I have a Netgear FA511 PCMCIA NIC that worked fine under 9.1. Under 9.2 I
get the following message:
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: port 0x1100-0x11ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on cardbus0
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: attaching PHYs failed
This used to work under 9.1, does anyone
Waitman Gobble wrote:
> >
> > It is written in axe(4) and in the HCL for 9.1 that D-Link DUBE100 is
> > supported. I have bought one and the system shows it as
> >
> > ugen0.3: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
> > (480Mbps) pwr=ON (200mA)
> >
> > What am I doing wrong? Why does it not attach a
On Aug 3, 2013 8:05 AM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> It is written in axe(4) and in the HCL for 9.1 that D-Link DUBE100 is
> supported. I have bought one and the system shows it as
>
> ugen0.3: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
(480Mbps) pwr=ON (200mA)
>
> What am I doing wro
Dear Colleagues,
It is written in axe(4) and in the HCL for 9.1 that D-Link DUBE100 is
supported. I have bought one and the system shows it as
ugen0.3: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
(480Mbps) pwr=ON (200mA)
What am I doing wrong? Why does it not attach a driver to it? Should I
do somethi
7;s a pity there's no
response to it.
Greetings,
Boris
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Xu Zhe wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I am trying to use lagg to bind four 1Gb NIC into 4Gb one. I was testing
> this using two machines running FreeBSD 8.2, each of the machine has
> four 1Gb eth
Hi, all,
I am trying to use lagg to bind four 1Gb NIC into 4Gb one. I was testing
this using two machines running FreeBSD 8.2, each of the machine has
four 1Gb ethernet card, and connected correspondingly, means:
MACHINE1 MACHINE2
em0 <->em0
em1 <
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Surat Sodchuen wrote:
> thank for your kindness
> i tired that your suggestion but cannot resolve problem.
> for more information ...
> FreeBSD 9.1-Release on HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 128GB of Ram
> every time when booting process it seem freezing about 15 seconds
>
On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I work with FreeBSD9.1 and Mellanox devices.
> Every time I unload / load mlx4ib module, NIC names of mellanox devices (ibX)
> are renamed.
> Can I prevent it?
>
> [root@h-qa-032 mlx4]# ifconfig
> ib8: fl
Hi.
I work with FreeBSD9.1 and Mellanox devices.
Every time I unload / load mlx4ib module, NIC names of mellanox devices (ibX)
are renamed.
Can I prevent it?
[root@h-qa-032 mlx4]# ifconfig
ib8: flags=8002 metric 0 mtu 65520
options=80018
lladdr 80.28.0.48.fe.80.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2
Please include your question as email content, not subject.
http://serverfault.com/questions/361673/hp-nc107i-bcm5723-on-freebsd-9
Indicates
you may be able to set
hw.bge.allow_asf="0"
in /boot/loader.conf. Try this, and if the problem persists, please reply
with more information (FreeBSD versio
Surat Sodchuen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
...spelling correction
Should be Marvell
2013-05-13 09:48, Leslie Jensen skrev:
I'm having some problems with my Marvell NIC (msk0) and loss of connection.
I found a solution where one could use the settings below:
In
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.inet.tcp.tso=0
And in
/boot/loader
I'm having some problems with my Marwel NIC (msk0) and loss of connection.
I found a solution where one could use the settings below:
In
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.inet.tcp.tso=0
And in
/boot/loader.conf
hw.msk.msi_disable=1
This seems to work but the trade-off is that I now only hav
>I believe that easiest way is using tcpdump.
>Also you should specify what you mean by 'accessing packets': is it
>the need to view raw packet data, or what? :)
Yes, i need to view raw packets and check their protocol, e.g. whether they are
ICMP packets or something else ...
__
>I believe that easiest way is using tcpdump.
>Also you should specify what you mean by 'accessing packets': is it
>the need to view raw packet data, or what? :)
Yes, i need to view raw packets and check their protocol, e.g. whether they are
ICMP packets or something else ...
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Oct 31 06:29:57 2012
> From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQuNGC0LDQu9C40Lkg0KLRg9GA0L7QstC10YY=?=
>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:29:05 +0200
> Subject: Re: Access packets directly from NIC
> To: Jack Mc Lauren
> Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mail
2012/10/31 Jack Mc Lauren :
> Hello FreeBSD users !
>
> How can i access and check packets directly from NIC ?
>
> Regards,
> Jack
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Hello FreeBSD users !
How can i access and check packets directly from NIC ?
Regards,
Jack
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ques
= 'Realtek Semiconductor'
device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Family all in one NDIS
Driver v5.728.0604.2009 06/04/2009 (Rtl8023)'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
On 9.0 I got it to work once or twice out of a couple of dozen tries.
9.0 d
device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Family all in one NDIS
Driver v5.728.0604.2009 06/04/2009 (Rtl8023)'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
On 9.0 I got it to work once or twice out of a couple of dozen tries.
9.0 dmesg reports:
re0: RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169
This card is on a Dell Inspiron. It works perfectly on 8.x. Dmesg on 8.2
reports it as:
re0:
pciconf:
re0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x04341028 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
device = 'Realtek 10/100/1000 PCI-E NIC Fa
Hi Im looking for help and some more info on the subject.
the only post i found is from april 2008 the post suggests to add the
capability to the driver based on or copy from a different WiFi
NIC driver and it is not working still same error
the NIC hangs in a way ifconfig show IP address the
Hi Enthusiast,
I have a server which has around 20 nic interfaces.
Some are connected port to port via cross cable and some are connected via
a switch and few are not connected.
(Let consider all are connected port to port)
I want to find out the way so that I can determine the pairs efficiently
I have an Intel Wifi Link 1000 BGN NIC that
I'm having trouble getting to work. I have
FreeBSD 8.3 installed. I looked in the NOTES file under
/usr/src/sys/conf
for the driver and did not see it listed. It is PCI.
I have tried to configure the settings
via the sysinstall command
On 06/07/2012 11:14, Fbsd8 wrote:
Running ipfilter and trying to list the total amount of the traffic
passing through the external NIC.
Maybe there is some other command to show this info.
Any help is appreciated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
El día Thursday, June 07, 2012 a las 12:14:56PM -0400, Fbsd8 escribió:
> Running ipfilter and trying to list the total amount of the traffic
> passing through the external NIC.
>
> Maybe there is some other command to show this info.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
In the pa
Running ipfilter and trying to list the total amount of the traffic
passing through the external NIC.
Maybe there is some other command to show this info.
Any help is appreciated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Greetings all,
Has anyone seen similar problems as this...
Nov 22 14:49:49 sleipnir kernel: msk0: watchdog timeout
Nov 22 14:49:49 sleipnir kernel: msk0: prefetch unit stuck?
Nov 22 14:49:49 sleipnir kernel: msk0: initialization failed: no memory for Rx b
uffers
The NIC freezes completely
ions@freebsd.org
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:24:02 +0200
> Subject: Intel 82573E NIC and BMC with FreeBSD 8
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> I added a M3291 BMC on a TYAN S5197 motherboard and I'm trying to make it
> work with FreeBSD 8.
>
> I first tried to set it up
with the correct Firmware
- DOS, flash the Intel NIC (82573E) EEProm to enable IPMI
- DOS, configure the MAC/IP of the BMC (I choose a BMC MAC different from the
NIC MAC, and of course an IP different from the host)
- LINUX, "modprobe ipmi_si type=kcs ports=0xca8 irqs=0 regspacings=4&quo
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michael W. Lucas
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Will applications such as NFS cut bandwith usage that much?
>
I have seen similar performance degradations with NFS in the pas
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> >
> >
> > 3.65 419155.4
>
> Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
> was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
>
> 3.65 419155.4
Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ?
> So no, I'm not saturating this network. Not even close. I
/netblast 10.11.11.241 500 300 10
>
> start: 1311346264.584043978
> finish:1311346274.583848423
> send calls:7417664
> send errors: 4214676
> approx send rate: 320298
> approx error rate: 0
>
>
> When the sender if an igb nic, I am able to pus
346264.584043978
finish:1311346274.583848423
send calls:7417664
send errors: 4214676
approx send rate: 320298
approx error rate: 0
When the sender if an igb nic, I am able to push out 955Mb to the em0
nic acting as a sink. The other way around, 855Mb
The em nic is
em1@p
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local ethernet and see if you can generate and receive a full
gigabit on the wire
other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
> >> > client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
> >> > filezilla, winscp,
> >>
> >> FTP and NFSv3 both have similar results.
> >>
> >> ==ml
> >
> >
me ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
>> > filezilla, winscp,
>>
>> FTP and NFSv3 both have similar results.
>>
>> ==ml
>
> Perhaps you have reached the maximum disk speed. Sorry not more ideas,
> but it doesn't look like a nic problem. Put t
v3 both have similar results.
==ml
Perhaps you have reached the maximum disk speed. Sorry not more
ideas, but it doesn't look like a nic problem. Put the file in cache
before sending it. If it's faster the problem is a bottleneck on hard
disk or s
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:31:25 +
Peter Harrison articulated:
> Sorry for top posting. My 'phone makes it awkward.
>
> I use ndis for the wifi connection in my netbook. Was trivial to
> convert the Windows driver, and it works without issue.
>
> Anyone know whether it could do 'N' class devices
al Message-
From: per...@pluto.rain.com
Sent: 21/07/2011 13:05:54
To: nec...@retena.com
Cc: questi...@freebsd.org; mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org
Subject: Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?
Eduardo Morras wrote:
> If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can
> force it
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
>
> Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
> client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
> filezilla, winscp,
FTP and NFSv3 both have similar results.
==ml
--
Michael W. Luca
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
filezilla, winscp,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:32:27PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 21:16 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> >It's at gigabit:
> >
> >em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> >
> >options=219b
> >ether 00:15:17:31:c8:fe
> >inet xxx
> >media: Ethernet autoselect (1000ba
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:19:47PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 7/20/2011 12:04 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
> > or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
> > network, no errors showing.
Eduardo Morras wrote:
> If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can
> force it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the
> cable.
Last I heard, this does _not_ work with gigabit unless you can
force-configure both ends of the link. The negotiation protocol is
such
On 7/20/2011 12:04 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
> or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
> network, no errors showing.
what does
sysctl -a dev.em
show ?
What kind of switch is the box plug
At 21:16 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
It's at gigabit:
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=219b
ether 00:15:17:31:c8:fe
inet xxx
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
status: active
All seems to be ok, try a netstat -I em0 -d (it's a capita
it
> >network, no errors showing.
> >
> >It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
> >that.
>
> Don't know about that, but perhaps the nic is not working at full gigabit.
>
> Can you post the output of ifconfig?
>
> #i
ng at
that.
Don't know about that, but perhaps the nic is not working at full gigabit.
Can you post the output of ifconfig?
#ifconfig em0
If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can force
it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the cable.
As per suggestio
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
that.
As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried d
Steve Polyack wrote:
> I was able to "fix" the single-user mode behavior (which I agree,
> isn't necessarily broken) and get it to bring up the links by
> simply patching init(8) to call system("/sbin/ifconfig") before
> prompting for the single-user shell. It works, but I feel dirty.
I see no
interfaces?
When trying to troubleshoot a problem that was known or suspected to
involve the network or its hardware, one might not _want_ the NICs
alive.
Short of patching init(8) (or perhaps the NIC drivers?), I don't
see another way for me to ensure the links come up even when the
system dr
ote Access Controllers (DRACs). Now, they do have
their own dedicated NIC, which we use for anything that really needs the
attention. However, the shared feature saves us a switchport per server
we use it on. When both on-board NICs are cabled (i.e. for lagg(4)
failover), then the DRAC's shared
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Steve Polyack wrote:
... An occaisional fat-finger in /etc/fstab may cause one to
end up in single-user mode ... some of these systems have a LOM
(lights-out management) controller which shares the system's
on-board NICs ... when the system
?
When trying to troubleshoot a problem that was known or suspected to
involve the network or its hardware, one might not _want_ the NICs
alive.
> Short of patching init(8) (or perhaps the NIC drivers?), I don't
> see another way for me to ensure the links come up even when the
> sys
up on the attached interfaces? Shouldn't they come up after the
driver discovers and initializes the devices? Keep in mind that I don't
even have to pass any arguments (such as "up") to ifconfig.
Furthermore, the behavior is exactly the same for bce(4) and em(4).
Short
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
I'm looking at the D945GSEJT which has a realtek 8111DL nic. Which driver is
used for this nic?
re(4). Some forum users have had recent problems with certain versions
(maybe newer) of the 8111. My older 8111C onboard versions have always
w
oot (FBSD81, GENERIC
kernel). So,
I'm looking at the D945GSEJT which has a realtek 8111DL nic. Which
driver is used for this nic?
Well, basically I need to preconfigure the network so I can connect
if/when it gets up.
Thanks, Erik
___
freebsd-ques
On Jan 7, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
>> "uname -a" is probably the most general answer, as most FreeBSD
>> NIC drivers don't have individualized version #s, aside from the
>> OS version itself.
>
> That is not my understanding.
>
Chuck Swiger writes:
> > Is there a command line utility, a la ethtool or the like, that
> > can be used to query the NIC driver version?
>
> "uname -a" is probably the most general answer, as most FreeBSD
> NIC drivers don't have individualized vers
5pm, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:33 AM, vrwmil...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a command line utility, a la ethtool or the like, that can be
used to query the NIC driver version?
"uname -a" is probably the most general answer, as most FreeBSD NIC
drivers don't
On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:33 AM, vrwmil...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there a command line utility, a la ethtool or the like, that can be used
> to query the NIC driver version?
"uname -a" is probably the most general answer, as most FreeBSD NIC drivers
don't have individualized v
HI All,
Is there a command line utility, a la ethtool or the like, that can be used
to query the NIC driver version?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:16:01PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote:
> [Huge snip]
Super :-)
> > What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install
> > pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would
> > certainly help. I
On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote:
[Huge snip]
What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install
pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would
certainly help. I installed pfSense by CDROM initially and
figure this time the install would b
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote:
> >Folks (mostly Adam),
> >
> >Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> >Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> >the stuff he installed a few years back
On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote:
Folks (mostly Adam),
Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
ALIX.2D13 system board - $115
CompactFlash card
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:45:41PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > Folks (mostly Adam),
> >
> > Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> > Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> > the stuff he in
yourself out of parts. Any respectable
computer shop will have Mini-ITX Atom motherboards and cases, just add
another NIC to that along with memory/drives and you're done.
Regards,
--
Matt Emmerton
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> Folks (mostly Adam),
>
> Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
> Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
> the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
>
>
> > ALIX.2D13 system boa
Folks (mostly Adam),
Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said.
Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among
the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better::
> ALIX.2D13 system board - $115
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:14:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >Anybody?
> >
>
> Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
> low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>Anybody?
>
Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is
low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom. It's
also been tested with FreeBSD and pfSense according to the manufacturers
s
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
> --On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> >typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> >_thought_ I'd found a computer to re
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
> Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
> [pfSense], but nada.
>
> Any wizards on this list ha
work port version.
>
Thanks to everyone indeed. The long-story-short is that just a
few months ago I thought I *had* found a low-power [Atom] box
with a dual-NIC for around $300. So I figured that since there
was at least that one there might be others. Late last
On 11/24/10 01:43, Gary Kline wrote:
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have a clue?
I don't kno
--On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline wrote:
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have
Bruce Cran writes:
> You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work. e.g.
>
> http://reviews.cnet.com/adapters-nics/d-link-dfe-570tx/1707-3380_7-785663.html
The machine I'm typing on has a two port Intel Pro/1000-GT; I
cannot recommend it highly enough.
One ca
On 24.11.2010 02:43, Gary Kline wrote:
> Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
> typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
> _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
> [pfSense], but nada.
>
> Any wizards on this list have a clue?
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:26:53 -0800
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH
> should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a
> NIC.
You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work.
Gary Kline wrote:
> I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs.
Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH
should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a
NIC.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and
typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I
_thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall
[pfSense], but nada.
Any wizards on this list have a clue?
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thou
Eduard Rozenberg writes:
> I've checked the latest 8.1R hardware compatibility and don't see
> the Intel 82580 ethernet chipset being supported. This is Intel's
> latest ethernet chipset, released beginning of 2010 I think. Is
> there support planned for this?
The person to ask would
Hi,
I've checked the latest 8.1R hardware compatibility and don't see the Intel
82580 ethernet chipset being supported. This is Intel's latest ethernet
chipset, released beginning of 2010 I think. Is there support planned for this?
Thanks!
--Ed___
fre
>
> > I've tested the ethernet connection with a nearby machine and it works.
> > I also booted the 2950 from an Ubuntu live CD and the NIC worked, so i
> > don't think it's a hardware issue.
> >
> > Is there a way I can rebuild the driver w
ing fine for well over a year. It uses the BCE driver. Ifconfig
> shows it to be up and active and configured with the correct IP, mask
> and gateway, but I can't ping anything.
>
> I've tested the ethernet connection with a nearby machine and it works.
> I also booted t
to be up and active and configured with the correct IP, mask
and gateway, but I can't ping anything.
I've tested the ethernet connection with a nearby machine and it works.
I also booted the 2950 from an Ubuntu live CD and the NIC worked, so i
don't think it's a hardware iss
happened, status = 00
Jan 9 21:29:12 musca kernel: ed0: at port
ed(4) appears to be driver for that card
Sure.
I'm using GENERIC kernel,
and it includes cbb(4), ed(4) device driver.
But the system does not work fine with this PC card.
You are not clear just how you are inserting th
On 1/10/10, Hashimoto wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Paul.
>
>>> $ uname -a
>>> FreeBSD musca.localdomain 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0
>>> r201741: Fri Jan 8 01:01:18 JST 2010
>>> r...@aries.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>>>
>>>
>>> $ tail /var/log/messages
>>> Jan
Thanks for your reply, Paul.
>> $ uname -a
>> FreeBSD musca.localdomain 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0
>> r201741: Fri Jan 8 01:01:18 JST 2010
>> r...@aries.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>>
>>
>> $ tail /var/log/messages
>> Jan 9 21:29:12 musca kernel: cbb1: ready nev
On 1/9/10, Hashimoto wrote:
> Hello.
> I have a problem with a PC card Ethernet interface.
>
> When I insert the PC card to my laptop,
> the system hungs and makes no response.
> When I eject the card,
> the system starts again and works fine.
> (working
> -> insert the card
> stopping
> -> eje
Hello.
I have a problem with a PC card Ethernet interface.
When I insert the PC card to my laptop,
the system hungs and makes no response.
When I eject the card,
the system starts again and works fine.
(working
-> insert the card
stopping
-> eject the card
working)
Of course, I cannot use thi
Assuming I have the name of an interface, what's the easiest way
programmatically to get the status of the interface?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mai
Is the RealTek RTL8112L PCIe gigabit LAN Controller support in FreeBSD 7.2?
I could not find this in the hardware notes. Is it listed under another
name?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Freeco wrote:
>
> Maybe i made some cabling loop, becauce my internet stoped to work. In the
> beginning everything was ok, but after some time when all 3 pc's who was
> connected to switch it stopped to work. Why?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.c
ext:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25520353.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
Freeco wrote:
> My gateway gave me a message: "gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
> got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
That MAC address is that of a Mikrotic router.
I suspect that you've created a cabling loop of some sort again.
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptograp
My gateway gave me a message: "gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513518.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabbl
1 - 100 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
