On 17 February 2012, at 23:21, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 19:56:00 2012
>> From: Doug Hardie
>> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800
>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>>
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 19:56:00 2012
> From: Doug Hardie
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:50:44 -0800
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
> > We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 17:59:50 2012
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:54:18 -0800
> From: Jim Pazarena
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: swap space
>
> is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
>
> A "df" seems to avoid the swap area.
That
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 16:25:49 2012
> From: sean
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:20:26 -0500
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Adobe Linux Flash
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> >
> >
> > Problem, I think lies, in the symlink. You
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 16:20:48 2012
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800
> From: "Robison, Dave"
> To:
> Subject: One or Four?
>
> Hiya,
>
> A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
> opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versi
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
2012-02-17 23:46, Polytropon skrev:
Four? There should be five! :-)
Read on to find out why.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style default
with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
have said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
swap
/tmp
/var
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 05:05:23 Robison, Dave wrote:
>
> It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
> as such:
>
> /
> /tmp
> /var
> /usr
> swap
>
it really makes sense to keep it this way.
> The recent changes in 9.x with bsdinstall use a default behavi
>Can anyone suggest a MUA which has support for Maildir that I can use?
Pine is dead, replaced by alpine. The FreeBSD port has a config option
to support maildirs. I've used it, it works.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style default with
> 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and swap.
I only run servers and set them up with /, /usr, and swap. Other partitions
are placed o
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:48:31PM -0500, sean wrote:
>
> On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
> >
> >
> >Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
> >
> >Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
> >Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
> >Auto
On 02/18/12 11:17, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition containing all subtrees
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
>> Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
>> this:
>>
>> Partition scheme
>>
>>
>> [ ] all in one + swap
>> Create one partition containing all subtrees
>> plus one swap
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 15:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>>
>> Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root
>> partition; although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem
>> might be better for many situations.
>
> Sure it
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 5:00 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On 02/18/12 10:55, Da Rock wrote:
> > On 02/
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:55 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > O
On 02/18/12 10:55, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks
using MacOS
X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they
sometimes do
fill up their
On 02/18/12 10:48, sean wrote:
On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/li
On 02/18/12 10:40, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks using MacOS
X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they sometimes do
fill up their disks, that's a situation which they
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:41 PM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: 'FreeBSD -'
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> >> However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority o
On 02/17/12 19:27, sean wrote:
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin
Looking for
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> However, for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of folks using MacOS
>> X don't have problems using a single root partition, and while they
>> sometimes do
>> fill up their disks, that's a situation which they should be able to recover
>
Well I deleted the symlinks, swfdec, and stepped through the
instructions in the handbook again.
Now when I run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i as a user I get the following,
Auto-install plugins from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Looking for plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins
Auto-install plu
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robison, Dave
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:11 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: swap space
>
> On 02/17/2012 15:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Polytropon wrote:
Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
this:
Partition scheme
[ ] all in one + swap
Create one partition containing all subtrees
plus one swap partition.
[ ] separ
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:56 PM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: FreeBSD -
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
[snip]
> > I'd argue that there should never be a single-"/"
On 02/17/2012 15:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A "df" seems to avoid the swap area.
You're looking for "swapinfo"
Regards,
Chuck beat me to it.
"swapinfo" or top are the two wa
On 02/17/2012 15:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root partition;
although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem might be better
for many situations.
Sure it has its uses, but now you're jumping into new territory where
t
On Feb 17, 2012 6:55 PM, "Jim Pazarena" wrote:
>
> is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
>
> A "df" seems to avoid the swap area.
>
> This would be on a live production server.
> Thanks.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:cswi...@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:56 PM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: FreeBSD -
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> > a. A security issue
> >
> > /tmp is by-default out-of-the-box
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
Given their suc
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
>
> A "df" seems to avoid the swap area.
You're looking for "swapinfo"
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
On 2/17/2012 6:54 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
>
% pstat -T
438/12328 files
98M/10240M swap space
---Mike
--
---
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet se
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> a. A security issue
>
> /tmp is by-default out-of-the-box world-writable (perms 1777).
Yes. It works as intended even when /tmp is part of a single root partition;
although mounting /tmp as a RAM- or swap-based tmpfs filesystem might be better
is there a command which can show the size of the hard drive swap?
A "df" seems to avoid the swap area.
This would be on a live production server.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 02/18/12 09:24, Robison, Dave wrote:
On 02/17/2012 15:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
No. Bad idea. Not on questions@, the list of the least clued up,
the list raw beginners are referred to subscribe to. At least get
a majori
On 02/17/2012 15:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
No. Bad idea. Not on questions@, the list of the least clued up,
the list raw beginners are referred to subscribe to. At least get
a majority on hackers@ or current@ or arch@. Som
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:11:52 -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> > questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister
> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:53 PM
> > To: Polytropon
> > Cc: david.robi
> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style default
> with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and
> swap.
I've been doing Unix 30+ years, so there's a tendency to respond
"Multiple", 'cos seeing a single 1 partition on a system normaly
meant it
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:53 PM
> To: Polytropon
> Cc: david.robi...@fisglobal.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: One or
I like this because it gives the user a choice, and it clearly lays out the
choices based on partition schemes instead of a less-specific 'machine use'
choice.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> Four? There should be five! :-)
>
> Read on to find out why.
>
On 02/18/12 08:40, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Robison, Dave
wrote:
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partiti
I would prefer having the option of four partitions for fault tolerance reasons
if needed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> questi...@freebsd.org] On Be
>
> > Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
>
> Why not add a selection to the installer, something like
> this:
>
> Partition scheme
>
>
> [ ] all in one + swap
> Create one partition containing all subtrees
>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:05:23PM -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
> opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
>
> It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
> as suc
Four? There should be five! :-)
Read on to find out why.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:05:23 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style default
> with 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and
> swap.
In my case, preferenc
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Robison, Dave
wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
> opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
>
> It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap as
> such:
>
> /
> /t
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 2:18 PM
> To: david.robi...@fisglobal.com
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: One or Four?
>
> On Fe
On 17/02/2012 18:16, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everything
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Da Rock wrote:
>
>
> Problem, I think lies, in the symlink. You don't need it, kill it and run
> nspluginwrapper - the only flash file in your browser plugins directory
> should be prefixed with npwrapper.
>
> There may be an issue with nspluginwrapper (currently
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Robison, Dave wrote:
> We'd like a show of hands to see if folks prefer the "old" style default with
> 4 partitions and swap, or the newer iteration with 1 partition and swap.
For a user/desktop machine, I prefer one root partition. For other roles like
a server, I
Hiya,
A question has arisen with the implementation of bsdinstall in 9.x as
opposed to sysinstall in 8.x and previous versions of FreeBSD.
It has always been FreeBSD's default to create four partitions and swap
as such:
/
/tmp
/var
/usr
swap
The recent changes in 9.x with bsdinstall use a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:27:07PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:27:07 +0100
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: how can i offload a 600m file without graphic tools?
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
>
>
> We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
> the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
> Anonymous.
>
> I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask w
On 2/17/2012 11:16 AM, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everythi
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:06:01 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
> Mutt would be my choice. I have been using it for over a decade,
> and it handles Maildir as well as other common mailbox formats.
Also pine should be able to handle it (even though it could
be called "overcomplex" in relation to /usr/bin
Hello,
is there an equivalent to Linux' cryopid for FreeBSD?
http://code.google.com/p/cryopid/
Thanks,
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012, APseudoUtopia wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
>and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
>the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
>with the Maildir. I'm running every
On 17/02/2012 17:16, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everything
Hi,
Reference:
> From: APseudoUtopia
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:16:29 -0500
> Message-id:
>
APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
> and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
> the
On Fri, February 17, 2012 12:16 pm, APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
> and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
> the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
> with the Maildi
Hello,
I'm setting up the email system on my server. I got rid of sendmail
and installed postfix, and I will be installing dovecot. I researched
the difference between mbox and maildir formats, and I'm going to go
with the Maildir. I'm running everything on ZFS, so many small files
shouldn't be a
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Brent Clark wrote:
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to download
the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use "Install from an FTP server"
The error message I get
On 02/18/12 00:22, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:14:47 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Think about that:
% netcat 192.168.123.456< /tmp/printing.pdf
I can do either:
nc 192.168.1.100 9100< /tmp/print.pdf
or nc 192.168.1.100 9100< /tmp/print.ps
right now without
Hi,
On Thursday 16 February 2012 17:20:23 krad wrote:
> On 14 February 2012 20:28, Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Mike Dockery wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> >
> > Aloha,
> >
> > >
> > > I have been a user of Linux since 1994, but most of the linux distros
>
On 02/17/12 23:57, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:33:33 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
PDF is not exactly PS, but it does use a subset of the instructions.
That's correct, but both formats share essential parts of
functionality. Conversion between them is relatively easy.
The other thing y
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:14:47 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
> Think about that:
>
> % netcat 192.168.123.456 < /tmp/printing.pdf
I can do either:
nc 192.168.1.100 9100 < /tmp/print.pdf
or nc 192.168.1.100 9100 < /tmp/print.ps
right now without any problems.
If you looked at
Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2012 08:49:37 Da Rock wrote:
> On 02/17/12 11:21, Al Plant wrote:
> > I have not seen any action in 2 days.
> There's been plenty of action in the last 2 days. Maybe check your mail
> server logs for errors?
I noticed the same thing. The missing mails arrived all meanwh
On 02/17/12 23:33, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/17/12 23:14, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
It appears that "ps" is no-longer the format of choice but is being
replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that P
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:33:33 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> PDF is not exactly PS, but it does use a subset of the instructions.
That's correct, but both formats share essential parts of
functionality. Conversion between them is relatively easy.
> The other thing you will notice is that its mostly on
Replacing the old battery with a new one usually solves this kind of
problem. I just did this yesterday ;)
On 2/17/12, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> guys, this is just a FWIW, but it's worth bearing in mind. i just
> tried to change the bios settings so that the old computer would
> boot from CD first.
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether people slave the root zone
or not, and why if not.
Active poster, renown
On 02/17/12 23:14, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
It appears that "ps" is no-longer the format of choice but is being
replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that PS still seems to be the
format that
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:32:07 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> w can i move a file from my home filesystem to my one disc drive
> without using a GUI? i don't have a graphic interface on my FBSD
> system and want to save a 600MB file to my cdrom?
>
> thanks for tips on what i have Long forgotten!
I
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:00:38 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> It appears that "ps" is no-longer the format of choice but is being
> replaced by PDF, a format that is natively supported by many printers.
Jerry, I wanted to point out that PS still seems to be the
format that _applications_ use as output format
Dear,
First, please accept my apologies for the disturbance.
I am a Senior Consultant Infrastructure Program Manager with 20 years
experience in IM&T. I started my career with Digital in Sophia Antipolis in
1988 and over time, made my primary focus in IT Program/Project management.
Here are compa
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:08:54 -0600
Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Ryan Frederick
> wrote:
> > It looks like others have run into this problem with avahi-app as
> > well:
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068658.html
> >
> > A cursory se
Dear,
First, please accept my apologies for the disturbance.
I am a Senior Consultant Infrastructure Program Manager with 20 years
experience in IM&T. I started my career with Digital in Sophia Antipolis in
1988 and over time, made my primary focus in IT Program/Project management.
Here are compa
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Ryan Frederick
> wrote:
>> It looks like others have run into this problem with avahi-app as well:
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068658.html
>>
>> A cursory search shows
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:31:39 +0200
Brent Clark wrote:
> I use "Install from an FTP server"
>
> The error message I get is "Unable to transfer the sbase distribution
> from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.";
>
> Does anyone know of another way to get the kernel source.
Get it with csup and be sure to set
On 2/17/12 11:02 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
> Hi Damien
>
> Additional question:
>
>
> On 17/02/2012 11:14, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote:
>
>> Sorry top post, posting from phone.
>>
>> 8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
>> desk
>
>
>
> A lot of these Dell
On 02/17/12 19:31, Brent Clark wrote:
Hiya
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to
download the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use "Install from an FTP server"
The error message I
On 02/17/12 19:58, Chip Oakley wrote:
Thanks interesting possibilities.
One thought I had is creating an operating system independent BIOS where
the appropriate machine code is inserted into the events that lead to an
override of the processes that is forcing into windows. Maybe burned to a
CD o
Hiya
I seem to have this problem with sysinstall, whereby I cant seem to download
the kernel source.
I tried following this example
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-install-kernel-source-code/
I use "Install from an FTP server"
The error message I get is "Unable to transfer the sbase dis
Hi Damien
Additional question:
On 17/02/2012 11:14, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote:
>Sorry top post, posting from phone.
>
>8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
>desk
A lot of these Dell R210 II's ship with the S300 PERC. Does FreeBSD have
support for this contr
Thanks interesting possibilities.
One thought I had is creating an operating system independent BIOS where
the appropriate machine code is inserted into the events that lead to an
override of the processes that is forcing into windows. Maybe burned to a
CD or USB, from another computer and tie th
On 17/02/2012 11:14, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote:
>Sorry top post, posting from phone.
>
>8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my
>desk
Thanks, Damien! Much appreciated!
>
>
>On 17 Feb 2012, at 09:11, Traiano Welcome
> wrote:
>
>> Hi List
>>
>> Is there a vers
Chip Oakley wrote:
> Am tempted to remove the drive and insert a new one, not sure as
> there is memory on the drive available and nothing really wrong
> with it.
If you don't mind losing everything currently on the drive,
overwriting the MBR -- and the backup GPT at the end of the drive,
if the
Sorry top post, posting from phone.
8.2-stable, 9.0-release, will post a link with a tutorial when I hit my desk
On 17 Feb 2012, at 09:11, Traiano Welcome
wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Is there a version of freebsd (preferably 8 upwards) that supports the PERC
> H200 controller on Dell R210 II serve
On 02/17/12 18:19, jb wrote:
Hi,
I have these warnings. Any known cause and solution ?
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0
$ dmesg
...
ubt0: on usbus0
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
They should be fine, they're
On 02/17/12 17:59, The Todds wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether it would possible to get Google+ Hangout running
on Freebsd.
I am running firefox-10.0,1 installed from the ports on FreeBSD
8.2-STABLE #0:amd64
Trying to install the plugin from the Google+ page and I get an almost
finished messa
Hi List
Is there a version of freebsd (preferably 8 upwards) that supports the PERC
H200 controller on Dell R210 II servers ? I've followed the thread at:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/74192
But it seems somewhat inconclusive.
Thanks in Advance,
Traiano
Hi,
I was wondering whether it would possible to get Google+ Hangout running
on Freebsd.
I am running firefox-10.0,1 installed from the ports on FreeBSD
8.2-STABLE #0:amd64
Trying to install the plugin from the Google+ page and I get an almost
finished message, but that is as far as it goes. I
Hi,
I have these warnings. Any known cause and solution ?
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0
$ dmesg
...
ubt0: on usbus0
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(bluetooth) after domainfinalize()
WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
...
jb
___
f
96 matches
Mail list logo
