URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
2008/7/28 Nicolas R. Wadhwani:
tile_city() returns real current situation. Instead server should
send to client what player knows. Player may think there is a city in
fogged tile, when in reality city has been destroyed since last
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
Indeed Marko is right; this is a server problem after all. You should
be sending the city ID of the dumb city. This code has been rewritten
however and apparently I no longer have any clue how it works. See
maphand.h.
-jason
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
tile_city() returns real current situation. Instead server should
send to client what player knows. Player may think there is a city in
fogged tile, when in reality city has been destroyed since last seen,
or new city has been founded
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
tile_city() returns real current situation. Instead server should
send to client what player knows. Player may think there is a city in
fogged tile, when in reality city has been destroyed since last seen,
or new city has been
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
2008/7/25 Marko Lindqvist:
You seem to be avoiding
setting ptile-worked to NULL when server requests it by sending
worked == IDENTITY_NUMBER_ZERO. It seems to me that problem has to be
in server side sending such information in the
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 25. Jul 2008, 16:12:11]:
It seems to me that problem has to be
in server side sending such information in the first place. Something
wrong with send_tile_info()?
Thanks for the hint. The same I did on the
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 25. Jul 2008, 16:12:11]:
It seems to me that problem has to be
in server side sending such information in the first place. Something
wrong with send_tile_info()?
Thanks for the hint. The same I did on the
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
2008/7/24 guest user:
There is the catch: Between the versions the ptile-city member has been
replaced by ptile-worked which points to the city working on the tile,
so many tiles are pointing to the same city (in the city radius I
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This also brings the concept of client sied invisible cities. These
are cities client knows to exist, because it has seen some tile it
uses, but doesn't know
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
[per - Thu Jul 24 12:14:28 2008]:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This also brings the concept of client sied invisible cities.
These are cities client knows to exist, because it has
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:13 PM, guest user Freeciv wrote:
There is the catch: Between the versions the ptile-city member has been
replaced by ptile-worked which points to the city working on the tile,
so many tiles are pointing to
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I probably have the time for working on this but my experience
doesn't quite match yours with neither the C programming language nor
the freeciv source code, so I'm not all that confident that it would be
just a
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
pcity-tile and ptile-city are both set to the correct values.
In general ptile-city-tile == ptile and pcity-tile-city == pcity
all the time (that would be a useful assertion to add somewhere - in
fact client-side sanity checks might
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40316
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:34 PM, guest user Freeciv wrote:
Attached patch will let the cities be visible in the fog after you
viewed them with a unit or something else. Note that if you test it on a
savegame affected by the current
14 matches
Mail list logo
