--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> PS: Can anybody access (or provide a mirror of)
> http://easymamecab.mameworld.net/html/snddosdr.htm or
> http://vsynchmame.mameworld.net/ at the moment?
>
they are now:
http://easymamecab.mameworld.info/
http://vsynchmame.mameworld.info/
At the moment I am using this motherboard:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131232
There are no ISA slots available I'm afraid. I do have 2 PCI slots, have
tried the SB16 emulation with a Sound Blaster Live! Value PCI card but the
emulation test/diagnostics fails each time
Johnson Lam has posted a new 9-Jun-2009 DRIVERS.ZIP file
on his site at . The
UIDE and UIDEJR drivers can again be run without any XMS
memory for "ancient" PC systems. The drivers now set a
"UIDE$" or UIDEJR$" driver name when if CD/DVD units are
found, so autoloader scripts do not get their /
Sorry, in my previous post about UIDE/UIDEJR, I meant
to write " ... when NO CD/DVD units are found ..."!
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
Hi D Z,
> www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131232
>
> There are no ISA slots available I'm afraid. I do have 2 PCI slots, have
> tried the SB16 emulation with a Sound Blaster Live! Value PCI card but the
> emulation test/diagnostics fails each time.
As far as I know, the SB Liv
Most people find that they don't need Windows 3.x, but a lot of software
needs Windows 9x that won't work properly or at all in Windows NT and
it's variants XP/2000/Vista/7 etcetera.
One example is Warcraft II Battle Net edition. A better example is Red
Alert Command and Conquer I. Wolfenstein 3
Marco Antonio Achury Palma wrote:
>Exist newer ports to X on DOS.
>
>Some times appear here people asking for a free win3.1 replacement.
>Why not to have X Windows system for DOS?
Would like to see an X Windows implementation for DOS if only to get some nice
apps that will work on X Windows por
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Michael
Robinson wrote:
> So, how are efforts to replace Windows 9x coming along? Theoretically,
> freedos could support an open source replacement.
AFAIK, there is no effort to do this at all. Feel free to educate me
on that, though.
And in my opinion, the only
Well, I'm not sure that I want to put anything quite like this on the
FreeDOS roadmap. The effort involved in something like this is about
the same as it is for ReactOS. And it isn't the basic Windows DLLs,
but all the support DLLs that are necessary for applications to run
properly. To be hones
