Hi!
I'm setting up a jailed server. I'm hoping to eventually use
sysutils/ezjail to deaden the pain a bit!
First step, have to get the disks partitioned! They're unpacked, at least ;-)
I've read lots of comments like,
You should never setup your FreeBSD systems the way Linux or other
*nix's
drive 2:
/ 2GB
A bit big, but fine
I though so, but with drives this big cheap ... :-)
/boot 2GB
Nope, FreeBSD doesn't need / want a /boot
I didn't realize :-/
Just to be sure, you DO mean it doesn't want a separate
slice/partition,
Hi guys!
Some great ideas advice. Thanks a lot :-)
/boot *needs* to be on /. A loader looks for [bootdisk][bootslice]
[a]/boot/loader.
Ok, gotcha.
Since you have 2 physical drives, you may want to do 8G on each drive. In
the
rare case it's needed, your system is in trouble and
Hi everybody!
If we've
i) raised a question about a port on this list
ii) sent an email to the port maintainer
iii) filed a pr
iv) waited ~ a month, then followed-up the pr
and there's still no communication / action, what's the right next
step? Is there a different list to communicate
Hi John!
Does your PR include a fix?
Well, I've sent my suggestion to the maintainer -- I don't know if
it's the *right* fix for the general port. But, it works for me as a
workaround.
For what it's worth, in this particular case, I've simply asked that
the www/apache22 port be made
Hi Bill!
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
During the freeze, you'll have difficulty getting any ports changes
through.
That's what I figured -- and why I've been trying to communicate about
this for ~ a month already.
It's not really that *I* have an
Hi everybody!
I'm not a very heavy perl user, but I've never *needed* to install CPAN on
FreeBSD. A little creative searching has revealed that most perl packages
are part of the FreeBSD Ports collection.
If you use more obscure CPAN packages, I can see there might be a need to
install
Hi Jerry!
I am not sure I understand all of what is being said or implied here.
Hm. Now *I'm* confused by your confusion ;-) Let me summarize --
The www/apache22 port ignores (or more correctly, is not yet aware of
...) a port-installed bdb46. unlike most other ports that are
up-to-date, it
Hi Howie,
What does CPANPLUS do that CPAN doesn't that makes this a better
solution? Does it somehow integrate with the ports better? (rather than
getting conflicts between p5-* and bsdpan-*)
I use quite a lot of CPAN modules, so a way to be able to get 'obscure'
modules, and still use
Hi,
Yes, I'm aware of pending freezes and such ... and the need for a PR.
As for ignoring make and build settings, that should probably
be put in a PR (bug report). If it is a serious bug, then it
might get addressed before the release. Otherwise it won't get
touched until after.
I
Hi everybody,
I'm building my 1st FreeBSD-based box. Yay, I guess ;-p
I've already installed Berkeley DB v46 from the Ports system.
Now, I'ts on to MySQL server.
I can easily build manually from source, configuring whatever I need.
But, I'm trying to get the Ports system's knobs figured out
Hi Dan!
(1) Turn OFF use of BDB completely. The build seems to default to the
bundled BDB
Mysql 5.0's configure script doesn't seem to have a --without-bdb flag,
so it always gets built.
(2) Use the Port install of BDB v46 I mentioned above.
It does have a --with-berkeley-db=DIR
Hi Dan!
I just tried it and it looks like that does disable bdb. I never
noticed that line in the Makefile before :)
Well, you'd think it should. But even with,
grep berkeley-db ./Makefile
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-assembler --without-berkeley-db
the build seems to /ignore/ the flag,
Hi Dan,
One last thing (It's way past my bedtime here ;-p)
See that --with-berkeley-db in there? :-(
A little digging in the mysql ditribution's source files dredged up
the CONF_COMMAND variable.
Do-ing,
CONF_COMMAND=--without-berkeley-db; export $CONF_COMMAND
perl -pi -e
I'll check the build's output with ldd when the build finishes.
Looks like the simple workaround works :-)
ldd /usr/local/libexec/mysqld
libz.so.3 = /lib/libz.so.3 (0x284a8000)
libwrap.so.4 = /usr/lib/libwrap.so.4 (0x284b9000)
libssl.so.5 =
Hi!
When I ran an upgrade to the Ports tree using the portsnap tool
portsnap fetch update
I saw an available update available to /usr/ports/www/apache22, but it
was immediately followed with an error,
IGNORED
Unknown Berkeley DB version
in the console output.
Other ports eventually get
Hi Gerard!
I have been having the same problem with the latest version of
Berkeley. I was going to contact the maintainer '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
however, I have not gotten around to it yet. Perhaps you might want to
inquire of him how to get this problem rectified.
Sure! Best, I guess, to just
Hi!
Just FYI, I didn't get any response to the message I sent to the
port-maintainer. I do know they've been working on / releasing stuff
on this port in the meantime.
Since I don't see any other way to communicate to a maintainer other
than by list/email, I guess the right, next step is filing
18 matches
Mail list logo