The parallelism theorem of labeled transition systems is, I think,
misinterpreted sometimes. It's too strong to claim that for any parallel
process a sequential process can be defined that operates/funtcions the same
way. The theorem relies on the existence of hidden transitions within the
__
From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > on
behalf of Frank Wimberly mailto:wimber...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 5:53:53 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
Sorry, John. It was a weak attempt
> *From:* Friam on behalf of Frank Wimberly <
> wimber...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 27, 2018 5:53:53 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
>
> Sorry, John. It was a w
Friam on behalf of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 5:53:53 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
Sorry, John. It was a weak attempt to be humorous.
Also, I mistyped. I meant "algebraic geometry" w
Sorry, John. It was a weak attempt to be humorous.
Also, I mistyped. I meant "algebraic geometry" when I was asking for a
book recommendation.
Frank
---
Frank Wimberly
My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
My scientific publications:
John writes:
“Is there something that animals, or more particularly humans, can do which we
can prove cannot be duplicated by a sequential machine?”
A sequential computer program could simply be a loop that sampled random
numbers and indexed into the address space of the computer program
ng Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
Hi Marcus, Frank, et al,
I am a mathematician who knows category theory, which Rosen seems to have found
exciting. My thinking about a machine that would learn how to reprogram itself
is surely at a naive level, but it s
y in a graduate Math course. I convinced myself they
were about the same thing
--John
From: Friam on behalf of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 11:11:10 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter,
om
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
Yes, but not with multiple signatories. Sorry.
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)505.473.9646(h)
NM Foundatio
s more sophisticated
> rules for producing an output.
>
>
> --John
> --
> *From:* Friam on behalf of Tom Johnson <
> t...@jtjohnson.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 4:23:01 PM
> *To:* Friam@redfish. co
24, 2018 11:14 AM
To: Friam@redfish. com mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter, draft #2
I will sign on, Nick.
Tom Johnson, Professor Emeritus, San Francisco State University
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalis
ofessor of Psychology and Biology
>
> Clark University
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom
> Johnson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 11:14 AM
> *To:* Friam@redfish. c
<http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Tom Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 11:14 AM
To: Friam@redfish. com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Open Letter,
I will sign on, Nick.
Tom Johnson, Professor Emeritus, San Francisco State University
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)505.473.9646(h)
*NM Foundation for Open
14 matches
Mail list logo
