> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Venturoli
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 1:08 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Firefox 3 and 4 with NFS home director
On 06/20/11 21:55, Devin Teske wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has been able to test Firefox 4 on NFS $HOME.
I had problems in the past with Firefox 3, but they are gone.
Firefox 4 also works.
Right now I'm using 8.1, but I don't remember if this was what solved.
In any case, have you got stat
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Warren Block wrote:
One other note: FF3 wanted to check my extensions for compatibility almost
every time it started. A process for disabling that check is described here:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updating_extensions
It's just adding these two settings to about:config:
> I did experience this, and I had to tweak the following settings in
> about:config before the experience became usable:
>
> network.http.pipelining: true
> network.http.pipelining.maxrequests: 10
> network.http.pipelining.ssl: true
>
> The image loading and display code seems to hav
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Jason W. Morgan wrote:
I also get the annoying black boxes. I haven't tested it thoroughly
yet, but it seems to happen most often with resized png images. That
could just be a result of the pages I visit though; they seem to use
pngs quite extensively.
That's a known bug:
> I did experience this, and I had to tweak the following settings in
> about:config before the experience became usable:
>
>network.http.pipelining: true
>network.http.pipelining.maxrequests: 10
>network.http.pipelining.ssl: true
>
> The image loading and display code seems to have cha
On 2008.07.14 14:08:03, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 06:24:50PM -0600, Keith Seyffarth wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone else had problems with Firefox 3 installed from the ports
> > being massively slow?
> >
> > Unlike on Windows, where the load time for the application is much
> > slo
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 06:24:50PM -0600, Keith Seyffarth wrote:
>
> Has anyone else had problems with Firefox 3 installed from the ports
> being massively slow?
>
> Unlike on Windows, where the load time for the application is much
> slower (takes roughly twice as long as FF2 did), but once the
On Sun 2008-07-13 18:24:50 UTC-0600, Keith Seyffarth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Has anyone else had problems with Firefox 3 installed from the ports
> being massively slow?
No. I installed it from Ports on a FreeBSD 7.0 and it seemed to run
with no major dramas. Certainly no long delays betwe
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:47:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 07:31:28PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Mel wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 07:31:28PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Mel wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I d
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I down
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Mel wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I downloaded the firefox*gz file from
On Saturday 05 July 2008 17:56:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I downloaded the firefox*gz file from devel but it doesn't make for
> > > 64-bit. Is Firefox 3 ava
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I downloaded the firefox*gz file from devel but it doesn't make for
> > 64-bit. Is Firefox 3 available for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7.0?
>
> It builds fine from ports o
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:27:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the firefox*gz file from devel but it doesn't make for
> 64-bit. Is Firefox 3 available for 64-bit AMD FreeBSD 7.0?
It builds fine from ports on amd64 7-STABLE. Use the port www/firefox3.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:06:45 -0400
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the gui looks just like v2, right?
>
> TFC
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:34:01AM +0200, herbs wrote:
> >> Yes, you invoke #firefox (the V
the gui looks just like v2, right?
TFC
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:34:01AM +0200, herbs wrote:
>> Yes, you invoke #firefox (the V2.x) or #firefox-devel (for the new one).
>> Dont remember with the bookmarks and plugins thoug
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:34:01AM +0200, herbs wrote:
> Yes, you invoke #firefox (the V2.x) or #firefox-devel (for the new one).
> Dont remember with the bookmarks and plugins though, you maybe have to
> import/reinstall these.
Thanks for confirmation.
--
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: htt
Yes, you invoke #firefox (the V2.x) or #firefox-devel (for the new one).
Dont remember with the bookmarks and plugins though, you maybe have to
import/reinstall these.
Cheers
herbs
> > I took firefox-devel. Some days ago it was version 3.0a2. Works quite well
> > if you really dont want to wait
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:35:46PM +0200, herbert langhans wrote:
> I took firefox-devel. Some days ago it was version 3.0a2. Works quite well if
> you really dont want to wait..
Does it coexist happily with Firefox 2.x?
--
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
I was ess
On Fri 2008-06-27 14:01:46 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Now that there's been quite some focus on the release of Firefox 3, I'm
> wondering if anyone on the list knows when one can expect it to appear
> in the ports tree?
3.0.a2 is currently in the ports tree - www/fir
I took firefox-devel. Some days ago it was version 3.0a2. Works quite well if
you really dont want to wait..
Cheers
herbs
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:01:46 +0200
Leslie Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that there's been quite some focus on the release of Firefox 3, I'm
> wondering if anyo
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 02:01:46PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> Now that there's been quite some focus on the release of Firefox 3, I'm
> wondering if anyone on the list knows when one can expect it to appear in
> the ports tree?
> Thanks
> Leslie
Also, will the port of Firefox 3 work with AM
25 matches
Mail list logo
