On 6 July 2012 00:09, Jacob Nevins
0jacobnk.fc...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Not sure if this is a bug or expected behaviour, so I haven't raised a
ticket.
Please open ticket. Even if it's expected result of the way
buffering (or something) has been made, this has to be fixed somehow.
Not sure if this is a bug or expected behaviour, so I haven't raised a
ticket.
With the Gtk3 client, I've noticed that intermediate updates to the map
don't seem to be drawn. For instance if I start a game and then hit X
on my Explorer, he instantly appears three tiles away, whereas with the
Gtk2
On 13 Feb, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
Idea in that transition guide is that there will be gtk3 only
application in the end, requiring gtk 3.0.0 at least, i.e. , it has no
problem of not being backward compatible with *any* gtk2 version.
We can increase our minimum gtk2 version
Does anybody have any idea what it means for Freeciv that gtk3 is now
released? Do we need two different gtk-clients for a while like we did
when gtk1.2 and gtk2 coexisted. What about schedule? Do we need to
change something for 2.3, or can these things wait until 2.4?
http://www.gtk.org/
- ML
Marko Lindqvist writes:
Does anybody have any idea what it means for Freeciv that gtk3 is now
released? Do we need two different gtk-clients for a while like we did
when gtk1.2 and gtk2 coexisted.
There's a transition guide here:
On 13 February 2011 20:26, Jacob Nevins
0jacobnk.fc...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
I guess that the move to Cairo is probably the biggest deal for us, but
I haven't looked into it.
Yeah. And now I remembered again how one of the last things we ever
heard from mbook before her disappearance
On 13 February 2011 20:26, Jacob Nevins
0jacobnk.fc...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
There's a transition guide here:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
Looks like we can start preparing now by avoiding old-fashioned
constructs while continuing to use Gtk
