Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-31 Thread Blair Campbell
it only uses code that the compiler used to produce it creates.  DJGPP
just happens to use protected mode because it allows the executable
itself to reach astronomical sizes :-).

On 8/30/06, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:45:28 -0700, you wrote:

 Hi Blair,

 Hi.  About the 80386 code thing.  It is not necessary to switch to
 protected mode to use large amounts of memory.  This is possible with
 plain 8086 code.  And XDEL has options close to what you wish with
 DEL.

 If 8086 code can works.

 What I mean is ... only use 80386 when necessary, just like your LAME port,
 it
 should support the latest CPU candies such as 3DNOW Professional and SSE3
 because CPU did affect the speed.


 Rgds,
 Johnson.

 -
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
 easier
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



-- 
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
   David Letterman (1947 - )

See ya

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-30 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi Johnson,

 My own point of view, FreeDOS programs should better than MS-DOS old one

I completely agree, I think it's already 100x better!

 (like
 KEYB), not just a clone, now we have a lot of memory and CPU power, allow to
 use a better UI, easier operation and a better speed.

Yes, but where do you draw the line, and how do you deal with backward 
hardware capability and how far back in history do you go? What about 
forward compatibility such as eight core 64 bit processor? If you 
need/want a modern fast open-source o/s with a UI how does FreeDOS fit 
into this concept sitting next to Linux? Who will write all the drivers 
for the latest NICs, USB, Kerberos, signed SMB, NFS, NTFS, TCP/IP with 
IP v6, not to mention cameras, scanners, printers - how will they all 
work? What standards will this new UI adhere to?

-- 
Gerry Hickman (London UK)

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-30 Thread Aitor SantamarĂ­a
Hello Johnson,

Thanks for your wishes!
In this case it wouldn't make too much sense to clone 100%, first
because MS-KEYBOARD.SYS is complex and contains code, and even if it
was just data for KEYB, I would have to update it with every new
country: this way each user can make their own keyboard.

Thanks,
Aitor

2006/8/30, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:33:55 +0200, you wrote:

 Hi Aitor,

 As I wish to embrace other FreeDOS projects, there will be a small
 evolution through small evolutives in the 2.X projects (leaving maybe
 some for the 3.X series). I just mention some of the planned changes:
 - A first new release with lots of many more documents
 - Improvements in library file manipulation (UPX support to save space)
 - dynamic translations (as opposed to nowadays static ones)
 - supplementary loadable mappings (e.g. multimedia, apm, ...)
 - multiple layouts in memory
 - accessibility options
 - optional usage of XMS

 Best wishes to the success of KEYB, you did great job making it better.

 My own point of view, FreeDOS programs should better than MS-DOS old one (like
 KEYB), not just a clone, now we have a lot of memory and CPU power, allow to
 use a better UI, easier operation and a better speed.


 Rgds,
 Johnson.

 -
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-30 Thread Johnson Lam
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:44 +0100, you wrote:

Hi Gerry,

I completely agree, I think it's already 100x better!

We're now in 21 century :-)

Yes, but where do you draw the line, and how do you deal with backward 
hardware capability and how far back in history do you go? What about 

Just my own standard ... I think programmers need some guideline to work,
otherwise everyone code different standard programs with different compiler
and got different problems, consuming lots of human resources.

1) Basically should be 80386 based, because of the Protect mode, necessary for
programs to access large amount of memory, but if the program don't need lots
of memory, no need speed optimizations, 8086 should be supported if possible

forward compatibility such as eight core 64 bit processor? If you 

2) If the program is not TSR, and it's operation need large amount of memory
or CPU power (e.g. codec, need a lot of calculating), it should have a routine
to detect CPU ability and full utilize it. However program like FDISK or
FORMAT doesn't need those advance detection.

need/want a modern fast open-source o/s with a UI how does FreeDOS fit 
into this concept sitting next to Linux? Who will write all the drivers 

3) The UI I refer to is a better layout TEXT, the Russian PTS-DOS shows a good
UI, also TurboVision like UI is good for beginners. But for history reason,
the original DOS UI need to preserve, solution is simple, just a switch or
.CFG file to let user choose what they like

for the latest NICs, USB, Kerberos, signed SMB, NFS, NTFS, TCP/IP with 
IP v6, not to mention cameras, scanners, printers - how will they all 
work? What standards will this new UI adhere to?

These new things not exist before can have a TurboVision like UI, or try to
direct inherit from Linux (if not too complex).

I use RM more than deltree, and a number of DOS people sure have some UNIX
port command line utils because they're really better than DOS, I don't think
we need to wipe out the current DOS one, just improve it is enough!

For example, DEL can be improved by adding /r for recurse sub-directories,
XCOPY can be improved to handle date and time or file size filtering (refer to
XXCOPY)... etc.


Rgds,
Johnson.

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-30 Thread Blair Campbell
Hi.  About the 80386 code thing.  It is not necessary to switch to
protected mode to use large amounts of memory.  This is possible with
plain 8086 code.  And XDEL has options close to what you wish with
DEL.

On 8/30/06, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:44 +0100, you wrote:

 Hi Gerry,

 I completely agree, I think it's already 100x better!

 We're now in 21 century :-)

 Yes, but where do you draw the line, and how do you deal with backward
 hardware capability and how far back in history do you go? What about

 Just my own standard ... I think programmers need some guideline to work,
 otherwise everyone code different standard programs with different compiler
 and got different problems, consuming lots of human resources.

 1) Basically should be 80386 based, because of the Protect mode, necessary
 for
 programs to access large amount of memory, but if the program don't need
 lots
 of memory, no need speed optimizations, 8086 should be supported if possible

 forward compatibility such as eight core 64 bit processor? If you

 2) If the program is not TSR, and it's operation need large amount of memory
 or CPU power (e.g. codec, need a lot of calculating), it should have a
 routine
 to detect CPU ability and full utilize it. However program like FDISK or
 FORMAT doesn't need those advance detection.

 need/want a modern fast open-source o/s with a UI how does FreeDOS fit
 into this concept sitting next to Linux? Who will write all the drivers

 3) The UI I refer to is a better layout TEXT, the Russian PTS-DOS shows a
 good
 UI, also TurboVision like UI is good for beginners. But for history reason,
 the original DOS UI need to preserve, solution is simple, just a switch or
 .CFG file to let user choose what they like

 for the latest NICs, USB, Kerberos, signed SMB, NFS, NTFS, TCP/IP with
 IP v6, not to mention cameras, scanners, printers - how will they all
 work? What standards will this new UI adhere to?

 These new things not exist before can have a TurboVision like UI, or try to
 direct inherit from Linux (if not too complex).

 I use RM more than deltree, and a number of DOS people sure have some UNIX
 port command line utils because they're really better than DOS, I don't
 think
 we need to wipe out the current DOS one, just improve it is enough!

 For example, DEL can be improved by adding /r for recurse sub-directories,
 XCOPY can be improved to handle date and time or file size filtering (refer
 to
 XXCOPY)... etc.


 Rgds,
 Johnson.

 -
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
 easier
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



-- 
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
   David Letterman (1947 - )

See ya

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-30 Thread Johnson Lam
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:45:28 -0700, you wrote:

Hi Blair,

Hi.  About the 80386 code thing.  It is not necessary to switch to
protected mode to use large amounts of memory.  This is possible with
plain 8086 code.  And XDEL has options close to what you wish with
DEL.

If 8086 code can works.

What I mean is ... only use 80386 when necessary, just like your LAME port, it
should support the latest CPU candies such as 3DNOW Professional and SSE3
because CPU did affect the speed.


Rgds,
Johnson.

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] ANNOUNCE: FD-KEYB 2.0 final ready!

2006-08-29 Thread Johnson Lam
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:33:55 +0200, you wrote:

Hi Aitor,

As I wish to embrace other FreeDOS projects, there will be a small
evolution through small evolutives in the 2.X projects (leaving maybe
some for the 3.X series). I just mention some of the planned changes:
- A first new release with lots of many more documents
- Improvements in library file manipulation (UPX support to save space)
- dynamic translations (as opposed to nowadays static ones)
- supplementary loadable mappings (e.g. multimedia, apm, ...)
- multiple layouts in memory
- accessibility options
- optional usage of XMS

Best wishes to the success of KEYB, you did great job making it better.

My own point of view, FreeDOS programs should better than MS-DOS old one (like
KEYB), not just a clone, now we have a lot of memory and CPU power, allow to
use a better UI, easier operation and a better speed.


Rgds,
Johnson.

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user