I have a process that is CPU intense.
'top -C' shows CPU usage for this process no higher than 20%, more like
15-18%.
But TIME field grows 10 sec for every 15-17 secs or real time.
top(1) says: Each time -C flag is passed it toggles between "raw
cpu" mode and "weighted cpu" mode
So I a
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:11:52AM -0900, Mel wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:31:26 Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Out-of-band corroboration of a certificate's authenticity is kind of
> > necessary to the security model of SSL/TLS. A self-signed certificate,
> > in and of itself, is not really
Dear Paul,
thank you very much for your help, that surely clarifies things.
best
giuseppe
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Paul Procacci wrote:
> Paul Procacci wrote:
>>
>> Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> well that is interesting. I do have 4 Gigs of RAM but I thought that
>>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:09:03PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
>
> freebsd-questions:
>
> I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386:
>
>
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand
> a-server
>
>
> Most of my software background is GN
Hello,
I'd like to ask on the best options for using setfib and pf in a non-BGP
environment. I will run 2 uplinks, with VLANs for internal networks and want
to fail over external links if one of them fails.
Currently pf supports to the best of my knowledge:
a) rtable - this means i can create the
Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:06:53AM +0100, Peter Boosten wrote:
>>
>> Also: most scripts updated by mergemaster during 7.0->7.1 are only
>> version numbering diffs. Is there no smarter way to do this, apart from
>> typing 'i' every time?
>
> I think you want -U option (auto upg
Yuri Pankov writes:
> > Also: most scripts updated by mergemaster during 7.0->7.1 are only
> > version numbering diffs. Is there no smarter way to do this, apart from
> > typing 'i' every time?
>
> I think you want -U option (auto upgrade files that have not been
> modified by user) along
At 12:31 PM -0700 1/6/09, Chad Perrin wrote:
>On the other hand, I don't trust Verisign, either.
What's to trust? If you pay them, you "in."
--
Walter M. Pawley
Wump Research & Company
676 River Bend Road, Roseburg, OR 97471
541-672-8975
__
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:06:53AM +0100, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Johann Hasselbach wrote:
> > I was doing a src upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1
> >
> > After installkernel, i rebooted, and accidently ran "mergemaster"
> > instead of "mergemaster -p" before installworld. I ctrl-c'd once I
> > realized what
Johann Hasselbach wrote:
> I was doing a src upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1
>
> After installkernel, i rebooted, and accidently ran "mergemaster"
> instead of "mergemaster -p" before installworld. I ctrl-c'd once I
> realized what I had done, but the damage was done.
>
> It seems to have overwritten my
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:01:58PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> stan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:23PM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:51:08PM -0500, stan wrote:
> >>> Clearly I am still confused. :-(
> >>>
> >>> I just duid as you sugested, and all went
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 17:56:43 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It shouldn't be so hard to give every citizen the option to "get an
> > online certificate corresponding with their passport" and similarly for
> > Chambers of Commerce to provide certificates for businesses.
>
> Only that would
stan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:23PM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:51:08PM -0500, stan wrote:
>>> Clearly I am still confused. :-(
>>>
>>> I just duid as you sugested, and all went well untill I pushed the "Write
>>> Config" button at Step 2. At this point
Hi,
> It shouldn't be so hard to give every citizen the option to "get an online
> certificate corresponding with their passport" and similarly for Chambers of
> Commerce to provide certificates for businesses.
Only that would mean that 200 countries become Certificate Authorities
and tens of t
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:23PM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:51:08PM -0500, stan wrote:
> >
> > Clearly I am still confused. :-(
> >
> > I just duid as you sugested, and all went well untill I pushed the "Write
> > Config" button at Step 2. At this point I was off
Hi everyone,
I run numerous systems (mostly networking gear) from 2GB USB thumb
sticks. These systems do not have hard disks.
To update one of these systems, I'd generally copy the thumb drive
filesystem to a hard disk in another PC, upgrade it, and then transfer
the necessary data back to the US
Message from RealTracker / Bericht van RealTracker
http://www.realtracker.com/images/flags/us.gif"; border="0"> I'm
protecting myself from receiving junk mail and spam.
http://www.realtracker.com/images/flags/nl.gif"; border="0"> Ik
probeer mijzelf te beschermen tegen spam en ongewenste email. K
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen
> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top
>> command output:
>>
>
> -
> snip
> -
>
>> We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE:
>> pfault) and my server
Dear all,
Please note that Eric Yeo is no longer an employee of FLY Entertainment with
immediate effect. He no longer represent FLY or any of FLY's clients/entity for
any matter.
For further enquiries, please contact the following person in charge:
Cindy Teo: ci...@fly.com.sg
Keifer Ang: kei.
Paul Procacci wrote:
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
Hello,
well that is interesting. I do have 4 Gigs of RAM but I thought that
the nvidia driver would not work only if the 64 bit version of FreeBSD
was installed. I installed the i386 version, so I assumed that I was
just wasting some memory. In ca
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
Hello,
well that is interesting. I do have 4 Gigs of RAM but I thought that
the nvidia driver would not work only if the 64 bit version of FreeBSD
was installed. I installed the i386 version, so I assumed that I was
just wasting some memory. In case I would want to use
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:23PM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:51:08PM -0500, stan wrote:
> >
> > Clearly I am still confused. :-(
> >
> > I just duid as you sugested, and all went well untill I pushed the "Write
> > Config" button at Step 2. At this point I was off
Hello,
well that is interesting. I do have 4 Gigs of RAM but I thought that
the nvidia driver would not work only if the 64 bit version of FreeBSD
was installed. I installed the i386 version, so I assumed that I was
just wasting some memory. In case I would want to use the nvidia
driver, would
> I've already looked at the ISC DHCP source code. They use raw sockets
to
> send their broadcasts, which seems to us to be a convoluted way of
> sending a simple broadcast. I've seen examples of DHCP client/server
> code written in Java using standard UDP. Unfortunately, our own system
> is alread
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
Dear all,
I have just installed FreeBSD 7.1 Release on a machine with a GeForce
8500 GT (I think this is the card, but more about that later...) and
an LCD screen with a native resolution of 1680 x 1050.
Xorg works fine with the standard "nv" driver. However, if I try t
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:57:27 you wrote:
> Your PPD is probably wrong ...
>
> Accorfing to:
> http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/models/deskjet/deskjet_d1500_series.ht
>ml
>
> Your printer is fully supported. But the right PPD seem to be: DJ3320
>
> Get into the cups web interface, remove y
Dear all,
I have just installed FreeBSD 7.1 Release on a machine with a GeForce
8500 GT (I think this is the card, but more about that later...) and
an LCD screen with a native resolution of 1680 x 1050.
Xorg works fine with the standard "nv" driver. However, if I try to
install the x11/nvidia-d
I was doing a src upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1
After installkernel, i rebooted, and accidently ran "mergemaster"
instead of "mergemaster -p" before installworld. I ctrl-c'd once I
realized what I had done, but the damage was done.
It seems to have overwritten my password and group files.
I successful
> What you're trying to do with sending to the all-ones broadcast
> address is known as sending a "link-local" packet. On some systems,
> sending a UDP packet to 255.255.255.255 will actually cause a packet
> with that destination to be generated from all network interfaces
> which are "UP
2009/1/6 Mel :
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:07:17 David Naylor wrote:
>> 2009/1/6 Mel :
>> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
>> >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet
On Jan 6, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Peter Steele wrote:
Our efforts so far indicate the answer is no, which baffles us. We
want
to send a limited broadcast to 255.255.255.255 but the message never
arrives. The same code works fine under Linux. Is there a trick for
doing this kind of thing under FreeBSD
Hi,
Where can I schedule the test for certification?
I found the site of Prometric and Vue.
Gustavo Millani
Brazil, Porto Alegre
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@f
Sunday, 4 January 2009 at 20:43:24 +0100, Per olof Ljungmark said:
> Peter Harrison wrote:
> >Wednesday, 31 December 2008 at 2:06:55 +0100, Per olof Ljungmark said:
> >>Peter Harrison wrote:
> >>>Tuesday, 30 December 2008 at 23:49:23 +0100, Per olof Ljungmark said:
> >>>
> Hi all,
>
> >>
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:31:26 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:22:29AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >>someone like the FreeBSD Foundation as an appropriate body to own the
> > >>cert.
> > >
> > >
> > >I would actually trust a self-signed cert by the FreeBSD security
> > >
Dear List!
I have such a problem (or is it a problem?):
# dmesg | grep da0
da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
da0: 100.000MB/s transfers
da0: 1430481MB (2929625088 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 182360C)
GEOM: da0: corrupt or invalid GPT detected.
GEOM: da0: G
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:07:17 David Naylor wrote:
> 2009/1/6 Mel :
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
> >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the compute
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:22:29AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>someone like the FreeBSD Foundation as an appropriate body to own the
> >>cert.
> >
> >
> >I would actually trust a self-signed cert by the FreeBSD security officer,
> >more then one by Verisign.
> of course.
>
> there is no nee
2009/1/6 Mel :
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
>> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
>> inside my network.
>>
>> I would like to set up a transparent
On Tue 2009-01-06 10:50:39 UTC-0600, Kevin Kinsey (k...@daleco.biz) wrote:
> IANAE, but (and I don't intend a personal offense) this is a very
> convoluted configuration. Having PHP4 and PHP5 side by side isn't
> something I'd try on one box
Presumably one could make use of FreeBSD's jails then
why 255.255.255.255 not your net broadcast address?
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Peter Steele wrote:
Our efforts so far indicate the answer is no, which baffles us. We want
to send a limited broadcast to 255.255.255.255 but the message never
arrives. The same code works fine under Linux. Is there a tric
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
> inside my network.
>
> I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to
Our efforts so far indicate the answer is no, which baffles us. We want
to send a limited broadcast to 255.255.255.255 but the message never
arrives. The same code works fine under Linux. Is there a trick for
doing this kind of thing under FreeBSD?
__
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I am getting 'segmentation faults' when using php (apache module) on a server
that recently had php 4 instlalled when php 5 was already there.
/var/log/httpd-error.log:
[Tue Jan 06 09:44:39 2009] [notice] child pid 8209 exit signal Segmentation
fault (11)
Is there a
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am getting 'segmentation faults' when using php (apache module) on a server
> that recently had php 4 instlalled when php 5 was already there.
>
> /var/log/httpd-error.log:
>
> [Tue Jan 06 09:44:39 2009] [notice] child pid 8209 exi
Hi all,
I am getting 'segmentation faults' when using php (apache module) on a server
that recently had php 4 instlalled when php 5 was already there.
/var/log/httpd-error.log:
[Tue Jan 06 09:44:39 2009] [notice] child pid 8209 exit signal Segmentation
fault (11)
Is there a way to completely
Hi,
My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
inside my network.
I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to transparent HTTP
proxy, aka squid) on the server. Does anyone
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:16:51 +0100, "Stefan Miklosovic"
wrote:
> hi,
>
> i would like to know, if it has a sense to compile software provided
> in form of ports in /usr/ports. I mean, I know there is a bunch of
> options you can choose from and make certain application more
> suitable for your ha
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top command
> output:
>
-
snip
-
> We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE: pfault)
> and my server should be reboot
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Morgan Wesström
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have two almost identical FreeBSD servers with FreeBSD 7.0, Apache
> 2.2.11 and PHP 5.2.8. After a restart of Apache four days ago, the PHP
> module on one of those servers no longer loads /usr/local/etc/php.ini
> and I can't for
hi,
i would like to know, if it has a sense to compile software provided
in form of ports in /usr/ports. I mean, I know there is a bunch of
options you can choose from and make certain application more
suitable for your hardware / software needs. I just want to know, if
I can install software in b
Since i updated my ports/source/world on a FREEBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE AMD64
a few days ago and had to do a reboot, all of a sudden my network
connection is dropping out if no consistent traffic is being done, more
then simply an IRC chats. i've had to have a few torrents seeding to
maintain the co
Hi,
thank for the tip!
portsnap3 just worked good right now for me, it surely has to do with the
release of FreeBSD 7.1 as said in this post:
http://www.nabble.com/FYI%2C-portsnap-problems-td21301895.html
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
>>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:23PM -0600, Kelly D. Grills wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:51:08PM -0500, stan wrote:
> >
> > Clearly I am still confused. :-(
> >
> > I just duid as you suggested, and all went well until I pushed the "Write
> > Config" button at Step 2. At this point I was off
someone like the FreeBSD Foundation as an appropriate body to own the cert.
I would actually trust a self-signed cert by the FreeBSD security officer,
more then one by Verisign.
of course.
there is no need to have an "authority" to make key pairs, everybody do it
alone.
actually i would fe
Dear all,
we faced problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top
command output:
last pid: 5836; load averages: 0.03, 0.17, 0.24
up 0+01:17:30
15:24:11
96 processes: 1 running, 95 sleeping
CPU: 0.
> > Unless designed carefully, there will be substantial logistical
> > problems to maintaining such lists of signatures.
> ...
> > You can then verify the correctness of what's on your disk ...
>
> The idea is that one needs to get this public key only once
> ...
> IMHO, this could or should take
Dear All,
we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top command
output:
last pid: 5836; load averages: 0.03, 0.17, 0.24
up 0+01:17:30 15:24:11
96 processes: 1 running, 95 sleeping
CPU: 0
57 matches
Mail list logo
