Yes, this is exactly what I am trying to accomplish. I've already been looking
in to the BIND views clause and would like to hear if anyone has any feedback
as to how well this works in the real world.
In this case the implementation of IPA is using an external standard BIND
implementation loa
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonwrote:
It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead and run
CLEANRUV.
I cleaned up a load o
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead and run
>>> CLEANRUV.
>>
>> I cleaned up a load of these entries, but now I
On 04/13/2012 10:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Brian Cook wrote:
Ideally I would rely on a -group- of servers, and then rely on DNS if it
is down. I don't want to hammer one server. We're talking about 500-1000
servers running virtual machines
On 2012-04-13, at 4:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>
>>> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When troubleshooti
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
first.
You are cor
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
first.
>>>
>>> You are correct. Try this:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Brian Cook wrote:
>Ideally I would rely on a -group- of servers, and then rely on DNS if it
>is down. I don't want to hammer one server. We're talking about 500-1000
>servers running virtual machines, so potentially a lot of traffic. Got
>
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a
Ideally I would rely on a -group- of servers, and then rely on DNS if it is
down. I don't want to hammer one server. We're talking about 500-1000 servers
running virtual machines, so potentially a lot of traffic. Got any suggestions
for that?
---
Brian Cook
Solutions Architect, Red Hat, Inc
Brian Cook wrote:
Has anyone worked any magic to keep DNS, kerberos and LDAP request
routed to local servers in an IPA setup where topology is separated by
WAN links?
I have looked at things like doing sorts in the DNS client
configuration, BIND views, etc. but I would like to know if anyone els
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like I'v
Has anyone worked any magic to keep DNS, kerberos and LDAP request routed to
local servers in an IPA setup where topology is separated by WAN links?
I have looked at things like doing sorts in the DNS client configuration, BIND
views, etc. but I would like to know if anyone else has tried to tac
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like I've been emailing this list once a week or so
On 04/13/2012 12:22 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be some
corruption since t
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 13:39 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
> FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
> Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
> 15/16). I've also had to add/
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
>> I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
>> built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be some
>> corruption since there's an entry which I'm unable t
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to add/remove replicas many
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to add/remove replicas many times - and run into
problems installing wh
On 2012-04-13, at 1:18 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>
>>> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what
looks to be a bug in ipa-client-install
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=k
On 2012-04-13, at 1:09 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Kelvin Edmison wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what
>> looks to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
>>
>> On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
>> ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=kelv
Kelvin Edmison wrote:
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=kelvin-c5.
and successfully bound to the domain.
I am now trying to get nfs
Hi,
When troubleshooting what I thought was an NFS4 issue, I have found what looks
to be a bug in ipa-client-install.
On a CentOS 5.8 machine, I ran
ipa-client-install --no-ntp --force --hostname=kelvin-c5.
and successfully bound to the domain.
I am now trying to get nfs4 up and running, and f
HiI have multiple domains her but I want to use one user/group etc. database. How can I do it? Options:1. Different realm for each domain, but how to share the user/group etc infos betwen different ipa servers?2. One realm for al domains. Possible? (it is possible to change the realm after install
25 matches
Mail list logo
