On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
Completely unrelated, it's just a random number basicly.
If it is a random number how can
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:35:07AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Thx this clears alot of questions :)
One more question doh, about the x cookie.
How long does it take to calculate the x cookie string yourself of a
user you want to hack :)
PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
Completely unrelated, it's just a random number basicly.
If it is a random number how can the xserver it user x random number
and not user y random number ?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:47:04 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:21:34AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:58:35 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This enable all programs to have access that are using unix domain
sockets to
Thx this clears alot of questions :)
One more question doh, about the x cookie.
How long does it take to calculate the x cookie string yourself of a
user you want to hack :)
PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
___
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:21:34AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:58:35 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This enable all programs to have access that are using unix domain
sockets to not need the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE stored in the .Xauthority file
in the users
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gert Cuykens
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6:20 PM
To: Chris Hodgins
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: xhost +localhost
Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
xscreensaver as root?
Chris
Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
gert. User gert has alot of pictures and
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 5:58 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont start :(
Sounds like your trying to run the screensaver from a root terminal in a
normal
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is dumb
enough to leave the console of his UNIX system accessible then user
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:02:50PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont
epilogue wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is dumb
enough to leave the console of his UNIX system accessible then
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:58:35 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This enable all programs to have access that are using unix domain
sockets to not need the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE stored in the .Xauthority file
in the users home directory so any user can open a program on that
display.
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:40:01 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:58:35 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This enable all programs to have access that are using unix domain
sockets to not need the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE stored in the
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:49:48PM -0500, epilogue wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is dumb
enough
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:48:40 -0800, Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:49:48PM -0500, epilogue wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont start :(
If you're trying this on 5.3, the syntax has changed. Try something
like
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont start :(
If you're trying this on 5.3, the syntax has changed. Try
On 02/02/05 05:02 PM, Chuck Swiger sat at the `puter and typed:
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Don't shoot the messenger! :)
Heh, sorry, that wasn't my intention.
[ ... ]
It's probably not the only deprecation or interface change from 4.x. I
believe the 'nslookup' tool is now a wrapper to the 'host' utility, but
I never used either one in complex enough ways to see any
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message can
not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla. Instead i get a message
in my log that locking is not enabled ?
On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message can
not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla. Instead i get a message
in
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message
Gert Cuykens wrote:
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message can
not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla. Instead i get a message
in my log that locking is not enabled ?
On 02/03/05 12:05 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:24:32 -0600, Henry Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/3/2005 at 00:05 Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
I# xhost local:
non-network
I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
into X as root.
no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
root :) Lets call it the user root window.
Try this:
check your DISPLAY environment variable with
echo $DISPLAY
make sure it's ':0.0' or
Gert Cuykens wrote:
I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
into X as root.
no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
root :) Lets call it the user root window.
Try this:
check your DISPLAY environment variable with
echo $DISPLAY
make sure
On 02/03/05 01:10 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
into X as root.
no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
root :) Lets call it the user root window.
Try this:
check your
Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
xscreensaver as root?
Chris
Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
gert. User gert has alot of pictures and music stuff phone numbers
user gert dont want does things to be gone. Somebody hacks
On 02/03/05 03:19 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
xscreensaver as root?
Chris
Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
gert. User gert has alot of pictures and music stuff phone
31 matches
Mail list logo
