--- Vladimir Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
If you change hardware settings, you should
also maintain the same
settings on both ends of the wire, i.e. at
the computer *and* the
ethernet switch.
[SNIP]
I just forced it to use 100baseTX /
I vote for
Look what they've done to my song, Ma - a
commentary on the destruction of the (formally)
world's best operating system.
--- Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root wrote:
We are promoting a new punk rock band the is
being developed as I write this email. We are
looking for ways to
--- Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdow wrote:
From: dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10 Dec Nicklas B. Westerlund wrote:
Sasa Stupar wrote:
Can someone tell me in plain words what
will I gain if I upgrade my
server from 5.4 to 6.0?
Comparing 5.4 and 6.0 is like
--- RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 05:33, K P wrote:
hello,
i just got AMD Athlon 64bit but i want to
know that FreeBSD for AMD64 port
will work at 64bit mode or it is 32bit and
just will work in 64bit arch?
i386 works in 32-bit mode, AMD64 works in 64
bit
--- Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Guillaume R. thusly...
2005/12/5, David O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 06:50:55PM -0400,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I didn't realize that the newer Xeon's
were 64bit ... now,
I've
--- Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:17 2005-12-09, Jiri Mikulas wrote:
Hello
I'm looking for PCI-Express 1x network adapter
for FBSD-6
I found adpaters only for PCI-X in
documentation,
on google I didn't find much more :(...
Is there any PCI-E adapter supported ?
Could you
I was referring to 4.x vs 5.x+ of course
--- David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
I vote for
Look what they've done to my song, Ma - a
commentary on the destruction of the
(formally)
world's best operating system.
So far I'm finding 6.x a heck of a lot
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:00:42PM +, David
Gerard wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
I vote for
Look what they've done to my song, Ma -
a
commentary on the destruction
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:14:18PM -0800,
Danial Thom wrote:
Well thats just hogwash Kris. Pure bridging
performance is a measure of the efficiency of
the
kernel to do rote tasks like respond to
interrupts, and the latencies in performing
Because those of us with real jobs are required
to do so.
Kris doesn't just not see my point. If you can't
see that then you can't be reasoned with either.
--- Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
Kris is just a PR front man for a team of
developers that is lost
--- David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
developers that is lost. Their theory on
how to
build a better mousetrap for MP is completely
wrong, and now they're going to try something
else, using the entire FreeBSD community as
guinea pigs. First 5.4
--- Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
Kris is just a PR front man for a team of
developers that is lost. Their theory on
how to
build a better mousetrap for MP is
completely
wrong, and now they're going to try
something
else, using the entire FreeBSD community
--- Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 12/12/2005 8:13 AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Michael,
Fundamentally, here's the problem Danial is
claiming exists:
it takes a certain amount of time to get the
packet clocked in
from the network into the ethernet receiver.
This is
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:35 PM
To: Drew Tomlinson; Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
Kris Kennaway
--- Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote, On 12/13/2005 12:44 AM:
-Original Message-
From: Drew Tomlinson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:30 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Michael Vince; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
--- Cezar Fistik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Just a remark. I'm using an Intel PRO/1000 MT
Dual Port Gigabit Copper
CAT5 Server PCI express Adapter in a box
serving as router. Pumping 150Mbps
through it with 99% idle CPU and 1% interrupts,
polling enabled. It's
a litle bit
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:08 AM
To: Cezar Fistik;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Polling For 100 mbps
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:07 AM
To: Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Polling For 100 mbps
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections
--- Cezar Fistik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Or maybe FreeBSD just sucks wind? I promise
you
that no machine known to man can pass 150Mb/s
and
be 99% idle. Get a god-damned clue for pete's
sake. All polling does is screw up accounting
so
the timings are wrong. At best
-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14
AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps
Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)
Well, if polling does no good for fxp,
due
LOL. Trying to dig ditches with ice cream sticks
boys?
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sasa,
Try this ping flooder then:
http://my-security.net/outofsite/ICMP%20Ping%20Flood.zip
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
--- Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted
Mittelstaedt wrote:
If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is
easy, run
PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The ISP
has to
do so also.
If they are going to different ISP's then you
--- Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0800, Ted
Mittelstaedt wrote:
If both DSL lines go to the same ISP it is
easy, run
PPP on them and setup multilink PPP. The
ISP
has to
do so also
Ted the incompetent, wrong on all counts once
again:
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:56 AM
To: Loren M. Lang; Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Yance Kowara;
freebsd-questions
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Loren M. Lang
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:47 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Yance Kowara;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router two DSL
connections
--- Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel A.
wrote:
Hi Andy,
I am sorry for the trouble you have had with
Windows XP.
I suggest that you use Linux, as FreeBSD
really is not targeted at
people who want to use graphical user
--- Yance Kowara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted, you have to think outside the box. Life
is
more than one connection. While you can't
increase the throughput of a single
connection,
you can increase the throughput of your
network,
which is usually the point. Throughput in
this
--- Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Yance Kowara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ted, you have to think outside the box.
Life
is
more than one connection. While you can't
increase the throughput of a single
connection,
you can increase the throughput of your
network
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.edimax.com/html/english/products/PRI582.htm
...Performs Outbound load balancing by
session, weight round robin or
traffic...
Note that they say by SESSION not by PACKET.
It's marketingspeak. They are simply using the
term
--- Miguel Saturnino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 07:34 -0800, Danial Thom
wrote:
--- Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel
A.
wrote:
Hi Andy,
I am sorry for the trouble you have had
--- Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 07:34, Danial Thom
wrote:
--- Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:54, Daniel
A.
wrote:
Hi Andy,
I am sorry for the trouble you have had
--- Don Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Danial:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 10:44, Danial Thom
wrote:
--- Miguel Saturnino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 07:34 -0800, Danial
Thom
wrote:
--- Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
--- rod person [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't expect you to care, but saying you
prefer FreeBSD and saying FreeBSD is
better
are different animals. I just wanted to know
what
you could do with FreeBSD
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
Schwab Streetsmart
Accounting Software (CA)
Quicken
Photoshop
Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs)
Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there
are
some half-assed alternatives for some
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2005-12-24 14:01, Danial Thom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, FreeBSD is about twice as fast/easy
to install/configure,
and infinitely cheaper.
Considering that WinXP usually comes
--- Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that PPP_FILTER kernel option is
mentioned in pppd(8) man
page. Could somebody tell me how where
PPP_DEFLATE PPP_BSDCOMP
options are used, or where can i find
information on them?
They are
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
Cc: Yance Kowara;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:59 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD router
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 3:47 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Loren M. Lang
Cc: Yance Kowara;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD router two DSL
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote:
There is also the problem that some sites are
designed to work with
Internet Explorer. You can try to visit with
firefox but that doesn't
always work even with firefox on XP.
NO site should be designed to
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 7:34 AM
To: Michael C. Shultz;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Daniel A.; Andy Sjostrom
Subject: Re
--- Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 07:24 am, Danial
Thom wrote:
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Dec Kent Stewart wrote:
There is also the problem that some sites
are
designed to work with
Internet Explorer. You can
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
It doesn't really matter what the accepted
standard is; its the one
that *most* people are using.
Bring this rule to society and it won't take
all that much time before
we'll live in a jungle (happely ever
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:50 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Winelfred G. Pasamba
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD router
--- Malcolm Kay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:27 am, Danial Thom
wrote:
Schwab Streetsmart
Accounting Software (CA)
Quicken
Photoshop
Adobe Acrobat (for creating PDFs)
Those are the ones I use daily. Surely there
are
some half-assed alternatives for some
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
--- dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Dec Danial Thom wrote:
It doesn't really matter what the
accepted standard is; its the
one that *most* people are using.
Bring this rule
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does it meet the test I already outlined?
Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
remote server,
with both lines connected. Time it.
Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test. If
the time to
download and upload when both DSL lines
--- Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does it meet the test I already outlined?
Download the FreeBSD iso then upload it to a
remote server,
with both lines connected. Time it.
Disconnect 1 line, then repeat the test
--- fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears
is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
When you have a contest and none of the entrees
are any good
you do not have to pick any of then, you could
have just
closed the contest with no winner.
I am
--- Sam Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is there a reason why both the old and new
logos cannot be used in
tandem? I'd rather leave the old one up on my
web site, since,
personally, I like it better ... I understand
the argument for a 'new
logo', but,
--- Christer Folkesson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, this is my first message to the
mailing-list. I hope that I have
included
enough information about the problem.
The problem is that my FreeBSD 6.0 (release)
won't use the default route
(gateway). So I can't access anything on the
--- Nicolas Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On January 2, 2006 04:52 pm, Sean wrote:
Sean wrote:
Looking for recommendations on any Unix
programming books.
I have been out of things for a while so I
would put my skill level back
to the beginning.
Thanks
--- Mark Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
azri abdul majid wrote:
Hi there
I am a linux user and I am very interested on
trying FreeBSD. I just
curious about one matter. Currently I have an
old linux machine with
15GB Hdd, 64MB RAM, 266MHz Intel Celeron
Processor. I just want to use
--- Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lars wrote:
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Sean wrote on Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at
04:09:27PM -0500:
Looking for recommendations on any Unix
programming books.
I have been out of things for a while so I
would put my skill level
back to the
--- azri abdul majid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I am thinking about. As a linux
user for such a long time,
its quite dissappointed to say that linux has
become a monster.
Ah, but mp3s are nice and smooth!!! :-)
If you don't need any of the newer features, I'd
suggest FreeBSD 4.x
--- Holtor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE on a remotely
hosted server and I'd like to find out the DDR
speed
of the RAM chips installed so I can order the
proper ones for an upgrade. I know it's either
DDR333 or DDR400 so I assume I can just
,
--Vorpal
On 1/6/06, Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Holtor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE on a
remotely
hosted server and I'd like to find out the
DDR
speed
of the RAM chips installed so I can order
the
proper
--- Robert Slade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 05:45, David Banning
wrote:
My server just was listed with Spamcop.
Before I exercise my -one time-
option to de-list it I need to verify that
indeed my server is not sending
spam. I have 3 win boxes routing through my
--- JD Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Nicolas Blais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On January 2, 2006 04:52 pm, Sean wrote:
Sean wrote:
Looking for recommendations on any Unix
programming books.
I have been out of things for a while so I
would put my
--- Michael P. Soulier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/01/06 Jorge Biquez said:
Hello all. Very interesting comments and
suggestions.
I hope my question does not seems too off
topic. Do you think the path to
follow for developing applications for the
new PDA, Smartphones, Ipaq and
--- Robert Slade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 04:51, Ted Mittelstaedt
wrote:
What machine code exploits currently exist
for FreeBSD on the i386
other than the F00F bug, which has already
been patched out?
I wasn't aware of any.
Ted
-Original
--- Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an
advantage to running FreeBSD on
a SPARC than compared with a regular PC.
Obviously the architecture is
different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can
purchase a higher powered PC box
for less money
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks
and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE
available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly
appreciated.
This is obviously a trick question, because real
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are
--- Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that
is only acting as an NFS server
and nothing else, is there any advantage to
using an SMP machine? Any
no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200
class machine does have no
problems working
--- jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Banning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda
and such services anger
some people. I also find other people who
ask me how they can get
such a service, only because spam is so
difficult to block. I guess it
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of jdow
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:12 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to
diagnose why
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gerard Seibert
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture
Danial Thom [EMAIL
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
That's why you should graduate to Emacs -
with the makefile syntax
highlighting, you'll at least see the
differences between tabs and
spaces before getting into
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:28 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture
--- Ted
--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better
(can't believe that they took
a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I
know that HyperThreading is
definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close
--- Peter Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
I have two cisco switches, configured to
put ports 2-6 on each of
them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on
both set to trunk between
the two
switches. If I have a device on port 2 on
switch1 it can ping a device on
port 2 on
--- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm going to assume that Dual Core is
better
(can't believe that they took
a step back
The ability of a car to handle perfectly at
100Mph is more than just a minor improvement,
unless you just use a car to take you to the
train station or to the market.
Ted wrote:
Actually, it's a pure waste of money, at least
in
the US, since no public roads have 100Mph speed
limits and chances
--- Martin Cracauer cracauer@cons.org wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at
12:52:24PM -0400:
I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better
(can't believe that they took
a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I
know that HyperThreading is
definitely != Dual
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Danial Thom
wrote:
Wait, I can download music, run a virus
scanner
and play games all at the same time? wow.
Wait,
I can do that anyway. Does each core have its
own
hard drive too?
I wonder how many
--- Martin McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One of our FreeBSD systems has begun randomly
shutting down
its Ethernet interface. After doing so, the
box continues to try to
run but prints the following errors in syslog:
Jan 16 03:01:23 xx /kernel: fxp0: SCB timeout:
0x70 0x0
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the essential difference
between FreeBSD and Linux (Fedora for
instance)?
Where can I find any list of differences?
What/Where are the advantages of FreeBSD vs
Linux?
Greetings
Greg
Whats the difference between a wheelbarrow and a
dumptruck? You
--- FlashWebHost.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
performance. There are much
already discussed about it, a google search
will give you more info.
Nothing personal, but thats about the
--- Mike Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:25AM -0800,
Danial Thom wrote:
--- FlashWebHost.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Linux is just kernel only.
FreeBSD is complete operating system.
FreeBSD and Linux have almost similar
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS,
I seriously doubt it. They don't need to with
their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe or something?
For pete's sake, how can so many people be so
patently clueless and still be able to find food
and
--- Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/01/06, Danial Thom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft pays hardware manufacturers to
make drivers for their OS,
I seriously doubt it. They don't need to
with
their market share.
Ok, what do you guys live in a shoe
--- Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danial Thom
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:54 AM
To: Dick Davies; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux
Microsoft
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:28:09PM -0800,
Derrick Francis wrote:
Have a simple question. If someone to
request support for version 4.10
or 4.9 how would they be supported? Please
let me know. I need to
verify this version of FreeBSD is
--- Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 4.11 server runing nfs server and a
nfs client running freebsd 5.4
ive setup both according to the freebsd
handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nfs.html
When i go to mount the nfs share onto the
client
--- David Raison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sadly even that simple example doesn't work.
There's no output of mountd in the syslog and
showmount -e doesn't
list any shares either.
David
Andrew P. wrote:
On 1/22/06, David Raison
--- David Raison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sure thing, but I wish to share my external usb
hdds which are mounted
@ those mountpoints.
/mnt is usually a mount point, are you sure
you don't have it
backwards?
/etc/exports on server1:
The question of the day is: why are you porting
it to 6.0? Have you proven that its better?
There are many commercial appliances that are
sticking with 4.x because its more suitable for
that kind of application. The issue with an
open-source type of appliance is capacity; The
kind of people that
--- Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am implementing and using a test bed
simulating a huge amount of IP
clients, each preferable having a unique IP
address. There is no, no way
to have an individual physical interface for
each simulated client so I
--- László Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%ifconfig
ed0:
flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST
mtu 1500
ether 00:50:bf:29:52:a8
media: Ethernet autoselect
(10baseT/UTP)
rl0:
flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST
mtu 1500
--- O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sirs.
FreeBSd is now since 1996 my companion in
scientific computing and
related server systems and also my favorite
operating system for every
network stuff, firewalls and desktop systems I
ever used.
Now going ahaed with 64Bit,
According to Ted this won't work anyway, since he
claims that all ISPs source filter and won't let
any source addresses other than theirs through.
So maybe that's why they've never done it?
--- Webster, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am using Zebra, but it will only keep one
route to the
--- Steve Coles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a strange deterministic boot problem
with ATA devices on 2-way dell
precision machines which boot from their SCSI
disks. I have 4 of these
boxes, and the only difference is the add-in
ATA controller in the affected
box.
A good summary
I've seen it happen when the ethernet device gets
a bus error and throws it into some strange
state. I've seen it mostly with on-board intel
devices (fxp), but thats what we use mostly so it
may not be part specific.
DT
--- brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone run into this scenario where
Things that stop after 5-10 minutes are usually
ARP related, but I can't be certain.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need more background info.
Explain where you are getting the public
non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip
address from.
You say the ADSL router is using them.
Did you edit your real ip
and *hopefully* not
on others (e.g. RELENG_6_0)?
Brent
Danial Thom writes:
I've seen it happen when the ethernet device
gets
a bus error and throws it into some strange
state. I've seen it mostly with on-board
intel
devices (fxp), but thats what we use mostly
so it
may not be part
could also be a ppp keepalive problem. As they
say in the open source world you have the
source, so trace it out. You're just wasting
time blabbering about it.
--- Ian Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here might be a better drawing (possibly)
Router (10.0.0.2)
|
|
--- ptitoliv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am writing here because I have a problem with
network on freebsd 5.3
and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100
Mbit/s with via rhine network
cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge
computer. When I try to
transferts big
--- ptitoliv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit :
what about netstat -e on each host ?
(looking for errors)
no errors detected
are you on swicthes ?
Are the switches port on auto or forced ?
I don't know exactly : the servers are hosted
by a company. So I
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
