Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-16 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Robert Riebisch schreef: > > And the QEMU Windows port can be used on a DOS host with the help of > Japheth's HX DOS extender. > > Robert Riebisch > most interesting. I've got no idea which emulators exist nowadays, beyond Bochs, DosEmu, Xdosemu, VDMsound, Dosbox, Vmware, VirtualPC and Qemu. O

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-15 Thread Alain M.
Hi Robert, > Don't forget http://www.virtualbox.org/ from the VirtualPC makers. > I didn't know it :) :) it looks very nice... How is using it? I have a few questions: 1) is it fast for *graphics in DOS*? this is not very good in either VMware or Qemu (it is good in Dosemu) 2) does it use accel

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-15 Thread Lélio Ronei Knop
Sorry, My English is bad, I understood wrong ...    - Original Message - From: "Robert Riebisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion. Lélio Ronei

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-15 Thread Robert Riebisch
Lélio Ronei Knop wrote: > Which is the problem of the VirtualBox? I didn't say anything bad about VirtualBox. Feel free to read my posting again. Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.bttr-software.de/ - Take Surveys

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-15 Thread Lélio Ronei Knop
Which is the problem of the VirtualBox?   - Original Message - From: "Robert Riebisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:16 AM Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion. > Mark Bailey wrote:

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-15 Thread Robert Riebisch
Mark Bailey wrote: > I've had pretty good luck with bochs: http://bochs.sourceforge.net/ Don't forget http://www.virtualbox.org/ from the VirtualPC makers. And the QEMU Windows port can be used on a DOS host with the help of Japheth's HX DOS extender. Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://w

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-14 Thread Alain M.
VMware is very good and works with FreeDOS, any windows and Any Linux. You will not need support, it easy and it does what you expect it to do, Qemu is good too, but diffuclt to install and setup. VMware is fast, nearly 90% of host machine. Graphics for DOS are very slow (Qemu is a little bette

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-14 Thread Geraldo Netto
Hi guys, i myself prefer qemu which seems(imho) faster bochs, gpl and for linux hosts now they have what they call kvm - http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki this feature can be found on mainline linux kernel(2.6.20+) but you will need a recent intel or amd processor, kvm uses intel's vt instruction or

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-14 Thread Giorgos
> > DON"T USE MICROSOFT'S VIRTUAL PC. Go to http://www.vmware.com and > switch ASAP. A suggestion is that dosemu, which is free, might be > better at supporting freedos than even vmware. Virtual PC is an > inferior product compared to vmware. You can use an evaluation copy of > workstation and

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-14 Thread Mark Bailey
Giorgos wrote: >> DON"T USE MICROSOFT'S VIRTUAL PC. Go to http://www.vmware.com and >> switch ASAP. A suggestion is that dosemu, which is free, might be >> better at supporting freedos than even vmware. Virtual PC is an >> inferior product compared to vmware. You can use an evaluation copy of

Re: [Freedos-user] About the VMWARE suggestion.

2007-03-14 Thread Giorgos
> > DON"T USE MICROSOFT'S VIRTUAL PC. Go to http://www.vmware.com and > switch ASAP. A suggestion is that dosemu, which is free, might be > better at supporting freedos than even vmware. Virtual PC is an > inferior product compared to vmware. You can use an evaluation copy of > workstation and