:
https://enazadev.ru/stub-data/freebsd12-patched-trap.png
05.11.2020 11:06, Cevin пишет:
The problem seems to have been fixed, but the code is still in the review.
For more details, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26915#601420
Eugene M. Zheganin 于2020年11月5日周四 下午12:35写道：
Hello,
Guys, does
Hello,
Guys, does anyone have VM running in AliCloud Chinese provider (one of
the biggest, if not the biggest one) ? They seem to provide stock
FreeBSD 11.x images on some Redhat-based Linux with VirtIO which run
just fine (at least I take a look at their kernel and it seem to be a
stock
Hello,
On 13.10.2020 14:19, Kristof Provost wrote:
Are these symptoms of a bug ?
Perhaps. It can also be a symptom of resource exhaustion.
Are there any signs of memory allocation failures, or incrementing
error counters (in netstat or in pfctl)?
Well, the only signs of resource
Hello,
I'm running a FreeBSD 12.1 server as a VM under Hyper-V. And although
this letter will make an impression of another lame post blaming FreeBSD
for all of the issues while the author should blame himselm, I'm atm out
of another explanation. The thing is: I'm getting loads of sendmail
On 09.09.2020 17:29, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hello,
I'm using sort of FreeBSD ZFS appliance with custom API, and I'm
suffering from huge timeouts when large (dozens, actually) of
concurrent zfs/zpool commands are issued
(get/create/destroy/snapshot/clone mostly).
Are there any tunables
Hello,
I'm using sort of FreeBSD ZFS appliance with custom API, and I'm
suffering from huge timeouts when large (dozens, actually) of concurrent
zfs/zpool commands are issued (get/create/destroy/snapshot/clone mostly).
Are there any tunables that could help mitigate this ?
Once I took part
Hello,
27.08.2020 23:01, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
And as soon as I'm switching to it from DNS RR I'm starting to get get
"Can't assign outgoing address when connecting to ...". The usual
approach would be to assign multiple IP aliases to the destination
backends, so I wil
Hello,
I have a situation where I'm running out of client ports on a huge
reverse-proxy.
Say I have an nginx upstream like this:
upstream geoplatform {
hash $hashkey consistent;
server 127.0.0.1:4079 fail_timeout=10s;
server 127.0.0.1:4080 fail_timeout=10s;
Hello,
I'm Running 12.0-REL in a VM under W2016S with CARP enabled and paired
to a baremetal FreeBSD server.
All of a sudden I realized that thjis machine is unable to become a CARP
MASTER - because it sees it's own ACRP announces, but instead of seeing
them from a CARP synthetic MAC
Hello,
I have a FreeBSD 11.1 box with 2 public IPs that has two tunnels to
another FreeBSD box with 1 public IP. One of these tunnels is working,
the other isn't. Long story short: I have some experience in ipsec
tunnels setup. and I supposed that have configured everything properly,
and to
Hello,
Am I right concluding that there's something wrong in either how freebsd
works with swap partition, or with how gstat reports its activity ?
Because on the consistently woring mirror the situation when only one
disk member is used and the other is not for both reads and writes just
Hello,
20.11.2018 15:42, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
I have server which is mostly torrent box. It uses ZFS and equipped
with 16GiB of physical memory. It is running 11-STABLE (r339914 now).
I've updated it to r339914 from some 11.1-STABLE revision 3 weeks ago.
I was used to see 13-14GiB of
Hello,
On 20.11.2018 16:22, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I know others have created a daemon that observe the ARC and the
amount of wired and free memory, and when these values exceed some
threshold, the daemon will allocate a number of gigabytes, writing
zero to the first byte or word of every
Hello,
On 20.11.2018 15:12, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On freebsd-hackers the other day,
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2018-November/053575.html,
it was suggested to set vm.pageout_update_period=0. This sysctl is at
600 initially.
ZFS' ARC needs to be capped, otherwise it
Hello,
I have a recent FreeBSD 11-STABLE which is mainly used as an iSCSI
target. The system has 64G of RAM but is swapping intensively. Yup,
about of half of the memory is used as ZFS ARC (isn't capped in
loader.conf), and another half is eaten by the kernel, but it oly uses
only about
Hello.
On 28.04.2018 17:46, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded a server from 10.4 to 11.1 and now al of a sudden the
server complains about:
ZFS: Can't find pool by guid
And I end up in the boot prompt:
lsdev gives disk0 withe on p1 the partion that the zroot is/was.
This is an
Hi,
I have a bunch if the dumb (not sarcasm) questions concerning FreeBSD
CTL layer and iSCSI target management:
- is the "FREEBSD CTLDISK 0001" line that the ctladm lunlist is
presenting, and that the initiators are seeing as the hwardware id
hardcoded somewhere, especially the "CTLDISK
Hello,
On 14.05.2018 18:12, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:32:21PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Well, unfortunately this gives me exactly same information as the
core.X.txt file contains - process names without arguments, and I really
want to know what arguments
Hello,
On 14.05.2018 16:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:02:28PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to extract the process arguments from the system
crashdump ? If yes, could anyone please explain to me how do I do it.
ps -M vmcore.file -N
Hello,
On 14.05.2018 16:15, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:02:28PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to extract the process arguments from the system
crashdump ? If yes, could anyone please explain to me how do I do it.
ps -M vmcore.file -N
Hello,
Is there any way to extract the process arguments from the system
crashdump ? If yes, could anyone please explain to me how do I do it.
Thanks.
Eugene.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I have some active vdev disk members that used to be in pool that
clearly have not beed destroyed properly, so I'm seeing in a "zpool
import" output something like
# zpool import
pool: zroot
id: 14767697319309030904
state: UNAVAIL
status: The pool was last accessed by
Hello,
what is this panic, got it just recently on a fresh -STABLE r332466:
Apr 18 17:52:39 san1 kernel: vputx: usecount not zero for vnode
Apr 18 17:52:39 san1 kernel: 0xf80f4d7d1760: tag devfs, type VCHR
Apr 18 17:52:39 san1 kernel: usecount -1, writecount -1, refcount 0
"vputx:
Hi.
About a month ago I was experimenting with HAST on my servers, and,
though I did have a complications with signal 6 on init phase, I was
able to start it and it was working in test mode for a couple of weeks.
After that I had to reboo both of them and now it doesn't start al all -
both
Hi,
05.04.2018 20:15, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
You can indeed tune things here are the relevant sysctls:
sysctl -a | grep trim |grep -v kstat
vfs.zfs.trim.max_interval: 1
vfs.zfs.trim.timeout: 30
vfs.zfs.trim.txg_delay: 32
vfs.zfs.trim.enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.vdev.trim_max_pending: 1
Hello,
On 05.04.2018 20:00, Warner Losh wrote:
I'm also having a couple of iSCSI issues that I'm dealing through
bounty with, so may be this is related somehow. Or may be not. Due
to some issues in iSCSI stack my system sometimes reboots, and
then these "waves" are stopped for
Hello,
On 05.04.2018 19:57, Steven Hartland wrote:
You can indeed tune things here are the relevant sysctls:
sysctl -a | grep trim |grep -v kstat
vfs.zfs.trim.max_interval: 1
vfs.zfs.trim.timeout: 30
vfs.zfs.trim.txg_delay: 32
vfs.zfs.trim.enabled: 1
vfs.zfs.vdev.trim_max_pending: 1
Hi,
I have a production iSCSI system (on zfs of course) with 15 ssd disks
and it's often suffering from TRIMs.
Well, I know what TRIM is for, and I know it's a good thing, but
sometimes (actually often) I'm seeing my disks in gstat are overwhelmed
by the TRIM waves, this looks like a "wave"
Hi,
On 04.04.2018 12:35, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,
Am 04.04.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Eugene M. Zheganin <eug...@zhegan.in>:
I'm just trying to understand these numbers:
file size is 232G, it's actual size on the lz4-compressed dataset is 18G, so
then why is the compressratio only
Hello,
I'm just trying to understand these numbers:
file size is 232G, it's actual size on the lz4-compressed dataset is
18G, so then why is the compressratio only 1.86x ? And why logicalused
is 34.2G ? On one hand, 34.2G exactlyfits to the 1.86x compresstaio, but
still I don't get it.
Hello,
On 22.03.2018 18:05, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
today I eventyally got "panic: vdrop: holdcnt 0" on an iSCSI host, on
an 11.1. Since I don't see any decent information on this - I just
wanted to ask - what this kind of panic generally mean ? And where do
I go with this. The
Hi,
today I eventyally got "panic: vdrop: holdcnt 0" on an iSCSI host, on an
11.1. Since I don't see any decent information on this - I just wanted
to ask - what this kind of panic generally mean ? And where do I go with
this. The only PR I see is about 9.[, and the author there got multiple
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a HAST on FreeBSD, and suddenly it appears to be
a mind-breaking procedure. I totally don't get it, thus it doesn't work,
dumps cores and behaves weirdly. First of all, in an existing
configuration files paradigm, used widely in the whole IT industry, the
local
Hi,
On 22.12.2017 00:38, Marek Zarychta wrote:
Maybe switching to the x-window driven desktop environment at home should be
taken into consideration in this case.
Both ncures and slang versions of misc/mc work fine (key bindings, border
drawing etc.) for ssh(1) client called from xterm
Hi,
On 21.12.2017 23:20, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi,
So, there's a puzzle of minor issues and I wanted to ask how you guys
deal with it.
- with standard ncurses misc/mc there's no borders in mc in putty, and
Ctrl-O flushes the output beneath panels.
-with slang misc/mc Ctrl-O flushes
Hi,
So, there's a puzzle of minor issues and I wanted to ask how you guys
deal with it.
- with standard ncurses misc/mc there's no borders in mc in putty, and
Ctrl-O flushes the output beneath panels.
-with slang misc/mc Ctrl-O flushes the output beneath panels (and I
lived with this
Hi,
my company is developing some sort of API for iSCSI managing, and at
this time we are trying to figure out how to create and delete targets
using ctladm and not usingb the configuration file.
And the relationship between LUNs and ports are unclear to us if we
don't use the
Hi,
would be really nice if the 11.2 and subsequent versions would come with
the hw.vga.textmode=1 as the default in the installation media. Because
you know, there's a problem with some vendors (like HP) who's servers
are incapable of showing graphics in IPMI with the default
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 16:07, Edward Napierala wrote:
2017-08-30 11:45 GMT+02:00 Eugene M. Zheganin <e...@norma.perm.ru
<mailto:e...@norma.perm.ru>>:
Hi,
I have an iSCSI production system that exports a large number of
zvols as the iSCSI targets. System is running Free
Hi,
I got one more problem while dealing iSCSI targets in the production
(yeah, I'm boring and stubborn). The environment is as in previous
questions (a production site, hundreds of VMs and hundreds of disks).
I've encountered this issue before, but this time i decided to ask
whether it's
Hi.
On 02.10.2017 15:03, Edward Napierala wrote:
Thanks for the packet trace. What happens there is that the Windows
initiator logs in, requests Discovery ("SendTargets=All"), receives
the list
of targets, as expected, and then... sends "SendTargets=All" again,
instead of logging off. This
Hi,
Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote 2017-09-22 12:15:
There are two weird things here. First is that the error is coming
from
ctld(8) - the userspace daemon, not the kernel. The second is that
those
invalid opcodes are actually both valid - they are the Text Request,
and the Logout Request
Hi,
Eugene M. Zheganin писал 2017-09-22 10:36:
Hi,
I have old 11-STABLE as an iSCSI server, but out of the blue I
encountered weird problem: only 579 targets can be created. I mean, I
am fully aware that the out-of-the-box limit is 128 targets, with is
enforced by the CTL_MAX_PORTS define
Hi,
I have old 11-STABLE as an iSCSI server, but out of the blue I
encountered weird problem: only 579 targets can be created. I mean, I am
fully aware that the out-of-the-box limit is 128 targets, with is
enforced by the CTL_MAX_PORTS define, and I've set it to 1024 (and of
course rebuilt
Hi,
I have an iSCSI production system that exports a large number of zvols
as the iSCSI targets. System is running FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p7 and
initially all of the zvols were confugured with default volmode. I've
read that it's recommended to use them in dev mode, so the system isn't
On 13.08.2017 16:13, Tenzin Lhakhang wrote:
You may want to have an async zfs-get program/script that regularly
does a zfs get -Ho and stores then in a local cache (redis or your own
program) at a set interval and then the api can hit the cache instead
of directly running get or list.
I cannot
Hi,
On 12.08.2017 20:50, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Aug 11, 2017, at 2:28 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin <e...@norma.perm.ru> wrote:
Why does the zfs listing eat so much of the CPU ?
47114 root 1 200 40432K 3840K db->db 4 0:05 26.84% zfs
47099 root 1 200 40432K
Hi,
Why does the zfs listing eat so much of the CPU ?
last pid: 47151; load averages: 3.97, 6.35,
6.13up 1+23:21:18 09:15:13
146 processes: 3 running, 142 sleeping, 1 waiting
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 30.5% system, 0.3% interrupt, 69.2%
On 05.08.2017 22:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi,
I got a problem that I cannot solve just by myself. I have a iSCSI zfs
SAN system that crashes, corrupting it's data. I'll be short, and try
to describe it's genesis shortly:
1) autumn 2016, SAN is set up, supermicro server, external JBOD
Hi,
On 05.08.2017 22:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
pool: userdata
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
corruption. Applications may be affected.
action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the
entire
Hi,
I got a problem that I cannot solve just by myself. I have a iSCSI zfs
SAN system that crashes, corrupting it's data. I'll be short, and try to
describe it's genesis shortly:
1) autumn 2016, SAN is set up, supermicro server, external JBOD, sandisk
ssds, several redundant pools, FreeBSD
Hi,
today I got the following panic on the December 2016 11-STABLE:
FreeBSD san02.playkey.net 11.0-STABLE FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r310734M:
Thu Dec 29 19:22:30 UTC 2016 emz@san02:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
panic: dva_get_dsize_sync(): bad DVA 4294967295:2086400
GNU gdb 6.1.1
Hi.
On 02.08.2017 17:43, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:56:11 +0200, Eugene M. Zheganin
<e...@norma.perm.ru> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using several FreeBSD zfs installations as the iSCSI production
systems, they basically consist of an LSI HBA, and a JBOD with a
bunch of SSD dis
Hi,
I'm using several FreeBSD zfs installations as the iSCSI production
systems, they basically consist of an LSI HBA, and a JBOD with a bunch
of SSD disks (12-24, Intel, Toshiba or Sandisk (avoid Sandisks btw)).
And I observe a problem very often: gstat shows 20-30% of disk load, but
the
Hi,
any chance we will get the "include" directive for ctl.conf ? Because,
for instance, I'm using bunch of custom APIs on top of iSCSI/zfs and the
inability to split the ctl.conf to a set of different one-for-a-target
config files complicates lot of things. I understand clearly that this
Hi.
On 23.07.2017 0:28, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi,
On 22.07.2017 17:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
is this weird error "cannot destroy: already exists" related to the
fact that the zvol is faulty ? Does it indicate that metadata is
probably faulty too ? Anyway, is there a way
Hi,
On 22.07.2017 17:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
is this weird error "cannot destroy: already exists" related to the
fact that the zvol is faulty ? Does it indicate that metadata is
probably faulty too ? Anyway, is there a way to destroy this dataset ?
Follow-up: I sent a si
Hi,
I cannot destroy a zvol for a reason that I don't understand:
[root@san1:~]# zfs list -t all | grep worker182
zfsroot/userdata/worker182-bad1,38G 1,52T 708M -
[root@san1:~]# zfs destroy -R zfsroot/userdata/worker182-bad
cannot destroy 'zfsroot/userdata/worker182-bad': dataset
Hi.
Is there any chance to mount UDF filesystem under FreeBSD with mdconfig
and ISO image ? Mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /mnt/cdrom gives me the
readme.txt with "This is UDF, you idiot" and mount -t udf /dev/md0
/mnt/cdrom gives me
# mount -t udf /dev/md0 cdrom
mount_udf: /dev/md0: Invalid
Hi,
On 29.06.2017 16:37, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
Say I'm having a server that traps more and more often (different
panics: zfs panics, GPFs, fatal traps while in kernel mode etc), and
then I realize it has tonns of permanent errors on all of it's pools
that scrub is unable to heal
Hi.
Say I'm having a server that traps more and more often (different
panics: zfs panics, GPFs, fatal traps while in kernel mode etc), and
then I realize it has tonns of permanent errors on all of it's pools
that scrub is unable to heal. Does this situation mean it's a bad memory
case ?
Hi.
I'm using a FreeBSD 11.0-R server as a SAN system (with a native iSCSI
target). It has 12 disks attached via external enclosure and a Megaraid
SAS 3003 mrsas(4) controller. Actually I'm using several FreeBSD in
similar configurations as SAN systems, but this one is frequently
Hi.
On 18.04.2017 14:44, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
You did not provide any information about your issue. It is not known
even whether the loader breaks for you, or a kernel starts booting and
failing.
Ideally, you would use serial console and provide the log of everything
printed on it,
Hi,
I need to install FreBSD on an Intel system with s5000pal mainboard. The
problem is, that on the kernel loading stage, FreeBSD reboots the
server. Like, always and silently, without trapping. I have plugged out
all of the discrete PCI controllers, leaving only onboard ones. Still
Hi,
It's not my first letter where I fail to understand the space usage from
zfs utilities, and in previous ones I was kind of convinced that I just
read it wrong, but not this time I guess. See for yourself:
[emz@san01:~]> zpool list data
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAGCAP
Hi.
Some have probably seen this already -
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-March/313254.html
So, could anyone explain why FreeBSD was owned that much. Test is split
into two parts, one is nginx part, and the other is the IPv4 forwarding
part. I understand that nginx
Hi.
On 25.01.2017 15:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> does anyone suffer from this too ? Right now (and for several last
>> years) a 100% decent way to reset a terminal session (for instance,
>> after a connection reset, after acidentally displaying a binary file
>> with symbols that are treated
Hi,
does anyone suffer from this too ? Right now (and for several last
years) a 100% decent way to reset a terminal session (for instance,
after a connection reset, after acidentally displaying a binary file
with symbols that are treated as terminal control sequence, after
breaking a cu session,
Hi.
On 18.01.2017 15:03, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am use Chelsio and Solarflare.
> Not sure about you workload -- I am have 40K+ TCP connections, you
> workload need different tuning.
> Do you planed to utilise both ports?
> For this case you need PCIe 16x card. This is Chelsio T6 and
>
Hi.
Could someone recommend a decent 40Gbit adapter that are proven to be
working under FreeBSD ? The intended purpose - iSCSI traffic, not much
pps, but rates definitely above 10G. I've tried Supermicro-manufactured
Intel XL710 ones (two boards, different servers - same sad story:
packets loss,
Hi.
On 22.12.2016 23:46, Warner Losh wrote:
Sure sounds like your binaries are cross-threaded with the kernel.
what was "file `which camcontrol`" tell you?
I just got this on the FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE Live CD, whan trying to
rescan a scsci bus on an LSI3008 adapter. Looks more like a bug in
Hi.
On 22.12.2016 11:51, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi,
could anyone tell me where am I wrong:
# camcontrol rescan all
camcontrol: CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl failed: Invalid argument
# uname -U
1100122
# uname -K
1100122
# uname -a
FreeBSD bsdrookie.norma.com. 11.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p5
Hi.
On 22.12.2016 21:26, Alan Somers wrote:
I'm not surprised to see this kind of error in a ZFS on GELI on Zvol
pool. ZFS on Zvols has known deadlocks, even without involving GELI.
GELI only makes it worse, because it foils the recursion detection in
zvol_open. I wouldn't bother opening a PR
Hi,
Recently I decided to remove the bogus zfs-inside-geli-inside-zvol pool,
since it's now officially unsupported. So, I needed to reslice my disk,
hence to detach one of the disks from a mirrored pool. I issued 'zpool
detach zroot gpt/zroot1' and my system livelocked almost immidiately, so
I
Hi,
could anyone tell me where am I wrong:
# camcontrol rescan all
camcontrol: CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl failed: Invalid argument
# uname -U
1100122
# uname -K
1100122
# uname -a
FreeBSD bsdrookie.norma.com. 11.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p5 #0
r310364: Wed Dec 21 19:03:58 YEKT 2016
Hi.
On 19.12.2016 11:51, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin <e...@norma.perm.ru>
> wrote:
>> I tried the UEFI boot sequence on a Supermicro server. It boots only
>> manually, gives some cryptic error while booting automatically. W
Hi.
On 16.12.2016 22:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> I am reading uefi(8) and it looks like FreeBSD 11 should be able to boot
> using UEFI straight into ZFS, so I am thinking of converting that
> freebsd-boot partition to an EFI partition, creating a FAT filesystem and
> copying
Hi.
I kind of stepped on a limit of 255 targets (a bunch of VMs), what is
the possible workaround for this, besides running a secont ctld in bhyve ?
I guess I cannot run ctld inside a jail, since it's the kernel daemon,
right ?
Is the 255 limit a limit on entities - I mean can I ran like 255
Hi,
On 18.12.2016 02:01, David Marec wrote:
>
> A pass with `zfs scrub` didn't help.
>
> Any clue is welcome. What's that `dmu_bonus_hold` stands for ?
>
Just out of the curiosity - is it on a redundant pool and does the
'zpool status' report any error ?
Eugene.
Hi.
Sometimes on one of my servers I got dmesg full of
sonewconn: pcb 0xf80373aec000: Listen queue overflow: 49 already in
queue awaiting acceptance (6 occurrences)
sonewconn: pcb 0xf80373aec000: Listen queue overflow: 49 already in
queue awaiting acceptance (2 occurrences)
sonewconn:
Hi.
On 06.12.2016 18:43, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215000
>
> I think this started after moving from 10.3 to 11.0.
>
> Does nobody else see this panic?
>
>
Saw webcamd-initiated panic once, on an 11.x too; don't remember the
details, so I cannot
Hi.
Recently I've encountered the issue with "slow TRIM" and Sandisk SSDs,
so I was told to try to disable TRIM and see what happens (thanks a lot
by the way, that did it). But changing the
vfs.zfs.vdev.bio_delete_disable on the fly can lead to the system crash
with the probability of 50%. Is it
Hi.
On 28.11.2016 23:07, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Check your gstat with -dp so you also see deletes, it may be that your
> drives have a very slow TRIM.
>
Indeed, I see a bunch of delete operations, and when TRIM disabled my
engineers report that the performance is greatly increasing. Is this it
Hi,
recently we bough a bunch of "Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel"
disks (the model name by itself should already made me suspicious) for
using with zfs SAN on FreeBSD, we're plugged them into the LSI SAS3008
and now we are experiencing the performance that I would call "literally
Hi.
On 27.10.2016 15:01, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Has anyone seen this, and what are my actions ? I've google a bit, saw
> some references mentioning FreeBSD 9.x and ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS, but I
> don't have neither, so now I'm trying to understand what will my actions
> be
Hi,
I've upgraded one of my old FreeBSD from 10-STABLE (which was leaking
the wired memory and this was fixed in the spring; other than that it
was pretty much stable) to the 11.0-RELEASE-p2, and almost immidiately
got myself a panic:
===Cut===
# more core.txt.0
calypso.enaza.ru dumped core -
Hi.
On 21.10.2016 15:20, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
ZFS prefetch affect performance dpeneds of workload (independed of RAM
size): for some workloads wins, for some workloads lose (for my
workload prefetch is lose and manualy disabled with 128GB RAM).
Anyway, this system have only 24MB in ARC
Hi.
On 21.10.2016 9:22, Steven Hartland wrote:
On 21/10/2016 04:52, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
On 20.10.2016 21:17, Steven Hartland wrote:
Do you have atime enabled for the relevant volume?
I do.
If so disable it and see if that helps:
zfs set atime=off
Nah, it doesn't help at all
Hi.
On 20.10.2016 21:17, Steven Hartland wrote:
Do you have atime enabled for the relevant volume?
I do.
If so disable it and see if that helps:
zfs set atime=off
Nah, it doesn't help at all.
Thanks.
Eugene.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Hi.
On 20.10.2016 19:18, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
I've the same issue, but only if the ZFS resides on a LSI MegaRaid and one
RAID0 for each disk.
Not in my case, both pool disks are attached to the Intel ICH7 SATA300
controller.
Thanks.
Eugene.
Hi,
On 20.10.2016 19:12, Pete French wrote:
Have ignored this thread untiul now, but I observed the same behaviour
on mysystems over the last week or so. In my case its an exim spool
directory, which was hugely full as some point (thousands of
files) and now takes an awfully long time to open
Hi.
On 20.10.2016 19:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
What about snapshots? Are there any snapshots on this filesystem?
Nope.
# zfs list -t all
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zroot 245G 201G 1.17G legacy
zroot/tmp 10.1M 201G
Hi.
On 20.10.2016 18:54, Nicolas Gilles wrote:
Looks like it's not taking up any processing time, so my guess is
the lag probably comes from stalled I/O ... bad disk?
Well, I cannot rule this out completely, but first time I've seen this
lag on this particular server about two months ago, and
Hi.
I have FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE r289293 (but I have observed this situation
on different releases) and a zfs. I also have one directory that used to
have a lot of (tens of thousands) files. I surely takes a lot of time to
get a listing of it. But now I have 2 files and a couple of dozens
Hi.
On 17.10.2016 5:44, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeBSD for many years. Not as my main operating
system, though. But anyway several bugs and patches were contributed
and somebody even added my name into the additional contributors list.
That's pleasing but today I tried to
Hi.
On 16.10.2016 23:42, Gary Palmer wrote:
You're confusing disk manufacturer gigabytes with real (power of two)
gigabytes. The below turns 960 197 124 096 into real gigabytes
Yup, I thought that smartctl is better than that and already displayed
the size with base 1024. :)
Thanks.
Hi.
On 16.10.2016 22:06, Alan Somers wrote:
It's raw size, but the discrepancy is between 1000 and 1024. Smartctl
is reporting base 10 size, but zpool is reporting base 1024..
960197124096.0*6/1024**4 = 5.24 TB, which is pretty close to what
zpool says.
Thanks ! It does explain it. But then
Hi.
FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 r303979, zfs raidz1:
===Cut===
# zpool status gamestop
pool: gamestop
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
gamestopONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
Hi.
I should mention from the start that this is a question about an
engineering task, not a question about FreeBSD issue.
I have a set of zvol clones that I redistribute over iSCSI. Several
Windows VMs use these clones as disks via their embedded iSCSI
initiators (each clone represents a disk
Hi.
Recently I spent a lot of time setting up various zfs installations, and
I got a question.
Often when creating a raidz on disks considerably big (>~ 1T) I'm seeing
a weird stuff: "zpool create" blocks, and waits for several minutes. In
the same time system is fully responsive and I can see in
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
