On 05/28/2015 05:53 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu,
On 05/27/2015 01:04 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:32 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
If you really want to avoid unforeseen issues rather go and get rid of
major.minor logic we have in the topology plugin right now :-)
Ludwig, I thought we
Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 26.5.2015 v 16:32 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015
Hi Simo,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:23 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Simo,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin
On 28/05/15 16:29, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:23 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Simo,
On 05/28/2015 03:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:39 +0200, Oleg Fayans wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 08:55, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 10:46 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 09:05 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 16:59 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:11 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 10:49, Martin Kosek wrote:
On
On 05/28/2015 05:35 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:18 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:59 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 04:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:54 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce
On 05/26/2015 04:32 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
If you really want to avoid unforeseen issues rather go and get rid of
major.minor logic we have in the topology plugin right now :-)
Ludwig, I thought we agreed to avoid using major.minor format in the
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree and I believe
that it is not a good idea
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree and I believe
that it is not a good idea to have two places which say 'version 1' but and
On 26.5.2015 16:16, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 05/26/2015 02:12 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
it came to my mind that domain level for topology plugin should actually be
number 2, not 1.
We already used number 1 for incompatible changes in DNS tree
21 matches
Mail list logo
