On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6 day
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
>> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
>> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
>
> 6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines t
> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines to 110... ahead of
France and
That makes me kind angry too but many other failed to show the "big corps"
what the bsd* OSs worth.
Macromedia know about freebsd, the linux dev coordinator posts about freebsd
in his product blog but they don't care.. they know that having a linux
driver is enough to have a good reputation in th
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 05:34:48 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those that are accusing bsdstats of being a "pissing match" ... I'm
> personally tired of watching Linux get all the support when, IMHO, the
> *BSDs are the better system ... the point of bsdstats is to s
On 9/9/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to
> push the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes
> reporting from there ... DragonFly
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Granted, but, after talking to Matt @ DragonFly, based on the fact that
DragonFly doesn't have a port to AMD64 (it was a fork of FreeBSD 4.x)
I've removed China/India/Korea from the list as 'overly suspicious
numbers' ... :(
A
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Granted, but, after talking to Matt @ DragonFly, based on the fact that
> DragonFly doesn't have a port to AMD64 (it was a fork of FreeBSD 4.x)
> I've removed China/India/Korea from the list as 'overly suspicious
> numbers' ... :(
Ah well. I guess there will be a slight
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Interesting. The 300.bsdstats script seems to except OpenBSD and NetBSD
from the device reporting stuff, but not DFly.
That does look extremely consistent with the known supported platforms
and versions of the various BSDs. As you say, if it is someon
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> if it is real, and since it seems to come from
> a single IP so we can assume it's all from one project or corporate entity,
> then it sounds like a very interesting project I'd like to hear more about,
The other explanation that suddenly springs
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:02:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then Ne
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:24:02 -1000
Antony Mawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That issue has been addressed... us Aussies should start showing up as
> of next month's results (or re-run the submission manually if you can't
> wait :-). It was a timezone difference issue.
cool... though the issue
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Reported devices right now doesn't work on the other BSDs, as apparently
> we are the only one that has a pciconf command :( But, here is a
> sampling of systems information for those coming in from KR (that is
> Korea, right?):
>
> operating_system | release
On 8/09/2006 8:43 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:18:44 -0400
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly i
On 8/09/2006 3:02 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
Are there *really* no Korean Free
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:02:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
>
> Are
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:18:44 -0400
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
> > the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
> > from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBS
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>>
>> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to
>> push the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes
>> reporting from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD
On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to
push the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes
reporting from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then
OpenBSD ...
Are there *really* no
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, the
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, the
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>>> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
>>> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
>>> from there ... DragonFly is first, then Ne
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
>> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
>> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
>>
On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
>
> Are there *really* no
24 matches
Mail list logo