On 30.11.2016 16:09, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Still, bug reports and users' complaints is the only external measure we
have. There are close to nothing in complaints about NTP functionality,
other than requests to support chronyd and
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 16:57 +0100, David Kupka wrote:
> Upgrades to 4.x will revert configuration if done by FreeIPA.
Why would you revert a perfectly valid configuration ?
I can understand that you wan to stop managing the server, but I do not
see why you should un-configure it.
> I think it's
On 30/11/16 16:09, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Still, bug reports and users' complaints is the only external measure we
have. There are close to nothing in complaints about NTP functionality,
other than requests to support chronyd and a
On ke, 30 marras 2016, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Still, bug reports and users' complaints is the only external measure we
have. There are close to nothing in complaints about NTP functionality,
other than requests to support chronyd
David Kupka wrote:
> On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> Still, bug reports and users' complaints is the only external measure we
>> have. There are close to nothing in complaints about NTP functionality,
>> other than requests to support chronyd and a better discover of existing
>> NTP
On 29/11/16 18:10, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ti, 29 marras 2016, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 29.11.2016 16:02, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Spacek wrote:
On 29.11.2016 09:11, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
On ti, 29 marras 2016, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 29.11.2016 16:02, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Spacek wrote:
On 29.11.2016 09:11, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in
On 29.11.2016 16:02, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 29.11.2016 09:11, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
> On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
>> I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and
Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 29.11.2016 09:11, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
> I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
> customers use its functionality by
On 29.11.2016 09:11, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> David Kupka wrote:
>>> On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the
On 28.11.2016 20:57, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
servers and have the servers sync to the NTP source.
On 11/28/2016 02:57 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
servers and have the servers sync to the NTP
David Kupka wrote:
> On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
>> I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
>> customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
>> servers and have the servers sync to the NTP source. This way if the NTP
>> source ever
On 24.11.2016 20:31, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Martin Basti > wrote:
On 24.11.2016 16:11, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Martin Basti >
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 24.11.2016 16:11, Gabe Alford wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 24.11.2016 07:06, David Kupka wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
>>>
On 24.11.2016 17:14, Martin Basti wrote:
> If NTP is still configured on the IPA server, this may be less of an issue.
> Not everyone has/is/will be using ansible. Also in secure environments, DHCP
> is not allowed/used at all.
If DHCP is not good enough for your environment then you *must not*
On 24.11.2016 16:11, Gabe Alford wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Martin Basti > wrote:
On 24.11.2016 07:06, David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in
On 24.11.2016 07:06, David Kupka wrote:
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
servers and have the servers sync to the NTP source. This way if the NTP
On 22/11/16 23:15, Gabe Alford wrote:
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
servers and have the servers sync to the NTP source. This way if the NTP
source ever gets disrupted for long periods
I would say that it is worth keeping in FreeIPA. I know myself and some
customers use its functionality by having the clients sync to the IPA
servers and have the servers sync to the NTP source. This way if the NTP
source ever gets disrupted for long periods of time (which has happened in
my
On 22.11.2016 13:06, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 22.11.2016 12:15, David Kupka wrote:
Hello everyone!
Is it worth to keep configuring NTP in FreeIPA?
In usual environment there're no special requirements for time synchronization
and the distribution default (be it ntpd, chrony or anything else)
Hello everyone!
Is it worth to keep configuring NTP in FreeIPA?
In usual environment there're no special requirements for time
synchronization and the distribution default (be it ntpd, chrony or
anything else) will just work. Any tampering with the configuration
can't make it any better.
22 matches
Mail list logo