Re: acroread update: /compat/linux/usr/bin/strip:No such file ordirectory

2003-06-25 Thread Adam
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 19:07, Rob Lahaye wrote: Hi, I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 with up-to-date software from ports. Yesterday I upgraded (with portsupgrade) acroread (5.06 to 5.07) and in the process, I got this message: [...] === Generating temporary packing list /usr/bin/sed -i '' -E

Burning Nero .bin images

2003-03-27 Thread Daniela
Hi! Can anyone tell me how I could burn the Nero .bin and .cue files (without installing Nero)? Is there a program (preferably a command line tool) to turn them into simple ISO images? Please help me. Thanks in advance. Daniela ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Burning Nero .bin images

2003-03-27 Thread Andy Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ~ On 27-Mar-2003, Daniela wrote message Burning Nero .bin images ~ Hi! Can anyone tell me how I could burn the Nero .bin and .cue files

Re: Burning Nero .bin images

2003-03-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Daniela wrote: Hi! Can anyone tell me how I could burn the Nero .bin and .cue files (without installing Nero)? Is there a program (preferably a command line tool) to turn them into simple ISO images? Please help me. Thanks

/usr/local/bin/sed_inplace: not found

2003-03-14 Thread David Banning
I am getting this error message while trying to load /usr/ports/print/hpijs which is a part of apsfilter. This system is older; FreeBSD 4.3 (S) - is sed_inplace new? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message

Re: /usr/local/bin/sed_inplace: not found

2003-03-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 14), David Banning said: I am getting this error message while trying to load /usr/ports/print/hpijs which is a part of apsfilter. This system is older; FreeBSD 4.3 (S) - is sed_inplace new? Try manually installing the textproc/sed_inplace port first. The hpjis

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-03-03 Thread abc
. It also suffers from problems with arguments that are meant to include spaces, like: #!/bin/sh hello world foo bar Without a fully functional sh(1)-like parser, any solution that does magic with argv[] is incomplete :-( Apologies for a delayed response. This concerned how to load execve

Re: MAINTAINER for /usr/src/bin/rm

2003-02-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
So I'm trying to figure out who the Maintainer for /usr/src/bin/rm/ might be. I understand that this is part of the base system. So if there isn't a MAINTAINER for any thing for the base system who should I contact for code submissions? Send the patch to one of the technical mailing lists

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-28 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
contiguously with whitespace separated elements, so one could use constructs such as #!/bin/sh /script-preprocessor options, and to allow #!/interpreter opt1 opt2 and #!/interpreter opt1 arg1 type constructs, things that intuitively work as one would expect on a command line, since there didn't

/bin/sh logout script

2003-02-25 Thread dick hoogendijk
For bash I can use .bash_profile and .bash_logout to get things done at login/logout time. On my fbsd machine I use /bin/sh and I can't find how to execute things at logout time (login is set in .profile). I.e. I want to remove the ssh-agent pig at logout time and clear the screen) Does /bin/sh

Re: /bin/sh logout script

2003-02-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:19:45PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: For bash I can use .bash_profile and .bash_logout to get things done at login/logout time. On my fbsd machine I use /bin/sh and I can't find how to execute things at logout time (login is set in .profile). I.e. I want to remove

Re: /bin/sh logout script

2003-02-25 Thread Ciprian Badescu
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: /bin/sh logout script On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:19:45PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: For bash I can use .bash_profile and .bash_logout to get things done at login/logout time. On my fbsd machine I use /bin/sh and I can't find how to execute things at logout time

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
)-like parsers that would understand most of the sh(1) shell syntax would be exactly that... incomplete. Another bad thing about this is that you would then need a lot more memory to handle things like: #!/bin/sh -c \ 'my-magic-script.sh arg1 arg2 \ arg3

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-09 Thread abc
methods. i thank you very much for explaining this to me. Another bad thing about this is that you would then need a lot more memory to handle things like: #!/bin/sh -c \ 'my-magic-script.sh arg1 arg2 \ arg3 ...' \ `backquoted command` I'm not objecting

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
it breaks less flexible methods. It also suffers from problems with arguments that are meant to include spaces, like: #!/bin/sh hello world foo bar Without a fully functional sh(1)-like parser, any solution that does magic with argv[] is incomplete :-( To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-09 Thread abc
minor correction/addition to previous post: instead of infinitely recursive, i should've said that it would break things if script re-exec's the same file with a different interpreter. -- #!/bin/sh . script this won't work if script is going to do something before exec'ing

#!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-08 Thread abc
say i have 2 scripts, scriptA and scriptB. scriptA --- #!/bin/sh ./scriptB 1 2 3 scriptB --- #!/bin/sh echo 0:$0 echo 1:$1 echo 2:$2 echo 3:$3 -- $ ./scriptA $0:./scriptB $1:1 $2:2 $3:3 -- according to execve(2), only a single [arg] should be recognized: #! interpreter [arg

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-08 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: say i have 2 scripts, scriptA and scriptB. scriptA --- #!/bin/sh ./scriptB 1 2 3 scriptB --- #!/bin/sh echo 0:$0 echo 1:$1 echo 2:$2 echo 3:$3 -- $ ./scriptA $0:./scriptB $1:1 $2:2 $3:3 -- according to execve(2), only

Re: #!/bin/sh execve

2003-02-08 Thread abc
after the shebang, followed by command line options/args. but it sure muddies the water if you don't. otherwise there is a can of worms unnecessarily: #!/bin/sh -xthis is obviously ok. #!/bin/sh -vx this is obviously ok too. #!/bin/sh -cstringthis is currently not ok

Adding /usr/X11R6/bin to the /etc/rc PATH (was: Re: Why no /dev/one?)

2003-01-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-30 17:22, Roger Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I've asked in a separate question to the list, would adding /usr/X11R6/bin to the PATH statement in /etc/rc be a Bad Idea (tm)? Yes, it would be a bad idea. Is there need for anything under /usr/X11R6/bin while booting the system

Re: mozilla build port hangs at /usr/bin/sed

2003-01-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-27 13:12:39 +0100: Hi, i can't build mozilla from ports on FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE. It hangs at this point: /usr/bin/sed -e s|%%PREFIX%%|/usr/X11R6|g -e s|%%MOZILLA%%|mozilla|g /usr/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla

Re: mozilla build port hangs at /usr/bin/sed

2003-01-28 Thread Pascal Giannakakis
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-27 13:12:39 +0100: Hi, i can't build mozilla from ports on FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE. It hangs at this point: /usr/bin/sed -e s|%%PREFIX%%|/usr/X11R6|g -e s|%%MOZILLA%%|mozilla|g /usr/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh /usr/ports/www

Re: mozilla build port hangs at /usr/bin/sed

2003-01-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-28 16:54:20 +0100: # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-27 13:12:39 +0100: Hi, i can't build mozilla from ports on FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE. It hangs at this point: /usr/bin/sed -e s|%%PREFIX%%|/usr/X11R6|g -e s|%%MOZILLA%%|mozilla|g /usr

mozilla build port hangs at /usr/bin/sed

2003-01-27 Thread Pascal Giannakakis
Hi, i can't build mozilla from ports on FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE. It hangs at this point: /usr/bin/sed -e s|%%PREFIX%%|/usr/X11R6|g -e s|%%MOZILLA%%|mozilla|g /usr/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/mozilla (cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist

RE: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-26 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Assuming you have the object files from a buildworld hanging around, then cd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/vi cc -O -pipe -o vi *.o -lncurses -static strip vi mv vi /bin/ should probably supply you with what you want. When using VI in such a situation I usually also use rc.diskless2 to create

Re: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-26 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Paul Hoffman wrote: - As pointed out off-line, you also need to get it the termcap library. Doing cp /usr/share/misc/termcap.db /root/.termcap.db You propably want to strip that bugger down to its bones; they weight in at around 2Mb including the un-db-ed version.

A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Paul Hoffman
I'm kinda surprised this isn't in the FAQ (or at least not in a place that I could find it). It is really impossible to build a vi with no external dependencies that can be installed in /bin? All I want is something that knows how to full-screen edit on the console, nothing else. I dread

RE: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Petersen
Paul Hoffman wrote: I'm kinda surprised this isn't in the FAQ (or at least not in a place that I could find it). It is really impossible to build a vi with no external dependencies that can be installed in /bin? What made you think it was impossible? All I want is something that knows

RE: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 1:36 AM + 1/26/03, Petersen wrote: Paul Hoffman wrote: I'm kinda surprised this isn't in the FAQ (or at least not in a place that I could find it). It is really impossible to build a vi with no external dependencies that can be installed in /bin? What made you think

Re: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Dan Nelson
be installed in /bin? What made you think it was impossible? The book FreeBSD by Anderson (which was highly recommended by some) says so on page 371. I'm glad to hear that's wrong. One major problem is that without /usr, you have no termcap file. You might want to install e3, which is only 13k

Re: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 1:36 AM + 1/26/03, Petersen wrote: Assuming you have the object files from a buildworld hanging around, then cd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/vi cc -O -pipe -o vi *.o -lncurses -static strip vi mv vi /bin/ should probably supply you with what you want. Two modifications made this work fine

Re: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 25), Paul Hoffman said: Nice! e3 built from the ports collection linked statically automatically. e3 didn't work correctly on my console (it didn't recognize the Alt key), but e3vi worked fine and felt just like vi. Alt key support requires you to modify yur syscons

Re: A vi for /bin?

2003-01-25 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-01-25 19:22, Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 1:36 AM + 1/26/03, Petersen wrote: Assuming you have the object files from a buildworld hanging around, then cd /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/vi cc -O -pipe -o vi *.o -lncurses -static strip vi mv vi /bin/ should probably supply

Changes in /bin/sh between 4.6.2 and 4.7

2003-01-24 Thread Murat Bicer
Has something changed in sh between these versions: I get a weird error on some of my scripts #!/bin/sh case $1 in start) [ -x /usr/local/sbin/freevrrpd ] /usr/local/sbin/freevrrpd echo -n ' freevrrpd' ;; stop

Re: Changes in /bin/sh between 4.6.2 and 4.7

2003-01-24 Thread Murat Bicer
on some of my scripts #!/bin/sh case $1 in start) [ -x /usr/local/sbin/freevrrpd ] /usr/local/sbin/freevrrpd echo -n ' freevrrpd' ;; stop) killall freevrrpd /dev/null 21 echo -n

Re: Changes in /bin/sh between 4.6.2 and 4.7

2003-01-24 Thread Tim Kientzle
Murat Bicer wrote: killall freevrrpd /dev/null 21 echo -n 'freevrrpd' The construction 'a b' has always been complete nonsense and the shell no longer accepts it. (The '' means check the output of the preceding command, which isn't possible with 'a ' being run in the background.) If

Can I Mount a Bin/Cue CD Image?

2002-12-29 Thread Drew Tomlinson
I am wondering if it is possible to mount a CD image in the cue/bin format directly? I have searched Google and found how to mount an iso. I have also come acrosse the binchunker port that will convert cue/bin images to isos. Do I have to convert or is there a way? Thanks, Drew

Re: PROBLEM FOUND WAS : Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
/lib/libc.so.4 #2 0x2810c1da in getpwent () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #3 0x804b28e in free () #4 0x804cb94 in clear () #5 0x8049389 in free () Ok. So this led me to a password file entry. This host is a NIS client with +@vpnusers/tmp:/usr/bin/false at the end of master.passwd

Re: /usr/bin/finger problems...

2002-12-03 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:18:09PM +1100, J R Matthews wrote: On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:01:22PM +1100, J R Matthews wrote: I can submit a patch to fix this if you want or not.. I honestly dont give a damn to be honest ;) Submitting a PR

Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-03 11:11:24 -0800: I just cvsup'd, buildworld, installworld, etc. this morning to RELENG_4_7. /usr/bin/top is segfaulting... FreeBSD flagg.csl.sri.com 4.7-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2 #6: Tue Dec 3 10:42:13 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys

Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Mike Hogsett
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-03 11:11:24 -0800: I just cvsup'd, buildworld, installworld, etc. this morning to RELENG_4_7. /usr/bin/top is segfaulting... FreeBSD flagg.csl.sri.com 4.7-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2 #6: Tue Dec 3 10:42:13 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr

Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Kent Stewart
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 11:31 am, Mike Hogsett wrote: # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-03 11:11:24 -0800: I just cvsup'd, buildworld, installworld, etc. this morning to RELENG_4_7. /usr/bin/top is segfaulting... FreeBSD flagg.csl.sri.com 4.7-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p2 #6

Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Mike Hogsett
cat top.x /usr/src/usr.bin/top/top.local.1 top.1 gzip -cn top.1 top.1.gz install -s -o root -g kmem -m 2555 top /usr/bin install -o root -g wheel -m 444 top.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 flagg# top Segmentation fault flagg# To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd

Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Mike Hogsett
. are fine). And so there is not confusion... flagg# which top /usr/bin/top flagg# ls -l `which top` -r-xr-sr-x 1 root kmem 32520 Dec 3 13:42 /usr/bin/top flagg# To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message

PROBLEM FOUND WAS : Re: /usr/bin/top seg faulting

2002-12-03 Thread Mike Hogsett
/libc.so.4 #3 0x804b28e in free () #4 0x804cb94 in clear () #5 0x8049389 in free () Ok. So this led me to a password file entry. This host is a NIS client with +@vpnusers/tmp:/usr/bin/false at the end of master.passwd (for the radiusd). Some missing commas in the netgroup file

/usr/bin/finger problems...

2002-12-02 Thread J R Matthews
Whom it concerns, I just upgraded a myriad of my systems from 4.6R-p2 to 4.7 and lo-and-behold I could no longer use /usr/bin/finger to get a finger from remote Ascend NAS. Funnily enough, it still worked on remote Cisco and unix boxen. Still - i got shitty with it, and dug into the problem

Re: /usr/bin/finger problems...

2002-12-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:01:22PM +1100, J R Matthews wrote: I can submit a patch to fix this if you want or not.. I honestly dont give a damn to be honest ;) Submitting a PR containing a patch is the best way to get this fixed. Thanks! Kris msg10762/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: /usr/bin/finger problems...

2002-12-02 Thread J R Matthews
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:01:22PM +1100, J R Matthews wrote: I can submit a patch to fix this if you want or not.. I honestly dont give a damn to be honest ;) Submitting a PR containing a patch is the best way to get this fixed. Thanks! Well the

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Toomas Aas
The line it bitched about was something like: [ -x ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper ] ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper echo -n ' thttpd' I presume it was complaining about running a command in the background and then trying to use the operator to run the following command. Your diagnosis

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Brian Jackson
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: I already told you in the section of my mail you deleted. Kris mime-attachment No, it's the construction, which is illegal and should never have been allowed. Update to the latest version of the port and submit a PR if

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Brian Jackson
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 09:23 AM, Toomas Aas wrote: Your diagnosis is correct. This change is even mentioned in 4.7 release notes (which I read *after* posting similar message to this list a few weeks agog). Thanks very much for the pointer to the release notes!!! That answered

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 04:23 PM 11.27.2002 +0200, Toomas Aas wrote: The line it bitched about was something like: [ -x ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper ] ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper echo -n ' thttpd' I presume it was complaining about running a command in the background and then trying to use the operator

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Roman Neuhauser
that I only noticed that the database on my server wasn't starting after my upgrade to 4.7 (which of course very well may have been the case :) you guess right: you don't understand his answer. :) he says: /bin/sh was broken up to 4.7 in that it allowed . the port that broke

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
wasn't starting after my upgrade to 4.7 (which of course very well may have been the case :) /bin/sh no longer allows the illegal construct (see the release notes). Kris msg10420/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread Clint Olsen
Hi: I installed the port for thttpd, and when I upgraded to 4.7, it broke my rc.d script, complaining about an unexpected ''. The line it bitched about was something like: [ -x ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper ] ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper echo -n ' thttpd' I presume it was complaining about

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread paul beard
Clint Olsen wrote: Hi: I installed the port for thttpd, and when I upgraded to 4.7, it broke my rc.d script, complaining about an unexpected ''. The line it bitched about was something like: [ -x ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper ] ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper echo -n ' thttpd' I presume

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread Clint Olsen
On Nov 26, paul beard wrote: check to see how ${PREFIX} is being evaluated: I have found quite a few rc scripts where it never worked: I just hard-coded the necessary values. While I do agree with you, in this case it's not it. If I rewrote the script using an if statement, it worked just

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:14:18PM -0800, paul beard wrote: Clint Olsen wrote: Hi: I installed the port for thttpd, and when I upgraded to 4.7, it broke my rc.d script, complaining about an unexpected ''. The line it bitched about was something like: [ -x

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread Brian Jackson
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 12:25 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: Hi: I installed the port for thttpd, and when I upgraded to 4.7, it broke my rc.d script, complaining about an unexpected ''. ${PREFIX}/sbin/thttpd_wrapper Funny that this should come up, as I recently upgraded to

Re: 4.7 changes to /bin/sh?

2002-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:38:03AM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 12:25 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: Hi: I installed the port for thttpd, and when I upgraded to 4.7, it broke my rc.d script, complaining about an unexpected ''.

Linking applications to /usr/local/bin/

2002-10-13 Thread MET
Why does linking an application such as java/javac to the /usr/local/bin/ directory make the java and javac commands global? Whereas 'kmail' is not in there, but if I type it Kmail will launch anyways. Anything specific I should read? ~ Matthew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Linking applications to /usr/local/bin/

2002-10-13 Thread David Lloyd
Matthew, Why does linking an application such as java/javac to the /usr/local/bin/ directory make the java and javac commands global? Whereas 'kmail' is not in there, but if I type it Kmail will launch anyways. Do a which kmail. You probably need to read about how FreeBSD (and Linux

perl 5.8.0 use.perl system doesn't update /usr/local/bin/perl

2002-07-24 Thread Mark Stosberg
(after running user.perl port) which I'd like to ask about. The script sucessfully updated /usr/bin/perl, but left me with a couple oddities. First, /usr/bin/perl5.8.0 now points to perl 5.00503, which is confusing. Secondly, /usr/local/bin/perl still points to the newer Perl 5.8.0. As a FreeBSD

Re: perl 5.8.0 use.perl system doesn't update /usr/local/bin/perl

2002-07-24 Thread Adam Weinberger
/usr/local is where ports go. ports don't install into /usr/{bin,include,lib}, and system doesn't install into /usr/local{bin,include,lib}. that's the whole point. you should modify your scripts to use /usr/bin/perl. if you want to use perl5.8.0, use /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.0 -Adam

<    1   2   3   4   5   6