John Nielsen wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2009 19:44:15 Steve Bertrand wrote:
My problem is performance. I'm only willing to make this box virtual if
I can keep the abstraction performance loss to 25% (my ultimate goal
would be 15%).
usable memory = 8575160320 (8177 MB)
avail memory =
is performance. I'm only willing to make this box virtual if
I can keep the abstraction performance loss to 25% (my ultimate goal
would be 15%).
The following is what I have, followed by my benchmark findings:
# 7.2-RELEASE AMD64
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 07:18:07 UTC 2009
r
John Nielsen wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2009 19:44:15 Steve Bertrand wrote:
I'd appreciate any feedback on tweaks that I can make (either to VMWare,
or FreeBSD itself) to make the virtualized environment much more efficient.
See above about storage. Similar questions come up
From: John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net
Subject: Re: VMWare ESX and FBSD 7.2 AMD64 guest
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca
Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 10:22 AM
On Thursday 23 July 2009 19:44:15
Steve Bertrand wrote:
This message has a foot that has
Richard Mahlerwein wrote:
If I recall correctly from ESX (well, VI) training*, there may be a minor
scheduling issue affecting things here. If you set up the VM with 4
processors, ESX schedules time on the CPU only when there's 4 things to
execute (well, there's another time period it
From: Dean Weimer dwei...@orscheln.com
Subject: RE: VMWare ESX and FBSD 7.2 AMD64 guest
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: st...@ibctech.ca
Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 10:49 AM
[snip]
servers while running between datacenters. Also keep
in mind that as of vSphere 4 (We
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12:14PM +0200, Oliver Pinter typed:
debian not only linux based: http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/
http://www.debian.org/ports/#nonlinux
That's not the point. FreeBSD is a complete OS. Not just a kernel and some tools
Why would you want to replace all the
That's not the point. FreeBSD is a complete OS
Yeah, I know, and I use true FreeBSD, and not debian gnu/kfreebsd.
On 7/23/09, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:12:14PM +0200, Oliver Pinter typed:
debian not only linux based:
willing to make this box virtual if
I can keep the abstraction performance loss to 25% (my ultimate goal
would be 15%).
The following is what I have, followed by my benchmark findings:
# 7.2-RELEASE AMD64
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 07:18:07 UTC 2009
r...@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr
hi all
I have freebsd 7.2 amd64 installed on IBM server with dual NIC but i
only use one and put 2 ip address ( aliases ) on that NIC the other left
unuse, using ezjail I create one jail. All is working fine but there is
something strange happening, every 1 or two minute that jail ip can't
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine is Turion with some other
name
2009/7/21 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca:
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/21 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca:
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine is Turion with some other
name
I noticed that on my amd64 systems almost all of /bin, /sbin, /lib, /
usr/bin, etc had changed from 7.2-RELEASE-p1 to 7.2-RELEASE-p2. On my
i386 only some network drivers, libc and rescue files were updated.
Is this normal? Before installing the update I made a copy of the
files, and it looks
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:32 AM, kxorrao luizbcam...@gmail.com wrote:
What port of wine should I download in order to play 32bit .exe
files on FreeBSD-7.0 amd64? Linux wine or Wine?
It's not a terribly big port. Compile it and check. Generally if there are
problems with port on a specific
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:10:58AM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:32 AM, kxorrao luizbcam...@gmail.com wrote:
What port of wine should I download in order to play 32bit .exe
files on FreeBSD-7.0 amd64? Linux wine or Wine?
It's not a terribly big port
. The
FreeBSD ports system doesn't currently isn't equipped to handle
this. Not that this would be impossible, but nobody has bothered.
I know that is must be possible, 64bit Linux's run 32bit wine apps.
Gentoo Linux and OpenSuse amd64 editions, work with wine
I use one of these two to Play World
What port of wine should I download in order to play 32bit .exe
files on FreeBSD-7.0 amd64? Linux wine or Wine?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 2009-06-30 02:13:11, Roland Smith wrote:
The page says it does.
Forgive me for being cynical but after countless experiences, I rarely believe
such statements any more!
Virtualbox + VMGL seems the most likely candidate at the moment -
From the abovementioned page: VMGL is available
Hello.
What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
OpenGL support is required?
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed.
xw
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello.
What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
OpenGL support is required?
Depends on what your definitions of a virtual machine and OpenGl support
are. :-)
All CPU level virtual
On 2009-06-29 23:34:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello.
What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
OpenGL support is required?
Depends on what your definitions of a virtual machine
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:59:04PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-06-29 23:34:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:14:17PM +0100, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello.
What's the preferred virtual machine on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE on amd64 if
OpenGL
In the last episode (Jun 24), Olivier Nicole said:
Is the port security/pgp working on amd64 system?
I copied my public and private keyrings from i386 to amd64 system and I
cannot decipher any file, it keeps on complaining that the pass phrase is
bad.
I already tried to export the key
version 2.10
pcib0: MPTable Host-PCI bridge pcibus 0 on motherboard
pci0: PCI Bus on pcib0
pci0: domain=0, physical bus=0
There's no PCI cards plugged in, just the AGP video card.
When I try booting the AMD64 ISO, the boot loader runs, I get the boot
menu, and regardless of what boot
--- On Tue, 6/23/09, ericr erobi...@gmail.com wrote:
From: ericr erobi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Can't boot 7.2-RELEASE i386 or AMD64 on an Abit KV8 Pro
motherboard with Sempron 3100+ CPU
To: Kent Stewart kstew...@owt.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009, 12:44
ericr wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Kent Stewart kstew...@owt.com wrote:
On Saturday 20 June 2009 11:00:45 am ericr wrote:
Hi,
As the subject says, I can't get the 7.2-RELEASE i386 CD to boot on a
system that has:
Abit KV8 Pro (K8T800P-8237-6A7L1A1BC-26) motherboard with the most
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Hi,
Is the port security/pgp working on amd64 system?
I copied my public and private keyrings from i386 to amd64 system and
I cannot decipher any file, it keeps on complaining that the pass
phrase is bad.
I already tried to export the key on the i386
-RELEASE. I'd use ifc but that's marked as
i386 only and I'm on an AMD64 box.
How do I get g77 running on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE? Thanks in
advance for any help that you can provide with my conundrum . . .
- Jason
___
freebsd
the gfortran port, however I don't see one
in my ports tree for 7.2-RELEASE. I'd use ifc but that's marked as
i386 only and I'm on an AMD64 box.
How do I get g77 running on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE? Thanks in
advance for any help that you can provide with my conundrum . . .
gfortran is part
.
When I try booting the AMD64 ISO, the boot loader runs, I get the boot menu,
and regardless of what boot options I give the kernel, I get the message
CPU doesn't support long mode and then I get the OK prompt.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't have a h/w problem, it'll boot and install Fedora
11, Win2K
, physical bus=0
There's no PCI cards plugged in, just the AGP video card.
When I try booting the AMD64 ISO, the boot loader runs, I get the boot
menu, and regardless of what boot options I give the kernel, I get the
message CPU doesn't support long mode and then I get the OK prompt.
I'm
--- On Mon, 6/8/09, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
wrote:
From: Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
Subject: Re: tcllib error while installing tcllib on amd64 system running
freebsd 7.0
To: Dino Vliet dino_vl...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions
Dino Vliet dino_vl...@yahoo.com writes:
[* ] [8.6b1] comm comm.test!Connect to remote failed: couldn't
open socket: connection timed out
Taking a look in the comm.test file, it looks to me like you already had
something on port 12345, so an attempt to open such a port failed.
--
Hi all,
On my AMD 64 system running freebsd 7.0 I try to install tcllib. I have up to
date ports and have installed tcl86-threaded first.
pkg_info | grep threads gives:
tcl-threads-8.6.b.1_4 Tool Command Language
Installing tcllib gives the following error:
[ * ] [8.6b1] cmdline PASS
The time of the first post of the original topic 4 apcupsd problems
using USB to connect on FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE was some 20 days ago, and
there are still 2 problems remained. So I copy the unsolved problems
here, plus the thing I did.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
=
OS version:
Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link status
up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.
hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange
almost the same.. three rl nic's with 7.0, no problems on all ifaces
hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange
almost the same.. three rl nic's with 7.0, no problems on all ifaces
rl and re are different drivers for different chips, just both produced by
realtek ;)
___
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl]
Sent: 26 May 2009 02:20
To: Graeme Dargie
Cc: ill...@gmail.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64
I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.
sun3# freebsd
On Tue, 26 May 2009 09:01:36 +0100
Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk wrote:
-Original Message-
Various network interface drivers have been improved, including ae(4),
ath_hal(4), axe(4), bce(4), cxgb(4), fxp(4), igb(4), jme(4), msk(4),
mxge(4), nfe(4), re(4), rl(4), sis(4), and
Are you suggesting a user should only upgrade if they are having a
problem, or do you just like to contribute more nonsense to the list
mostly yes - keep things as is if it works. and it's only nonsense for
you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I'd say it depends very much on the system's use. For a system
which is in production (i.e. doing ongoing work), there is a
great deal to be said for not fixing things that aren't broken.
if they are not broken - there is nothing to fix.
___
Very specifically that I was getting watchdog time outs and link status
up down up on the re nic driver, hopefully 7.2 solves this.
hmm i do have re(8) nic with 7.1 (6.3 before) - no problems. strange
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi All
I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.
sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 2 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Inspecting system... done.
2009/5/25 Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk:
Hi All
I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.
sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE
7.2-RELEASE
Maybe?
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: ill...@gmail.com [mailto:ill...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 May 2009 22:39
To: Graeme Dargie
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: updating from 7.1 to 7.2 AMD64
2009/5/25 Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk:
Hi All
I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems
I am trying to update 2 7.1 systems to 7.2.
sun3# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2RELEASE
7.2-RELEASE
Maybe?
Haha ... thank I knew it was something blindly obvious that I was
missing ... there be a lesson don't try to upgrade 3 systems at once and
watch TV.
even more important - why you are
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find in 7.1
problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?
Are you suggesting a user should only upgrade if they are having a
problem, or do
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
even more important - why you are upgrading at all. did you find
in 7.1 problems that you wanted to solve by moving to 7.2?
Are you suggesting a user should
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I'd say it depends very much on the system's use. For a system
which is in production (i.e. doing ongoing work), there is a
great deal to be said for not fixing things that aren't broken.
This was not the OP's reason for this
ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask 255.255.0.0
and output from:
dhclient bc0
I ran that on a local machine and it hung up the interface, requiring a warm
reboot.
I'll see what happens with my client's machine.
I assume you substituted the correct interface name? (bce0 in place of
Have you tried the bge drivers instead of bce? I have a Dell PowerEdge 2650
running 7.1 and it is using the bge drivers with no problems, though it is the
running i386 and not amd64.
Thanks,
Dean Weimer
Network Administrator
Orscheln Management Co
-Original Message
Dell PE1950 III
frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)
After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000 Mb/sec,
but cannot ping anything.
replaced cables, tried the other bc nic, nothing.
Linux in 3 other same machines works fine.
suggestions?
Len
Hi, Len
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Dell PE1950 III
frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)
After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000 Mb/sec,
but cannot ping anything.
replaced cables, tried the other bc
Dell PE1950 III
frebsd 7.1 AMD64 (to get support of full 4 GB RAM)
After fresh 7.1 install, and boot, ifconfig shows bc0 active and 1000
Mb/sec, but cannot ping anything.
replaced cables, tried the other bc nic, nothing.
Linux in 3 other same machines works fine.
Could you paste
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Could you paste the output of the following:
cat /etc/rc.conf | grep bc0
sorry, is bce not bc,
Was going to be my next suggestion... I couldn't find 'bc' in GENERIC
for amd64.
ifconfig_bce0=inet 10.2.17.8 netmask
-Original Message-
From: Glen Barber [mailto:glen.j.bar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 May 2009 22:58
To: lcon...@go2france.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dell broadcom nic fbsd 7.1 AMD64
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Could you
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Exactly which fonts are you having trouble with? I can tell you
whether I can reproduce the issue under 7.1.
Nothing exotic at all: cmr10.300.pk
The error message is:
$ xdvi memo
Note: overstrike characters may be incorrect.
xdvi: Wrong
HI Andrew,
Exactly which fonts are you having trouble with? I can tell you
whether I can reproduce the issue under 7.1.
Nothing exotic at all: cmr10.300.pk
The error message is:
$ xdvi memo
Note: overstrike characters may be incorrect.
xdvi: Wrong number of bits stored: char. 68,
Hi,
Exactly which fonts are you having trouble with? I can tell you
whether I can reproduce the issue under 7.1.
Nothing exotic at all: cmr10.300.pk
The error message is:
$ xdvi memo
Note: overstrike characters may be incorrect.
xdvi: Wrong number of bits stored: char.
Hello Oliver;
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Is there known issue with the port of Xdvi (/usr/ports/print/xdvi) on
6.4 amd64?
I suspect there is a problem with the size of the int/short/long as
Xdvi detects wrong number of bits in some font files, while these same
font files
Hi,
Is there known issue with the port of Xdvi (/usr/ports/print/xdvi) on
6.4 amd64?
I suspect there is a problem with the size of the int/short/long as
Xdvi detects wrong number of bits in some font files, while these same
font files are used without problem by other ports and are identical
Hi,
I'm trying to get myself around 64 bit custom kernel configuration for
FreeBSD on Intel Xeon L5430.
Does any one know what cpu option one should use for this? From my reading,
it seems HAMMER is purely for amd64 architectures. What is the Intel
architecture option.
Regards,
Mike
--
Mike
know what cpu option one should use for this? From my reading,
it seems HAMMER is purely for amd64 architectures. What is the Intel
architecture option.
Regards,
Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
,
Neo [GC]
Mike Barnard schrieb:
Hi,
I'm trying to get myself around 64 bit custom kernel configuration for
FreeBSD on Intel Xeon L5430.
Does any one know what cpu option one should use for this? From my
reading,
it seems HAMMER is purely for amd64 architectures. What is the Intel
just wanted to ask if anyone has the mail/isoqlog program working on an
amd64 box.
We have it working on i386 FreeBSD 7.x but it sig11's on amd64.
looking to have it filter exim logs fwiw.
I have sent emails to enderunix and not heard back..
and if it does not work, has anyone actually made
J. Julián Rodríguez warenost...@gmail.com writes:
I´m a FreeBSD user from 4.0 version to Current (i386 arch). I've recently
switched to a amd64 machine and
consecuently to the amd64 version of the OS.
You claim the amd64 version enjoys Tier 1 Status, but in the page
http://www.freebsd.org
Hi,
I´m a FreeBSD user from 4.0 version to Current (i386 arch). I've recently
switched to a amd64 machine and
consecuently to the amd64 version of the OS.
You claim the amd64 version enjoys Tier 1 Status, but in the page
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT), Dino Vliet wrote:
DV I have just installed 4 x 2gb kingston memory banks (Kingston HyperX 4GB
800mhz DDR2 Non-ECC CL5 (5-5-5-15) DIMM) onto my AMD 64 system with a X2 5200
CPU. The motherboard I have in this system is MSI K9AG Neo2-Digital.
DV
DV The
Dear freebsd people,
I have just installed 4 x 2gb kingston memory banks (Kingston HyperX 4GB 800mhz
DDR2 Non-ECC CL5 (5-5-5-15) DIMM) onto my AMD 64 system with a X2 5200 CPU. The
motherboard I have in this system is MSI K9AG Neo2-Digital.
The system boots fine and I wanted to try memtest to
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Dino Vliet dino_vl...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear freebsd people,
I have just installed 4 x 2gb kingston memory banks (Kingston HyperX 4GB
800mhz DDR2 Non-ECC CL5 (5-5-5-15) DIMM) onto my AMD 64 system with a X2 5200
CPU. The motherboard I have in this system is
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:05:12 +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk
frederi...@isafeelin.org wrote:
I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64.
Just to follow up on my quest here..
The upgrade went fine. Most ports were broken as expected. I gave up trying
Hi,
As a follow-up...
I spent a couple of days trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 on a Dell
PowerEdge 2950.
It won't finish booting properly from the installation CD:
with default boot, single user and verbose it stops at:
fdc0: ...
device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6
with ACPI
I am facing a problem that I cannot solve when trying to reinstall
wolrd on 6.4 amd 64.
More about this issue.
Regarding adjkerntz -i.
Places that are ahead of UTC don't need to do the adjkerntz -i after
rebooting in single user.
Suppose you are in a time zone at UTC +7.
Boot in
exactly why you DO need to run that when
(ever) working single user, if you want file/log datestamps consistent.
I can't comment on i386/amd64 differences, but it's necessary on i386.
cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Olivier Nicole o...@cs.ait.ac.th wrote:
Hi,
I've had(and have) several fairly new Dell PowerEdge2950 servers
running FreeBSD 7.1/amd64 just fine. Is this a brand new 2950
(2950 III, or whatever), or an older one?
Depends how new is new, we bought it at the end of last year.
I'd
Hi,
I got 2 PE2950 running 7.0/amd64 bought last summer - all running
without problems. Maybe CD/DVD drives are failing? Have you tried
another media - DVD instead of CD for example?
Hummm, I doubt that CD drives would fail on both machines, and I tried
also an external USB attached CD drive
-CURRENT/amd64 I did last week when the box ran FreeBSD
7.1-STABLE/amd64. Whenever I left a Xsession, the box died. Whenever I
rebootet it, the box died.
I already checked cabling and SMART logs of the harddrives making sure
there is no issue with lost blocks or similar. Then I tried testing
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I spent a couple of days trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 on a Dell
PowerEdge 2950.
It won't finish booting properly from the installation CD
I've had(and have) several fairly new Dell PowerEdge2950 servers running
FreeBSD 7.1/amd64 just fine. Is this a brand new
Hi,
I've had(and have) several fairly new Dell PowerEdge2950 servers running
FreeBSD 7.1/amd64 just fine. Is this a brand new 2950 (2950 III, or
whatever), or an older one?
Depends how new is new, we bought it at the end of last year.
I'd make sure that the BIOS, BMC, and PERC
at the
modification date of the link
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/machine; while on amd64 make
installworld looks at the modification date of the directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/include pointed by the link. Hence the different
behaviour.
This is annoying for people leaving ahead of UTC, that will install
the object.
My wild guess is that on i386, make installworld looks at the
modification date of the link
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/machine; while on amd64 make
installworld looks at the modification date of the directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/include pointed by the link. Hence
Hi,
What I did is: during the installation of the distrubition I set back
the CMOS clock to UTC time, and when FreeBSD was done installing from
the CD, I reset the CMOS clock to the wall clock. It worked, but it's
not very nice.
What you did is not necessary if you adjkerntz -i when you
Hi,
I spent a couple of days trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 on a Dell
PowerEdge 2950.
It won't finish booting properly from the installation CD:
with default boot, single user and verbose it stops at:
fdc0: ...
device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6
with ACPI disabled and Safe mode
Hi,
I am facing a problem that I cannot solve when trying to reinstall
wolrd on 6.4 amd 64.
On a brand new machine (Dell powerEdge 2950) I install RELEASE 6.4 amd64:
FreeBSD ufo2.cs.ait.ac.th 6.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE #0: Wed
Nov 26 08:37:42 UTC 2008
r...@palmer.cse.buffalo.edu
I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
and I don't like the PAE limitations.
I've done this a couple of times before with 4.x - 6.x but all remained
i386.
Are there any pitfalls when doing an upgrade
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:05:12AM +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
and I don't like the PAE limitations.
I've done this a couple of times before with 4.x
architecture.
OT: I've been trying to search the bsd list archives, but it appears
broken. I can view one page of search results, but if I click a page
further, I always end up with this error:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/mmsearch?config=freebsd-amd64;method=and;format=short;sort=score;words=update;page
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:05:12AM +0100, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
I'm planning to binary upgrade a machine that's now running i386
7.1-RELEASE-p3 to AMD64. Mainly because the machine has 8GB of memory
and I don't like the PAE limitations.
I've done this a couple
Since several weeks now /usr/sbin/pkg_delete core dumps whenever I try
to delete an obsolete package or portupgrade tries to do so.
The box is a Quad Core most recent FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE box as built world
of today's sources.
Regards,
Oliver
___
I need to put my printer to work and its driver finishes as
i386.rpm files. I've already installed linux_base-fc4 but when I type
/compat/linux/bin rpm -ivh --root=/usr/compat/linux/rpmfile.rpm I
got permission denied as root
___
Cross fingers, and reboot into amd64-land
Portupgrade -fa (this step wan't flawless since I was also upgrading
through the perl58 and gnome-2.24 updates, but still took less
than 24
hours)
All the while having my i386 kernel and root available to reboot
back into
if I screwed something
I installed the i386 distro on my Core 2 Duo instead of AMD64 and now
I want to switch to using AMD64.
Is there a good path to do this? Will I have to reinstall, or can I
do a buildworld/installworld over the i386?
--Andy
___
freebsd-questions
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:30:10AM -0800, Andrew Moran wrote:
I installed the i386 distro on my Core 2 Duo instead of AMD64 and now
I want to switch to using AMD64.
First of all, your Core2 Duo should work just fine with i386. The amd64
architecture is an extension of the x86 arch. Unless
need the ports to be 64-bit, but they SHOULD run just fine
without recompiling, yes?
--Andy
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:30:10AM -0800, Andrew Moran wrote:
I installed the i386 distro on my Core 2 Duo instead of AMD64 and now
I want to switch
/boot partition (installed as
/boot/kernel.amd64 temporarily)
Edit /boot/loader.conf and add
vfs.root.mountfrom=zfs:local_pool/root.amd64
kernel=kernel.amd64
Edit /etc/fstab on root.amd64 to mount / from local_pool/root.amd64
Cross fingers, and reboot into amd64-land
without recompiling, yes?
As long as you don't ever recompile anything. Otherwise the shit will
hit the fan. The base system by default keeps two sets of system
libraries on amd64, 64-bit and 32-bit. (you can compile the system
without the 32-bit libs and kernel stuff if you don't need them; see
I just did a successful portupgrade of multimedia/gpac-libgpac but when
trying to upgrade the exact same port on amd64, it fails with the
following error.
Thanks
cc -O3 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fPIC -pthread
-fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-pointer-sign
-I/usr/ports/multimedia/gpac-libgpac
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Troy t...@twisted.net wrote:
I just did a successful portupgrade of multimedia/gpac-libgpac but when
trying to upgrade the exact same port on amd64, it fails with the
following error.
Thanks
cc -O3 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fPIC -pthread
-fno-strict
701 - 800 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
