> > On Monday 19 January 2004 17:22, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > > You've pretty much wore out the "play with the config files" route.
> > > Let's try getting some data by finding out what is actually happening
> > > so we can figure out what's wrong. Can you post what the traffic on the
> > > other
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Monday 19 January 2004 16:21, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packets on
> > the interface that the 1921.68.0.0/24 network is supposed to use look
> > like you would expect?
>
> Nope
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:21, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packets on
> the interface that the 1921.68.0.0/24 network is supposed to use look
> like you would expect?
Nope... there's nothing on the external interfaces from the 192.168.0.0/24
networ
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:25:01AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Now, it does NOT work...
> 192.168.1.0 --> Internet works with no problem (tun0 being the default route
> on the FreeBSD gateway)
> 192.168.0.0 --> Internet doesn't work :(
When you tcpdump both external interfaces, do the packet
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Chris Knipe wrote:
>
> > I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
> > gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
> > service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
> > packets out on network B (b
On Sunday 18 January 2004 10:36, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> ipfw add fwd netconnexion1_gw ip from DMZ/netmask to any
> ipfw add fwd netconnexion2_gw ip from LAN/netmask to any
Allright people.
So I'm still trying to make my setup working (using IPFILTER).
Thanks for the help you gave, I finally end
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Chris Knipe wrote:
> I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
> gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
> service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
> packets out on network B (because of th
On Sunday 18 January 2004 10:54, Chris Knipe wrote:
> I have a service set up, some.host IN A A.A.A.x (i.e. in network A and
> gateway A). Now, the moment some one from network B connects to the
> service I've setup on network A, the FreeBSD Box will route the reply
> packets out on network B (bec
> On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:10, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > what i do today is i set the default route to the ISP i am more convinced
> > off, with static routes of certain large CIDR address blocks going out to
> > the other ISP. i decided on those large blocks after checking the global
> > route ta
On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:10, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> what i do today is i set the default route to the ISP i am more convinced
> off, with static routes of certain large CIDR address blocks going out to
> the other ISP. i decided on those large blocks after checking the global
> route tables, AS P
On Sunday 18 January 2004 06:15, Dinesh Nair wrote:
> you can do this with IPFW's fwd rulesets.
>
> ipfw add fwd netconnexion1_gw ip from DMZ/netmask to any
> ipfw add fwd netconnexion2_gw ip from LAN/netmask to any
Well, somehow, this never worked for me yet :(
But well, I'll try again on monday
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming:
> - from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1
> - from LAN to internet, using NET connection2
>
> To be more understandable, something like this:
> route add from DMZ defaut em0
> rout
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> I have one ethernet <--> router and one ethernet <--> dsl modem
> connections to connect to my ISPs. As you said, you're not sure about
> routed... Actually, I did not find anyone who actually make this
i've got exactly the same setup as you do, and
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>Antoine Jacoutot schrieb:,
>
>> What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming:
>> - from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1
>> - from LAN to internet, using NET connection2
>>
>> To be more understandable, something
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:41, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> > Thats easy on your router:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > gateway1="10.10.10.1"
> > gateway2="10.10.10.2"
> > dmz="10.10.20.0/24"
> > lan="10.10.30.0/24"
> > ipfw add fwd ${gateway2} ip f
On Thursday 15 January 2004 16:41, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Thats easy on your router:
> #!/bin/sh
> gateway1="10.10.10.1"
> gateway2="10.10.10.2"
> dmz="10.10.20.0/24"
> lan="10.10.30.0/24"
> ipfw add fwd ${gateway2} ip from ${dmz} to any
> ipfw add fwd ${gateway1} ip from ${lan} to any
Thanks... but
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 21:42, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> If you're using IPFilter, you might be interested in the HOWTO:
>
> http://www.obfuscation.org/ipf/ipf-howto.html
>
> The section on the "to" keyword is unfortunately very brief.
Yes I already checked this and as you said, it was poor
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:10:19PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 19:50, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or
> > the IPFilter 'pass out quick on to ' syntax) rather that
> > using the `route` command. I'
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 19:50, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or
> the IPFilter 'pass out quick on to ' syntax) rather that
> using the `route` command. I'm doing that myself (with IPFilter) and it
> works well. It's confusing to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is
> > very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two
> > connections.
>
>
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is
> very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two
> connections.
Thanks for the feedback :)
> So you can't round-robin between two default ga
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:00, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure (never used it myself), but I think you can use
> routed(8), depending on the way you connect to your ISPs.
I have one ethernet <--> router and one ethernet <--> dsl modem connections to
connect to my ISPs.
As you s
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:46:28PM -, Simon Gray wrote:
> > I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor
> > no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible.
> > Let the list know if you find anything interesting.
>
> Easiest way I would of thought would be to u
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot typed:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote:
> > Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
> > (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
> >
> > I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote:
> Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
> (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
>
> I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP and/or OSPF.
Yes, but one said that for BGP you had to work directly it
> I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor
> no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible.
> Let the list know if you find anything interesting.
Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra
(/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org)
I'm
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 14:42, budsz wrote:
> 1. With FreeBSD can do like this?, example with "route(8)"?
> 2. Does FreeBSD support more than 1 as "defaut gateway" in routing table??
> 3. I found some options in /etc/default/rc.conf like "static_routes=",
>if I use "static_routes=" _WITHOU
27 matches
Mail list logo
