Hi, Eric!
Your changes to the Print command did increase printing
dramatically and placed it on par with ms print!
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
N
Hi, Eric, all
I've been busy with other tasks and haven't been able to
travel to the one garage where FreeDOS is installed to test
the requested changes to FreeDOS print. The power company
here has been making some power feed changes -- and we had
some systems get scrambled on the resulting powe
Okay, I tried print and printq with freedos and neither of
them work like ms print. So, I'll use ms print until any
freedos updates for print come around. I may try other dos
flavors in the meantime but freedos does a fine job!
print/>
>
> Alain
>
> Chris Ruhl escreveu:
>
>> I will certainly give the NEWDOS a whirl when I can. I've downloaded
>> it, just need to get time to play!
>>
>> I will, no doubt, enjoy comparing the ms print with freedos print!! You
>> g
and
download it.
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Chris Ruhl schreef:
>
>> Any way I can pass this on to the PRINT side of the
>> project?? Anybody have any suggestions?? Again, can't
>> re-code the application.
>>
>>
> No idea, never expected any
I will certainly give the NEWDOS a whirl when I can. I've downloaded
it, just need to get time to play!
I will, no doubt, enjoy comparing the ms print with freedos print!! You
guys are great at fixing things up right and I seem to have the perfect
difficult hardware and applications for testi
ly know that we're using a non-FreeDOS
version of print but still...
I can understand you not thinking that anybody would actually use
"print" -- I rarely did, if ever, fifteen years ago when DOS was on
every IBM desktop.
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Chris Ruhl schreef:
>
>
I will test and let you know!
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Chris Ruhl schreef:
>
>> Any way I can pass this on to the PRINT side of the
>> project?? Anybody have any suggestions?? Again, can't
>> re-code the application.
>>
>>
> No idea,
Hi all!
First off, the recent improvements to JEMM386.EXE have made
this memory manager workable for my hardware. I could not
run with previous versions or the plain FreeDOS version!
Excellent job! No more boot issues or system locks so far.
The same is true with the DOSFSCK version 2.11c! Very
Glad to hear that you have no problems!! FreeDOS does work!
It works for me as well now that I know what's what with
certain hardware configurations.
The FreeDOS project has done very well considering -- there
are so many different hardware combinations, BIOSs, device
drivers, memory management i
Hi, Eric
12 minutes to do a 2045 Mb drive partition on one of my
older Celeron 400Mhz systems -- not bad! Counter moves
two-three times a second.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log fi
Hi, Eric
Your 2.11c version is great! It's just what that utility
needed to prevent confusion when using very large hard
disks. I let 2.11b run overnight and it finished okay. The
counter, at least, lets one know that it will take a l-o-n-g
time to finish!
Interesting twist on install routine:
Hello!
I'm beginning to wonder if some of my problems stem from using an SATA
hard drive ... many problems go away when I try an IDE drive. I
inadvertently started a new thread on that...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored b
Hi, Eric!
PA is short for Pennsylvania in the USA
I sure will send bug reports and help out! Will try
jemm386 on my test system and let you know
What went wrong with install and such?? Some examples as I
had no problem running from LiveCD:
1) The options to create a bootable flopp
Hello everyone and greetings from Southeastern PA!
I discovered your project when looking for newer alternatives to
MS-DOS. I have a process control program written in DOS that is used
for a critical commercial application and will need to support it for at
least five more years. My personal
15 matches
Mail list logo
