On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:23 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
...
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 13:33 +0100, J B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:23:38 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:36:21AM +, Luke Marsden wrote:
...
I'm trying to confirm that, on a system with no pages swapped out, that
the following is a true statement:
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
[ ... ]
My current (probably quite simplistic) understanding of the FreeBSD
virtual memory system is that, for each process as reported by top:
* Size corresponds to the total size of all the text pages for the
process (those belonging to
Thanks for your email, Chuck.
Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident
memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active +
inactive lists.
Hmm...if a process gets swapped out entirely, the pages for it will be moved
to the cache list, flushed, and then
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:07 -0500
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
* Resident corresponds to a subset of the pages above: those
pages which actually occupy physical/core memory. Notably pages may
appear in size but not appear in resident for
On 26/11/2010 18:24, Jack Raats wrote:
It looks like that there may be a memory leak of my swap space with one
of the processes that is running.
Big question: How can I determine which process is responsible.
Any suggestions?
Look for a process with a really big SIZE in top(1) ?
Look
It looks like that there may be a memory leak of my swap space with one of
the processes that is running.
Big question: How can I determine which process is responsible.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Jack
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
leak, how to find what causes the memory leak?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
+ free adds up to only 3 Gb.
Where is the rest of the memory ??
There are a lot other uses for memory. Try running top a couple of
time when you seem to detect the leak and add together the various
categories of memory.
Is there a memory leak, how to find what causes the memory leak?
If indeed
List,
Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
man 3 getenv
snip
Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
value to the same name will result in a memory leak. The FreeBSD seman-
tics for these functions (namely
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:43:57 -0600, Modulok modu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm just not that bright, but I have a question regarding the following:
man 3 getenv
snip
Successive calls to setenv() or putenv() assigning a differently sized
value to the same name will result in a memory leak
I get the feeling Conky 1.4.8 (the sysutil), or one of the libs it
links against, has a memory leak. I do not have any hard evidence yet
(like a patch to fix it), but the memory consumption slowly climbs to
what appears to be excessive. I did read the manual page about:
Conky is generally very
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:56:25PM -0700, Modulok wrote:
I get the feeling Conky 1.4.8 (the sysutil), or one of the libs it
links against, has a memory leak. I do not have any hard evidence yet
(like a patch to fix it), but the memory consumption slowly climbs to
what appears to be excessive
In the last episode (Mar 15), Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri said:
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it.
*sigh*
This happened since like 6 months I don't
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it. *sigh*
This happened since like 6 months I don't know why? it was okay before that.
here is the top info
last pid:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:55:24AM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hello,
I have a webmail server, has apache 2.2.4, mysql 5.0.33, php 5.2.1,
clamav, mailscanner ..etc.
The weird issue it goes into deep swap when it starts or I restart it.
*sigh*
This happened since like 6
Dear Mailing List,
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it. This is
appearing when starting vlc from shell playing a playlist and streaming
video over udp to LAN like so:
vlc --loop playlist.m3u --sout
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Roger Olofsson wrote:
The application vlc (found in ports) when run on FBSD 5.x and 6.x
behaves as if there's a memory leak somewhere hidden in it.
[ ... ]
My question is how do I track down a possible memory leak and would
there be a tool to monitor (from
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much documentation regarding this subject.
It has been reported
In response to Tom Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much documentation
On 8/30/06, Tom Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reading http://www.bsdnews.com and ran across an article about a
memory leak in php and mysql on FreeBSD. This is fairly concerning
considering I run quite a few servers with this setup. I haven't been
able to find much documentation
Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse
real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB)
avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB)
What's the best way to track down more information as to the cause of
this problem?
Do you run other applications also?
There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, Erik Norgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do you run other applications also?
There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak
that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are
available now.
Unfortunately no, its cli
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:30:17PM +1100, Robert Leftwich wrote:
From: Robert Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, Erik Norgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do you run other applications also?
There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:40 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and
Python and C :-(
I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived
Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's
python, some module, or the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500, David Scheidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived
Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's
python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But
the processes
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote:
After 1 dataset it is:
Mem: 107M Active, 1919M Inact, 158M Wired, 16K Cache, 214M Buf,
570M
Free
Swap: 4068M Total, 4068M Free
which totals 2968M
While running on the 6th dataset:
Mem: 1032M Active, 1045M Inact, 260M
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:07 -0500, Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote:
Possibly your database is using lots of SysV shared memory, which
would explain why wired is going up so much, otherwise perhaps
something in the kernel is
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, Robert Leftwich
I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o
size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the
extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point):
Oops, just noticed that
After running some number crunching for the last twelve hours I noticed
my box starting to use swap. Given that it has 4gb in it (of which 3gb
is available, see my other email for that issue) and I know that the app
never uses more than around 1gb I was surprised. Looking at the numbers
from top I
Robert Leftwich wrote:
[ ... ]
Mem: 274M Active, 227M Inact, 263M Wired, 95M Cache, 214M Buf, 4536K
Free
Swap: 4068M Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse
real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB)
avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB)
What's the best way to track down more information as to
I keep getting errors in my apache error logs with the following:
Is this a problem with PHP?
/usr/ports/textproc/php5-xml/work/php-5.1.1/ext/xml/xml.c(695) :
Freeing 0x0882
B624 (32 bytes),
script=/usr/local/www/groupoffice-com-2.14-FINAL-4/modules/phps
ysinfo/index.php
Okay, here's the background. I thought top was displaying my memory
stats oddly, so I ran a little test. I rebooted the pc, logged into the
console as a normal user, and ran top. I did this at around midnight
last night / this morning. I let it run until I got home from work,
(6:15 today) So
Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This machine sat unattended all day. What could be causing the drastic
drop in Free memory? Is this normal? When I actually use the machine,
it's even worse... Almost all of my RAM goes from Free to other
various states, Mostly Inactive, even after I've closed
there was a memory leak reported in Perl 5.8.2 but
I've found nothing on 5.8.4. Has anyone else experienced this with
threaded perl?
Regards,
Chris
Chris Miller
NetGate Internet
An iStrata Company
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
sorry if this quistion has allread been asked and awnsered..
i got noticeing that my system was runnung out of mem so i did top and this is what i
found
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
9936 dave -22 0 219M 98M RUN 16:03 46.04% 46.04% netscape-bin
15211 dave 31 0
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:38:49PM -0700, whitevamp wrote:
sorry if this quistion has allread been asked and awnsered..
i got noticeing that my system was runnung out of mem so i did top and this is what
i found
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
9936 dave -22
Hello everyone!
I have just noticed that ethereal eats a lot of memory.
Currently it has no capture running and no file loaded.
Previous analyzied file was about 56Mbytes. But it was
closed. Is this behavior normal?
Mem: 111M Active, 15M Inact, 46M Wired, 6820K Cache, 28M Buf, 564K Free
Swap:
That does seem excessive. From my -CURRENT system (admittedly
up less that 24 hours):
Mem: 179M Active, 190M Inact, 93M Wired, 25M Cache, 60M Buf, 7044K
Indeed :\
After a reboot, it was great. The system became all responsive again,
and it didn't swap anymore (applications were actually
Hi list,
I have been running 5.2.1 on a Celeron with 512MB RAM for nearly two
months straight, but have been experiencing heavy swapping these past
few days. In a last-ditch attempt, I stopped all the services hoping to
reclaim the memory somehow.
The output from top (after stopping services)
Woon Wai Keen @ doubleukay.com writes:
The output from top (after stopping services) reads:
Mem: 12M Active, 10M Inact, 451M Wired, 1364K Cache, 59M Buf, 11M Free
Swap: 1024M Total, 15M Used, 1009M Free, 1% Inuse, 12K In
I noticed that the amount of 'wired' memory before and after
Hi ,
I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
Looking for an early reply.
Thanks
Jitendra
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
In the last episode (Apr 12), jitendra pande said:
I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
dmalloc in ports (ports/devel/dmalloc) is very useful for catching
leaks.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure that there isn't anything else running? Why don't you give us
an ps -ax output? I don't think there's a memory leak in 5.1, since I've
seen running 5.1 just fine on a PE2650 with 2 GB RAM. You shouldn't
rely on top too much acually. Vmstat is a better program when looking
at memory
that there isn't anything else running? Why don't you give us
an ps -ax output? I don't think there's a memory leak in 5.1, since I've
seen running 5.1 just fine on a PE2650 with 2 GB RAM. You shouldn't
rely on top too much acually. Vmstat is a better program when looking
at memory.
Cheers,
Jorn
Argelo wrote:
Are you sure that there isn't anything else running? Why don't you give
us an ps -ax output? I don't think there's a memory leak in 5.1, since
I've seen running 5.1 just fine on a PE2650 with 2 GB RAM. You shouldn't
rely on top too much acually. Vmstat is a better program when
(I'm not a member of the list; please Cc me on any replies.)
We're running Apache 1.3.28 on a 5.1-RELEASE machine. It's a Dell PE 2650
w/ 2GB RAM. The site contains a lot of large files (multi-megabyte) -
otherwise there's nothing unusual running.
The Active memory use, according to top, seems
Hi,
Woops, sorry about my other asdf spam email.. :-)
This might be a stupid/obvious question but dmalloc is reporting that I have
a memory leak in the following (test) program and I don't know why:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include dmalloc.h
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char
49 matches
Mail list logo
