m server perspective, the bandwidth
advantage should be clear. There's no real advantage to gain maintaining altq
rules / mod_bandwidth / foo-solution or a streaming server, except if the
former are already in place.
Most important is to consider if your users "want to save the file&quo
ive. From server perspective, the bandwidth
advantage should be clear. There's no real advantage to gain maintaining altq
rules / mod_bandwidth / foo-solution or a streaming server, except if the
former are already in place.
Most important is to consider if your users "want to save t
I don't see what static content has got to do with it. OP wants a different
delivery method. Just like you can download the static FreeBSD DVD via
ftp/http or torrent.
i said "exaggeration", not "wrong way".
if there is a requirement to use THAT delivery method from client, you are
absolutely
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 21:59:58 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> but is it for video? seems like sound broadcast
> >
> > It doesn't care what's inside the ogg container:
> > http://www.theora.org/benefits/
>
> good. i was suggested by /usr/ports/audio/
>
> anyway for just playing static video/audio fi
but is it for video? seems like sound broadcast
It doesn't care what's inside the ogg container:
http://www.theora.org/benefits/
good. i was suggested by /usr/ports/audio/
anyway for just playing static video/audio files on user request it's just
exaggeration.
_
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 21:38:32 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> stream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2?
> >
> > Err, this thread is very long...can we blame our snuggle Pole or did no
> > one mention "convert to ogg-theora and install
> > audio/ices2+audio/icecast2".
>
> but is it for video? seems li
stream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2?
Err, this thread is very long...can we blame our snuggle Pole or did no one
mention "convert to ogg-theora and install audio/ices2+audio/icecast2".
but is it for video? seems like sound broadcast
___
freebsd-qu
On Monday 25 May 2009 15:41:04 Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as
> video streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth
> (...). Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a
> stream service/server int
content does get stored in main memory only. So it can happen
that content gets stored in the swap partition or in a local
swap file in the main file system (as a file or part of a file).
Temporarily, of course, and splitted.
You know what I mean. :-)
of course, i meant virtual memory saying mem
On Tue, 26 May 2009 18:09:42 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> > While downloading, you're usually not watching (while it's
> > still possible to watch inclomplete files with mplayer).
>
> if you type URL containing flash movie in browser (with flash enabled of
> course ;) it will start pla
Personally I have nothing with YouTube except that I constantly wonder how
i do have. because "youtube quality"== no quality.
i treat this mostly as a preview, like downloading for eg. music video to
look if it's worth to seek for normal quality version.
anyway noone is forced to use it, and
while watching...
While downloading, you're usually not watching (while it's
still possible to watch inclomplete files with mplayer).
if you type URL containing flash movie in browser (with flash enabled of
course ;) it will start playing it before downloading all.
And for complete correctn
have rtmpdump in the ports?
Maybe because of mplayer -streamdump rtsp:// ... ? :-)>
I've not checked, but using -streamdump with mplayer lets
you dump most datastreams (coming from another file, a DVD,
actually i never had a case it would fail to work :)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:21:26PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:11:41 +0200, cpghost wrote:
> > While we're talking about streaming protocols: how comes we don't
> > have rtmpdump in the ports?
>
> Maybe because of mplayer -streamdump rtsp:// ... ? :-)
>
> I've not checked,
On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:11:41 +0200, cpghost wrote:
> While we're talking about streaming protocols: how comes we don't
> have rtmpdump in the ports?
Maybe because of mplayer -streamdump rtsp:// ... ? :-)
I've not checked, but using -streamdump with mplayer lets
you dump most datastreams (coming
While we're talking about streaming protocols: how comes we don't
have rtmpdump in the ports?
http://lkcl.net/rtmp/
Thanks,
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On Mon, 25 May 2009 23:25:13 +0200, FBSD UG wrote:
> without that youtube nonsense there wouldn't be a youtube anymore
> it's a copyright agreement not to store the videos on someone's
> harddrive
> while watching...
While downloading, you're usually not watching (while it's
still possible to w
similarly to youtube and provide just link with "Play" to your movies.
Personally I have nothing with YouTube except that I constantly wonder how
they 'stream', which according to your information, is less than I expected
:-)
except that it prevents caching, it's not "less than" but "just fin
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
There will be no practical difference between playing from FTP/HTTP
and this.
Aha, now we are getting somewhere!
exactly! or - if you like "cool" webpage interface just make that
webpage similarly to youtube and provide just link with "Play" to your
movies.
Personally
Ott Köstner wrote:
Have You tried FFserver?
No, not yet. Thanks for this I will have a look to that one!
Best regards,
Jos Chrispijn
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To un
Comment:
Hyper fast realtime audio/video encoder/converter, streaming server
good for IP-TV but not very (and overcomplex) for playing few files.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
so please test as it's true :)
I did test it and indeed it looks that way...
OK
actually youtube player does not throttle at all - just load as fast as
possible into memory while playing at normal speed.
Yes but we are now discussing another service here. Imho there is some
difference betwe
when you play file directly from HTTP/FTP source it's streaming too.
just much more simple, portable, and cachable by squid/other proxies
Oke, but ftp doesn't show the actual file but only downloads it, right?
depend what program you use.
if you mean "ftp" as /usr/bin/ftp or maybe lftp/ncftp -
ream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2?
Have You tried FFserver?
NAME
ffserver - FFserver video server
SYNOPSIS
ffserver [options]
DESCRIPTION
FFserver is a streaming server for both audio and video. It supports
several live feeds, streaming from files and time shif
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
so please test as it's true :)
I did test it and indeed it looks that way...
actually youtube player does not throttle at all - just load as fast
as possible into memory while playing at normal speed.
Yes but we are now discussing another service here. Imho there is som
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
when you play file directly from HTTP/FTP source it's streaming too.
just much more simple, portable, and cachable by squid/other proxies
Oke, but ftp doesn't show the actual file but only downloads it, right?
Jos Chrispijn
__
we talked about playing/streaming videos from files.
Even streaming from files makes sense in many situations.
Please, go back to netbsd or start using linux, at least in linux forums your
constant stream of opinion based drivel is most welcome. In here you are
poisoning the questions list, e
we talked about playing/streaming videos from files.
Even streaming from files makes sense in many situations.
Please, go back to netbsd or start using linux, at least in linux
forums your constant stream of opinion based drivel is most welcome.
In here you are poisoning the questions list, e
Yes, you're right. For "static" content, buffering a TCP connection
is certainly "good enough."
But for live streams and video conferencing, buffering adds latency
we talked about playing/streaming videos from files.
for IP-TV, videophone, telephone of course only UDP transport make sense
___
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:31:54AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Sorry, mistake:
> > s/file streaming/file download/
>
> when you play file directly from HTTP/FTP source it's streaming too.
> just much more simple, portable, and cachable by squid/other proxies
Yes, you're right. For "static"
2009/5/26 Wojciech Puchar :
>>
>> So again, speaking before you research?
>
> again unnecessary comments.
>
Sorry, what? Do you really think:
Wojciech wrote:
> you mean videos from youtube are copyrighted?
that was necessary? Stop making noise!
>>
>> It's in the terms of use
>> http://www.yout
So again, speaking before you research?
again unnecessary comments.
It's in the terms of use
http://www.youtube.com/t/terms
The content on the YouTube Website, except all User Submissions
i'm not regular youtube watcher and actually i was not aware that there
are really anything else th
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>> without that youtube nonsense there wouldn't be a youtube anymore
>> it's a copyright agreement not to store the videos on someone's harddrive
>> while watching...
>>
>
> you mean videos from youtube are
On 25 mei 2009, at 19:16, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show
as video streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my
bandwidth (...).
^
Can someone tell me if
I already have FreeBSD installed. Just wondering if there is a streaming
server for it.
Hardly can believe that dedicated download (by opening the remote file in a
media player) will be more efficient that a streaming server that takes care
of bandwidth throttle and average processing time on
FreeBSD for this will use less bandwidth?
> I already have FreeBSD installed. Just wondering if there is a streaming
> server for it.
> Hardly can believe that dedicated download (by opening the remote file
> in a media player) will be more efficient that a streaming server that
>
anyway - file that is available through FTP/HTTP or similar way you can
stream too. just without any extra tools both under windoze and unix.
You're aware of UDP-based real-time streaming protocols, right?
yes it is, but we talked about youtube-like services. it's not UDP based
very well). I
without that youtube nonsense there wouldn't be a youtube anymore
it's a copyright agreement not to store the videos on someone's harddrive
while watching...
you mean videos from youtube are copyrighted?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
^^^
Sorry, mistake:
s/file streaming/file download/
when you play file directly from HTTP/FTP source it's streaming too.
just much more simple, portable, and cachable by squid/other proxies
On Monday 25 May 2009 15:41:04 Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as
> video streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth
> (...). Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a
> stream service/server int
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:06:57PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:30:30PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >
> > > make search key="streaming"
> > >
> > > in the ports directory. IMHO, streaming versus downloading is more
> > > bandwidth intensive overall.
> >
> > and give N
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:30:30PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > make search key="streaming"
> >
> > in the ports directory. IMHO, streaming versus downloading is more
> > bandwidth intensive overall.
>
> and give NO adventages.
>
> anyway - file that is available through FTP/HTTP or si
installing such a
stream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2?
somehow i can't understand you
do you mean installing FreeBSD for this will use less bandwidth?
I already have FreeBSD installed. Just wondering if there is a streaming
server for it.
Hardly can believe that dedicated download (by op
make search key="streaming"
in the ports directory. IMHO, streaming versus downloading is more
bandwidth intensive overall.
and give NO adventages.
anyway - file that is available through FTP/HTTP or similar way you can
stream too. just without any extra tools both under windoze and unix.
Hi, Jos
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as video
> streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth (...).
> Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a stream
> servic
I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as video
streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth (...).
^
Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a stream
s
I have some short movies (a la YouTube) that I would like to show as
video streams. Presenting them by download is messing up my bandwidth (...).
Can someone tell me if there is a simple solution installing such a
stream service/server into FreeBDS 7.2?
__
Okay. I found the fix to my problem. For the archives, I found the answer
on the Apple Streaming-Server-Users mailling list here:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/streaming-server-users/2004/Apr/msg00214.html
The Buildit script in the source/work directory
(work/DarwinStreamingSrvr5.5.3-Source
Hi!
I'm compiling the port of net/DarwinStreamingServer and ran into an error:
[...]
Installing source build of Darwin Streaming Server
copying Install to FreeBSD
copying DarwinStreamingServer to FreeBSD/DarwinStreamingServer
cp: DarwinStreamingServer: No Such File or Directory
*** Error c
Hi,
I'm currently looking for a good streaming server
softwares..
For video:
helix
vlc
darwin streaming server
fluendo
For audio:
icecast
apache mod_mp3
Which one do you recommend??
thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo!
Hello,
Does anybody is aware of such a software
that runs on FreeBSD?
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
51 matches
Mail list logo
