Re: [Freedos-user] UIDE /E For VirtualBox Now "Officially" Released.

2011-07-24 Thread Jim Hall
THANKS, Jack! I've mirrored this release on ibiblio, and updated the software list. A news item should appear on the www.freedos.org site in about an hour. On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Jack wrote: > > As noted earlier by Rugxulo, Johnson Lam has now posted > the 22-Jul-2011 DRIVERS.ZIP fil

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Eric Auer
Jack, >> A cache might already "know" that the directories are more >> useful because they are accessed more often ... Sorry about the misunderstanding - I did not mean that the cache would know what a FAT or directory is, just that those sectors are accessed frequently, giving the cache a chanc

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Jack
Eric, >> Having to "discard" DOS directories, to make room for new >> data files, is the main loss of speed when using UIDE ... > > A cache might already "know" that the directories are more > useful because they are accessed more often ... I did not want to add such logic in UIDE, because I dar

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Bernd, > Jack's driver only accepts certain values. This might be intentional due > to specific caching algorythms. > Using XMSSIZE I'd still have to use a lot of errorlevel stuff: > if not errorlevel 5 , then use /B /N1 /N3 > if not errorlevel 10, then use /S5 > if not errorlevel .. etc. > i

[Freedos-user] UIDE /E For VirtualBox Now "Officially" Released.

2011-07-24 Thread Jack
As noted earlier by Rugxulo, Johnson Lam has now posted the 22-Jul-2011 DRIVERS.ZIP file on his website at: http://johnson.tmfc.net/dos/driver.html Thus, the new UIDE and UIDE-S, with their /E "emulator" switch for use by VirtualBox, are "officially" released and users need not E-Mail me directl

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Eric Auer
Jack, > Except for minimal "boot" systems, like yours and Lucho's > multiboot diskette, I recommend a minimum of 250-MB cache > to handle todays' LARGE "Windows" files. Copying a 100- > MB file will take 200-MB of UIDE's cache space (input and > output), and some cache space must remain for dir

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Jack
Bernd, Re: UIDE accepting only certain cache sizes, this is true only for caches below 80-MB. UIDE allows 5, 15, 25, 40, or 50-MB caches, also ANY cache from 80-MB up to 4093-MB! Disregarding its /F switch, the regular UIDE can thus set 64K-byte cache blocks with an 80-MB+ cache, which reduces

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 24-7-2011 20:26, Rugxulo schreef: > Why? I mean, sure /S5 is fine, I'm not complaining, but you *could* > use Eric's XMSSIZE: > > http://ericauer.cosmodata.virtuaserver.com.br/soft/specials/xms-size-info-xmssizer.zip > > EDIT: Oh wait, that wouldn't work in CONFIG.SYS. But wait, you're > using D

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > Op 24-7-2011 16:52, Jack schreef: > >> Apologies for my "late" response re: UIDE v.s. VirtualBox.   Had to have >> my (infected!) gall-bladder removed, 25-Jun-2011.   NASTY episode, and I >> am still recovering and "moving a bit slow" on

Re: [Freedos-user] Weird UIDE.SYS (FreeDOS 1.1 Test) behavior under VirtualBox

2011-07-24 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jack wrote: > > I do not use and do not want VirtualBox, after all its problems as > users have noted on this list! It still more or less works (overall). ;-) > However, if you do want to go on > using it, I would seriously "gripe" to Oracle (or its maint

Re: [Freedos-user] Weird UIDE.SYS (FreeDOS 1.1 Test) behavior under VirtualBox

2011-07-24 Thread Jack
Juan, > Upgraded to VirtualBox 4.1, used the settings you said, and UIDE loads > fast > now. (And CD access still works.) But I don't get an EDD error, I get > this: > >> UIDE, 6-16-2011. 5-MB Cache, CD/DVD name is FDCD0001. >> No V2.0C+ PCI, BIOS I/O only! >> CD0: IDE0 Secondary-master,

Re: [Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 24-7-2011 16:52, Jack schreef: > Apologies for my "late" response re: UIDE v.s. VirtualBox. Had to have > my (infected!) gall-bladder removed, 25-Jun-2011. NASTY episode, and I > am still recovering and "moving a bit slow" on driver work! Re: recent > EDR-DOS forum posts, I say the same a

[Freedos-user] "Test" UIDE Available, For VirtualBox.

2011-07-24 Thread Jack
Apologies for my "late" response re: UIDE v.s. VirtualBox. Had to have my (infected!) gall-bladder removed, 25-Jun-2011. NASTY episode, and I am still recovering and "moving a bit slow" on driver work! Re: recent EDR-DOS forum posts, I say the same as our author Mark Twain once did -- "The r

Re: [Freedos-user] Weird UIDE.SYS (FreeDOS 1.1 Test) behavior under VirtualBox

2011-07-24 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 24-7-2011 5:59, Juan Castro schreef: > Upgraded to VirtualBox 4.1, used the settings you said, and UIDE loads > fast now. (And CD access still works.) But I don't get an EDD error, I > get this: remove the /N1 again to enable harddisk caching. Glad that UIDE loads fast again. I wonder if ther