Hi,
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:04 PM, TJ Edmister damag...@hyakushiki.net wrote:
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:29:14 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, NT 4.0 (1996?) didn't support either of those
NT4 does support LFNs.
Not in DOS apps, I meant, no Win9x-era int 21h, 71xxh, AFAIK.
It
With all this talk of really old NTs, is there a reason ReactOS wouldn't
work for some of you?
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:13:29 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
It supports FAT12/16 and NTFS out of the box, and
with a patched system file it will support FAT32 also (same goes for
NT3.51)
Is the patch officially part of some service pack or is it third-party?
I checked the site
Greetings jack,
I certainly agree with your stance here. I have been using one ms dos 7.1
package since at least 2007 or so easily and effortlessly. I have helped
others find it as well.
I am not sure where the .bg country code is, but I could not connect to
the
site when I tried it before
Karen,
I certainly agree with your stance here. I have been using one
ms-dos 7.1 package since at least 2007 or so, easily and effort-
lessly. I have helped others find it as well.
I am not sure where the .bg country code is, but I could not
connect to the site when I tried it before
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:03 PM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Jack gykazequ...@earthlink.net wrote:
You may not consider it reliable, and Dennis may have some odd
problem accessing it, but that website http://ms-dos7.hit.bg
did give me, on
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Jack gykazequ...@earthlink.net wrote:
I certainly agree with your stance here. I have been using one
ms-dos 7.1 package since at least 2007 or so, easily and effort-
lessly. I have helped others find it as well.
It might be easier to just tell them to
It's really too bad, though, that MS won't make it official and release
the MS-DOS source as public domain, or at least one of the various
open-source licenses.
Surely you JEST!, my friend [are joking]! Gates Co. are charter
members of the U.S.A.'s All we want is MONEY! brotherhood!
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jack gykazequ...@earthlink.net wrote:
Note on the FreeDOS main page that there are comments about FreeDOS
offering LBA large-disk capability (48-bit disk addressing, not 24-
bit CHS), which MS-DOS did not have, and which the main page says
was unavailable
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jack gykazequ...@earthlink.net wrote:
Wengier Wu's MS-DOS 7 variant has a licensing issue ...
So what??, as I noted in my prior post. At least 18 years have
gone by since Gates Co. declared DOS is dead!, and no lawyers
I know of have EVER gone-after
Hi, (yet another inane response from me)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jack gykazequ...@earthlink.net wrote:
It's really too bad, though, that MS won't make it official and release
the MS-DOS source as public domain, or at least one of the various
open-source licenses.
How would that be
11 matches
Mail list logo
