Here is another article that summarizes what you need to do, it's pretty
straight forward really. I just did this recently on my server, and it
appears to work like a charm so far.
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/07/26/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
Peace.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
The question is, are they charging you for total bandwidth used, or some
real time rate limit? When you use bandwidth shaping, you can reduce
your rate, but that will just spread things out. So if they are
charging you for total bytes moved, then you would have to do some math
to figure out what
The problem with this solution is that it doesn't prevent potential
queuing a lot of bounced emails, back to domains that are bad. The best
place to stop spam, is to deny it right at the on set, so as to not load
up your system trying to deliver bad mail.
-Daniel
The simple solution if you're
Oh come on, we can behave better than this...In normal conversation,
there is no reason to use such potentially offensive language, when
discussing FreeBSD. Which I might add what this list is supposed to be
about. At least, I know that's why I signed up for it.
On 04 Jan 2003 19:13:13 +,
I know how to set cvsup to update ports-all, or a specific branch like
ports-mail. However, I would like to be able to make a cvsupfile with a
list of just individual ports to update. Any ideas?
Thanks
-Daniel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions
So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out. When
are they going to make the FreeBSD install configurable enough to not have
to include sendmail, bind, openssl, etc? I choose to either install these
apps
05, 2003 at 01:15:30PM -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
I know how to set cvsup to update ports-all, or a specific branch like
ports-mail. However, I would like to be able to make a cvsupfile with
a
list of just individual ports to update. Any ideas?
Thanks
-Daniel
Check out the FreeBSD
These two apps both have compile time options to include support for
each other, but this quickly becomes a chicken or the egg question.
My instinct tells me to install SASL first, without LDAP, then install
LDAP with SASL, and then go back and reinstall SASL with LDAP.
Anyone else run into this
The problem may not be BSD. You say you have changed your BIOS to boot
the CD, but have you verified that any other bootable CDs work? Like
your original windows CD? Also, do you have another machine you could
check to verify that the FreeBSD CD is bootable? If not, I would check
your ISO
the contents of /var/db/pkg as the input for a
script?
Bri
- Original Message -
From: Joan Picanyol i Puig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Selecting a specific list of ports to update
* Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030105 19
as a SASL backend ? Most likely
not. You probably want LDAP to make use of SASL, not the other way
round. So you build SASL first and then LDAP. You can't have it both
ways, I believe.
Daniel Goepp schrieb:
These two apps both have compile time options to include support for
each other
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Selecting a specific list of ports to update
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:57:36PM -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: randall ehren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 4:47 PM
To: Daniel Goepp
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Selecting a specific list of ports to update
And have it just updates those specific apps, not the whole branch. I
realize that I can
Couple more guesses for you. First, you are probably just burning the
image file to the CD in your first example. If you put that CD in your
computer when you have windows loaded, do you see one file called 4.7
mini.iso, or do you see what looks like a CD with a bunch of files on
it? You do not
-freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duncan Anker
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:53 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions; Daniel Goepp
Cc: Lowell Gilbert
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 00:42, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1.freebsd.org itself
list.
Thanks.
Peace.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Daniel Goepp
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1
Have you tried Postfix? Many feel the configuration is a bit more
friendly.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Lofstedt
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:07 PM
To: 'Toomas Aas'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Redirecting
Just took me a while.digging.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/article.html
Installation Tools - Our installation program has long since outlived
its intended life span. Several projects are under development to
provide a more advanced installation mechanism. One of the
with.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions'
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lowell Gilbert
First, thank you all for your comments and information regarding this
matter. I'd just like to note a couple of things, as I go on my merry
way to create my own release, and tools to do so.
1. If anyone has any interest in working on this, please feel free
to contact me out side of this
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 at 22:32:42 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I don't know why you're talking about cvsup; cvsup is not relevant
to this; it is a method for downloading files, primarily from cvs
archives. What you're looking for is changing the base system
itself; how
Please find the humor in this, I'm not at all trying to be a pain in the
ass here...but since the OS is case sensitive, I chuckled when I read
this, thinking 'LS -L' is not a command.
Sorry...carry on...
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
[...]
The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade.
This process
left everything I had
I see no error here...so I'm sort of at a loss...anyone seen this
before? Any help greatly appreciated, I'm leaving town today, and want
to leave the box in top shape.
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libxpg4.a
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s
I know for certain the Cisco Aironet 250 PCMCIA card works, I can't
confirm the PCI version, which I thought was just a bridge that you plug
the PCMCIA card into.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wayne Pascoe
Sent: Thursday,
Quick questions about machine architecture setting getting picked up. I set
my CPUTYPE = k7 in make.conf, but when I compile world or kernel, I see
-march k6. If I comment out this line, I see nothing, so I'm sure my
make.conf is being read okay. And I grep'd the dir for any other k6 that
might
Does anyone know why OpenLDAP would not be able to find
SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms in OpenSSL?
checking for openssl/ssl.h... yes
checking for ssl.h... no
checking for SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms in -lssl... no
checking for SSL_library_init in -lssl... yes
This then in turn messes with a Postfix
Something odd here just started happening. I realize the ldconfig is run on
startup to rebuild the library list. And some ports have to add their lib
path to this list, for example mysql. Well, now, everytime I reboot, mysql
is getting cleaned out of this list. I haven't noticed this before,
Bah! Okay, stupid me. I had tracked it to ldconfig_paths in rc, but wasn't
seeing where that was coming from. Of course, rc.conf in /etc/default.
Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject
Hopefully an easy question here...
I have installed apache13-fp, and it is working fine. However, I would also
like to compile in ssl support, but that only appears to be included in one
of the apache-ssl ports. I would like both, but that doesn't appear to be
an option. Anyone have any ideas
.
-Daniel
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Apache with fp and ssl
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:52:32PM -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
I have installed apache13-fp, and it is working fine
I'm glad that someone else is questioning the way this works. The last time
I brought this up, people responded in a similar way of just ignore it.
Which to me is bad system administration. It's not necessarily about disk
space, but more about being a responsible operator. For example, if it
Hi all,
I was banging my head against the wall too long yesterday, so I have
broken down, and have to ask. Any help on this matter is greatly
appreciated.
Here is what I'm trying to do. I have two computers, both running 4.8,
clean, minimal installs. They have two serial cables connected to
33 matches
Mail list logo
