, Mike Loiterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just applied the patch to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
I'm running sendmail 8.11.6
What patch did you apply?
1. Is this the correct location for the patch?
Depends on the patch. If it's the one from www.sendmail.org for the
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 05:49:50PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just applied the patch to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
I'm running sendmail 8.11.6
1. Is this the correct location for the patch?
2. Do I need to do a `make world' or
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:53:26PM -0600, Terry Todd wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 05:49:50PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just applied the patch to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
I'm running sendmail 8.11.6
1. Is this the
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:15:05PM -0600, Terry Todd wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:53:26PM -0600, Terry Todd wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 05:49:50PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just applied the patch to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, March 03, 2003 8:23 PM Giorgos Keramidas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-03-03 17:49, Mike Loiterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just applied the patch to /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src
I'm running sendmail 8.11.6
What patch
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:15:05PM -0600, Terry Todd wrote:
Is there a way to test that the vulnerability has been fixed?
As Claus Assmann posted over in freebsd-security, you can test that
your sendmail binary has been patched by:
% strings /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail | grep 'Dropped
43 matches
Mail list logo
