On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:07:55 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
Hmm. Sorry I didn't check out how dosfsck is compiled but perhaps you
should compile with the GCC
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
options.
-Wmissing-declarations
may also come in handy
-Wnested-externs
sometimes too but it depends on your
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:01:04 +0300, you wrote:
Hi,
But VER /R of FreeCOM already does this! Typing VER /R gives:
FreeCom version 0.82 pl 3 XMS_Swap [Dec 10 2003 06:49:21]
DOS version 7.10
FreeDOS kernel version 1.1.33
Oh ... I don't know.
Hidden switch? :-)
Rgds,
Johnson.
The TU-Varna server doesn't work now
Just began working so I put it at
http://linux.tu-varna.acad.bg/~lig/freedos/DOSFSCK.EXE (58 KB)
Happy testing! But please take into account that I don't maintain it!
Lucho
---
This SF.Net email is
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:23:53 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
But VER /R of FreeCOM already does this! Typing VER /R gives:
FreeCom version 0.82 pl 3 XMS_Swap [Dec 10 2003 06:49:21]
DOS version 7.10
FreeDOS kernel version 1.1.33
Oh ... I don't know.
Hidden switch? :-)
It's documented, not hidden (type
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:07:34 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
Sorry, but I'm too busy for that. The TU-Varna server doesn't work now, so
I can't even do (4). I can't even test how DOSFSCK writes/fixes bad
volumes as I don't currently have one handy ;-)
If you need web space please tell me, I can
Hi!
1--2004 16:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johnson Lam) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But VER /R of FreeCOM already does this! Typing VER /R gives:
FreeDOS kernel version 1.1.33
JL Oh ... I don't know. Hidden switch? :-)
Well known switch (and I sometime mention it):
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:55:39 +0300, you wrote:
Hi,
It's documented, not hidden (type VER /? to see). It exists in M$ COMMAND
and JPSoft's 4DOS too.
Because in M$ it's a hidden switch (you get nothing by typing VER
/?)
And I didn't notice it's embedded in FreeCOM.
I try to read the FreeDOS
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:41:10 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
when FreeDOS is booted or not?
VER /R command shows you all you need.
Sorry for this, it's my careless mistake.
don't know how to check which version is kernel.sys if you did not boot it.
otherwise, simplest is to just download most recent
Johnson Lam schreef:
perhaps SYS CONFIG file can show the kernel version if file is a FreeDOS kernel.
I remember no version information when SYS. I didn't try SYS CONFIG.
Is it necessary to show version during SYS? My opinion is a bit more
information harmless.
might be a possible option.
SYS
But VER /R of FreeCOM already does this! Typing VER /R gives:
FreeCom version 0.82 pl 3 XMS_Swap [Dec 10 2003 06:49:21]
DOS version 7.10
FreeDOS kernel version 1.1.33
Ok, but:
1) never dreamed of typing VER /R or VER /? _this extended version
should be the dafault_
2) Kernel version only by
Alain schreef:
Ok, but:
1) never dreamed of typing VER /R or VER /? _this extended version
should be the dafault_
that may be not so compatible to batchfiles etc.
VER /R is an ancient trick.
2) Kernel version only by numbers is not enough, there are too many
variants that show only in the
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
Things like that are Megalo$0ft's favourite trick! Here's what Pat
Villani (the author of DOS/C on which our kernel is based) wrote about the
Microsoft's love to undocumented features:
there is constant debate over Microsoft's use of undocumented
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:50:12 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
So the result is: Ein Volk, ein Reich (Microsoft), ein Fhrer (William
Henry Gates III)! :-(
Hmm -- that won't stop you using MS Windows though...
User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227
Yes, I use the weapon of the enemy (W2K3)
Bernd Blaauw escreveu:
1) never dreamed of typing VER /R or VER /? _this extended version
should be the dafault_
that may be not so compatible to batchfiles etc.
VER /R is an ancient trick.
This will *not* be incompatible because this is just a text output. only
difference in that it is a
!
1--2004 14:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For this should be used option /C (which is yet equal to /A
in my MEM).
ASM Unless there's a bug, I don't see many
ASM differences between MEMA /C and MEMA /A,
ase Perhaps this was a confusion and you mean not
Hi!
1--2004 20:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG Adding *strings* just for information purposes in the precious resident
LG space is a bad idea.
Lucho, you blindly skip all my mentions about os_release. :( I mention
this variable (and subfunction 0xFF)
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
1-áÐÒ-2004 20:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG Adding *strings* just for information purposes in the precious resident
LG space is a bad idea.
Lucho, you blindly skip all my mentions about os_release.
|- Failed addresses follow: -|
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Mailbox quota exceeded / Mailbox voll.
|--- Message text follows: (body too large, truncated) --|
Received: from t-online.de ([151.42.108.25]) by mailin03.sul.t-online.de
Hi,
Some time ago, it was mentioned that there is a bug in FreeCOM's
implementation of LOADHIGH (or in LH), by which, in my understanding, no
space was left in the commandline between the program name and the
parameters.
This revealed that I am assuming in DISPLAY that such spaces exist, thus
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
PS: Why you not answer for previous time?
because at this point it seems to interest more people than just
you. I just cannot answer every question, or I wouldn't have any social
life left...
PPS: Do you report bugs in RBIL (eg, D-216C00) to Ralf?
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 23:39:12 +0400 (MSD), you wrote:
Hi,
I mean is yet equal to /A, as I say. In other words: which is not yet
completely implemented.
Maybe I'm too stupid.
MEMA/C or /A with /P give me a scrolled screen, I can see the programs
layout but can't scrolled back, I suggest
Hi!
2--2004 00:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PPS: Do you report bugs in RBIL (eg, D-216C00) to Ralf?
BO not the one in 216c00 -- I won't spend any effort on this anymore since
BO there hasn't been a release for almost 4 years now.
BO I did about the confusing
Hi!
2--2004 11:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johnson Lam) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JL MEMA/C or /A with /P give me a scrolled screen, I can see the programs
JL layout but can't scrolled back,
Of course, MEM doesn't store screen output into internal buffers. If
you wish to use scrolling
Hi!
2--2004 01:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamara Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASM Some time ago, it was mentioned that there is a bug in FreeCOM's
ASM implementation of LOADHIGH (or in LH), by which, in my understanding, no
ASM space was left in the commandline between the program
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:39:22 -0300, Alain wrote:
There is also one other for DR-DOS and something (which I don't know)
for Datalife-ROM-DOS.
Right. I posted the ROM-DOS one at the kernel mailing list last year.
But specificaly for FreeDOS it is not enough because there are far too
many
I move this discussion to the place where it belongs - the kernel mailing
list.
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:46:29 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
This string can't be removed -- it's part of RBIL:
D-2133FF-
INT 21 - FreeDOS - GET DOS-C/FREEDOS KERNEL RELEASE
26 matches
Mail list logo
