ools. So you MUST have a valid zpool.cache file in
order to import the zpool containing the "/" zfs dataset
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
to ESATA and it got much better.
Unfortunately, my external exclosure has a SATA port expander as I need to talk
to 4 external drives. That gives me about a factor of 2 worse performance than
the internal SATA drives (even if I am only talking to one drive via the
external connection).
--
Paul Kr
On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:14 AM, bw wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 03:13 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
>> On Feb 24, 2013, at 4:42 AM, bw.mail.lists wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, I tried to follow
>>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/9.0-RELEASE, but ended up
>>
minor issues :-)
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
ons.
*** [Source/CMakeFiles/CMakeLib.dir/cmBootstrapCommands.cxx.o] Error code 1
1 error
*** [Source/CMakeFiles/CMakeLib.dir/all] Error code 2
1 error
*** [all] Error code 2
1 error
*** [do-build] Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/cmake.
Thanks.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, Lon
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 05.03.2013 18:51, Paul Kraus:
>> In trying to build NagIOS, one of the dependencies is cmake and it is
>> failing to build. See below. And if I run make again it will fail on a
>> different file, see further d
erms of root FS or in terms of boot loader ?
The boot loader would be set in your BIOS (which physical drive you read for
that).
/ comes from the zpool/zfs dataset once the boot loader loads enough code
to find and mount the filesystem. That comes from all the drives in the zpool.
--
Paul Kraus
Dep
instead of /etc/rc.d. It works fine if
INST-BASE is disabled. I looked through the Makefile but could not suss out how
that difference in configuration was actually causing the problem.
Has anyone else run into this problem and what was the fix (or did you
just install into /usr/local) ?
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Paul Kraus writes:
>
>> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
>> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
>> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' g
22 to 24, but as part of building a new server to do
the same task went from 22 to 24. The "allow/deny" syntax has changed, I'm sure
there are others.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenec
e remaining device to full size (it
may do that anyway based on the setting of the auto expand property of the
zpool. The default under 9.1 is NOT to autoexpand:
root@FreeBSD2:/root # zpool get autoexpand rootpool
NAME PROPERTYVALUE SOURCE
rootpool autoexpand off default
root@
ent disk and copy back.
Is this a statement or a question ? If a statement, then it is factually FALSE.
If it is supposed to be a question, it does not ask anything.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Sche
s for zpool and zfs are full of such useful information :-)
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On May 11, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
2013/5/11 Paul Kraus On May 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>
> > There's no mature (or flexible, or "can do what I want" ) way to
> > increase/decrease disk sizes in FreeBSD for now {ZFS,U
0 0
>da34p3 ONLINE 0 0 0
>da35p3 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> errors: No known data errors
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
would work
(manually setting the ashift to 12 for 4K disks).
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
ut new writes will not be.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
ase than in the
case of a mirror, as the RAID code will have less data to process after being
compressed.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
it folks to sign up for the
forum and NOT get a ton of email. If the forum were publicly readable that
would also provide a way to look through (if not search) the archives.
I am not trying to make work for people, just suggesting another way to
address the competing issues of SPAM redu
> attack or something else.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
>
> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD
>
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns
can also set copies=2/3 just in case some errors occur, so ZFS can
> auto0repair the data. if you run ZFS over several LUNs this will make even
> more sense.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
On May 18, 2013, at 12:49 AM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:03:30PM -0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
>> On May 17, 2013, at 6:24 PM, "b...@todoo.biz" wrote:
>>> 3. Should I avoid using ZFS since my system is not well tuned and It would
>>>
TB
29 times you get the same result.
But this is a statistical probability, and some drives will have more
(much more) uncorrectable errors and others will have less (much less),
although I don't know if the distribution falls on a typical gaussian (bell)
curve.
--
Paul
only under very heavy I/O load. I only generate such load
when migrating large amounts of data, which thankfully does not happen all that
often.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
__
th the production server with the 9.1 OS drives, make sure everything is
working the way you want
6) import the data zpool
If the import fails, you can always put the 9.0 drives back in and get back up
and running fairly quickly.
My system has the OS on a mirror zpool of two drives for just t
without DeDupe with as little as 2GB of
total system RAM (depending on what else the system is doing). In my
experience, the amount of RAM depends on the amount of I/O not the amount of
storage. I find between 1GB and 3GB space for the ARC is adequate.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director
f my time between 1995 and 2012 managing Solaris
systems. An occasional Linux system would crop up. When I started really
looking at FreeBSD in 2012 (I wanted ZFS and OpenSolaris / OpenIndiana /
NexentaCore / Illumos did not support my hardware) I was very happily surprised
that it "felt&qu
"thrashing" where it spends the
vast majority of it's time just paging in and out and not actually getting
anything done.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-q
c understanding resource forks, that I cannot speak
to, but it should be easy to test. Copy a directory from an HFS+ volume to a
non-Mac OS X volume (NFS for example) using rsync and see if it creates the ._
files to go with the data.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound
les special files. The
problem with it is that it tends to be slow (I had to validate
millions of files).
--
{1-2-----3-----4-5-6-7-}
Paul Kraus
-> Principal Consultant, Business Information Technology Systems
-> Deputy Technical Directo
rom a drive does not corrupt a
file.
--
{1-2-3-4-5-----6-7-}
Paul Kraus
-> Principal Consultant, Business Information Technology Systems
-> Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 (http://lonestarcon3.org/)
-> Sound Coordinator,
= 1 (0x1)
10709: read(7,"\^A\^A\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^A\0\0\0\^A"...,4096) = 32 (0x20)
10709: read(7,0x80193a02c,4096) ERR#35 'Resource
temporarily unavailable'
10709: read(7,0x80193a02c,4096) ERR#35 'Resource
temporarily unavai
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
>>
>> I am seeing very poor response time running the VitrualBox GUI via X11
>> tunneled over SSH via the Internet. The issue _appears_ to be limited
>> to
start it. Yes, I know
I could script it, but that adds one additional layer that needs to be
supported.
P.S. I did get my VM repaired, very slowly and painfully, but I still
need to track down the VBox GUI issue.
--
{1-2-3-4-5-6-7-}
Pa
reebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ and you
can then view that on your iPad. Look for the Bookshelf or some such, I use an
iPod Touch and while similar, they are not identical to the iPad.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schen
:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS , keeping in mind that lots of it was written
before FreeBSD 9. I would NOT use ZFS, especially for booting, prior to release
9 of FreeBSD. Some of the reason for this is the bugs that were fixed in zpool
version 28 (included in release 9).
--
Paul Kraus
-Arg : None
Start Time: 1357834512
Timeout : 300 (sec)
Verify return code: 20 (unable to get local issuer certificate)
---
+OK Gpop ready for requests from 208.105.14.76 j10pf1276456vde.5
^C
[root@MailArch /usr/local/openssl/certs]#
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCo
ory (but
they are in the directory that c_rehash is working in).
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
> On 1/10/13 12:49 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like you don't have the Gmail certificate installed
>>> locally, unless I'm mistaken.
>>
>> I do not need to have the Google cert i
On Jan 10, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 1/10/13 1:38 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
>
> I put the certs for my test in /etc/ssl/certs when using the base
> system openssl and in /usr/local/openssl/certs when using the openssl
> port.
>
> c_rehash uses a specific openss
?
When you give ZFS the whole disk, it writes an EFI-like label on the
drive and makes us of one partition for the ZFS data. So there *is* a form of
partitioning at the lower most layer, it is just *not* user managed
partitioning.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, Lon
efinition, be children of the rootpool) you will end up with
hierarchical datasets. This means that future operations on datasets will have
to take place in very specific order (such as mounting and un mounting). By
avoiding hierarchical datasets (that are actually used) you avoid that
complexity.
-
(even with some horribly
unreliable low cost HW RAID systems under the ZFS layer... if we had not used
ZFS we would have lost data multiple times).
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
_
t; ^ However Solaris/Sparc uses another labeling scheme. If you want to be
> ^ fully compatible with other system GPT is a better choice.
>
> Is GPT compatible with Solaris, can Solaris access a GPT disk?
AFAIK, none of the Solaris derived OSes can read a GPT disk label.
--
Paul Kraus
Deput
derived
OS, then the safe bet is to give ZFS the entire disk and let it create the disk
label.
*Solaris-based OSes that I have used:
Solaris 10
OpenSolaris
NCP (Nexenta Core Platform)
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schen
out
there but you have to look for them.
--
Paul Kraus
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
> often, and swap does not have to be mirrored.
Note that if you do NOT mirror SWAP, then in the event of a disk
failure you will most likely crash when the system tries to swap in some data
from the failed drive. If you mirror swap then you do not risk a crash due to
missing swa
d I get between 40 and 50 MB/sec throughput on a Gigabit
ethernet link. Since you have already ruled out the known sync issue with ZFS
and no SSD-based write cache, then perhaps you are running into an NFS 3 vs.
NFS 4 issue. I am not sure if Mac OS X is using NF
49 matches
Mail list logo