On Wednesday 08 April 2009 23:23 (CEST), Eric Auer wrote:
You could either package the files into zips to make sure their
timestamps are set by unzip or you could fix your web server ;-)
Hi,
I am not talking about timestamps inside zips (these are usually preserved),
but about timestamps of
I think I'm using the stable kernel instead of the
unstable one.
I get an error that says essentially unload the
protected mode software and try again when windows
tries to start.
Are people taking out the smartdrive stuff or
simply adding a menu entry and if someone wants
windows loading
Hi Mateusz,
You could either package the files into zips to make sure their
timestamps are set by unzip or you could fix your web server ;-)
I am not talking about timestamps inside zips (these are usually preserved),
but about timestamps of the transaltions files, downloadable from my
Hi!
I think I'm using the stable kernel instead of the
unstable one.
I get an error that says essentially unload the
protected mode software and try again when windows
tries to start.
Neither free-EMM386 nor JEMM386 is compatible
with Windows 3.x 386enh mode or WfW 3.11...
You would
PS: RBIL says that year must be 2100, I guess this
means that MS-DOS did not implement leap years fully.
The Int21.2A (Get system time) description says the year is below 2100 as
you said. The DOS file date format can store years from 1980 up to 2107.
Some DOS applications are limited to
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:23:44 +0200, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of Eric Auer:
The EMM386 does, and some DOS extenders / DPMI
hosts. The problem is that Windows in 386enh
mode and WfW 3.11 try to take over the work
from EMM386 which uses a complex what exactly
Oops, just sent an empty reply...
and more than 2 near fnodes does not tell me what crashed.
It might mean you use an old kernel which leaves
file handles open when access is aborted due to
an error...
I do not think your RAM config is a problem.
Maybe your copy of FDUPDATE or WGET is
Couldn't there be a optional syncfat program that one could run at the
boot of freedos, and before shut down?
Could synchronize the FreeDos LFN and the M$ Dos storages mediums. It
may not,since isn't live access, violate
the patent. Many Programs write/read directly to and from the fat tables
Visual Basic for Dos (1.0)
1) Anyone know if this runs on FreeDos
2) If it does does anyone know where to get it?
FreeBasic
1) Does it have GUI?
2) Will it run QuickBasic programs?
QuickBasic
Are there any alternatives for FreeDos, Or would that be FreeBasic
thanks,
Usul
FreeBasic
1) Does it have GUI?
I meant can you write applications with GUI under freedos with freebasic
Forms, textboxes simple stuff.
usul
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a
Has anyone ever considered an open source equivalent to windows 3.11?
Compatible like Reactos is compatible? At least on the surface, enough
to where
most basic applications would run?
usul
--
This SF.net email is
If I want to delete/overwrite files from a script(batch), then either way,
it will interogate me:are you sure?y/n;
but I want the script to run unattended; is there a way to make it fully
'hands free'?, possibly with a redirection
away from the keyboard, or some such thing? PS: when deleting a
Michael Horvath wrote:
Is there a way to compress folders so they take up less space? Ideally,
I would like to be able to compress into a zip file, and still have the
OS treat it as a regular folder. As long as other OSs can view/access
the folder and its files, then any type of
Not workgroup.
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Uge!
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error that
there isn't enough extended memory.
Uge!
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:34 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an error
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 15:35 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
have an unsupported dos version.
Load the microsoft version that comes with windows, himem too.
If I try loading windows 3.1 in standard mode, I get an
17 matches
Mail list logo
