Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 + Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast! I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD! Why didn't you just get the FreeBSD precompiled

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jud
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:01:11 +0200, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 + Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast! I'm trashing my

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jesse Guardiani
dick hoogendijk wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 + Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its fast! I'm trashing my Windows partition tonight! Viva BSD! Why didn't you

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400 Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dick hoogendijk wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 + Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jud
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: dick hoogendijk wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:23:44 + Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never thought I would see the day, but now I can open Excel and Word docs in FreeBSD no problem! And its

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:12:14 -0400 Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:55:41 -0400, Jesse Guardiani Maybe I just don't understand how to use the ports tree 100% yet... If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports or packages. Ports are just a

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jud
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jud wrote: [snip] If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports or packages. Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could never install from a package

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jud wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jud wrote: [snip] If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports or packages. Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could never install from

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-17 Thread Jud
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:35:07 -0400, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jud wrote: [snip] I'm probably just being thick, but I'm not sure what cvsup-ing the ports has to do with availability/installability of packages. What have you read in the Handbook or elsewhere that gives you the

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-16 Thread Kenneth Culver
Quoting Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native java (diablo-jdk13)? Matthew Faircliff ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java

2003-10-16 Thread Jud
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:59:52 +, Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello, Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native java (diablo-jdk13)? Matthew Faircliff I don't know the answer, but would also appreciate one - perhaps slightly more