Hello
For some time now I have been watching tcp dumps by
sending them through tcpshow -cooked. This has worked
quite well on BSD 4.X and also I believe 5.2.1.
However, when I tried to do this on a 5.5 or 6.1
server, I get an error.
Can anyone help with why I might be getting these
errors
--- jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The number one problem I've had with SATA RAIDs
has been the cables! 4
times I've lost arrays because the cables came
loose or some other
stupid problem with the cables.
I need a vendor that has high quality
Hi
I have several web servers that are attached to a
Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
testing. All seem to have lousy performance. When
going through the issues with Netapp, the reasons
given were that we have too many
--- David Banning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am installing a new server and have to copy many
files from old server
to new. I have connected a windows box to each via
samba, and am dragging
from one to the other via the windows box.
This might seem like a silly question, but what is
the
--- Jeremy Kister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/2006 11:05 PM, N. Harrington wrote:
My current mount options are:
filer:/vol/fvol31/home/13/13 nfs
ro,noatime,-r=32768,-T,-b,-R0,-i,-D2,-L 0 0
for the same performance reason, mine is:
netapp1:/vol/vol0/export /export nfs
--- Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicole,
On 02/08/06, N. Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
I have several web servers that are attached to a
Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
testing. All seem to have
--- Lutz Rabing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
is someone still working on the bigdisk project?
it becomes
more an more easy to create disk arrays bigger than
2TB ... it
would be a really nice to have feature.
lutz
Nice to have, but I wouldn't want to fsck it! :)
Nicole
Hello
For some time now I have been watching tcp dumps by
sending them through tcpshow -cooked. (from the ports
tree) This has worked quite well on BSD 4.X and also I
believe 5.2.1.
However, now when I try to do this on a 5.5 or 6.1
server, I get an error.
Can anyone help with why
Hello
I am curious if the new Qlogic QLA2462 fibre channel
card is supported yet.
I do not see it listed in the hardware support page,
but since it's so new I was curious if it may just not
have made it in yet.
If it is not, what would it take to get a driver for
this? I could likely get a
Hello
I am testing out a new tyan motherboard that uses the
next generation of AMD chips and the Serverworks
Chipset. It seems that I can reliably crash it with a
simple bonnie++ test if I set:
/boot/loader.conf - Used for DiskD for Squid
kern.ipc.msgtql=2048
I am using FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
Hello.
I am testing out a new tyan motherboard that uses the
next generation of AMD chips and the Serverworks
Chipset. It seems that I can reliably crash it with a
simple bonnie++ test if I set:
/boot/loader.conf - Used for DiskD for Squid
kern.ipc.msgtql=2048
I am using FreeBSD
Hello
I seem to be having a problem similiar to one I found
also reported back in April.
I am running/testing FreeBSD-CURRENT 7.0 Dated Fri
Jul 27. amd64
On boot-up, SCSI disk speed being reported as 1/2
that found when using 6.2. It also seems to be
somewhat unstable.
FreeBSD 7
da0:
Hello
I feel stupid, but I am confused about kern.maxdsiz (or datasize via limits
command) on FreeBSD
amd64.
I have seen many posts and suggestions to raise it to 1G. However it seems
this only applies to
i386. By default, on servers I have with 4G of physical memory, and 2X that of
swap, I
--- JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 20:54:36 N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I feel stupid, but I am confused about kern.maxdsiz (or datasize via
limits command) on FreeBSD amd64.
I have seen many posts and suggestions to raise it to 1G. However it seems
Hello
I have several systems that are used as squid
caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI
disks and some that use SATA disks. They are
identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI
drives.
At random times, the sata based systems seem to be
freezing. You can ping them and
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I have several systems that are used as squid
caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI
disks and some that use SATA disks. They are
identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI
drives
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
N. Harrington wrote:
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
N. Harrington wrote:
Hello
I have several systems that are used as squid
caching servers. I have some systems that use
SCSI
disks and some that use SATA
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
N. Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have several systems that are used as squid
caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI
disks and some that use SATA disks
Hello
I have a server I am using as a load balancer that
has multiple ports. I have set sysctl
net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_movements=0 so I could
have the multiple ports on the same lan. However, I
need to make sure that what comes in via one port/IP
also goes out the same port/IP address.
I
I am trying to figure out how to bond or combine 2
interfaces together. Such that they each share
traffic.
I have tried one way, however when I use it I seem to
have an odd broadcast occuring on my switch. Such that
I am seeing incoming traffic hit some other ports on
the switch. Can someone
Fron a previous post I found I cannot solve my
problem via port bonding since I am stuck with a
switch that does not support Port bonding or trunking,
I would like to then try to setup various interfaces
with various IP's to help balance the traffic.
Basicly as normal, assign say:
ifconfig
21 matches
Mail list logo
