Re: Netgraph VLan support

Bump On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Ross Cameron wrote: > Hi there all > > I've trying to setup nested VLans using netgraph and most of my > googling suggests that this can be done. >    But alas it is not working on this side. I'm running a standard > FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 AMD64. > > The belo

Netgraph VLan support

Hi there all I've trying to setup nested VLans using netgraph and most of my googling suggests that this can be done. But alas it is not working on this side. I'm running a standard FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 AMD64. The below works just fine and creates a perfectly functional Vlan interface ngeth

Re: Can loader.conf give you NATD support?

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:39:14AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, John wrote: > > > The natd man page says it is still necessary to create a customer > > kernl with > > > > options IPFIREWALL > > options IPDIVERT > > > > Is that still true, or can it be accomplished vi a loader.c

Re: Can loader.conf give you NATD support?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/02/2010 15:39, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, John wrote: > >> The natd man page says it is still necessary to create a customer >> kernl with >> >> options IPFIREWALL >> options IPDIVERT >> >> Is that still true, or can it be accompl

Re: Can loader.conf give you NATD support?

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, John wrote: The natd man page says it is still necessary to create a customer kernl with options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT Is that still true, or can it be accomplished vi a loader.conf? It's a kernel option, so you probably can't do it at runtime. Consider using pf in

Can loader.conf give you NATD support?

The natd man page says it is still necessary to create a customer kernl with options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT Is that still true, or can it be accomplished vi a loader.conf? Thanks! -- John Lind j...@starfire.mn.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.o

Re: 8.0 and floppy support

Fbsd1 writes: > When booting release 8.0 i no longer get the fd0 floppy device prob > message. This pc has run freebsd 6.4 7.0 7.2 which all supported the > floppy drive. > > Has floppy drive support been dropped in 8.0? No; it's still in the GENERIC kernel, and i

8.0 and floppy support

When booting release 8.0 i no longer get the fd0 floppy device prob message. This pc has run freebsd 6.4 7.0 7.2 which all supported the floppy drive. Has floppy drive support been dropped in 8.0? I know the floppy drive works because i can boot win98 floppy disk ok

Re: Question and support

On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:07:06 +, davidowe...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Hello there how do i install freebsd to my dedicated server I may politely point you at FreeBSD's excellent online documentation, the handbook and the FAQ, which you'll find here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handb

Question and support

Hello there how do i install freebsd to my dedicated server is freebsd a easy to use platform I am new to Linux so i am ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: Support for Asus MicroATX Boards

Uwe Laverenz wrote: Am 08.01.2010 16:43, schrieb Anselm Strauss: chips. I can't find real evidence on the supported hardware list whether the following chipsets are really working with FreeBSD 8.0 or not. Maybe I have an Asus "M4A785TD-M EVO" running with RELENG_8 and it works fine. There i

Re: Support for Asus MicroATX Boards

Am 08.01.2010 16:43, schrieb Anselm Strauss: chips. I can't find real evidence on the supported hardware list whether the following chipsets are really working with FreeBSD 8.0 or not. Maybe I have an Asus "M4A785TD-M EVO" running with RELENG_8 and it works fine. There is/was a race condition

Support for Asus MicroATX Boards

Hi, I was looking for some new hardware to buy. I'm interested especially in the M4*/M3* boards from Asus with the AMD 785G/SB710, 780G/SB700 and nForce 720a chips. I can't find real evidence on the supported hardware list whether the following chipsets are really working with FreeBSD 8.0 or not.

HighPoint RR 2640 support in 8.0-RELEASE?

Hello everyone, I recently upgraded to 8, and purchased a HighPoint RocketRAID 2640 card. Sadly I had remembered incorrectly that this was supported by either the hptrr or hptiop driver, and instead it seems to only be supported by a binary driver from HighPoint. However, the latest release of t

8.0 Ext3/Ext4 support

Hi there, Is there Ext3/Ext4 read support in FreeBSD 8? Can we use fs with 256-byte inodes? Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Christmas Administrators - Recruitment Support Services

  Most of our recruitment clients recognise Christmas time as being the ideal opportunity to undertake an annual clean up of their databases to have their back offices ship shape for the New Year.   £45.00 per day   This is the cost of a FULL-TIME administrator This is the cost of a FULL-TI

Re: ATI Eyefinity support in FreeBSD

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:06:10 -0500 PJ PJ replied: [snip] >Hey, this is indeed very interesting. >But did you read the fine print at the bottom of the page? >"Linux support scheduled to be enabled via a future ATI Catalyst™ >driver release." >Nobody cares about us FreeB

Re: ATI Eyefinity support in FreeBSD

m of the page? "Linux support scheduled to be enabled via a future ATI Catalyst™ driver release." Nobody cares about us FreeBSD fraks... :'( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs

ATI Eyefinity support in FreeBSD

I recently came across this web page regarding ATI: http://www.amd.com/us/products/technologies/eyefinity/Pages/eyefinity.aspx Is this supported under FreeBSD also? -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com |=== |=== |=== |=== | No one gets sick on Wednesdays. ___

NIC Support

Is the RealTek RTL8112L PCIe gigabit LAN Controller support in FreeBSD 7.2? I could not find this in the hardware notes. Is it listed under another name? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:17:12 + Jeronimo Calvo replied: >I am using RT61, so makes me wonder that RT73 does. I contacted Belkin to make sure I had the proper information. They responded: Chipset information for F5D9050 version 4000 is Ralink RT2671F, RT2528L (RT73) -- Carmel carmel...@hot

Re: Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

Hi there, I am using RT61, so makes me wonder that RT73 does. Cheers! 2009/11/10 carmel_ny : > I just got my hands on a Belkin Wireless device that uses a Ralink > RT73 chipset. Rather than waste a lot of time attempting to get it to > work, I thought I would ask if anyone here has succeed in do

Does FreeBSD support the Ralink RT73 chipset

I just got my hands on a Belkin Wireless device that uses a Ralink RT73 chipset. Rather than waste a lot of time attempting to get it to work, I thought I would ask if anyone here has succeed in doing so. I see that FreeBSD supports: Atheros and Intersil Prism components;however, I did not see any

Support for Hauppauge 950Q USB tuner

Can the 950Q HDTV tuner be made to work with FreeBSD? The device is identified by dmesg but of course the Hauppauge firmware must be somehow transfered to the device and then something like the Linux dvb-apps must be used for tuning and streaming. My intent is use the 950 with Zotac IONITX mo

USB modem support on a FreeBSD box

I know about all the drivers being for windoz. And how we're pretty much left out in the cold. Does any solution exist? For example, if I access my USB modem via the Wine emulator, will that work? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

tft pivot support and auto rotation

hi there, my tft comes with pivot support. i'm running x with the nvidia closed source drivers and added Option "RandRRotation" "True" to my xorg.conf. so now when i do `xrandr -o left` or `xrandr -o right` X gets rotated which is great. under windows however i&

Support for Apple iBook keyboards

I need a replacement keyboard for my iBook (Processor 500MHz, PowerPC G3, 384 MB SDRAM, build 8S165, machine model PowerBook4,1, CPU PowerPC 750 (32.14), Bus Speed 67 MHz, USB Bus 3200, File System HFS+ AND - DIMM0/BUILT-IN: size 128 MB. Please advise mr of the following: 1) Do you carry it?

Re: ath(4) Atheros AR9285 support

now, if there will be any Atheros AR9285 support in >> ath(4) driver in nearest future? I've got my ASUS Eee 1005HA with one of >> these wireless adapters, and it doesn't seem to be working. >> >> -- >> wbr, >> Boo >> > > > It's a

Re: ath(4) Atheros AR9285 support

I had serious problems using the port hal in combination with an Atheros WiFi card. Maybe disable hal and try again? Cheers herb langhans On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:23:10PM +0400, Sergey Vinogradov wrote: > Hi, > Just wanted to know, if there will be any Atheros AR9285 support in &

Re: Is ALSA support working in 72?

On Monday 31 August 2009 21:56:50 Yuri wrote: > I tried new skype-2.1.0.47 on FreBSD-72. (I have > linux-alsa-lib-1.0.10.3_2 installed.) > > Skype starts but gives the errors below when I try to make a voice call. > Previous versions of Skype came in OSS flavor but now it seems to be > dropped a

Is ALSA support working in 72?

I tried new skype-2.1.0.47 on FreBSD-72. (I have linux-alsa-lib-1.0.10.3_2 installed.) Skype starts but gives the errors below when I try to make a voice call. Previous versions of Skype came in OSS flavor but now it seems to be dropped and it's only available for ALSA. Why would ALSA library

Re: CPU doesn't support long mode

John Francis Lee wrote: > My problem seems to be that > > CPU doesn't support long mode > > Is that it? Can't get there from here? My guess is that you've installed an amd64 version of FreeBSD, but your system is i386. Cheers, Mike _

CPU doesn't support long mode

My problem seems to be that CPU doesn't support long mode Is that it? Can't get there from here? -- John Francis Lee 1025/37 Thanon Jet Yod Mueang Chiangrai 57000 Thailand ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On 8/14/09, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> Valid point. I didn't make the clarification that I should >> have. graid3 and gmirror have reached the maturity and >> dedicated to the system, whereas ZFS is still experimental. >> When ZFS is no longer considered experimental,

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

> Valid point. I didn't make the clarification that I should > have. graid3 and gmirror have reached the maturity and > dedicated to the system, whereas ZFS is still experimental. > When ZFS is no longer considered experimental, I would expect > ZFS support in the i

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On 8/14/09, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> From: "Tim Judd" >> I don't use ZFS, UFS2 works fine for me. I would find it >> ridiculous to see ZFS support in the installer, but all GEOM >> should be supported. Especially the raid3 and mirror. > > So, yo

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

Jason Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:48, Tim Gustafson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if there was a plan or time line in place to support ZFS >> boot partitions in the installer. I Googled around a bit and found some >> how-to documents

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

at's included in the installer. > From: "Tim Judd" > I don't use ZFS, UFS2 works fine for me. I would find it > ridiculous to see ZFS support in the installer, but all GEOM > should be supported. Especially the raid3 and mirror. So, you like the idea of incl

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:58 -0700, Tim Gustafson wrote: > then there's no reason that the functionality couldn't or shouldn't be > built into the installer. With a few machines, yes. Once you get to 5 or 6, start building your own custom internal ISOs, and maintain your configuration templates in

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On 8/14/09, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> No one has gone near that stuff in years. We don't even >> have gmirror(8) creation support in there. Best not to use >> sysinst. The livefs image has all of the tools that you >> need to bootstrap a system. > > That

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

> No one has gone near that stuff in years. We don't even > have gmirror(8) creation support in there. Best not to use > sysinst. The livefs image has all of the tools that you > need to bootstrap a system. That's a silly answer. The way to get more people to use F

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:48 -0700, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there was a plan or time line in place to support > ZFS boot partitions in the installer. No one has gone near that stuff in years. We don't even have gmirror(8) creation support in there.

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

> I wouldn't recommend using zfs at all right now, unless you want > random crashes and lots of missing data.. ESPECIALLY in 8.0,1,2 > versions. I'm using 7.2 at the moment with a standard UFS2 boot partition and a 500GB ZFS pool. My ZFS pool actually seems pretty stable. I did a "make -j 16 b

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:48, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there was a plan or time line in place to support ZFS > boot partitions in the installer. I Googled around a bit and found some > how-to documents for setting it up in a hacky kind of way, but the >

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

My zfs only system works fine but it based on 8-beta2 built around 16 May( will be rebuilding soon) The main thing to remember to do it make sure your have zfs_loader_support="yes" in your src of make.conf I based my install on this howto http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSOnRootWithZFSboot#installFreeB

Re: ZFS Boot Support from Installer

Tim Gustafson wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if there was a plan or time line in place to support ZFS boot > partitions in the installer. I Googled around a bit and found some how-to > documents for setting it up in a hacky kind of way, but the impression I got > is th

ZFS Boot Support from Installer

Hi, I was wondering if there was a plan or time line in place to support ZFS boot partitions in the installer. I Googled around a bit and found some how-to documents for setting it up in a hacky kind of way, but the impression I got is that support for ZFS partitions is coming to the

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

Christian Grube wrote: > It is possible for me to spend my time without the file_charset, but the > other ones gives me some > problems. > Now I've to find out, what patches mutt in debian lenny is using to provide > them in FreeBSD. > Mutt is much important for me, I dislike any GUI-click-MUAs.

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

Hi Andrew, > I may be misunderstanding the issue with SMTP. Is the poster just > needing to send email through a non-local email server? If so, the > port msmtp is very easy to use and works very well with mutt. > > Andrew I've changed from Debian (used mutt there) to FreeBSD and it works very w

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

Christian Grube wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering, why there is no IMAP/SMTP-Support in mutt > or mutt-devel. I have had mutt-ng and muttprofile on my debianbox > and it works like a charm. > Is there a small hint for me to provide the same functionality under > FreeBSD 8? &

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

Andrew Gould wrote: > > IMAP support is AT LEAST in mutt-devel and probably in mutt as well, and > > has been since the 1.3 days (2003 or so).  As for SMTP support, that > > appeared around 1.5.17 I think (about a year ago); you might have to use > > mutt-devel for it.

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Randall Wood wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:53:47 -0500, "Doug Poland" > said: >> >> On Tue, July 28, 2009 11:49, Christian Grube wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was wondering, why there is no IMAP/SMTP-

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:53:47 -0500, "Doug Poland" said: > > On Tue, July 28, 2009 11:49, Christian Grube wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering, why there is no IMAP/SMTP-Support in mutt > > or mutt-devel. I have had mutt-ng and muttprofile on my

Re: mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

On Tue, July 28, 2009 11:49, Christian Grube wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering, why there is no IMAP/SMTP-Support in mutt > or mutt-devel. I have had mutt-ng and muttprofile on my debianbox > and it works like a charm. > > Is there a small hint for me to provide the sam

mutt with muttprofile and GnuPG-Support

Hi, I was wondering, why there is no IMAP/SMTP-Support in mutt or mutt-devel. I have had mutt-ng and muttprofile on my debianbox and it works like a charm. Is there a small hint for me to provide the same functionality under FreeBSD 8? Greetings Chris

Quota support in GENERIC or as loadable module?

Hello, Right now quota support is not available by default in the GENERIC kernel. As far as I know there is no way to compile quota support as a loadable module, am I correct? If so, what are the reasons for not including this feature in the GENERIC kernel and/or providing it as a loadable module

Re: intel atom mobo support; ASUS AT3GC ?

Henrik Hudson wrote: [snip Q about support of Realtek 8112 NIC] > One will be a dual-homed box, so I need > both the onboard and the single PCI slot. Or, perhaps, a one-slot dual-port NIC using already-supported devices -- provided someone still make

intel atom mobo support; ASUS AT3GC ?

Hey List, I'm looking into running on of these: ASUS AT3GC http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx?modelmenu=2&model=3129&l1=3&l2=192&l3=0&l4=0 Now it seems to differ from the stock intel Atom setup in that it's using a Realtek 8112 NIC and I can't seem to find an

Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2 [SOLVED]

On 7/22/09, Bryant Eadon wrote: ... > > I'm disappointed that FreeBSD mount_udf doesn't support this disc. > Disappointed enough to port the latest NetBSD UDF improvements to FreeBSD? Or to analyze the udfclient sources and make some improvements to the kernel module? ;

Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2 [SOLVED]

b. f. wrote: #How can I mount this disc ? Does udf.ko support this format ? I don't often use memory disks, so I'm not quite sure what is going wrong here. You could try configuring it and mounting it as read-only, to see if that helps. But you should be aware that FreeBSD does n

Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

#How can I mount this disc ? Does udf.ko support this format ? I don't often use memory disks, so I'm not quite sure what is going wrong here. You could try configuring it and mounting it as read-only, to see if that helps. But you should be aware that FreeBSD does not support

Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Bryant Eadon wrote: ... sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/ ## lists only a single file 'readme.txt' : This disc contains a "UDF" file system and requires an operating system that supports the ISO-13346 "UDF" file system specification. ## lovely .. sudo m

Re: Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

Bryant Eadon wrote: ... >sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/ > ## lists only a single file 'readme.txt' : > This disc contains a "UDF" file system and requires an operating > system that supports the ISO-13346 "UDF" file system specification. > ## lovely .. >sudo mount -t udf /dev/md0

Support of UDF ISO-13346 on 7.1-RELEASE-p2

mount -t udf /dev/md0 /mnt/iso/ mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid argument ## Not very helpful ... especially since kldstat shows I have udf.ko loaded. How can I mount this disc ? Does udf.ko support this format ? thanks, Bryant ___ freebsd-questions

Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

2009/7/2 Sam Fourman Jr. : > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote: >> Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems? > > amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's > > right now the big limitation for me is you can not > have a Nvidia bi

Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote: > Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems? amd64 supports both amd and intel 64bit CPU's right now the big limitation for me is you can not have a Nvidia binary graphics driver on amd64 progress has been made on this fron

Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

> amd64 Ah-hah. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Underwood wrote: > Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems? > > I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too > limited to confidently draw conclusions: > <http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/>

FreeBSD support for 64-bit x86 systems

Does FreeBSD currently support 64-bit x86 systems? I've been here, but my knowledge of hardware terminology is too limited to confidently draw conclusions: <http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/> ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

--On May 12, 2009 6:33:03 AM -0700 Peter Steele wrote: So, based on what I've read here and in my searches, for wake-on-LAN to work on a given system, the NIC itself has to support this feature, and in addition the OS has to be able to enable this feature (via the driver for the NIC). It

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

>I just noticed my 7.2-R i386 PC-Engines ALIX2 board with vr devices show up >(WOL_UCAST,WOL_MAGIC) in the ifconfig listing. Seems they're making some of >it available in 7.2-RELEASE > >I'll have to test/try this out, I'm glad I'm starting to see it happen. Unfortunately we're pretty much stu

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

8.0 man page has added anything. > > It has: > > wol, wol_ucast, wol_mcast, wol_magic > Enable Wake On Lan (WOL) support, if available. WOL is a > facil- > ity whereby a machine in a low power state may be woken in > response t

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

wol_mcast, wol_magic Enable Wake On Lan (WOL) support, if available. WOL is a facil- ity whereby a machine in a low power state may be woken in response to a received packet. There are three types of packets that may wake a system: ucast (directed sol

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

Peter Steele wrote: > Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD > system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work? Yes, with CURRENT and re(4): f...@africanqueen ~ $pciconf -lv | grep -A 4 re0 r...@pci0:0:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x816910ec ch

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

> --On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: >> >> I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the >> last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode >> the NIC gets set to and then the ACPI shuts the power off. >> >> Without this mode, the W

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

>In some cases (depending on the NIC and the BIOS) WOL works even without >OS support. It might be worth testing before you do anything else. I've tried various experiments with the wol command to try to wake up one of our boxes with no luck. We're using the stock nVidia drive

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

So, based on what I've read here and in my searches, for wake-on-LAN to work on a given system, the NIC itself has to support this feature, and in addition the OS has to be able to enable this feature (via the driver for the NIC). It seems likely that when this appears that a new option will

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

> FUD, read ifconfig(8) There is no mention of wake-on-LAN in the man page for ifconfig in 7.0. I'd be interested in seeing if the 8.0 man page has added anything. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

in the ports collection is that it can be used to wake any system that supports wake-on-LAN, and these systems can be running any OS. So, based on what I've read here and in my searches, for wake-on-LAN to work on a given system, the NIC itself has to support this feature, and in addit

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

he question of Wake-on-LAN has been around for a > while. I typically respond. > > Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts > the NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has > no Wake-on-LAN driver support, hence, no host r

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: > >> >> I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the >> last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode >> the NIC gets set to and then the

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

--On May 11, 2009 8:06:41 PM -0600 Tim Judd wrote: I've read Google, I've done my research, and know that what I say is the last word. They've exampled how WOL works, and as I said, it's a mode the NIC gets set to and then the ACPI shuts the power off. Without this mode, the WOL packets get t

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Wojciech Puchar < woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD >> system? >> > > wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is > powered up - as it's made to power up

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has isn't it BIOS option? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/ma

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD system? wake on lan works before any OS is started, actually before computer is powered up - as it's made to power up computer by LAN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

> Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the > NIC in a mode at shutdown that >allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has no > Wake-on-LAN driver support, hence, no host running FreeBSD has >Wake-on-LAN > capabilities. > >I'm shoc

Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

typically respond. Long story short: Wake-on-LAN requires OS/NIC driver support. The OS puts the NIC in a mode at shutdown that allows Wake-on-LAN to work. FreeBSD has no Wake-on-LAN driver support, hence, no host running FreeBSD has Wake-on-LAN capabilities. I'm shocked that the Intel NICs d

Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD?

Has anyone successfully used the wake-on-LAN tool wol to wake-up a FreeBSD system? If yes, what NICs did you need to use to get this to work? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To

Re: Support for Apple iBook keyboards

both my i386's and servers, so it would make sense to >> use it on my laptop instead of OpenBSD. > > ADB support was added fairly recently and is only available on > -current and hasn't been MFC'd to -stable. On the G4 you'll probably > want to run the follo

Re: Support for Apple iBook keyboards

sense to > use it on my laptop instead of OpenBSD. ADB support was added fairly recently and is only available on -current and hasn't been MFC'd to -stable. On the G4 you'll probably want to run the following at the OpenFirmware prompt to make the CPU run at full speed: dev /cpus/

RE: Support for Apple iBook keyboards

Hi, I would like to use FreeBSD on my Apple G4 iBook, can you tell me if the ADB keyboard is supported in the latest version available? I use FreeBSD on both my i386's and servers, so it would make sense to use it on my laptop instead of OpenBSD. Kind regards, Liam Sullivan. __

FreeBSD 8.x, Xen 3.3.x Dom0 support

Hi: Does anybody know the extent of Dom0 support for FreeBSD 8.x with Xen 3.3.x ? The discussion threads on -xen and -virtualization are fairly sketchy on this topic. Any pointers or observations ? thanks Saifi. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: Question about support for HP D1560 printer under FreeBSD

On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:06:14 +0530 Manish Jain wrote: > Hi Jerry, > Thanks for your message. I checked up the list, which says that the > D1560 is indeed supported, but it also says that the minimum version > of hplip required for this is 2.8.5, while the latest port available > is 2.8.

Re: Question about support for HP D1560 printer under FreeBSD

Jerry wrote: According to the [1]http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/index.html site, your printer is supported. Install the '/print/hplip' port. Be sure to read the docu mentation on configuring the program. I have hplip and cups installed on my system to support two HP wireless

Re: Question about support for HP D1560 printer under FreeBSD

n on configuring the program. I have hplip and cups installed on my system to support two HP wireless printers, and it works fine. -- Jerry And God said, "Let there be light. "But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL univer

Question about support for HP D1560 printer under FreeBSD

Hi, I am about to buy a new printer (my first one actually) and my retailer strongly recommends HP's D1560 printer (USB). I am running ghostscript8-8.62_5 under FreeBSD 7.1 and I can't see this model listed anywhere in apsfilter. So I just want to confirm whether I could get this printer to

USB disk support patches?

We've found that FreeBSD 7.0's support for USB disks is pretty unstable. We have a process that creates a bootable FreeBSD 7.0 image on a USB disk and this requires writing a fairly large amount of data in one shot to the USB drive. We've found that there is probably less than

RE: Webcam support in FreeBSD?

> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:09:42 -0700 > From: y...@rawbw.com > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Webcam support in FreeBSD? > > There are three Linux drivers supported under emulation code: > devel/linux-kmod-compat > <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb

Webcam support in FreeBSD?

There are three Linux drivers supported under emulation code: devel/linux-kmod-compat , multimedia/linux-gspca-kmod , multimedia/linux-ov511-kmod

Support for parallel building hits ports tree

Hi, I remember people on this list being interested in parallel builds, so here's the link to my forum post that explains the details of the support that's been added to the ports tree last Sunday: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=17604#post1760

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >