Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Michael Devore escribió: MEMCHECK checks for illegal INT 15h function 87h memory transfers to/from the real RAM address range -- the CHECK and MEM parts of the MEMCHECK option -- and dynamically builds and sets two scratch page tables to allow the access to occur if it is outside of normal

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
For the records, from the FPC documentation: 203 Heap overflow error The heap has grown beyond its boundaries. This is caused when trying to allocate memory exlicitly with new, getmem or reallocmem, or when a class or object instance is created and no memory is left. Please note that, by defaul

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-12 Thread Michael Devore
At 03:26 PM 7/10/2005 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote: > Just being curious: Does adding some EMM=... option to EMM386 make > any of your programs crash which would otherwise work? I just tested a variety of programs with EMM=4019 and SEAL2 and the Free Pascal IDE crashed. Both worked fine without

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread Blair Campbell
> PS: No, no idea about the DOSLFN problem. If VIM is compiled with > DJGPP, then I would assume other DJGPP-compiled programs, e.g. DOSFSCK, > to start complaining (either "completely" or only if you try to let > them use LFNs, like "dosfsck myfat16filesystemimage.bin"). Please test. As it turns

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread Michael Devore
At 12:50 PM 7/11/2005 -0300, Alain wrote: Blair Campbell escreveu: Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you use kind of "do not let HIMEM use all memory" in some way (e.g. HIMEM options or some XMS d

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread Blair Campbell
> PS: No, no idea about the DOSLFN problem. If VIM is compiled with > DJGPP, then I would assume other DJGPP-compiled programs, e.g. DOSFSCK, > to start complaining (either "completely" or only if you try to let > them use LFNs, like "dosfsck myfat16filesystemimage.bin"). Please test. I don't thin

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread Blair Campbell
Anybody have an idea about the doslfn problem? On 7/11/05, Alain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Michael, > > Blair Campbell escreveu: > >>Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition > >>to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you > >>use kind of "

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread Alain
To Michael, Blair Campbell escreveu: Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you use kind of "do not let HIMEM use all memory" in some way (e.g. HIMEM options or some XMS driver which cannot see all RAM)

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-11 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Michael, > The new auto-MEMCHECK approach thereby continues to provide protection > against wild memory access errors below 3G (by generating a fault) while > allowing MMIO access without fault above 3G. Protection is lost for wild > memory accesses in the 3G-4G range, but that could be an

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-10 Thread Michael Devore
At 10:29 PM 7/10/2005 +0200, Eric Auer wrote: > tried to use devload to load usbaspi.sys while EMM386 was loaded, > however, this rebooted the computer. Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you use k

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-10 Thread Blair Campbell
> Just being curious: Does adding some EMM=... option to EMM386 make > any of your programs crash which would otherwise work? I just tested a variety of programs with EMM=4019 and SEAL2 and the Free Pascal IDE crashed. Both worked fine without the EMM=4019 option. With SEAL2 it just finished the

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-10 Thread Blair Campbell
> Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition > to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you > use kind of "do not let HIMEM use all memory" in some way (e.g. HIMEM > options or some XMS driver which cannot see all RAM). So try if VDS > and/or MEMTEST

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-10 Thread Blair Campbell
I use /X2MAX32 for HIMEM > Hm, it works for me, but I use the VDS option for EMM386 in addition > to X=TEST. Plus also MEMCHECK but that should only be needed if you > use kind of "do not let HIMEM use all memory" in some way (e.g. HIMEM > options or some XMS driver which cannot see all RAM). So t

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: EMM386/DOSLFN

2005-07-10 Thread Blair Campbell
One of the errors was: Illegal Instruction occurred CS=3D73 IP= SS=D45A SP=01E2 DS= ES=3830 EAX=6C387073 EBX=3830 ECX=00086520 EDX=08007866 Opcodes @CS: IP 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Aborting Program > > once doslfn was loaded, vim (32-bit) refused to work giving me errors. > > What kind