Le Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:13:11 +0930,
Shane Ambler a écrit :
> I have a GT 520 with 9.0 amd64 and found that v304.43 refused to run
> my second monitor so I went back to v295.
Did you check the resolution of the second monitor? Here on my box, v304
does not handle any more the previous resolution
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2012-September/002066.html
This is very much related.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-question
On 03/10/2012 04:46, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very
strange problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just
broken.
This is happening on a FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 box with
linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238 nvidia-d
On 02/10/2012 21:16, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very strange
problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just broken.
See:
1. http://markand.malikania.fr/1.png
2. http://markand.malikania.fr/2.png
On the s
Hello,
I have a nvidia GT 630 and use the flash plugin, I've got a very strange
problem, on youtube (or any flash video), the colors are just broken.
See:
1. http://markand.malikania.fr/1.png
2. http://markand.malikania.fr/2.png
On the second picture, the man is supposed to wear a
On Friday 12 August 2011 17:15:04 Ross wrote:
> Is it possible to redirect sound of flash plugin?
>
> I am running firefox via ssh. Currently I successfully redirected
> sound of other applications using NAS. How can I do the same with
> flash? Maybe intercept sound some how.
T
Is it possible to redirect sound of flash plugin?
I am running firefox via ssh. Currently I successfully redirected
sound of other applications using NAS. How can I do the same with
flash? Maybe intercept sound some how.
___
freebsd-questions
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:01:17AM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> Hello, my desktop's memory is so low (256M). Therefore i can not run
> firefox. Instead, i'm running epiphany. That's too proper to me. Anyway
> is there any way to install flash plugin with epiphany? Curren
Hello, my desktop's memory is so low (256M). Therefore i can not run
firefox. Instead, i'm running epiphany. That's too proper to me. Anyway
is there any way to install flash plugin with epiphany? Currently, my
version is 8.0-RELEASE. Really i want to see YouTube under Free
HI,
just had this feeling that whenever there is a flash plugin,
firefox3 hangs up pretty bad. I remove a link under
/usr/local/lib/firefox3/plugins to disable plugin, firefox hangs no
more. is this because most flash plugins are upgraded from 9 to 10?
thanks!!
TFC
sites don't work.
How to make Flash plugin work?
I recall on Linux it's enough to just drop libflashplayer.so into
plugins directory somewhere under lib and it works.
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
> when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
> - linux_base-f7
> - linux_base-fc4
> - linux_base-fc6
> - linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
> what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
I would suggest linux_base-fc6 for Rel. 7.0 build, not linux_base-fc4. The
rel. 7
Robert Huff a écrit :
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= writes:
> when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
>
> - linux_base-f7
> - linux_base-fc4
> - linux_base-fc6
> - linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
>
> what is the right version to apply to avoid iss
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:56:45 +
Bernd-Michael Ruhe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different
> versions:
>
> - linux_base-f7
> - linux_base-fc4
> - linux_base-fc6
> - linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
>
> what is the right version to app
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:56:45 + Bernd-Michael Ruhe wrote:
> when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
> - linux_base-f7
> - linux_base-fc4
> - linux_base-fc6
> - linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
> what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
You should install
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= writes:
> > when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
> >
> > - linux_base-f7
> > - linux_base-fc4
> > - linux_base-fc6
> > - linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
> >
> > what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
>
Bernd-Michael Ruhe a écrit :
Hi all,
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
Hi,
I installed linux_base-fc4 yesterday, and it s
Hi all,
when checking /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base I find different versions:
- linux_base-f7
- linux_base-fc4
- linux_base-fc6
- linux_base-gentoo-stage1-3
what is the right version to apply to avoid issues?
Thanks for any support
Michael
___
fre
Does anyone know if the new linux base that was put into cvsup a few
hours ago fixes flash?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tuesday 18 of September 2007 02:12:38 you wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew - did u try re-running nspluginwrapper -i {flash's .so} as root
> ?
Hi Mel,
I was absent for a moment. So I tried today and it works now.
Thanks :-)
Best regards
___
freebsd-questions
so I googled.. and found that this flash thing could result from one of two
reasons,
1. composite extension "might" be internally made On, I add "Composite"
"false" to my xorg.conf
2. change depth from 16 to 24.
I did all of them, and now the flash is back on..at least i can watch
mlbtv.. :-)
TFC
ce makes me think your laptop has 4
cores... ;)
> One thing I need
> flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
> initiate. Also for some other multimedia on the internet, having flash
> working just makes it so much easier... uhn
why not just run a s
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:48:33 +0200
Zbigniew Komarnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 of September 2007 04:52:06 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > *(my symptoms were a bit different though, it would just time out when
> > calling flash... so each flash object in a page would take 40 seconds o
On Monday 17 of September 2007 16:15:16 you wrote:
> This flash issue has made me reconsider buying a low-end laptop running
> vista, so I dont have the urgency to deal with this issue. One thing I need
> flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
> initia
On Monday 17 September 2007, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> This flash issue has made me reconsider buying a low-end laptop running
> vista, so I dont have the urgency to deal with this issue. One thing I need
> flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
> initiate. A
This flash issue has made me reconsider buying a low-end laptop running
vista, so I dont have the urgency to deal with this issue. One thing I need
flash to work is that I watch mlbtv, and it requires flash plugin to
initiate. Also for some other multimedia on the internet, having flash
working
On Monday 17 of September 2007 04:52:06 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> *(my symptoms were a bit different though, it would just time out when
> calling flash... so each flash object in a page would take 40 seconds or
> sosllooo brooowwwsssiiinnn :-) )
This same behavior I have.
___
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:16:43 -0400
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> not sure if these two are really related, only know that my flash plugin
> doesnt work after I update xorg and re-enter x windows. I first re-install
> plugins by deleting the
Hi,
not sure if these two are really related, only know that my flash plugin
doesnt work after I update xorg and re-enter x windows. I first re-install
plugins by deleting the old plugs directory and then running nsplugwrapper
-v -a -i, anyhow, here is the error message:
The program
at
linux-firefox had unclear fonts - possibly they weren't properly
anti-aliased. There were also some problems with linux-firefox not being able
to browse to external applications. Opera is better under linux emulation, in
my experience, and can use the flash-plugin.
__
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 14:06, Bob M. wrote:
> I think it was Chris Hobbs who was nice enough to translate to english:
>
> http://altbit.org/pseudorandom/unixlike_translation.txt
>
These instructions are for the native Firefox, you don't need to do any of
this for linux-firefox.
_
he browser
> > > portion of Mozilla
> > > linux-firefox-1.5.0.7 Web browser based on the
> > > browser portion of Mozilla
> > >
> > > However when I am trying to open any sites from
> > > linux-firefox, the
> > > embedded flash applications are not
issing plugin.
>
> I have checked the installed plugins by typing
> about:plugins. But
> there is no flash plugin displayed there either.
>
> Where am I going wrong?
>
> Thanks and Best Regards
> Subhro
>
> --
> Subhro Kar
> Security En
ons are not displayed. Also
> the browser
> complains about missing plugin.
>
> I have checked the installed plugins by typing
> about:plugins. But
> there is no flash plugin displayed there either.
>
> Where am I going wrong?
>
> Thanks and Best Regards
> Sub
applications are not displayed. Also the browser
complains about missing plugin.
I have checked the installed plugins by typing about:plugins. But
there is no flash plugin displayed there either.
Where am I going wrong?
Thanks and Best Regards
Subhro
--
Subhro Kar
Security Engineer
iViZ Techno Solutions
--On Friday, September 15, 2006 14:44:26 -0400 Gerard Seibert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 September 2006 13:15, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote:
I put together a really quick translation at work a while back for some
co-workers.
http://altbit.org/?p=111
Isn't the
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:15 -0500, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I couldn't find the original message in my mail folders, but there was
> discussion of an English translation of the unixlike.com.br
> flash+firefox howto.
>
> I wrote a translatio
> >The babelfish translation of the page is not so bad:
> >
> >http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=pt_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unixlike.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D%252081
> >
Well, in the Handbook there's a section called:
6.2.4 Firefox, Mozilla and M
On Friday 15 September 2006 13:15, Christopher M. Hobbs wrote:
> I put together a really quick translation at work a while back for some
> co-workers.
>
> http://altbit.org/?p=111
>
> Isn't the linux flash plugin 7 (used in this article) broken anyhow?
> See: http://ww
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I couldn't find the original message in my mail folders, but there was
discussion of an English translation of the unixlike.com.br
flash+firefox howto.
I wrote a translation for it some time back, it can be found here:
http://altbit.org/?p=111
cmh
-
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:46, Jordi Carrillo wrote:
> This I suppose is the eternal question, but I'm quite sick of looking
> around google without having a detailed step by step process to get the
> flash plugin for firefox. There are some that talk about tweaking the
> ke
Well, I suppose you are talking about the kernel sources, right? Because
saying the sources of the base system is very generic. I'll investigate,
thanks
2006/9/2, Jona Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jordi Carrillo wrote:
> When it says:
> cd /usr/src
> patch -p0< /tmp/rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
>
> a q
Jordi Carrillo wrote:
> When it says:
> cd /usr/src
> patch -p0< /tmp/rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
>
> a question arises saying:
> File to patch:
>
> Then what is supposed I have to patch?
> and there's nothing in /usr/src as well.
> Thanks
You don't have the sources of the base system.
You can fetch th
looking
around
> google without having a detailed step by step process to get the flash
> plugin for firefox. There are some that talk about tweaking the kernel
and
> applying patches? Is it really so difficult having the flash plugin for
> firefox (compiled one)?
> If anyone has the
pose is the eternal question, but I'm quite sick of looking around
> google without having a detailed step by step process to get the flash
> plugin for firefox. There are some that talk about tweaking the kernel and
> applying patches? Is it really so difficult having the flash
This I suppose is the eternal question, but I'm quite sick of looking around
google without having a detailed step by step process to get the flash
plugin for firefox. There are some that talk about tweaking the kernel and
applying patches? Is it really so difficult having the flash plugi
Chris Maness wrote:
What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin installer
do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux)
Thanks
Chris Maness
___
This is what I am using from ports
flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U
On Monday 13 February 2006 08:03, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin
Try my how-to located here:
http://akparadise.byethost33.com/freebsd/linuxpluginwrapper_ho
--- Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin
> >> installer do-dad choked (I gu
Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin
> >> installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linu
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin
installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux)
Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the
www/linux-flashplugin6 port.
It instal
Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin
> installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux)
Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the
www/linux-flash
What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin installer
do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux)
Thanks
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:43:26 -0900, Beecher Rintoul wrote:
>
> Try starting firefox from a terminal and see if you get plugin errors before
> it starts. I was working on that port locally to fix the paths. I uninstalled
> everything and did an install with the fixed port and none of the plugins
On Friday 23 December 2005 07:57 am, Darren Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > Use the location menu item on RealPlayer and add
> > http://66.246.59.69:8700
> >
> > You probably won't understand it but Xeoax, Oaxaca is the only
> > realaudio stream that I listen to.
>
>
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Kent Stewart wrote:
Use the location menu item on RealPlayer and add
http://66.246.59.69:8700
You probably won't understand it but Xeoax, Oaxaca is the only realaudio
stream that I listen to.
kmplayer and gmplayer handle it perfectly. Xine handles it but doesn't
sound q
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 04:59 pm, Darren Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Rob wrote:
> > I can sympathize about these linux program problems. I want to be
> > able to listen to Real Audio streams, but as it is now I have to
> > boot into Windows to do it.
>
> While not directly relate
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:24 pm, Scott I. Remick wrote:
> I had Flash6 working but have need to try Flash7 (I know it might crash,
> but some sites I use require at least Flash7). But I can't get it to work
> at all.
>
> I uninstalled linuxpluginwrapper and linux-flashplugin6 before I started
I had Flash6 working but have need to try Flash7 (I know it might crash,
but some sites I use require at least Flash7). But I can't get it to work
at all.
I uninstalled linuxpluginwrapper and linux-flashplugin6 before I started.
I've tried Beecher's instructions and about:plugins still doesn't sh
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Rob wrote:
I can sympathize about these linux program problems. I want to be
able to listen to Real Audio streams, but as it is now I have to boot
into Windows to do it.
While not directly related to the point its possible to listen to
realaudio streams just fine without
> > >
> > > The linux-realplayer won't start because it can't find any fonts and
> > > it tells me to fix fontconfig. I never had problems with fonts before
> > > fontconfig came into being. I really have no idea why it exists.
> >
> > I have no problems running realplayer installed from the por
On Monday 19 December 2005 07:24 pm, Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 05:41 pm, Rob wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:12:07 -0900
> >
> > Beecher Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday 19 December 2005 07:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > > On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul
On Monday 19 December 2005 05:41 pm, Rob wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:12:07 -0900
>
> Beecher Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2005 07:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
Rob writes:
> I can sympathize about these linux program problems. I want to
> be able to listen to Real Audio streams, but as it is now I have
> to boot into Windows to do it.
>
> The linux-realplayer won't start because it can't find any fonts
> and it tells me to fix fontconfig. I nev
On Monday 19 December 2005 18:41, Rob wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:12:07 -0900
>
> Beecher Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 19 December 2005 07:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
> >
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:12:07 -0900
Beecher Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 07:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> > > On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wro
On Monday 19 December 2005 07:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wrote:
> > > > Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > > > > The port is not broken cvsup your tree
> > >
On 18 Dec Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wrote:
> > > Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > > > The port is not broken cvsup your tree
> > >
> > > Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the
On Sunday 18 December 2005 10:16 pm, Dev Tugnait wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wrote:
> > Dev Tugnait wrote:
> > > The port is not broken cvsup your tree
> >
> > Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the
> > proper symbolic link for the acrobat plu
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 01:06 -0500, James Bailie wrote:
> Dev Tugnait wrote:
>
> > The port is not broken cvsup your tree
>
> Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the
> proper symbolic link for the acrobat plugin, nor is the path
> for it correct in the sample libmap.confs
Dev Tugnait wrote:
> The port is not broken cvsup your tree
Yes it is. While some things work, it still does not create the
proper symbolic link for the acrobat plugin, nor is the path
for it correct in the sample libmap.confs. Beecher's fix will correct.
--
James Bailie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
h
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 19:47 -0900, Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote:
> > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing
> > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any
> > upgrade?
>
> That port is borked, here's
On Sunday 18 December 2005 07:47 pm, Beecher Rintoul wrote:
> On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote:
> > Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing
> > problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any
> > upgrade?
>
> That port is borked, here's
On Sunday 18 December 2005 06:57 pm, Ross Adams Lippert wrote:
> Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing
> problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any
> upgrade?
That port is borked, here's what you have to do to get it working:
## Workaround for broken port
What vexing problem? Care to share it... install www/linuxpluginwrapper
WITH_PLUGINS=YES
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:57 -0500, Ross Adams Lippert wrote:
> Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing
> problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any
> upgrade?
>
> (not s
Where is the latest documentation on this continually vexing
problem? Why do I feel like this is the hardest part of any
upgrade?
(not subbed)
-r
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-question
> I don't have any problem with these 2 sites. Maybe
> it's your Java plugin that messes things up. Try
> disabling it for a while (just comment out lines
> in the java section in libmap.conf). I think 1.5.0
> can still be very unstable.
Up untill i installed the fl
On 10/2/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting...
> >
> > Please, send me some links which behave badly.
> >
> > >From the output of firefox it feels like the problem
> >
> > is with permissions or something like that. Try
> > running firefox under root, please.
>
> http://www.hattri
> Interesting...
>
> Please, send me some links which behave badly.
>
> >From the output of firefox it feels like the problem
>
> is with permissions or something like that. Try
> running firefox under root, please.
http://www.hattrick.org
Http://www.neopets.com
Basically any website that has fl
On 10/2/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The plugin works on most things although there are sites that dont like the
> flash plaugin because it is out of date and will frequently crash firefox on
> me .. below is the output, bottom being the result AFTER it has closed
> itself.
>
>
> > This
On 10/1/05, Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warren wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 9:17 pm, Andrew P. wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Whats a good stable flash plugi
On 10/1/05, Bill Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Sat, 1 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:
>
> > On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i
> >> have
&g
At Sat, 1 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:
On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i have
tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji
> > I installed the above mentioned & flash is still not working with
> > FireFox, so unless im issing something then something has gone screwy
> > somewhere.
> >
> > Anyone with any ideas ?
> > --
> > Yours Sincerely
> > Shinjii
> > http://www.shinji.nq.nu
>
> Did you edit libmap.conf?
>
> If yes
Warren wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 9:17 pm, Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i
have tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
www/linuxpluginw
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 9:17 pm, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i
> > have tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
>
> www/linuxpluginwrapp
On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I installed the above mentioned & flash is still not working with
> > > FireFox, so unless im issing something then something has gone screwy
> > > somewhere.
> > >
> > > Anyone with any ideas ?
> > > --
> > > Yours Sincerely
> > > Shinjii
> > >
On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 9:17 pm, Andrew P. wrote:
> > On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i
> > > have tried in the past h
On 10/1/05, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i have
> tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
> --
> Yours Sincerely
> Shinjii
>
Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD? various ones i have
tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 05:07, Jorge Mario G. Mazo wrote:
> Hi there
> I had the www/linuxpluginwrapper flash plugin working
> yesterday I used portupgraded to upgrade and after
> that
> flash is not working anymore
>
> I tried removing the port and installing again
> buck
Hi there
I had the www/linuxpluginwrapper flash plugin working
yesterday I used portupgraded to upgrade and after
that
flash is not working anymore
I tried removing the port and installing again
buck no luck
any tips?
my libmap.conf is the old one
and every thing else is the same old stuff
On Saturday 16 July 2005 12:48, Emil Khatib wrote:
> Hi, I can't get flash movies to play in freebsd 5.4 amd64. The movies
> play too fast. I've tried the flashplugin-mozilla plugin in the ports.
> I also tried another one. Is there any way to solution this?
The normal answer is that the only port
Hi, I can't get flash movies to play in freebsd 5.4 amd64. The movies
play too fast. I've tried the flashplugin-mozilla plugin in the ports.
I also tried another one. Is there any way to solution this?
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 02:53, Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
> I used this:
> http://freebsd.kde.org/howtos/konqueror-flash.php
> for Konq-3.4.0.
Fantastic, sorted! Just Opera to go now!
Thanks a lot,
Ben
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 01:46, the author Ben Paley contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: Flash plugin:
>On Tuesday 14 June 2005 03:21, Eric Schuele wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> Here's a link (back to the archives) that helped me out (firefox &
>> flash)...
>
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 03:21, Eric Schuele wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> Here's a link (back to the archives) that helped me out (firefox &
> flash)...
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1302736+0+/usr/local/www/db/tex
>t/2005/freebsd-stable/20050306.freebsd-stable
>
> HTH.
Very much! linuxplug
--On June 13, 2005 6:42:24 PM -0700 Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There seem to be lot mozilla/firefox choices in the ports tree.. which
version(s) did you use and what version of freebsd are you running?
I am just recompiling firefox in the hope of getting flash working.
I am using /usr/por
Ben Paley wrote:
Hello,
First, sorry - I know there's a thread about this already, but I just noticed
I had "empty trash on exit" ticked in my mail client (doh!), so I can't find
it...
I've got a brand new (1 week and a bit) install of 5.4-RELEASE, and I'm
driving myself mad trying to get s
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 06:24, Ben Paley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First, sorry - I know there's a thread about this already, but I just
> noticed I had "empty trash on exit" ticked in my mail client (doh!), so I
> can't find it...
>
> I've got a brand new (1 week and a bit) install of 5.4-RELEASE, and I'm
>
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
