On Aug 1, 2007, at 4:41 PMAug 1, 2007, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an
IPv6
tunnel to
On Wed, August 1, 2007 16:12, Christopher Hilton wrote:
> Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
>>> Hey list,
>>>
>>> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
>>> tunnel to the
>
> I second that recommendation. The ISP in question is Hurricane Electric
> and the process is 100% web driven. It took me less than a day to get a
> gif tunnel up and an ipv6 /64 assignment.
>
>
They are FAIRLY response to service issues (I had problems getting
to FTP1.FREEBSD.ORG fo
Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:52:45 -0500, Eric Crist wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
> tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
> problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
&g
the problems at the ISP, so not sure what to tell
you.
Tuc
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
Hey list,
While my ISP is rather geeky and more than willing to give me an IPv6
tunnel to the internet, there seems to be a large number of routing
problems upstream from them that prevent us from accessing the
majority of the IPv6 net.
So, I ask two things really.
1) Does anyone know
On 3/20/07, Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > E
Eric F Crist schrieb:
[...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel
ifconfig gif0 inet6 alias ::a::a ::b::b prefixlen 126
When I execute the last command, I get:
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument
[...]
Use a prefi
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:01, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
> >
> > On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > > > [...] I'm performing the config
On 3/20/07, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My ISP tells me it should be prefixlen 126, not 128
On 3/20/07, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Eric F Crist schrieb:
> > [...] I'm performing the configuration as follows:
> >
> > ifconfig gif0 create
> > ifconfig gif0 tunnel
>
Hey all,
I've got a FreeBSD 6.2 system, compiled from source only two days ago, so it
should have the routing patch applied. I'm trying to get a tunnel between
my systems and my ISP. I'm performing the configuration as follows:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel
ifconfig gif0 inet6 al
If you are, please show me your working setup :)
Either in the form of rc.conf, or a custom shell script.
Thank you,
-- Fafa
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
__
Hi all,
I recently moved to using ipfilter from ipfw (no particular
reason, just wanted to try another option.) The problem now is that where
i used to have an ipv6 tunnel (from the people at http://tunnelbroker.net)
(again no good reason but it gives me a change to try it out for when i
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:13:26AM -0500, Dukemaster wrote:
> At my first co-location my FreeBSD server has a native IPv6 connection
> and a /64 subnet
> I have a second co-location with a different isp, that doesn't have
> IPv6.
>
> Is it possible to have my first FreeBSD box act as a tunnel to m
f
my boxes
-Original Message-
From: Robert Huff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:36 AM
To: Dukemaster
Subject: IPv6 Tunnel
Hello:
> At my first co-location my FreeBSD server has a native IPv6
> onnection and a /64 subnet
> I have a second co-location with a
At my first co-location my FreeBSD server has a native IPv6 connection
and a /64 subnet
I have a second co-location with a different isp, that doesn't have
IPv6.
Is it possible to have my first FreeBSD box act as a tunnel to my second
box, and get it on IPv6 over the existing IPv4 connection?
___
Hi there,
iam trying to configure a tunnel ipv6 over ipv4
i try:
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel 193.137.232.35 193.136.2.2
ifconfig gif0 inet6 alias 3ffe:31ff:0:::83/127
then i try to see if the tunnel is working and do:
ping6 ff02::1%gif0
and insted of giving me two replies i get
18 matches
Mail list logo
