X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
(on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users
have to use rsh)
Why rsh? Isn't ssh a drop-in replacement for rsh?
The reason for using rsh instead of ssh is that
it's a computing cluster. Host B
with ssh server but without X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
(on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users
have to use rsh)
Why rsh? Isn't ssh a drop-in replacement for rsh?
The reason for using rsh instead of ssh is that
it's a computing
On Friday 22 August 2008 12:58:24 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Humm.. it's a pity that ssh -Y or -X will only listen on the
loopback interface, but for sure there are good reasons it
is done that way.
I guess -X achieves a particular goal, that is being
able to login to a remote box, run X11 apps
On Friday 22 August 2008 13:10:29 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Automatically? No.
You can however use ssh to create generic TCP tunnels, using
-R and -L. But this is much more complicated than remembering
a DISPLAY variable.
Wait! I found a possible workaround.. it seams that setting
), I think.
Using xhost(1) is much easier, but it's insecure. On the
other hand you're using rsh and a public network socket
to connect to, so everything you do is insecure anyway.
I hope you're going to make your users aware of that.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co
Anybody on this, please?
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Hello list.
I have this scenario
1) host A with X server
2) host B with ssh server but without X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
(on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users
have
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
1) host A with X server
2) host B with ssh server but without X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
(on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users
have to use rsh)
now, I need to connect from host
On Thursday 21 August 2008 09:54:29 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Anybody on this, please?
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Hello list.
I have this scenario
1) host A with X server
2) host B with ssh server but without X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
Hi Oliver.
The reason for using rsh instead of ssh is that
it's a computing cluster. Host B is the master node
and access point to the cluster, and host C is any
one of the computing nodes. The cluster resources are
managed by the Sun Grid Engine (SGE) and so users
obtain the computing resources
Hello list.
I have this scenario
1) host A with X server
2) host B with ssh server but without X server
3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server
(on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users
have to use rsh)
now, I need to connect from host A to host
Hi
I have 2 BSD boxes, want to acheive automatic rsh login from one BSD box to
other.
I tried placing host name of the boxes in .rhosts file of the boxes under
~root directory.
This works fine with user account and I am able to remotely execute
commands on the other box with rsh.
Eg
Ashok TM wrote:
Hi
I have 2 BSD boxes, want to acheive automatic rsh login from one BSD
box to
other.
I tried placing host name of the boxes in .rhosts file of the boxes under
~root directory.
This works fine with user account and I am able to remotely execute
commands on the other box
. No idea if it will match the ttcp
solution, but much safer than enabling rsh :-)
--Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but the
handshake latency and ssh overhead is killing me.
I've looked at many examples of tar|rsh tar and I can't figure it out,
most of the examples on the net look like this:
# tar cf - . | rsh hostname dd of=tape-device obs=20b
# tar -cf -...|rsh ...tar xf -...
Two quick options even more
In the last episode (Jun 24), Nikolas Britton said:
On 6/23/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!, but I got rsh going. I first had to edit /etc/hosts.equiv,
after that I figured it out:
tar cf - . | rsh 192.168.1.242 'cd /data; tar xpvf -'
I was thinking tar -f
On 6/24/06, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 24), Nikolas Britton said:
On 6/23/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!, but I got rsh going. I first had to edit /etc/hosts.equiv,
after that I figured it out:
tar cf - . | rsh 192.168.1.242 'cd
I need to backup the /data directory on hostA to /data on hostB, about
1TB of data on a gigabit link. Right now I'm using scp but the
handshake latency and ssh overhead is killing me.
I've looked at many examples of tar|rsh tar and I can't figure it out,
most of the examples on the net look like
In the last episode (Jun 23), Nikolas Britton said:
I need to backup the /data directory on hostA to /data on hostB,
about 1TB of data on a gigabit link. Right now I'm using scp but the
handshake latency and ssh overhead is killing me.
I've looked at many examples of tar|rsh tar and I can't
looked at many examples of tar|rsh tar and I can't figure it out,
most of the examples on the net look like this:
# tar cf - . | rsh hostname dd of=tape-device obs=20b
# tar -cf -...|rsh ...tar xf -...
Two quick options even more lightweight than rsh are netcat (base
system) and ttcp (in ports
In /etc/pam.d/rsh, in the auth line with pam_rhosts.so, make sure you have
allow_root as on option, like this:
authrequiredpam_rhosts.so no_warn allow_root
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Roger Williams wrote:
I have a machine using FreeBSD 6.0 which wont let me rcp
I have a machine using FreeBSD 6.0 which wont let me rcp as root. I can rsh
as root or rcp as another user but no rcp as root. I have several 4.10
machines that work fine as well as a 6.0 machine with no issues.
My .rhosts(chmod 600) file is in place as well as the hosts.equiv file, and
inetd
Context: 2 pentium 4 boxes; freebsd 5.4 6.0
I detected that remote login via rsh doesn't work in my boxes:
e.g.
# rsh uffbsd
uffbsd.myd.prv: Connection refused
even though I've defined the trusted hosts on each box both in $HOME/.rhosts
and in /etc/hosts.equiv.
I've also uncommented the shell
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 08:30 am, Vittorio De Martino wrote:
Context: 2 pentium 4 boxes; freebsd 5.4 6.0
I detected that remote login via rsh doesn't work in my boxes:
e.g.
# rsh uffbsd
uffbsd.myd.prv: Connection refused
even though I've defined the trusted hosts on each box both
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 30-nov-2005
2.15 PM
A: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org
Cc: Vittorio De Martino
[EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Ogg: Re: rsh
fails: [WAS] pvm connection problems
On Wednesday 30 November 2005
08:30 am, Vittorio De Martino
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:01:06PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Vittorio, and lo! it spake thus:
6) I reciprocate the same configuring steps on the other
machine uffbsd.
Well in the end:
# rsh uffbsd
uffbsd.myd.prv:
Connection refused
rsh with no arguments uses rlogind, not the rshd
Alle 15:19, mercoledì 30 novembre 2005, Matthew D. Fuller ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:01:06PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Vittorio, and lo! it spake thus:
6) I reciprocate the same configuring steps on the other
machine uffbsd.
Well in the end:
# rsh uffbsd
uffbsd.myd.prv
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:45:24PM +0900, Rob wrote:
Hi,
I have a cluster of PCs, on which the 'slaves' used to only allow rsh
connections, to execute commands, but no logins.
I have removed the r-commands, and want to use the ssh command family
instead. Although 'ssh slaveN command
Hi,
I have a cluster of PCs, on which the 'slaves' used to only allow rsh
connections, to execute commands, but no logins.
I have removed the r-commands, and want to use the ssh command family
instead. Although 'ssh slaveN command' works fine, this also allows login
to the slave PC, simply
Rob wrote:
Hi,
I have a cluster of PCs, on which the 'slaves' used to only allow rsh
connections, to execute commands, but no logins.
I have removed the r-commands, and want to use the ssh command family
instead. Although 'ssh slaveN command' works fine, this also allows login
to the slave PC
to work.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:45:24 +0900, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a cluster of PCs, on which the 'slaves' used to only allow rsh
connections, to execute commands, but no logins.
I have removed the r-commands, and want to use the ssh command family
instead. Although
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:42:41PM -0500, John Von Essen wrote:
I have a Solaris 2.6 box that has been sending data to a Solaris 8 box
via rsh and rcp.
I finally changed the Solaris 8 box to a FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE machine.
Unfortunately, I am noticing alot of problems with my rsh and rcp
I can do two rsh's back to back with no problems, its the third (and 4th
and so on) that hang.
On the FreeBSD side, after the first rsh, netstat shows:
tcp4 0 0 mx100.851 embryo.bluebell..1021
TIME_WAIT
tcp4 0 0 mx100.shellembryo.bluebell..1022
One more thing. Apparently, if I do 'rsh -n host cmd' on the Solaris box,
it no longer hangs, and I can do it back to back indefinitely. Say I do
ten of them, 5 secs apart. I still see the following 10 times in netstat:
tcp4 0 0 mx100.841 embryo.bluebell..1014
TIME_WAIT
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0500, John Von Essen wrote:
I can do two rsh's back to back with no problems, its the third (and 4th
and so on) that hang.
On the FreeBSD side, after the first rsh, netstat shows:
tcp4 0 0 mx100.851 embryo.bluebell..1021
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:20:23 -0500 (EST)
John Von Essen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing. Apparently, if I do 'rsh -n host cmd' on the Solaris box,
it no longer hangs, and I can do it back to back indefinitely. Say I do
ten of them, 5 secs apart. I still see the following 10 times
I have a Solaris 2.6 box that has been sending data to a Solaris 8 box
via rsh and rcp.
I finally changed the Solaris 8 box to a FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE machine.
Unfortunately, I am noticing alot of problems with my rsh and rcp
calls. Again, the rsh/rcp calls are being initiated on my Solaris 2.6
I'm trying to use rdist to mirror a tree from a 4.5 machine
(speyburn) to a 5.1 machine (banff). So firstoff rsh has to work.
This is root-to-root.
I've set up the /root/.rhosts on the target 5.1 machine and also
on the 4.5 machine so I can check it both ways round.
Logged on as root on the 5.1
to prevent cvsup from doing this in the
first place, but like I said, I'm new.
The problem I need help with though, is the fact that I cannot chmod 000
certain binaries after this process (for example: /usr/bin/rsh,
/usr/bin/yppasswd, /usr/bin/ypchfn, etc.). The following occurs:
# chmod 000 /usr/bin
The account in question has no password. The system runs -current.
Rlogin to the account works with no problems, and so does simple rsh
(which execs rlogin). But attempts to run a command with rsh fail.
Seems inconsistent...
This is a secure network, protected by a firewall. Rsh is needed
ALLAH
hi
i have a problem about rsh
my accounting server doe's not kill user
in linux i have this problem and resolv it by
adding a SYSTEM user and add ip of accounting server
to
/home/SYSTEM/.rhosts file
but in free bsd i have this problem and don't about it
please help me
thanx
I'm not able to get rsh or telnet to work on my FreeBSD box (however ssh
works fine). Is there some file I need to edit to get this to work?
Pavan Balaji,
CIS Graduate Student,
Ohio State University
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect... It just means that
you have decided
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:53:40AM -0700, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
I'm not able to get rsh or telnet to work on my FreeBSD box (however ssh
works fine). Is there some file I need to edit to get this to work?
/etc/inetd.conf
--
Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED
/etc/inetd.conf just gives an option for telnet, but not for 'rsh'. I'm not
able to get 'rsh' working yet. Any other suggestions?
Pavan Balaji,
CIS Graduate Student,
Ohio State University
Being happy doesn't mean that everything is perfect... It just means that
you have decided to see beyond
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:12:28PM -0700, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
/etc/inetd.conf just gives an option for telnet, but not for 'rsh'. I'm not
able to get 'rsh' working yet. Any other suggestions?
It's these lines in /etc/inetd.conf:
#shell stream tcpnowait root/usr/libexec
: Re: rsh not working
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:12:28PM -0700, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
/etc/inetd.conf just gives an option for telnet, but not
for 'rsh'. I'm not
able to get 'rsh' working yet. Any other suggestions?
It's these lines in /etc/inetd.conf:
#shell stream tcp
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:12:28PM -0700, Balaji, Pavan wrote:
/etc/inetd.conf just gives an option for telnet, but not for 'rsh'. I'm not
able to get 'rsh' working yet. Any other suggestions?
For the bog-standard Berkeley rsh, you want to allow shell:
shell stream tcp nowait root
46 matches
Mail list logo
