.. and I've just done the if_iwn_debug.h stuff, so you should update your
patchset to include that.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 23 October 2013 17:43, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
>
> Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
>
> I was also h
Hi,
Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
I was also hoping that we could get the updated hardware support into this
without necessarily adding the PAN support. But, you're the one driving
this, so it's up to you. :)
* There's DPRINTF(
bsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [IWN] Review
Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge
in more stuff from you?
-adrian
On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_br...@yahoo.com]
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : &
reless@freebsd.org
> > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
> > >
> > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
&
> De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_br...@yahoo.com]
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : RE: [IWN] Review
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I forgot your lastest commit b
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
>
>
>
> So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
>
>
>
> Cedric
Cedric:
Which branch should we be testing?
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is
-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [IWN] Review
.. is this diff (split_6) against the most recent -HEAD? There looks like
there's some extra stuff in there that I committed recently (ie, the rate
control change and deref/free)
I'll go check it out in more depth soon.
Thanks,
-a
.. is this diff (split_6) against the most recent -HEAD? There looks like
there's some extra stuff in there that I committed recently (ie, the rate
control change and deref/free)
I'll go check it out in more depth soon.
Thanks,
-a
On 29 September 2013 01:34, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Cool, I'll
Cool, I'll review it now!
-a
On 28 September 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm get some free time. So I setted up my github for split work.
>
>
>
> So on https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN/
>
>
>
> You will find 2 new branch : split_6 and split_7.
>
>
>
> Split_6 is iwn
> >
> > I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff
> > and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff
> > clearly lives elsewhere.
>
> Ok I'll do that.
>
Here is new version of split 6 with new files and new function renamed.
Cedric
pan2.patch
Des
I have a lot of the NICs now. I may even test with the 1000 series NICs. :p
-adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@f
> -Message d'origine-
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> Ok,
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it
up once the rest of this work is debugged.
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff
and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff
clearly lives elsewhere.
I wonder which NICs su
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't
> test it further.
>
> What could be interest of this ?
> Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card.
It's likely for STA on one VAP and P2P-GO o
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 19:31
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> How do you create the second VAP, and what'
c GROSS
>> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
>> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>>
>> On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>>
>> > U1 stand for unit 1.
>> > As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1
>> > within iwn
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote:
&g
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> U1 stand for unit 1.
> As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within
> iwn_vap_create.
>
> As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when
> standard run will be ok.
Right. But what's going on,
> -Message d'origine-
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> Hi!
>
Hi!
What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent?
-adrian
On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here is patch split 6.
>
>
>
> It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context.
>
> This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno.
>
>
>
> Cedric
>
>
>
Tested, tidyed up and committed, thanks!
-adrian
On 9 August 2013 08:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
>>> So please go and fix that!
>>
>> Done.
>
> Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get
> back to you.
>
>
>
> -adrian
On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>> So please go and fix that!
>
> Done.
Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get
back to you.
-adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
> -Message d'origine-
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 août 2013 07:14
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn] Review split 5
>
> Hiya!
>
Hiya!
So, you removed sc->broadcast_id and replaced it with
IWN5000_BROADCAST_ID. You need to undo that and go back to using
sc->broadcast_id; the broadcast id is different between the 4965 and
5000 (and later, I bet.)
So please go and fix that!
Thanks,
-adrian
(I'm going to spin up a 4965 n
edric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn] Review split 5
>
> .. so what's this PAN context stuff?
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is another
.. so what's this PAN context stuff?
-adrian
On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here is another split.
>
>
>
> This one update if_iwnvar.h with new structure for later but also modify
> iwn_softc for context selection.
>
> Context will be used later when PAN context w
Committed!
Thanks!
-adrian
On 2 August 2013 04:12, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> After split 3 applied and committed , you will find split 4.
>
> This one modify if_iwnreg.h
>
>
>
> Add nearly everything we will need for later use.
>
>
>
> Cedric
>
>
>
Committed ,thanks!
-adrian
On 29 July 2013 11:39, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
>
>> De : Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
>> Envoyé : lundi 29 juillet 2013 20:11
>> À : Adrian Chadd
>> Cc : Cedric GROSS; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> > Hi!
>
> De : Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 29 juillet 2013 20:11
> À : Adrian Chadd
> Cc : Cedric GROSS; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Cool! ok, the style niggles.
> >
> > * Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB bet
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Cool! ok, the style niggles.
* Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah
value. Right now you have spaces.
There is whitespace at the end of some of the comment lines also.
textproc/igor will find problems like that:
i
Hi!
Cool! ok, the style niggles.
* Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah
value. Right now you have spaces.
* $FreeBSD$ should be after the copyright header, not before
* Your new file is missing the standard single-include stuff.. ie
#ifndef __IF_IWN_DEVID_H__
#defin
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : dimanche 21 juillet 2013 06:06
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
>
> Hi!
>
> so, my feedback!
>
> * Why'd you disable including opt_wlan.h ? It'
Hi!
so, my feedback!
* Why'd you disable including opt_wlan.h ? It's required
* What merge issues did you have? I'd like to get this tree updated to
the latest -HEAD, including whatever my recent changes for rate
selection, so we can get this stuff tidied up for -HEAD
* Why was ieee80211_resume_a
ail.com');>]
> *De la part de* Adrian Chadd
> *Envoyé :* dimanche 21 juillet 2013 00:55
> *À :* Cedric GROSS
> *Cc :* Adrian Chadd; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org 'cvml', 'freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org');>;
> freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org 'freebsd-driv...@
Diff sent to you Adrian.
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de
Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : dimanche 21 juillet 2013 00:55
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : Adrian Chadd; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: IWN Review
yup! against -HEAD
yup! against -HEAD would be great!
-adrian
On Saturday, July 20, 2013, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:
> adrian.ch...@gmail.com ] De la part de
> Adrian Chadd
> > Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 23:42
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is great news!
> >
> > Are you able to
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de
Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 23:42
>
> Hi!
>
> This is great news!
>
> Are you able to merge this into the iwn driver? Is it feasible? I'd
> rather not have two drivers in the tree for the same family o
Hi!
This is great news!
Are you able to merge this into the iwn driver? Is it feasible? I'd
rather not have two drivers in the tree for the same family of NICs.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 20 July 2013 08:54, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
>
>> De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
> [...]
>> >>
>>
> De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
[...]
> >>
> >> Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode?
> >
> > What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ?
> > If so, answer is yes :
> >
> > #dmesg |grep iwn0
> > iwn0: mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq
> > 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 #ifcon
Hello, Andrey.
You wrote 20 июля 2013 г., 19:42:41:
AF> I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :)
Atheros is better. And, yes, Intel doesn't support host AP mode.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mail
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>> De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
>> Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29
>> À : Cedric GROSS
>> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>> > He
> De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm please to announce that I
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> Hello dear all,
>
>
>
> I'm please to announce that I completed my work on IWN.
>
>
>
> My version available here https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN include
> improvement issued by seanbruno (https://github.com/seanbruno/freebsd-iwl)
> but
43 matches
Mail list logo
