Original Message
Subject:Re: package vs ports question
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:57:04 -0300
From: Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I also have a question
Duane Whitty wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: package vs ports question
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:57:04 -0300
From: Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:15:07 -0400
Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the installation process install any package that may be
overriden by any port?
yes. for example ,you select to install bash-3 from sysinstall ( the
freebsd installer UI ). this reads and installs the package
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from packages - or
make package then pkg_add
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:57:49 -0300
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
np :)
So if a port may override a package,
a port and a package are the same thing, in a different form :). the
tree structure under
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you, you
dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit counter-intuitive, but
really handy)
Make package creates a package out of an installed port (it will install the
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
counter-intuitive, but really handy)
Make package creates a package out
Wow, I stopped following this thread for a few hours and now I can just
compile a mini-ports howto. ^^ So, first things first: thanks for all who
replied. All replies were meaningful, so thank you all.
Kevin, what I didn't know was the fact that ports and packages share the
same database. Knowing
On Monday 27 March 2006 17:02, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Wow, I stopped following this thread for a few hours and now I can just
compile a mini-ports howto. ^^ So, first things first: thanks for all who
replied. All replies were meaningful, so thank you all.
Kevin, what I didn't know was the fact that ports and
I am curious, the key different between packages and ports are that packages
are precompiled and ports are not? Am I erroneous in this statement? I'm a
little confused as I have been always using make install clean from the
ports and don't see the difference... Has anyone else had the same
Huy Ton That wrote:
I am curious, the key different between packages and ports are that packages
are precompiled and ports are not? Am I erroneous in this statement? I'm a
little confused as I have been always using make install clean from the
ports and don't see the difference... Has anyone
14 matches
Mail list logo
