Re: File system full

2006-10-18 Thread Paul Murphy

Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear All,
My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I
have try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files
inside / but I still get 12 MB of free space with total 495 MB
worth of that partition. Any ideas?


First of all, try to track down where all the space has gone, by
using `df' and `du' with the -x option.  For example, you can get
a good idea of which places in your root filesystem are the top-10
users of space with:

# cd /
# du -xm . | sort -nr | head -10

If this doesn't show up a lot of stuff, then there's probably a
rogue process which has opened a file and then removed it, so
it's not directly visible by traversing the tree with `du', but
you can still look for it with:

# fstat -f / | sort -k +8

After you get this sort of information, we can make more informed
suggestions about the best way to move forward :)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




 I have been trying to track down a similar problem! Using the 
above method I think I have found 'natd' to be the culprit. Should 
'natd' receive a signal when 'alias.log' rolls over? Restarting 
'natd' seems to have releases some megabytes.



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0642-0, 17/10/2006
Tested on: 18/10/2006 7:13:37 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: Radeon x1600

2006-02-17 Thread Paul Murphy
Christian Reiss wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> So I fear there is no solution to get this card working in any
> way with BSD? No well-kept secret moves?
> 
> Oh well.
> 
> Thanks anyway!
> -Christian Reiss.
> 
> 
> --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< ---
> 
> Greetings people!
> 
> I am using FreeBSD for quiet some years now, and I just recently
> upgraded my PC. Along came a Radeon x1600 (PCIE). Before that I
> was a happy-happy joy-joy nvidia (-module) user - it just worked. ;)
> 
> Now I am having a dickens of a time to get the Radeon x1600 working
> under Xorg (latest) to work - even 2D would suffice. But google'ing
> around just yielded my own questions in several forums.
> 
> The ati and radeon drivers (native from xorg, which i am using
> out of a currents ports tree) did not work with that card.
> Unless, of course, some magic incantations are required.
> Just to be on the safe side, I am hording virgin blood right now.
> 
> Using the vesa driver my screen yells "input not supported", and
> forcing the vesa driver didnt work out. I got a TFT that can, and
> should do 1280x1024.
> 
> Using FreeBSD 6.0 Patch 4.
> 
> Any help would be more than welcome.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Christian Reiss.
> 
> --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< ---
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 

I asked a similar question earlier and got the response...X1600's are
unsupported.
Does your X1600 show up in dmesg, mine doesn't. I would think that
whether or nor Xwindow System supports it doesn't matter until FreeBSD
actually detects the card.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Sound and Video cards not detected at boot

2006-02-03 Thread Paul Murphy


- Original Message - 
From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Paul Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Sound and Video cards not detected at boot



"Paul Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Hardware:
Realtek High Definition Audio (integrated on mobo, ACL 880 I think)
Windows XP says 'Location 65535 (Internal High Definition Audio Bus)'

Radeon X1600
Windows XP says 'PCI bus 1, device 0, function 0'


Dmesg only shows the standard 'VGA' for video, and nothing for sound.

I have tried compiling all the sound drivers in the kernel, as well as
load sound.ko and snd_driver.ko as modules (without drivers in kernel).

dmesg, uname, pciconf and .asl output can be found at
http://home.cogeco.ca/~paul.murphy/

Thanks for any help people can provide!


Does this happen on 6.0?



(If you mean literally '6.0') Yes, I tried it with 6.0 before I cvsupped 
source.


(If you mean RELENG_6) See below:

FreeBSD earth.upton.net 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Feb
2 10:04:09 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EARTH 
i386


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Sound and Video cards not detected at boot

2006-02-02 Thread Paul Murphy

Hardware:
   Realtek High Definition Audio (integrated on mobo, ACL 880 I think)
Windows XP says 'Location 65535 (Internal High Definition Audio Bus)'

   Radeon X1600
Windows XP says 'PCI bus 1, device 0, function 0'


Dmesg only shows the standard 'VGA' for video, and nothing for sound.

I have tried compiling all the sound drivers in the kernel, as well as load 
sound.ko and snd_driver.ko as modules (without drivers in kernel).


dmesg, uname, pciconf and .asl output can be found at 
http://home.cogeco.ca/~paul.murphy/


Thanks for any help people can provide! 


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: VIA KM266

2004-07-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:22:00 -0400
"Darkbackwardz co. ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have just installed FreeBSD version 4.10 along with KDE and the 
> X-Window system on my x86 PC, unfortunately, when I type "startx" at
> the command line I get this error message:
> 
> "XFree86 Version 4.3.0
> Release Date: 27 February 2003
> X Protocol version II Revision 0 Release 6.6
> Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.10 i386 [ELF]
> Build Date: 29 April 2004
> 
> Before reporting problems check http://www.XFree86.Org to make sure
> you have the latest version
> 
> Module loader present
> Markers: (--)probed, (**) from config file, (= =) default setting, (+
> +) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning,
> (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
> 
> 
> (= =) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed June 30 23:43:12
> 2004(= =) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config"
> 
> (WW) SAVAGE: chipset "ProSavage DDR" in device section "VIA
> ProSavage8" isn't valid for this driver
> 
> (EE) No devices detected
> 
> Fatal server error:
> no screens found
> 
> 
> When reporting a problem related to server crash, please send the full
> server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the
> lof file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log. Please report problems to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown)
> X auth: creating new authority file /root/.Xauthority
> xauth: (argv) :1: bad display name ":0" in remove command
> xauth: (argv) :1: bad display name ":0" in remove command
> #"
> 
> 
> 
> I'm quite sure that I've chosen the wrong video driver during setup,
> my computer runs on a VIA KM266 chipset with an integrated S3
> ProSavage8 DDR video card (Seen here: 
> http://www.via.com.tw/en/ProSavage%20Chipsets/km266.jsp )
>  Which BSD driver would best suit this card? So far I've tried
>  selecting 
> the ProSavageK category and the driver labled "savage", as well as the
> "generic-vga" category and "vga" driver in the XFree86 setup.
>If my card isn't supported by BSD, which one of the drivers on 
> http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=296 would I use and how would I
> install it from a floppy disc? I've already installed the
> compatibility packages for Linux binaries, but I don't know which
> version would be best accepted.
> 
> 
> Any help would be appreciated!
>-Melinda Coates
> 
> 
> 
> 

 I have a similar setup and this is the Device section I use:

Section "Device"
Option  "NoUseBIOS"
Identifier  "ProSavageDDR"
Driver  "savage"
VendorName  "S3 Inc."
BoardName   "[ProSavageDDR K4M266]"
BusID   "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
 


-- 
Cogeco ergo sum




pgpaTSMa4fBId.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[OT]Re: Manually starting RCng scripts disabled in rc.conf

2004-05-17 Thread Paul Murphy
On Mon, 17 May 2004 12:30:32 -0600
"Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On May 17, 2004, at 11:53 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> 
> > RCng scripts require an entry in /etc/rc.conf along the lines of
> > _enable="YES" otherwise the script will fail to do
> > anything.
> >
> 
> As an aside, you may want to use /etc/rc.conf.local instead.
> 
> on a related note:
> 
> One problem is that it appears that /usr/local/etc/rc.d is NOT a 
> full-citizen in the rcNG system.  You must have a .sh on the end,
> which is not true of things in /etc/rc.d  . I do not know if this
> means that /usr/local/etc/rc.d scripts run inside the main process as
> a .sh script does from /etc/rc.d or if it runs as a sub-process.  In
> /etc/rc.d, ones without .sh run as sub-processes of the main startup
> script, while ones ending with .sh run in the main process...
> 
> Chad
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

 Slightly off topic, but is there any documentation for RCng? The
'examples' in [/usr/local]/etc/rc.d are not very self-explanatory.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum




pgpsQJuZnZpDC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: clamav ports

2004-03-10 Thread Paul Murphy
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:34:44 -0500
Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 10, 2004, at 9:26 PM, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
> 
> > Bart -
> >
> > just a thought, but it is possible that the port updated the virus 
> > database to the possibly older version in the distfile.  You may
> > want to run freshclam and see if this clears up the issue. Hopefully
> > thats all the problem is.
> >
> > hope this helps
> >
> 
> On a lark, I reran the test (situation: I ssh to my home account that 
> isn't filtered, and send myself two small viruses that some MS user
> was so kind to have unknowingly sent to me...I'm using Mac to
> store/send them, so I guess it's nice to be immune when I have to test
> these things :-)
> 
> Weird.  It caught it this time.  And I did run a freshclam, thinking 
> something odd happened to the database.  Perhaps clamd just doesn't
> see the update right away?  (there's also a freshclam run from a cron 
> script every four hours or so).  I doublechecked and I wasn't
> imagining things; one virus I sent slipped right through the first
> time, but this time in an identical test almost five hours later the
> antivirus on the FreeBSD filter slapped it right down.
> 
> Not gonna question it though, as long as it's working!  Thanks!
> 

 Just a thought, do you have '#NotifyClamd [/optional/config/file/path]'
uncommented in freshclam.conf


-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: cdbakeoven errors when burning multiple tracks

2004-01-11 Thread Paul Murphy
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm setting up cdbakeoven on FreeBSD 4.8 and I'm
> trying to burn a set of MP3 files to an audio CD.
> Everything works fine if I only burn a single track,
> but when I try to do more than one it appears to trip
> over itself when writing to the /tmp directory. Here's
> the results of "dump", the error message seems to be
> on the last line with  "no such file or directory..."
> 

[snip]

> Burn failed!
> 

 I have been struggling with this same problem.

 The part that puzzles me is "No read access for
'/usr/tmp/cdbo_audio_1_10_17_55_31.wav etc..'"

 It doesn't seem to be a permissions problem because I too have run as
root plus changed permissions on everything to world readable.

Eric F Crist wrote:
> Do you have cdrecord installed?  It seems as if this program depends
> on it.  If so, make sure it's been installed to the directory that
> cdbakeoven expects it in.  If not, either create a link, or change the
> config for cdbakeoven.io 


[earth] /home/paul: which cdrecord
/usr/local/bin/cdrecord
[earth] /home/paul: which cdbakeoven
/usr/local/bin/cdbakeoven

 From cdrecord(1):
 To record a pure CD-DA (audio) at single speed, with each track
contained in a file named track01.cdaudio, track02.cdaudio, etc: 

 
cdrecord -v speed=1 dev=2,0 -audio track*.cdaudio 

 I wonder if the way cdbakeoven feeds multiple track names to cdrecord
is the problem? (note wild card)

 Anyway, keep me CC'ed if anyone has any solutions.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Stuff

2003-12-23 Thread Paul Murphy
 Terrilynn could you please make sure your mum gets the attachment on
this message. Thanx

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


What have I missed? (linux_dri)

2003-11-11 Thread Paul Murphy
 I have installed emulators/linux_base-8 and graphics/linux_dri but
/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo reports:

[earth] /root: /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo
/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo: error while loading shared
libraries: libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory

 Have I missed installing some other port?

p.s. Native DRI is installed and works fine.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Weirdness with permissions after mounting USB flash drive

2003-11-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:06:19 +0100
Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Paul Murphy:
> 
> >  I'm stumped!
> 
> Once fstab  is properly configured,  of course the mount  command
> should be  invoked without  options  and  with only  one  argument,
> the  target directory:
> 
> mount /mns/usbkey
> 
> Did you do that?

 Yes. BTW, just upgraded to 4.9-STABLE from 4.9-RC? and now that
'mount_msdos' accepts '-M' everything works fine.

 Still stumped, but happy!

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Freebsd 4.8 Command to finish typing

2003-10-23 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:54:58 -0400
Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Ruben de Groot writes:
> 
> >  > How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older
> >  > version I just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
> >  
> >  That depends on your shell. You're probably used to a
> >  bourne-shell variant like ksh, where  is used for word
> >  completion. In csh, use the  key.
> 
>   And note this is not "line completion" but file name completion
> - it will fill in as much as uniquely possible of the path starting
> with what you have already typed. 
> 
> 
>   Robert Huff

 If the command is in your history, arrow-up does "line completion"
(csh).

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Trying to see website from the Internet

2003-10-21 Thread Paul Murphy
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Micke P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I opened the port on my (hardware) router box, not
> > the
> > > FreeBSD firewall. Internet -> ISP -> Modem ->
> > Router
> > > -> FreeBSD box. Hopefully that's all I need to do
> > to
> > > forward the port 8080 packets. Do I need to
> > configure
> > > the FreeBSD firewall settings as well to reflect
> > the
> > > port?
> > 
> > no, if you can get to the website from inside your
> > hardware firewall (a
> > machine other then your freeBSD box) then the
> > problem ly's with either
> > your hardware firewall, or your ISP.  What Brand
> > firewall do you have? 
> > Remeber that just opening port 8080 will not work,
> > you have to go into the
> > "Port Forwarding" section of your firewall and
> > forward the 8080 port to
> > your inside box
> 
> While it's not called Port Forwarding on the router
> setup, I'm certain that is what I've set up. 
> 
> Do you know what an ISP, earthlink, in this case,
> might do to keep you from serving pages? I'm using
> another port from 80, because I just get the ISP modem
> status page when using the dynamic IP with the normal
> 80 port.
> 
> I'm afraid I'm just frustratedly baffled.
> 

 Are you sure Earthlink is not blocking all the obvious HTTP
server ports? Try using some arbitrary port >32000

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Weirdness with permissions after mounting USB flash drive

2003-10-21 Thread Paul Murphy
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:26:17 +0200
Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Paul Murphy:
> 
> > Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > * Paul Murphy:
> > >
> > > >  I _can_ read/write to it as root,  but I would really like to
> > > >  use
> > > > it as a non-root user. Any thoughts as to why this is happening?
> > >
> > > [...] in  /etc/fstab you may  adjust the  mode, see below  -m700
> > > for msdos filesystem:
> > >
> > > /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbkey msdos rw,-m700,noauto 0 0
> >
> > fstab: /dev/da0s1 /flash_drive msdos rw,-m775,noauto 0 0
> >
> >
> > mounted  permisions:  d-  1  root  wheel  22016  Dec  31 
> > 1979 flash_drive
> 
> FWIW you could check if your  specific FreeBSD supports the -m switch
> by looking at the mount_msdosfs man page.
> 

 Seems to, at least the man page says so.

 Also tried 'chmod 755 /flash_drive' after the fact, but it is silently
ignored.

 I'm stumped!

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Weirdness with permissions after mounting USB flash drive

2003-10-21 Thread Paul Murphy
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:15:58 +0200
Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Paul Murphy:
> 
> >  I _can_ read/write to  it as root, but I would really  like to use
> >  it
> > as a non-root user. Any thoughts as to why this is happening?
> 
> See FreeBSD  FAQ[1].  Also, in /etc/fstab  you may adjust the  mode,
> see below -m700 for msdos filesystem:
> 
> /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usbkey msdos rw,-m700,noauto 0 0
> 

usbd.conf:
device "Flash Drive"
devname "umass0"
vendor 0x0ea0
product 0x2168
release 0x0200
attach "/sbin/mount /flash_drive"


fstab:
/dev/da0s1  /flash_drivemsdos   rw,-m775,noauto 0   0


mounted permisions:
d-1 root  wheel22016 Dec 31  1979 flash_drive


cd to /flash_drive as non-root user:
flash_drive: Permission denied.

FWIW:
vfs.usermount: 1

(Mounting is no problem, usbd does that for me. It's _how_ it's mounted
that is the problem)


 As a side note, the device has a little slider that is supposed to lock
the drive from being written to. Does FreeBSD honour this? Is this a 
software or hardware lock?
 I'm pretty sure in the above case it is in the unlock position.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Weirdness with permissions after mounting USB flash drive

2003-10-20 Thread Paul Murphy
usbd.conf snippet:

device "Flash Drive"
devname "umass0"
vendor 0x0ea0
product 0x2168
release 0x0200
attach "/sbin/mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 /flash_drive"

permissions of '/flash_drive' before mounting:

drwxrwxrwx2 root  wheel  512 Oct 20 22:27 flash_drive


permissions of '/flash_drive' after mounting:

d-1 root  wheel22016 Dec 31  1979 flash_drive

(notice the date too!)


 I _can_ read/write to it as root, but I would really like to use it as
a non-root user. Any thoughts as to why this is happening?


[earth] /: usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), rev
1.00 port 1 powered
 port 2 addr 2: power 200 mA, config 1, Flash Disk  (0x2168), USB   
 (0x0ea0), rev 2.00

[earth] /: uname -a
FreeBSD earth.upton.net 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #0: Fri Oct 17 17:05:59
EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EARTH_ACPI  i386

/var/log/messages snippet:

Oct 20 22:41:55 earth /kernel: umass0: USB  Flash Disk  , rev
2.00/2.00, addr 2 
Oct 20 22:41:55 earth /kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0
target 0 lun 0 
Oct 20 22:41:55 earth /kernel: da0:  Removable
Direct Access SCSI-2 device 
Oct 20 22:41:55 earth /kernel: da0: 650KB/s transfers 
Oct 20 22:41:55 earth /kernel: da0: 125MB (256000 512 byte sectors: 64H
32S/T 125C)


-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mail-list PGP Keys

2003-10-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:27:29 -0700
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:15:03PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote:
> 
> > How do I submit my keys?
> > 
> > TIA
> 
> 1) Don't middle-post
> 
> 2) Read the URL provided.
> 
> > > > Just a little pet peeve.
> > >
> > > AFAIK, most people use http://pgp.mit.edu to submit their keys.
> 
> Kris

 FWIW, have you checked _your_ pgp key lately, I always get:

BAD signature from "Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
aka "Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
aka "Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"



-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ports : Mozilla / Mozilla-devel

2003-10-01 Thread Paul Murphy
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:23:36 -0500
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In the last episode (Sep 30), Mike Hogsett said:
> > I have been pulling my hair out over this.  I installed a package
> > several days ago that required gettext.  The gettext in ports has
> > been updated so I had to deinstall the existing on and install the
> > version from ports.
> > 
> > After that mozilla and mozilla-devel (and some other stuff) wont run
> > becuase libintl.so.4 no longer exists. (gettext from ports installs
> > libintl.so.5 now).
> > 
> > I pkg_delete'd mozilla and mozilla-devel and rebuilt (have tried
> > both) but even after they build and install they are still asking
> > for libintl.so.4!!
> 
> They may be linking against a shared library that requires
> libintl.so.4.
> 
> > I rm -rf'd /usr/ports and cvsup'd back hoping to clear any cruft
> > that may have remained and rebuilt mozilla-devel, still no dice!
> > 
> > Anyone have a suggestion how I can get either of these ports to work
> > again?
> 
> At this point, you'll probably have to rebuild all the ports that
> depended on the old gettext.  The portupgrade tools minimize this risk
> by preserving old shlibs in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg, so you can
> upgrade dependant ports at your leisure.
> 

 Before upgrading just about _everything_ (which you will do if you
upgrade dependencies in gettext) try upgrading your GNOME-ish ports, I
found these were the holdouts when doing as you originally did.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: xmms-arts plugin

2003-09-11 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:11:36 +0200
Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wednesday 10 September 2003 01:49, Todd Stephens wrote:
> 
> > > I am having a lot of pain trying to compile the xmms-arts plugin
> > > available from xmms.org, since it is not in the ports anymore. If
> > > anyone uses the xmms-arts plugin on freebsd I would really
> > > appreciate any help. I am running FreeBSD-4.8 STABLE, with the
> > > ports cvsuped and upraded today.
> > I do not believe you need it.  I am running XMMS under KDE with no
> > arts plugin without any problems at all.
> 
> You don't *need* it, but xmms will lock the sound-device while playing
> and thus hindering kde-apps using it. One solution is to use vchans,
> but it sound *awfull* with my HW. An arts-plugin to xmms would be
> really nice, but I never got the plugin working apart from crashing
> everythin IIRC.
> 
> Bjarne

 I have 'artsd' set-up to use /dev/dsp0.1 (while xmms uses /dev/dsp) and
both co-exist nicely.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: using FreeBSD plus KDE as a kiosk

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 16:42:36 -0500
"Matt Hartzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am interested in using FreeBSD and KDE as a semi-publicly accessible
> internet terminal.  I have a web-based application that I would like
> to run from this type of setup.
> 
> Does anyone have any experience using a setup like this? Can any one
> point me toward relevant documents?
> 

 The KDE site (www.kde.org) does have a HOWTO for KDE in kiosk mode. I
don't have the url handy but I know I've read it there.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Undo MBR

2003-09-04 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:38:04 -0400
Paul Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:11:25 +0100
> Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:00:30PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 05:13 pm, Paul Murphy wrote:
> > > >  I have just installed FBSD-CURRENT on a test box. During
> > > >  install I
> > > > unwittingly installed a BootMgr entry for the second HDD (it
> > > > will just be a data disk, no need to boot from it).
> > > >
> > > >  If I do 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rad2 count=15' will this
> > > >  "erase"
> > > > the BootMgr or will I have to redo Fdisk and etcetera. There is
> > > > no data on the disk yet so this would be no hardship, but is
> > > > there a"proper" way of doing what I want?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  Just to clarify, upon booting I get:
> > > >
> > > > F1 FreeBSD
> > > > F5 Drive 1
> > > >
> > > >  but I just want to boot straight into FreeBSD, no "dual-boot".
> > > 
> > > I don't know why you are fretting about this prompt and
> > > momentarily pause in the boot process. Also think you are confused
> > > about the MBR thing on the 2nd drive.
> > > 
> > > The prompt above is coming from your first HD. If the BIOS did not
> > > know about the 2nd drive the F5 entry would not be there and the
> > > FreeBSD F1 entry would still be there. You could hide this prompt
> > > by retuning the MBR to pause 0 or 1 seconds. Zero might be
> > > infinite.
> > > 
> > > To eliminate the prompt, wipe the HD and reinstall "dangerously 
> > > dedicated." The result will be a disk which lacks the headers
> > > which allows other x86 OS's to understand what/how the disk is
> > > used.
> > 
> > Errr... That's a little excessive.  The quick way to remove the
> > FreeBSd boot manager and restore a standard MBR is:
> > 
> > # boot0cfg -B -b /boot/mbr ad0
> > 
> > (The OP might want to do that on his data disk ad2 as well).  No
> > changes to the filesystems on those disks should be necessary.
> > 
> 
>  THAT'S what I was looking for! I knew it should have something to do
> with boot0cfg, just didn't read the man page closely enough I guess.
> 

 Hmm, problems...

# boot0cfg -B -b /boot/mbr ad0
# boot0cfg: /boot/mbr: unknown or incompatible boot code

 Now, a little bit of history:

 This is a new install if FBSD-CURRENT from binaries, after which I
realized I shouldn't have installed BootMgr. Then I tried to 'undo' it
but having no success I did the email thing.

 _Meanwhile_ I did a CVS upgrade to FBSD-HEAD (for unrelated problems).

 I shouldn't think this would cause the boot0cfg error though. The
/boot/mbr file is pretty stable code isn't it?


-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Undo MBR

2003-09-04 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:11:25 +0100
Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:00:30PM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 05:13 pm, Paul Murphy wrote:
> > >  I have just installed FBSD-CURRENT on a test box. During install
> > >  I
> > > unwittingly installed a BootMgr entry for the second HDD (it will
> > > just be a data disk, no need to boot from it).
> > >
> > >  If I do 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rad2 count=15' will this "erase"
> > > the BootMgr or will I have to redo Fdisk and etcetera. There is no
> > > data on the disk yet so this would be no hardship, but is there a
> > > "proper" way of doing what I want?
> > >
> > >
> > >  Just to clarify, upon booting I get:
> > >
> > >   F1 FreeBSD
> > >   F5 Drive 1
> > >
> > >  but I just want to boot straight into FreeBSD, no "dual-boot".
> > 
> > I don't know why you are fretting about this prompt and momentarily 
> > pause in the boot process. Also think you are confused about the MBR
> > thing on the 2nd drive.
> > 
> > The prompt above is coming from your first HD. If the BIOS did not
> > know about the 2nd drive the F5 entry would not be there and the
> > FreeBSD F1 entry would still be there. You could hide this prompt by
> > retuning the MBR to pause 0 or 1 seconds. Zero might be infinite.
> > 
> > To eliminate the prompt, wipe the HD and reinstall "dangerously 
> > dedicated." The result will be a disk which lacks the headers which 
> > allows other x86 OS's to understand what/how the disk is used.
> 
> Errr... That's a little excessive.  The quick way to remove the
> FreeBSd boot manager and restore a standard MBR is:
> 
> # boot0cfg -B -b /boot/mbr ad0
> 
> (The OP might want to do that on his data disk ad2 as well).  No
> changes to the filesystems on those disks should be necessary.
> 

 THAT'S what I was looking for! I knew it should have something to do
with boot0cfg, just didn't read the man page closely enough I guess.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Undo MBR

2003-09-04 Thread Paul Murphy
 Thanks for the replies.

>  I have just installed FBSD-CURRENT on a test box. During install I
[etc]

> So, if there is nothing to be lost, just try it out and see what
> happens.  Smoke testing is a tried and true technique.

 Nothing ventured, nothing gained!

> You kind of have to read the disklabel man page in conjunction with
> the fdisk man page to make any sense of things, and then it may still
> take some experimenting.

 Yes I think that's where I got my previous command line from (or
someplace similar) although the example I read said 'count=15' vs.
'count=32'

> If you have a bootable DOS disk with fdisk, you can clear the MBR
> without destroying partitions by executing:
> 
> fdisk /mbr

 I did know that, I just wanted to do it The FreeBSD Way(tm).

> corresponding switches/parameters, but the questioner said there was 
> nothing to save on the disk

 Yes

> and wanted to wipe it, so...

 Not necessarily, if I could do it without (potentially) destroying any
data, that would be the ideal solution (for future reference).

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Undo MBR

2003-09-03 Thread Paul Murphy
 I have just installed FBSD-CURRENT on a test box. During install I
unwittingly installed a BootMgr entry for the second HDD (it will
just be a data disk, no need to boot from it).

 If I do 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rad2 count=15' will this "erase" the
BootMgr or will I have to redo Fdisk and etcetera. There is no data
on the disk yet so this would be no hardship, but is there a "proper"
way of doing what I want?


 Just to clarify, upon booting I get:

F1 FreeBSD
F5 Drive 1

 but I just want to boot straight into FreeBSD, no "dual-boot".

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Konqueror as sftp client

2003-09-02 Thread Paul Murphy
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:31:23 -0400
Robert Froese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've used Konqueror as a graphical sftp frontend in the past under
> GNU/Linux.  It doesn't work on my FreeBSD 5.1 system.  For example, if
> I type
> 

 I've never thought of using Konqueror as an sftp client! However it
works flawlessly on my FBSD 4.8 box.

FreeBSD earth.upton.net 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Sat Jul 19
16:00:50 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EARTH 
i386

Konqueror 3.1.3 (Using KDE 3.1.3)

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:00:53 +
Andrew Sparrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:58:54PM +0100, Charlie Root wrote:
> > According to Paul Murphy:
> > > mplayer -vo x11 -stop_xscreensaver -zoom  
> > 
> > For a full screen on ati I prefere 
> > 
> >  mplayer -vo dga -stop_xscreensaver -zoom file.avi 
> >  ^^^
> 
> You might also like to try:
> 
>   mplayer -vo xvidix -zoom -fs (etc.)
> 
> This also requires root privs, like DGA (curses!). Unlike DGA, you
> can't fix it with SGID perms on mplayer and /dev/mem (which implies
> that GtK GUI mode won't work, as this stops running if the EUID is 0)
> 
> Xvidix seems to needs to open the video device as root, and there
> are only a limited number of built-in graphics devices (happily
> from my POV, Mach64 is one of them).

 rage128 too!

 To OP (I forget who that was), all these methods work fullscreen for
me. The best description of my card is:

[earth] /home/paul: scanpci

[snip]
pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x5046
 ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS

 If it is not just a mis-configuration on your part then I guess there
is a (major) difference between the Rage PRO and the Rage 128 PRO.
(Where I bought the computer from, they called it "Rage Fury PRO")

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:19:35 +0100
Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thursday 20 March 2003 15:51, Paul Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:58:54 +0100
> >
> > Charlie Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > According to Paul Murphy:
> > > > mplayer -vo x11 -stop_xscreensaver -zoom  
> > >
> > > For a full screen on ati I prefere
> > >
> > >  mplayer -vo dga -stop_xscreensaver -zoom file.avi
> > >  ^^^
> >
> >  That doesn't work for me. According to the mplayer FAQ you need...
> >
> > (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA
> >
> > ...but my XFree86.0.log doesn't show that.
> 
> You need to have
> 
> Load "extmod"
> 
> in your 'Section "Module"' in XF86Config, and make sure you have NOT
> 
> SubSection "extmod"
>   Option  "omit XFree86-DGA"
> EndSubSection
> 
> somewhere in there, too.

 Doh!

> 
> >
> >  Also dga must be run as root.
> 
> Or change permissions for /dev/mem.
> 

 Just read permission, right?

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:58:54 +0100
Charlie Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> According to Paul Murphy:
> > mplayer -vo x11 -stop_xscreensaver -zoom  
> 
> For a full screen on ati I prefere 
> 
>  mplayer -vo dga -stop_xscreensaver -zoom file.avi 
>  ^^^
> 

 That doesn't work for me. According to the mplayer FAQ you need...

(II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA

...but my XFree86.0.log doesn't show that.

 Also dga must be run as root.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:53:16 +0100
Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 06:35:22AM -0500, Paul Murphy wrote:
> >  MPlayer command line:
> > 
> > mplayer -vo x11 -stop_xscreensaver -zoom  
> 
> But now you're not using xv according to 'mplayer -vo help':
> 
> Available video output drivers:
> xv  X11/Xv
> x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm )
> 
> Does mplayer -vo xv work?
> 
> --Stijn (without an ATI but just trying to make sure I understand -vo
> right)
> 

 Oops, you are correct. However 'mplayer -vo xv -stop_xscreensaver -zoom
' still does fullscreen.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: No xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro?

2003-03-20 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:34:39 +0100
Heinrich Rebehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Is there any driver that provides xvideo support for ATI Rage Pro /
> 128?

 It works for me:

[earth] /home/paul: dmesg | grep ATI
pci1:  at 0.0 irq 11
drm0:  port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem
0xdb00-0xdb003fff,0xdc00-0xdfff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1

[earth] /home/paul: xvinfo
X-Video Extension version 2.2
screen #0
  Adaptor #0: "ATI Rage128 Video Overlay"
number of ports: 1
port base: 61
[snip]

 From /etc/X11/XF86Config:

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Rage 128"
Driver  "ati"
VendorName  "ATI"
BoardName   "Rage 128 Pro PF"
BusID   "PCI:1:0:0"
#VideoRam32768
# Insert Clocks lines here if appropriate
Option  "Display" "BIOS"
Option  "AGPMode" "4"
EndSection

 MPlayer command line:

mplayer -vo x11 -stop_xscreensaver -zoom  

[earth] /home/paul: uname -a
FreeBSD earth.upton.net 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #2: Sun Mar 16
11:02:18 EST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EARTH 
i386

 Hope that helps.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Shell variables

2002-12-12 Thread Paul Murphy
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:43:34 -0600
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In the last episode (Dec 12), Paul Murphy said:
> >  I am having trouble understanding what is the difference between
> >  "$variable" and "${variable}".
> > 
> >  I have read sh(1) and understand than ${} is a "parameter" and can
> >  contain more than just a variable, but browsing through /etc/rc I
> >  see lots of "${variable}" (i.e. "case ${svc_val} in").
> > 
> >  Is this just for readability or is there some functional difference?
> 
> Mainly readability, but sometimes you need the {}'s to delimit the
> variable name: compare
> 
> echo texttext${variablehere}texttext
> 
> vs.
> 
> echo texttext$variableheretexttext
> 

 Thanks all, I've got it now.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum



msg11874/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Shell variables

2002-12-12 Thread Paul Murphy
 I am having trouble understanding what is the difference between "$variable" and 
"${variable}".

 I have read sh(1) and understand than ${} is a "parameter" and can contain more than 
just a variable, but browsing through /etc/rc I see lots of "${variable}" (i.e. "case 
${svc_val} in").

 Is this just for readability or is there some functional difference?

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum



msg11858/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: NFS from win to fbsd

2002-10-27 Thread Paul Murphy
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:50:47 -0500 (EST)
"Michael Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Anyone know of a decent, free NFS client for win32 that can access exports
> from my fbsd nfsd?
> 

 How about 30 Free Trial?

 NFS Maestro (http://www.hummingbird.com/)



-- 
Cogeco ergo sum





msg06813/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mylex Controller

2002-09-18 Thread Paul Murphy

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 07:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Arie Kachler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> One of our mail server hard drives went dead and when
> we issue a mlxcontrol check command we get the
> following error:
> 
> su-2.05# mlxcontrol check mlxd0
> mlxcontrol: ioctl MLXD_CHECKASYNC: Cannot allocate
> memory
> 
> This server used to be Linux and this happened before,
> so I know there is a posibility that the failure is
> logical rather than physical. So to be able to recover
> the drive logically would be the best solution, as
> opposed to replacing the drive.
> 
> Any help as to why the mlxcontrol command is not
> working will be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Arie Kachler
> SysAdmin/Telcom.net
> 

 Just tried the command, get the same error. The console says "mlx0: command failed - 
invalid or non-redundant drive"

Hardware and config available upon request.

-- 
Cogeco ergo sum





msg02097/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature