What happened to hw.vmm.topology.cores_per_package?

hw.vmm.topology.cpuid_leaf_b: 1 root@freenas[~]# What happened to those tunables? Thanks, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

the VLAN, not the port ... But give vm-bhyve a spin with the address on the physical. Or use two different physical interfaces - one for the host, one for the "public" bridge. HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 91

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

Hi! > Am 20.10.2020 um 14:10 schrieb D'Arcy Cain : > > On 10/20/20 7:39 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >>> When I started I thought of a switch as analogous to a physical switch. If >>> I am in an office with one ethernet jack but I have multiple devices I >>

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

m -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -tso -lro -vlanhwtag -vlanhwtso up ixl:-rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -tso -lro -vlanhwtag -vlanhwtso up bnxt: -rxcsum -rxcsum6 -txcsum -txcsum6 -tso -lro -vlanhwtag -vlanhwtso -vlanhwfilter up HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infr

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

Hi all, > Am 20.10.2020 um 12:50 schrieb D'Arcy Cain : > > On 10/20/20 5:36 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >>> I did see that. Does that mean that I don't even need to create switches >>> at all? >> What is a switch in this context? I use bridge interfac

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

Hi all, > Am 20.10.2020 um 11:28 schrieb D'Arcy Cain : > > On 10/20/20 4:36 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >> It's officially documented here: >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html > > I did see that. Does that mean that

Re: When is a switch not a switch?

k/network-bridging.html "If the bridge host needs an IP address, set it on the bridge interface, not on the member interfaces." Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.pun

Re: FreeBSD a server and bhyve

ELENG_X instead of RELENG_X_Y. Very much so. HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian Stein signature.

Re: FreeBSD a server and bhyve

chyves seem to be two possible choices: https://github.com/pr1ntf/iohyve http://chyves.org Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsfü

Re: FreeBSD a server and bhyve

cal NIC and assign that additional IP address in the guest OS? At least that is what I do all the time ;-) Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 1

Re: Need X-server to run in bhyve guest

bhyve which mandates UEFI boot? Or am I not aware that bhyve can do legacy boot, too? Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsführer: Jü

Re: Need X-server to run in bhyve guest

s what I figure he suggests. Start a virtual frame buffer server like Xvnc and connect to that via VNC. Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de i...@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsfüh

Re: Virtualbox on Linux in bhyve?

Hi, > Am 04.07.2019 um 11:33 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen : > is it possible to run Ubuntu 18.04 inside a bhyve VM > and use Vagrant with Virtialbox? I just found out - yes, you can. As long as you stickt to 32 bit Virtualbox guests. You need nested virtualization for 64 bit guests. Kin

Virtualbox on Linux in bhyve?

Hi all, is it possible to run Ubuntu 18.04 inside a bhyve VM and use Vagrant with Virtialbox? Currently we have this show stopper: Stderr: VBoxManage: error: AMD-V is not available (VERR_SVM_NO_SVM) VBoxManage: error: Details: code NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005), component ConsoleWrap,

Re: [vm-bhyve] shutting down VMs and kern.init_shutdown_timeout

Hi all, > Am 28.04.2019 um 06:41 schrieb Victor Sudakov : > "if the /etc/rc.shutdown does not terminate within 120 seconds, init will > terminate it. The timeout can be configured via the sysctl variable > kern.init_shutdown_timeout.“ What’s keeping you from increasing that timeout for your

Re: bhyve, sparse disk image and trim support?

Hi! > Am 21.04.2019 um 19:01 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb > : > Do we support this? Has anyone worked on this? How do people deal with > these problems? I’m actually surprised this is supported for some configurations - thanks for starting the thread. As for how others deal with this - e.g. VMware

Re: bhyve and vfs.zfs.arc_max, and zfs tuning for a hypervisor

Hi all, > Am 21.03.2019 um 11:24 schrieb Matt Churchyard via freebsd-virtualization > : > I'd also be intrigued to know what the logic in FreeNAS is for it. It is > simply a case of "(arc = total_ram - guest_allocated)"? > Is there a lower limit based on a percentage or total RAM, and/or a hard

Re: bhyve and vfs.zfs.arc_max, and zfs tuning for a hypervisor

Hi Matt, > Am 20.03.2019 um 10:34 schrieb Matt Churchyard : >>> 2. If ARC does cache volumes, does this cache make sense on a >>> hypervisor, because guest OSes will probably have their own disk cache >>> anyway. >> >> IMHO not much, because the guest OS is relying on the fact that when >> it

Re: bhyve and vfs.zfs.arc_max, and zfs tuning for a hypervisor

Hi! > Am 20.03.2019 um 02:52 schrieb Victor Sudakov : > Is SLOG also used by zfs volumes? Yes, but for synchronous writes only, if I’m not mistaken. So fundamentally yes, but in most cases no. Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a

Re: bhyve and vfs.zfs.arc_max, and zfs tuning for a hypervisor

Hi! > Am 19.03.2019 um 03:46 schrieb Victor Sudakov : > 1. Does ARC actually cache zfs volumes (not files/datasets)? Yes it does. > 2. If ARC does cache volumes, does this cache make sense on a hypervisor, > because guest OSes will probably have their own disk cache anyway. IMHO not much,

Re: bhyve: Detecting that a guest kernel has booted

Hi all, > Am 11.03.2019 um 19:09 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes > : > I have no love for them either, but until we get our UEFI updated > it is a rather sad state of affairs. I routinely boot FreeBSD, Ubuntu and Windows 10 with UEFI, so I don’t see much that I would consider broken. Missing

Re: bhyve: Detecting that a guest kernel has booted

Hi all, > Am 11.03.2019 um 18:04 schrieb Mark Raynsford via freebsd-virtualization > : > Leaving aside userland monitoring tools such as Prometheus[0], is there > any way to detect on the host that a guest kernel running in bhyve has > booted? I'm assuming "booted" in this sense to mean "PID 1

Re: The status of docker

Good morning, > Am 28.01.2019 um 03:53 schrieb Paul Kraus : > (Open)Solaris already had Linux Brand zones, which I’m sure helped get there > much faster. > They could already run Linux (user space) in a Zone. Yes, but how did they get there? Is there some technical reason why Linux branded

Re: The status of docker

Hi! > Am 22.01.2019 um 21:09 schrieb Grzegorz Junka : > BTW is Joyent is any way related to Oracle? Why would they want to support > zones? Is the support they implemented open sourced? Sorry, I don’t know many details. Their cloud is built on Open Solaris, hence the connection. IIRC the

Re: The status of docker

Hi all, > Am 22.01.2019 um 20:48 schrieb Grzegorz Junka : > 2. A docker container in a jail with no native linux kernel, docker is > running completely in FreeBSD environment > > 2 would be most convenient but also most difficult as all smallest docker > features would need to be ported

Re: The status of docker

Good morning, > Am 22.01.2019 um 03:57 schrieb Craig Rodrigues : > I hope I am wrong, but unfortunately I think getting Docker to work on > natively on FreeBSD is ultimately a losing battle, > unless you can get a team of several developers to work on it full time. I have the same gut feeling,

Re: Bhyve Guest Network Troubles

Hi, > Am 10.08.2018 um 11:29 schrieb David Powers via freebsd-virtualization > : > I have a test vm running in Bhyve that is able to reach all interfaces on its > host via icmp. > However, the guest is unable to reach the default route of the host, and thus > no Internet. > I was hoping that

Re: Why can't I dtrace processes running in a jail from the host?

Hi! > Am 09.08.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Mark Johnston : > For userland static probes to be globally visible, the process needs to > register them with the kernel when it starts. This is done > automatically using a constructor which issues ioctls to > /dev/dtrace/helper, hence the requirement for

Why can't I dtrace processes running in a jail from the host?

Hi all, I'm wondering why on a busy hosting server with hundreds of PHP-FPM workers running in jails "dtrace -l" on the host does not show any PHP specific probes. PHP *is* compiled with dtrace support for all the jails. Enabling /dev/dtrace/* via devfs.rules for a specific jail and then

Re: Centos7 uefi boot problem with bhyve after update

Hi all, > Am 04.05.2018 um 15:41 schrieb Peter Grehan : > > Hi Mike, > >> the fault here could be that of bootrom not reading the files it should > > That is exactly the issue. The current UEFI code does not save non-volatile > variables to persistent storage. Guest o/s's

Re: bhyve networking

Hi! > Am 26.04.2018 um 15:32 schrieb Paul Esson : > I'd really like to try and use the switch approach if possible and had > thought that creating the switch and adding the igb1 interface would have > brought igb1 up automatically. Is that the expected behaviour? You

Re: Migrate from real server to virtual

Hi all, > Am 28.02.2018 um 15:31 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes > : > Yes, I do believe that is the correct conclusion to your current situation. > The other part that could be at issue here is if this is a 32bit or 64bit > version of windows. As Peter stated only

Re: Running dual boot windows inside of bhyve

Hi all, > Am 27.12.2017 um 18:15 schrieb Alan Somers > I fear that you may be out of luck. Windows deliberately frustrates this > use case by profiling its hardware at installation time and at every boot > thereafter. If the hardware changes too much, then Windows demands

Re: Storage overhead on zvols

Hi all, > Am 05.12.2017 um 16:41 schrieb Paul Vixie : > in some bsd related meeting this year i asked allan jude for a bhyve level > null mount, > so that we could access at / inside the guest some subtree of the host, and > avoid block > devices and file systems altogether.

Re: Vagrantboxen stblassitude/freebsd-11 and stblassitude/freebsd-10 with workaround for sudo

Hey, guys, > Am 08.11.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Stefan Bethke : > > I’ve just updated my Vagrant boxes with a workaround for sudo segfaulting > when no hostname is set (by setting a default hostname in the box). So did we - I did not think this was honoring a mention ;)

Re: Ubuntu guest in bhyve - startup.nsh

Hi! > Am 02.08.2017 um 15:15 schrieb Christian Stærk : > After installing refind I had to move it to the default boot location in > order to have it boot automatically: Yes, of course. That's the idea ;-) > Now it works. Thank you. You are most welcome. Patrick

Re: Ubuntu guest in bhyve - startup.nsh

Hi! > Am 02.08.2017 um 14:34 schrieb Christian Stærk : > I was trying to work around bhyve not saving the EFI nvvars by creating a > startup.nsh file inside the EFI partition. > None of my attempts seemed to make any kind of difference when trying to boot > so I am still

Re: UEFI and othere Unixes

Hello > Am 23.05.2017 um 03:45 schrieb The Doctor : > > All right, I am using UEFI for all my virtualisation. > > I was wondering using UEFI how to install > > netBSD > OpenBSD > Gentoo > Mandrake > Mandriva > et al > > I see an entry for ArchLinux I had good

Re: What is the recommended version of virtio-win for bhyve

Hi! > Am 07.04.2017 um 13:15 schrieb Christian Stærk : > Can anoyone here recommend a version, that works with bhyve and windows 10? According ti the FreeBSD wiki 0.1.96 is the recommended version. https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve/Windows I'm running Windows 7 with 0.1.134

Re: virtio_console in bhyve? (FreeBSD host and guest)

Hi, Jakub, nice to meet you here. > virtio_console(4) driver in 10.3 and in 11.0 doesn't support named ports > feature, > which is used by bhyve in FreeNAS 10. I'll look into backporting FreeBSD 12 > fixes > to stable/10 and stable/11. May I suggest (as a first step) to document that simple

Re: virtio_console in bhyve? (FreeBSD host and guest)

Some more information: > I'm trying to get guest-additions to work for FreeBSD guests in FreeNAS 10. > FreeNAS 10 is built on top of RELENG_11 and uses the bhyve hypervisor. > > Each VM is started with one virtio_console device like this: > > bhyve [...] -s >

virtio_console in bhyve? (FreeBSD host and guest)

Hi, all, I'm trying to get guest-additions to work for FreeBSD guests in FreeNAS 10. FreeNAS 10 is built on top of RELENG_11 and uses the bhyve hypervisor. Each VM is started with one virtio_console device like this: bhyve [...] -s