https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Allan Jude changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #25 from IPTRACE ---
(In reply to Allan Jude from comment #24)
Yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #24 from Allan Jude ---
Can this be closed now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
https://
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #23 from Vincenzo Maffione ---
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=358180
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-vir
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Willem Jan Withagen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w...@digiware.nl
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #21 from Vincenzo Maffione ---
Just to clarify the situation, on current HEAD if_vtnet + bhyve + jumbo-frames
works as expected, even withouth mergeable rx buffers support.
I did not test on stable/11, but if it is still true th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #20 from Vincenzo Maffione ---
I prepared a patch to enable mergeable rx buffers for virtio-net, even with the
tap backend.
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23342
Anyone willing to test this with jumbo frames?
To test it, append "
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Vincenzo Maffione changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmaffi...@freebsd.org
--- Comm
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #18 from Arjan van der Velde ---
(In reply to Aleksandr Fedorov from comment #17)
Not sure. I was hoping someone here could shed some light on that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Aleksandr Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandr.fedorov@itglobal.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Arjan van der Velde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vandervelde...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #15 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #14)
Sorry for so much nonsense and off-topic comments; But to correct myself in
case anybody else wonders
You do _not_ need the driver reload hack for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #14 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #13)
> Happy to share the rc(8) script on request.
yup, "request" please. thx.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #13 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #12)
In case you end up switching from "vmxnet3"/[vmx(4)|vmx3f(4)] to
"e1000"/[em(4)], depending on your workload, you can save lots of overhead if
you switch to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #12 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #11)
[ doh! vmx(4)/em(4) -- not ..(8)! sigh, brain rot. ]
yup, I was suspecting vmx(_4_) was doing something like that.
With our limited resources, our options for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #10 from P Kern ---
(In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #9)
Thanks for the code! Yes vmx(8) does support recv/xmit of 9k frames
but in a case where the VM has 2 vmx(8) NICs, the 9k frames do not seem to
be able to tr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #9 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #8)
*offtopic, vmxnet3 specific only, nothing PR related in this comment*:
It's correct that if_vmx(4) does not mention MTU or "jumbo" frames, but I was
quiet su
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #8 from P Kern ---
(In reply to P Kern from comment #7)
Sigh. I should have rtfm: just noticed vmx(8) does _not_ mention
supporting jumbo frames. Never mind. P Kern.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
P Kern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||des.gauf...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #6 from Arjan van der Velde ---
Hi! We are running into this issue in our environment too. We'd like to use
jumbo frames w/ NFS in bhyve, using virtio-net. We're on a 10G/40G network and
we want to minimize the overhead for netw
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #5 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to Peter Grehan from comment #4)
Peter, thanks a lot for this clarification.
I missed the e1000 diffs. I'm ready to test anything I get to compile :-)
Should be no problem for recent ne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Peter Grehan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gre...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #3 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #2)
Hmm, reading my own report would have told me that the problem couldn't be in
if_vtnet(4), because replacing virtio-net with e1000 at the bhyve(8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
--- Comment #2 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
Just a quick note:
This is not related to r321679
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=321679)
>From the description I was confident that the problem was in if_vtnet(4) and
sol
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
IPTRACE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arkadiusz.majewski@iptrace.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215737
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-am...@freebsd.org |
Assignee|freebsd-b...@fr
28 matches
Mail list logo
