Hi,
So all in all, I added « -vlanhwtag -txcsum -txcsum6 » on all 4 igb interfaces.
They still all put themselves in promiscuous mode, however. But TCPing the host
from a VM now works. Please find the relevant dmesg and ifconfig output below.
But I’d still appreciate more background
Bezüglich Vincent Olivier's Nachricht vom 21.03.2017 16:51 (localtime):
> Hi, I can confirm that ping works but ssh and (I haven’t tried anything else,
> but I assume you are right) TCP as a whole doesn’t work.
>
> From there, I guess that, since I haven’t changed the MTU on the 1G
> interfaces
Bezüglich Vincent Olivier's Nachricht vom 20.03.2017 23:32 (localtime):
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for waiting so long. I don’t know if i’m doing it right but I tried «
> -vlanhwtag » all the interfaces and I’m still having problems. Namely (as I
> didn’t have this information before) that all
O_LINKLOCAL>
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
groups: tap
Opened by PID 16378
> Le 7 févr. 2017 à 03:53, Ruben <m...@osfux.nl> a écrit :
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> Didn’t try it it with disabling the tso/lro/vlanhwtagging features. Will
>>> Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate
>>>> interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known
>>>> problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD
>>>> 11, so I would like to know
; driver, re driver , all kinds of combinations).
Didn’t try it it with disabling the tso/lro/vlanhwtagging features. Will try
again with those disabled.
> I have no experience in comparable setups without the vlan "layer" though.
My setup didn’t involve vlans, only this: tap <—> b
..@up4.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate
>> interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known
>> problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD
> Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate
> interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known
> problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD 11,
> so I would like to know if it is because tap/bridging
Hi,
Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate
interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known
problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD 11, so
I would like to know if it is because tap/bridging a lagg
