Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the
krad wrote:
a few massive assumptions here I feel.
1. all the domains are controlled by said person
2. Are on the same server
3. Fits with the relevent provisioning system,
4. Is probably are using bind
You betcha, though all good information.
1. Nope, the CNAME is not controlled by me.
2. N
-0400
> >> > From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> >> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >> > Subject: DNS Question
> >> >
> >> > Good morning.
> >> >
> >> > I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always cr
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
The other interesting side would be reverse DNS lookups. Only one
> record would be returned, and most likely would be the original A
> record. A nice example of this is doing a basic "ping -a ww.yahoo.com"
> which you get back that it is resolving "www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:07 -0700
xSAPPYx wrote:
> Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
> on all these domains, use A records
You can use the domains for mail provided that that they share MX
servers, if example.com has a CNAME pointing to example.net then mai
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
on all these domains, use A records
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh
wrote:
>
>> >how is this illegal?
>>
>> CNAME rule:
>>
>> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>>
>> for the node domain.tld
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the canonical name ra
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have
an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if
> >how is this illegal?
>
> CNAME rule:
>
> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>
> for the node domain.tld:
>
> domain.tld. soa ...
> domain.tld. ns ...
> domain.tld. cname otherdomain.tld.
>
> this node has a CNAME and "other data", so it's illegal, no matter what you
>
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should
have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if i
had control ov
>> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>> >was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>> >this.
>> >
>> >example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >
>> >I was taught this was not good form
>>
>>
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:17:48 +0200
> From: lcon...@go2france.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: DNS Question
>
> >
> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
> >was that we have requests to use a CNA
>
>All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>this.
>
>example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>
>I was taught this was not good form
worse, it's illegal.
,
-- Original Message --
From: krad
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:56:40 +0100
>2009/10/23 Sean Cavanaugh
>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
>> > From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
>> >
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
> From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: DNS Question
>
> Good morning.
>
> I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
> record for
2009/10/23 Sean Cavanaugh
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
> > From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: DNS Question
> >
> > Good morning.
> >
> > I have been asked by my co-wor
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
> From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: DNS Question
>
> Good morning.
>
> I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
> record for new domains we host instead
DAve wrote:
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME.
The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a
website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to
have
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME.
The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a
website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to
have DNS point www
Hi Erik:
I don't recall the how-to explaining the usage of this script. I too,
just recently setup a DNS server for a couple domains. My
recommendation is to familiarize yourself with the Administrators
Reference Manual (ARM) on BIND's website:
http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/arm93/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
国徽 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script
> "/etc/namedb/make-localhost" used in the document, So I can't go on
> now? Please tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!>
>
Unfortunately the docume
Hello,
I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script
"/etc/namedb/make-localhost" used in the document, So I can't go on now? Please
tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!
Best Regards!
Freebsd Lover:Erik
___
freebsd-questi
On June 25, 2007, gahn wrote:
> hi all:
>
> could anyone here recommend a software package for
> dynamic dns?
>
> thanks
I've used http://www.no-ip.com/ for a few years with good success. There is a
free version if you're not picky about your domain name. There is a client
in the ports (dns/no
gahn wrote:
> hi all:
>
> could anyone here recommend a software package for
> dynamic dns?
>
> thanks
>
/usr/ports/dns/ddclient
I am using it with no problems on all my Linux/BSD machines.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
hi all:
could anyone here recommend a software package for
dynamic dns?
thanks
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go
I think it depends upon the registrar. Of the 200 domains, they are
probably registered across 2 or 3 registrars.
Some ask for just the host name, while others ask for both hostname and IP.
Jeff.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:14:01 +, Dick Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jeff MacDonald <[EMA
* Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0157 12:57]:
> Not really a freebsdquestion specifically.
>
> My company uses
>ns.foo.com and ns1.foo.com for primay/secondary dns, about 200
> domains rely on these.
>
> We want a new physical machine , in a different location, with a
> different IP to
Not really a freebsdquestion specifically.
My company uses
ns.foo.com and ns1.foo.com for primay/secondary dns, about 200
domains rely on these.
We want a new physical machine , in a different location, with a
different IP to be our secondary dns. lets call it www.jerky.com ip =
244.233.222
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Tom Huppi wrote:
> So, what do you use for firewall/nat? ipfw/ipf/pf? I think I can
> help you with ipf, if you use something else then I'm sure
> someone can help you once they know they have the knowledge you
> need.
user-ppp has it's own firewall i
Tom Huppi wrote:
I mean one runs NAT, and the other uses it. I've searched various
things and have run into subtle refernences which seem related to
my problem (like 'gethostbyname' isn't even supposed to consult
/etc/hosts), but nothing specific.
Yeah, I sort of guessed that, I was thinking that
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> Tom Huppi wrote:
> > I have a FreeBSD 5.3 workstation connected to the net via user-ppp
> > with a dynamic IP. I have user-ppp doing both NAT and simple
> > firewall.
> >
> > I have a headless server box, also 5.3, set up as a NAT client.
> > I run i
Tom Huppi wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 workstation connected to the net via user-ppp
with a dynamic IP. I have user-ppp doing both NAT and simple
firewall.
I have a headless server box, also 5.3, set up as a NAT client.
I run it only when I need the horsepower since it's loud and sucks
power.
My pr
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 workstation connected to the net via user-ppp
with a dynamic IP. I have user-ppp doing both NAT and simple
firewall.
I have a headless server box, also 5.3, set up as a NAT client.
I run it only when I need the horsepower since it's loud and sucks
power.
My problem is that
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:22:19AM -0500, stan wrote:
> Can I use dig, or some tool to query an upstream DNS amchine to findout
> what rnage it is authoratative for in _reverse_ DNS?
If you can do it for a "normal" zone, yes.
(hint: there's not really any such thing as reverse DNS).
Ceri
--
p
Can I use dig, or some tool to query an upstream DNS amchine to findout
what rnage it is authoratative for in _reverse_ DNS?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
have dns working perfectly on one system copied the files over to
another system made the necessary domain changes but when bind is
invoked i cannot ping remote hosts
#ping google.ca
ping: cannot resolve google.ca: No address associated with name
when i do a nslook up i get this it does not matt
Hi,
Have you try "host" command ?
host
Maybe DNS takes a couple day for propagation.
If this is the case try later in next 2-3 days.
Cheers,
--- Xpression <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, I'm
getting a problem with my DNS, I'm running 4.7 +
> named, the
> config files are teorically w
Hi list, I'm getting a problem with my DNS, I'm running 4.7 + named, the
config files are teorically well, but when I tried to get access from
outside (of the network) to my ftp site, no returns records, when I tried
with the real IP, everything's fine, any suggestion...???
___
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:29:29PM -0400, Xpression wrote:
> Hi list:
>
> I want to change my DNS server/service, I still using named almost
> understand it so good, then I want to know is anyone have knowledge of any
> other DNS server that can be installed to serve DNS requests...thanks.
Hi list:
I want to change my DNS server/service, I still using named almost
understand it so good, then I want to know is anyone have knowledge of any
other DNS server that can be installed to serve DNS requests...thanks...
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ahh okay, I understand that. Someone once told me the information is
already downloaded in a list, so the server doesn't have to contact
root all the time to get ns information. Is this not true anymore?
bind9 has the root-servers "hints zone" in its binary, but will use an
external hints zone
>[please wrap you lines at 72 characters or so]
>
>aSe wrote:
>
>> When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
>> how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
>
>FreeBSD comes with a list of "root" DNS servers. These are master servers
>maintain
When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
The DNS navigates the DNS namespace until it finds a positive or negative
answer, or the until DNS's that should have the answer fail to respond.
Len
[please wrap you lines at 72 characters or so]
aSe wrote:
When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
> how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
FreeBSD comes with a list of "root" DNS servers. These are master servers
maintained by man
I've got a dns running on a freebsd computer at my company. I'm new to the concept of
DNS and how it all works.
My question is:
When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached, how does It
find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
Thanks!
To Unsubscrib
45 matches
Mail list logo
