Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-09 Thread Artem Koutchine
>From: "Joshua Lokken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Artem Koutchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-08 06:44]: > > IMHO the upgrade pricedure is unstable and wrong in either case. > > > > What do you think? > > I don't pretend to understand *all* of the reasoning behind the > recommended upgrade procedu

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Remko Lodder
Kent Stewart wrote: On Thursday 08 April 2004 07:09 am, Remko Lodder wrote: install kernel, reboot, make buildworld, reboot in singleusermode make installworld, mergemaster -p , reboot, mergemaster. does the same imho. I may be confused here but if you do a buildworld after you do an install ker

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Joshua Lokken
* Artem Koutchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-08 06:44]: > IMHO the upgrade pricedure is unstable and wrong in either case. > > What do you think? I don't pretend to understand *all* of the reasoning behind the recommended upgrade procedure. Since I began using FreeBSD, I have performed somewhe

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Kent Stewart
On Thursday 08 April 2004 07:09 am, Remko Lodder wrote: > Artem Koutchine wrote: > > IMHO the upgrade pricedure is unstable and wrong in either case. > > Then why is it a proven working procedure? (I upgraded my boxes from > 5.0-RC1 to 5.2.1-p4 (all the way) And it never failed on me!) I agree bec

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:38:27PM +0400, Artem Koutchine wrote: > IMHO the upgrade pricedure is unstable and wrong in either case. > > If you build, install a new kernel and reboot and they make installworld > you may face code dumps because all world is not compatible with the > new kernel. >

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Remko Lodder
Artem Koutchine wrote: IMHO the upgrade pricedure is unstable and wrong in either case. Then why is it a proven working procedure? (I upgraded my boxes from 5.0-RC1 to 5.2.1-p4 (all the way) And it never failed on me!) Previously on 4.x it also worked out fine (another method i used over there,

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Artem Koutchine
? - Original Message - From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andy Rozman (Aleksander)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:11 PM Subject: Re: Install

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Andy Rozman (Aleksander) wrote: > > Hi ! > > I succesfully compiled FreeBSD 5.2.1, but problem happened when I wanted to do > install. After I run installworld install started but halted at one point > (with copying ld-so.1 in libexec). I found > ld-so.1

Re: Install world fails, computer almost unusable

2004-04-07 Thread Kent Stewart
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 04:45 am, Andy Rozman (Aleksander) wrote: > Hi ! > > I succesfully compiled FreeBSD 5.2.1, but problem happened when I > wanted to do install. After I run installworld install started but > halted at one point (with copying ld-so.1 in libexec). I found > ld-so.1.old file