Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-21 Thread Johnson Lam
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:45:13 +0200 (CEST), you wrote: Hi Friend, What's going on? What happened to FreeDOS? Everybody talking about a memory manager, but I can't imagine what happened. Who started the trouble? Don't get into the trouble. I suggest you ignore all these message, most of them are

Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-21 Thread Schumacher, Gordon
# Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:42:29 +0100 # From: Shane M. Coughlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] # To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net # Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ... # Reply-To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net # # Let's just get back to work, eh? Nothing to see

Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-20 Thread Johnson Lam
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:22:32 -0700, you wrote: Hi Blair, You should understand that Jim and others have given up trying to keep Jack happy, basically. I tend to join them. Count me in too. I have personally never used the Q drivers and will distribute the X drivers with my distro because I

Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-20 Thread Johnson Lam
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:50:41 +0200 (MEST), you wrote: Eric, You got lot of time writing, I don't mind if you keep everything reasonable. 1) Jack don't want to let people think his work is a part of FreeDOS, he didn't ask ALL the people to remove the XDMA source, just don't want it on FreeDOS

[Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-20 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Johnson, it is not necessary that Jack protects himself by no longer letting us distribute XDMA as part of the FreeDOS distro. It is not necessary that we distribute some modified by some other FreeDOS guy variant of XDMA to protect Jack either. In fact, XDMA is and will be by Jack, but we can

Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-20 Thread Escorter
Hello! What's going on? What happened to FreeDOS? Everybody talking about a memory manager, but I can't imagine what happened. Who started the trouble? Regards, Escorter ___ Hogyan szerezz új állást? Regisztrálj,

Re: [Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-20 Thread Shane M. Coughlan
Escorter wrote: What's going on? What happened to FreeDOS? Everybody talking about a memory manager, but I can't imagine what happened. Who started the trouble? Let's just get back to work, eh? Lots to do. FreeDOS is in great shape, but some edges need polishing. The main distro needs

[Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-19 Thread Eric Auer
Hi all, Shane is right. As is Jim. You cannot remove GPL from a software. So you cannot force us to delete XCDROM and XDMA. And, why should we? They are good software and you do not allow us to use the better QCDROM and QDMA instead. You can do the latter, because as the author, you can release a

[Freedos-user] re: Not to flame but let others know ...

2006-04-19 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Johnson, 1) Jack don't want to let people think his work is a part of FreeDOS, he didn't ask ALL the people to remove the XDMA source, just don't want it on FreeDOS server Fewer people will use XDMA when it is no longer included with FreeDOS. 2) He didn't limit anyone to use the XDMA