Hi freesurfers,
I am doing a connectivity analysis on cortical areas. I load the 2d fmri
surface file in fsaverage5 space into matlab and I get 20484 vertices for
both hemispheres. Some of which are zero because I previously specified to
get only the cortex vertices. However, the number of
*Hello,*
*I would like to conduct an analysis using mri_glmfit but I'm getting this
error:*
*ERROR: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled, condno = 1e+08*
*I am appreciated you can help me solve this problem. *
*My command was:*
mri_glmfit --y age9vs8ml01.mgh --fsgd new.fsgd dods --C
I get a different error when I use --regmethod surface (below). I double
checked that I am in the correct hemishpere. I'm not sure if it has to do with
teh volume I used to draw to ROI or something with how I drew it.
Thanks,
Anna
mri_label2label --srcsubject segfs --srclabel
Hi Douglas,
Thanks for your reply.
I thought when individual space data is projected onto fsaverage5 space it
get wrapped in a common space, so one vertex would correspond to the same
area across subjects, like in MNI.
I tried to create a group subcortical mask by loading each subject fmri
Hi,
I downloaded FreeSurfer development version built on Sep 20. Then I ran
the "trac-all" for the same set of DWI data four times. The volume and
averaged DTI parameters of the fiber pathways, which found in the file
~/sub/dpath/*_PP_avg33_mni_flt/pathstats.overall.txt, are different for
Hi Anna
sorry, I've lost track of where this is at. Can you send us the full
screen output of the command you tried to run and the error it gives?
thanks
Bruce
On
Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> I have tried multiple variations for my subject directory. I have had it end
> at
You need to specify --trgsubject ico in mri_vol2surf
On 9/28/16 3:01 PM, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
> Hi All, forwarding this message along again as I'm still having some trouble
> getting this to work. Basically I would like to 1) project processed
> residual time-series from the subject-space
Hello FreeSurfers,
I am considering using Freesurfer recon-all for segmentation of T1 brain
MRIs of young subjects (1-4 years). I am planning to use a Freesurfer
compliant pediatric template to maximize the segmentation accuracy.
In the publication titled *A FreeSurfer-compliant consistent
Is Testing1.label a surface-based label? If so, use --regmethod surface
On 09/28/2016 04:39 PM, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> The subject path was
> /mnt/netScratch/crawforda/Brainstem/study11074/S2sdt/segfs/surf
>
> From:
Can you send me the label?
On 09/28/2016 05:54 PM, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> I get a different error when I use --regmethod surface (below). I double
> checked that I am in the correct hemishpere. I'm not sure if it has to do
> with teh volume I used to draw to ROI or something with how I drew
Hello all,
I am using mri_glmfit (DODS method) to run a CT analysis with 2 groups and
4 covariates and have a couple of questions regarding the statistical tests
performed within the group analyses:
1. Can Freesurfer test the change in model fit or delta R-squared in a
hierarchical
Hi All, forwarding this message along again as I'm still having some trouble
getting this to work. Basically I would like to 1) project processed residual
time-series from the subject-space volume to the subject-space surface, 2)
smooth on the surface, 3) down-sample to FS4 space.
To do this
You do not need to specify that. In fact, you should not because it may
mess up the orientation. You do not need to add any special arguments to
mri_convert. You can also specify .nii instead of .nii.gz
On 9/27/16 3:14 PM, Sepeta, Leigh wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry to re-post:
I am trying to
The command line looks ok. The low efficiency is coming from the low
number of events per event type.
On 9/27/16 9:52 AM, Alexandre Obert wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to optimize my design by inserting null-events between my
trials (in order to better catch the HRF shape with reasonable
Hi Greve
Thanks for your reply, can I have more detail about how to solve my
problem. By the way, I may not think it's the problem about covariates.
Thank you.
Jin
2016-09-28 15:29 GMT-04:00 Douglas Greve :
> Try normalizing your covariates (ie, subtract the mean and
Try giving it the full path to the label, ie,
--srclabel
/mnt/netScratch/crawforda/BrainStem/study11074/S2sdt/segfs/label/Testing1.label
On 9/28/16 3:47 PM, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is the command I entered with the output containing the error. I also
> tried different variations
Hi there,
Anyone can help me out? Thank you.
2016-09-28 13:46 GMT-04:00 kinson li :
> *Hello,*
>
> *I would like to conduct an analysis using mri_glmfit but I'm getting this
> error:*
>
> *ERROR: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled, condno = 1e+08*
>
> *I am
Hi,
Below is the command I entered with the output containing the error. I also
tried different variations on the path for the directory, but this is the one I
thought it should be.
Thanks,
Anna
mri_label2label --srcsubject segfs --srclabel Testing1.label --trgsubject segfs
--trglabel
what was your freeview command line, and what did you do to make it crash?
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> Thank you! that seemed to have worked. I thought I had tried that before, but
> must not that. The input/output is below. The new label was created. When I
> tried to load
can you email me (offlist) the inflated surface and the label you tried
to load?
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> The subject path was
> /mnt/netScratch/crawforda/Brainstem/study11074/S2sdt/segfs/surf
>
> From:
There is no way. Yes, you can specify fsaverage for yoursubject
On 9/28/16 3:47 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote:
Hello Doug,
Do you know if there's any command to make it continue from where it
stopped in case of future incidents? Also, what does " yoursubject"
mean in this code? Can I substitute
The subject path was
/mnt/netScratch/crawforda/Brainstem/study11074/S2sdt/segfs/surf
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bruce Fischl
[fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September
I don't understand what the problem is. Can you elaborate?
On 9/27/16 12:13 PM, Tamara Tavares wrote:
The differences have been found in the outputs from the aseg file.
Particularly, I am interested in the ventricles and the intracranial
volumes. I have loaded both anatomicals in FreeView and
compute the mean and stddev of your covariate, subtract the mean from
each covariate, and then divide the result by stddev.
On 9/28/16 3:47 PM, kinson li wrote:
Hi Greve
Thanks for your reply, can I have more detail about how to solve my
problem. By the way, I may not think it's the problem
Thank you
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Douglas Greve
wrote:
> There is no way. Yes, you can specify fsaverage for yoursubject
>
> On 9/28/16 3:47 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote:
>
> Hello Doug,
> Do you know if there's any command to make it continue from where it
>
I just opened freeview (just typed freeview into the command line). Then from
inside freeview, under the surfaces tab, I loaded the lh.inflated and
rh.inflated. Also under the surfaces tab, under Label I chose the label file
created (Testing1N.label). When I tried to open the label, is when
which lh.inflated and rh.inflated did you load? That is, for which
subject?
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> I just opened freeview (just typed freeview into the command line). Then from
> inside freeview, under the surfaces tab, I loaded the lh.inflated and
> rh.inflated. Also
Those are not residuals. If you want residuals, you will need to run
mri_glmfit from the command line adding --eres-save. You can get the
command line from the mri_glmfit.log file in the glmdir
On 9/28/16 10:58 AM, Damien MARIE wrote:
Dear FreeSurfers,
Sorry for the repost. I’m still
Hello Doug,
Do you know if there's any command to make it continue from where it
stopped in case of future incidents? Also, what does " yoursubject" mean in
this code? Can I substitute it with fsaverage?
Thanks
Paul
mri_mcsim --o $FREESURFER_HOME/average/mult-comp-cor/yoursubject/rh/cortex \
Hi Tamara
can you let us know how big the differences are?
thanks
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016,
Douglas Greve wrote:
I don't understand what the problem is. Can you elaborate?
On 9/27/16 12:13 PM, Tamara Tavares wrote:
The differences have been found in the outputs from the aseg
Try normalizing your covariates (ie, subtract the mean and divide by the
stddev).
On 9/28/16 3:07 PM, kinson li wrote:
Hi there,
Anyone can help me out? Thank you.
2016-09-28 13:46 GMT-04:00 kinson li >:
/Hello,/
/I would like to
It is changing with each subject because each subject's brain is
different, and you can't get a subject-specific mask from fsaverage5.
Can you load all your data into matlab and then compute a mask based on
non-zero voxels?
On 9/28/16 1:57 PM, Dorothy Sincasto wrote:
Hi freesurfers,
I am
Thank you! that seemed to have worked. I thought I had tried that before, but
must not that. The input/output is below. The new label was created. When I
tried to load the label onto the surface, FreeView crashed the same as it did
before though which brings me back to my original problem on
Dear FreeSurfer Team,
I have an additional question about the ?h.sulc.
[mris_anatomical_stats can do this if you specify sulc as the "thickness"
file]
your explaination means that
instead of the
mris_anatomical_stats -l -t *lh.thickness* -b -f lh
I can use these command with change the -t
Dear Freesurfer experts
Based on the FS wiki, I calculated the cortical thickness difference between
the LH and RH of a subject in subject's native surface.Now, I want to use FS
commands to extract the information such as "?h.aparc.stats" for this
difference map (LH - RH).Now this difference
yes, I believe so
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, Hanbyul Cho wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer Team,
I have an additional question about the ?h.sulc.
[mris_anatomical_stats can do this if you specify sulc as the
"thickness" file]
your explaination means that
instead of the
mris_anatomical_stats -l -t
you can actually skip the ico thing and just use --trgsubject fsaverage6
On 9/28/16 7:06 PM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
Thanks Doug,
This does seem like it will do the right thing, but it’s failing
because it’s looking for /SUBJECTS_DIR/ico/ and I do not seem to have
an ico subject in my
Dear freesurfer experts:
I was wondering if it would be possible to parcellate whole white matter
into different lobules (e.g. white matter in frontal lobule, parietal lobule,
temporal lobule, and so on) by using Freesurfer ?
My goal is to compute the white matter volume, as well as FA
Hi,
When using mri_convert to create 001.mgz from dicom that have *not* been
anonymized does any patient, institution, study description etc information get
transferred into the 001.mgz?
Thanks.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Thanks a lot Bruce!
This is extremely useful!
A.
De : freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
de la part de Bruce Fischl
Envoyé : mardi 27 septembre 2016 17:23:30
À : Freesurfer support list
Dear all,
We have been working quite extensively with Freesurfer over the years. We
are now starting to collect a new large cohort and we are about to decide
which T1-weighted sequence to use, MPRAGE or MP2RAGE (Siemens 3T Prisma,
headcoil 20 Chanel). When we visually inspect the images we
Hello experts,
I was running 1 monte carlo simulation before my desktop automatically
restarted, does anyone know a command to continue from where it stopped?
The simulation for left hemisphere stopped at 9146/1 and right
hemisphere at 9125/1. Thank you
Paul
I would just use what was created. There is nothing magical about 10,000
iterations. A few iterations short won't make any difference.
On 09/28/2016 10:35 AM, miracle ozzoude wrote:
> Hello experts,
> I was running 1 monte carlo simulation before my desktop
> automatically restarted, does
Dear FreeSurfers,
Sorry for the repost. I’m still trying to extract the residuals of cortical
surface area from a qdec analysis with two factors (2 levels) and 2 covariates.
I tried this command line:
mri_segstats --in
Thank you Doug
Paul
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> I would just use what was created. There is nothing magical about 10,000
> iterations. A few iterations short won't make any difference.
>
>
> On 09/28/2016 10:35 AM, miracle ozzoude
45 matches
Mail list logo