work reliably, you can have only a single
%n at the end of the format string. %n before anoter Format
variable may not be portable.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
redraw sidepics only if parts of them are exposed
There was a small bug in the patch. To test wether the expose
area and the sidepic no not overlap, this is correct:
(x >= offset + width)
not
(x > offset + width)
^^^
(Fixed).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vog
's life time.
>
> It is probably enough to call them once, but I'm not sure where else to
> put them.
With my latest patches, you can just put the call in
flib_init_graphics() (libs/fvwmlib.c).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s the typical module init stuff. It seems the core
and fvwm-root do it in a different way. THey have to call the
svg init function on their own.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ssage:
> * add fvwmlib.c to libfvwm_a_SOURCES
Hm? I already added it.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ething();
...
}
Whis way the code is compiled every time (but optimized away if
USEFOO is 0). Much easier to maintain, and the ifdefs are only in
the header file.
An in this special case, since the debug code in FvwmIconMan has
not been used since at least 1998, we might as well remove it.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packaging efforts.
What's the problem? All files in fvwm are distibuted under the
GPL, as stated in the COPYING file. We don't have copyright
notices in many header files either.
However, if that makes you happy, and you make a patch for these
files (*not* for the header files), I&
a_SOURCES
> > * added librsvg2-dev to Build-Depends (debain/control.in)
>
> * removed unnecessary tests
I have applied your patch with some small changes (most notably:
rename SvgSupport with USE_SVG and define it in Fsvg.h).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:02:57AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "DV" == Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DV> What's the problem? All files in fvwm are distibuted under the
> DV> GPL, as stated in the COPYING file. We don&
>
> > Other than that, the patch seems good. Can you make the above changes?
>
> Sure. I removed all #endif comments except in the termination of include
> guards.
Applied.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packed similarly to a
> subdirectory.
>
> fvwm_icons-20070121/
>
> This would help package/handle icons easier for distributions.
This is now
fvwm_icons-20070101/
fvwm_icons-20070101.tar.gz
fvwm_icons-20070101.tar.bz2
(just wait a bit until the web page has been updated).
Ciao
D
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:53:39PM -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > I won't argue about scripts and other files with executable or
> > source code, but I it's useless to place copyright notices in
> > files with trivial contents that can not be pr
ile,
and hardly less readable.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Shaded resize works well with interactive operation. However there are
> multiple issues with resizing a shaded window by arguments.
>
> * The code assumes that any shaded window is shaded in N or S direction.
> (it allows for change of the width of the window, but not the height.)
> Resizing
essage:
> * initial fix for resizing shaded windows by parameters (Se comments
> starting with ??? in move_resize.c)
So far, the patch is fine. Using g.normal would be wrong as we
want to use g.max if the window is maximized and shaded at the
same time.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:09:31AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 04:49:59PM -0600, fvwm-workers wrote:
> > CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
> > Module name:fvwm
> > Changes by: griph 07/01/31 16:49:59
> >
> > Modified files:
&
e + 3 pixels
Move keep w+10w+3p
* Move a window up by 10% of its size + 3 pixels
Move keep w+-10w-3p
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tch looks safe, I prefer not to removed grabbing
from the __move_loop() function. The new code passes the desired
cursor to the functions (and just grabs the cursor twice).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:36:54PM +0100, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >I have removed these two styles and replaced them with the much
> >more general style "PositionPlacement".
>
> Can the code forcing the top left corne
char *s;
> + char *dotchar = ".";
> +
> + if( strstr(var, dotchar) )
> + {
> +fprintf(stderr,"<> Illegal character '.' in
> variable name.\n");
> +return;
> + }
>
> s = safestrdup(var);
> var = s;
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
erring_ to an FVWM
> command option. eg:
>
>when _describing_ an
> option to a command. eg:
>
>
> This will highlight the option name & allow the option to be
> referenced elsewhere.
> * Use when you only want the text to appear in HTML output.
le way. And it's hell to read. A single page with intra-
document links is much more usable.
In any case, we're talking about Unix, not windoze. It can't be
*this* hard to make a script that extracts the individual files
with the command documentation from one big master source file
ks like long lines
broken with \\ are not typeset correctly.
* There is an inappropriate use of a single backtick in this line:
undefine(`include')
* A lot of text has been removed from the BUGS section.
* THe section "command expansion" contains rubbish.
Ciao
Domi
.
Nice. Now it should have a command index too.
> > In any case, we're talking about Unix, not windoze.
>
> I'm confused. What has this got to do with anything? (Perhaps my
> confusion comes from not having used Windoze since ~1998.)
Forget it, nobody seems to get the joke :-)
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
MWM menu.
Fvwm does really not try to look exactly like MWM. I really don't
see a reasun to change the looks of menu separators as long as
they look fine.
> These fixes, of course were extremely simple and hope to have them
> added to FVWM.
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAI
future patches (I've written one myself for
this one).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:23:16PM +0200, Stefan Huehner wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:17:19AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:28:36PM +0200, Stefan Huehner wrote:
> > > attached patch converts some function declarations from () to (void) and
>
k.h
>
> Log message:
> * do raise hacks even when the internal stack is intact, unless on a
> client request
Can you elaborate on why this is necessary, please? I'd just
like to understand the code.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
th experimental fvwm..
I'm starting FvwmTheme this way:
#// run FvwmTheme before anything else is done
ModuleSynchronous Timeout 5 FvwmTheme
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
The license:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt
More information and discussion:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Simon Griph wrote:
> Currently;
>
>All (State 1,Sticky) Lower
>
> will lower all state 1 windows, regardless of stickiness.
>
> A patch fixing this problem is attached.
Good patch.
Committed.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Domin
fvwm-xcursor_p6.diff
>
>This is the actual Xcursor patch, adding libXcursor calls to
>PImageLoadCursorFromFile, making it possible to load ARGB and
>animated mouse cursors.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> (it starts up an interactive shell, instead of sleeping & exiting)
>
> Am I missing something? or am I going to have to use the source?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and for
debugging functions.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:16:32AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:41:38PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> >>I need confirmation I'm not crazy.
> >>
> >>This works ok (substitute rxvt f
ImageLoadBitmap is removed.
Why? What's wrong with bmp images?
>Most of the old PImageLoadPixmapFromFile is made into
>the new local function PImageLoadArgbDataFromFile.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e candy, do you have an example
to try out the new features?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
f fvwm-xcursor-patches.tar.gz | patch -p0)
[snip]
Committed.
By the way,, I liked the patches. Very clean and easy to read.
Thank you!
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 11:17:51PM +0300, Juhani Pelli wrote:
> I've just built the current cvs version without any extra patches. It
> seems that DestroyFunc command is not working correctly. It just does
> nothing. No errors either.
Fixed.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
-
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:54:09PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > Probably some of the latest changes is breaking this.
> >
> > The attached patch fixes these errors and some more warnings.
> > Can someone please commit it?
>
> This patch does not appl
at does the configure summary say?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Boom, segmentation fault. Any ideas?
I don't get any crashes. Do you have a stack trace and an minimal
config file?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:42:06PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:27:15AM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> > >
> > > > But I'm still getting lots of errors in libs/FRend
o
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1.2.2
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> locate Xcursor.so
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_builddir.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:16:05PM +1000, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > ...
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luthien/src/fvwm/doc'
> > cp: `./header.html' and `head
cp $(srcdir)/$@ $(top_builddir)/doc/$@
>
> Does this fix your problem?
Yup.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
over the pager button, its border
is still lit.
Looks like FvwmButtons is ignoring more LeaveNotify events than it
should.
> Se attached patch for a fix.
Committed.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
le(
> - button_info *b, Window win, GC gc, XEvent *pev, Bool do_not_modify_fg);
> +void DrawTitle(button_info *b, Window win, GC gc, XEvent *pev);
>
^
There are too few context lines after the "+void ...". I can't
decide whether the patch is complete. Did you manually
own the function to separate pieces
so that no more than four levels of indentation are used? I find
it hard to read things like
for() if () for () if () if () ... else ... break;
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at is special about the last entry in the charset list? Or are
we just picking some random entry and hope that it works?
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d. The latter assertion seems to go against the former.
I think the man page is correct, but the wording is confusing.
"It is ... critical to ..."
Means "it is very important to ..." but can be read as "it is very
bad to ...".
I'll change it in CVS.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to interactiove motion because the
command might be caused by a module action or some other non-user
input.
> I changed it to return 0 if the first shift fails to parse, but
> return 1 on subsequent parsing failures, so that
>
>Move syntax error
>
> will case an interactiv
e first shift fails to parse, but
> >> return 1 on subsequent parsing failures, so that
> >>
> >>Move syntax error
> >>
> >> will case an interactive move, but
> >>
> >>Move 50syntax 50error
> >>
> >> will move the window to 50 50.
> >
> > Can you redo that particular patch against the CVS code?
>
> Since I can't use "is_first_shift" for that anymore, I would have
> to use a new variable to indicate if it's the first iteration of
> the parsing loop or not, which would make the code more confusing in
> my opinion. But that is what I will do if you won't accept my other
> patch. ;-)
I'm just trying to understand my own code. :-)
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> added to the starting position before entering the shifting loop.
>
>
> Now we just have to make your code follow that *pattern* a little
> better. :-)
>
> First of all, we have the issue with the pointer ("m") prefix:
>
>Move m-5 m-5
>
> currently works exactly the same way as
>
>Move m+-5 m+-5
>
> despite the fact that this violates the *pattern*. If it should work
> like that, then I really need an explanation so I can understand why.
I think the second form is useless. The +- thing only makes sense
for a numeric position specifier, not for m or w.
> The other issue, is the fact that you only include the screen_offset
> in the reference point if the first numeric argument doesn't have any
> suffix. Why should
>
>Move screen 2 -5p -5p
>
> move a window to screen 0 when
>
>Move screen 2 -5 -5
>
> moves the window to screen 2?
>
> This seams strange to me, and not at all in line with the *pattern*.
That's a bug. I remember thinking about it in a hurry.
> I also still think that the return value somehow should indicate if
> the parsing failed or not. If we don't want an interactive move on
> syntax error, I think it's better to handle that in the __move_window
> function instead.
Probably. Make a suggestion based on my latest commit.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t;> the parsing failed or not. If we don't want an interactive move on
> >> syntax error, I think it's better to handle that in the __move_window
> >> function instead.
> >
> > Probably. Make a suggestion based on my latest commit.
>
> I've attached a suggestion.
I'll look at the patch later. In any case, I'd prefer to fall
back to interactive motion only if the action was triggered by
direct user interaction. A message on the console wouldn't hurt
either.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
w event shouldn't be there in the first place, but I
> don't think it's supposed to work like it currently does.
>
> Test case:
>
>*FvwmEvent: enter_window 'Echo enter $[w.id]'
>*FvwmEvent: leave_window 'Echo leave $[w.id]'
>Module F
>
> Can you please make that error go away? Because the option
> --enable-htmldoc is IMHO pretty useless until you do.
Fixed. I now force the --enable-htmldoc for "make distcheck" so
that we find such errors automatically.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'll remove the "in-place" installation of the html docs that
caused problems recently. To test the html docs, just run
make install
in the future. Pleae remember to *always* run
make distcheck
when changing installation procedures.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vog
They must not contain any GNU make
extensions like $(wildcard ...), $(shell ...) of $(patsubst ...).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; release?
The documentation:
* There are several FIXME comments in the generated
documentation. Try this:
$ cd doc
$ find . -type f | xargs grep -I FIXME
* GNU make is needed to build it.
I'm working on the second problem
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, domi
tached.
Committed to CVS.
Thank you.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:58:01PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > good.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Should we wait a couple of days for tes
DV: As you have a much better grasp of the build system than I, is this
> something you might like to tackle? If not, some implementation
> advice would be very helpful.
Yes, I'm planning to do this, but it's not necessary for this
release. Let's not do too many things at the same time.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
re used to be the "autobook", but it's no longer available
as postscript, only as a paper copy and html files.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
se.
And why should acronyms be written in capitals?
Fvwm is a name, and it's written "fvwm" almost everywhere. I
unified the spelling years ago, and I see no reason to change it
again. "fvwm" works just fine. The remaining occurences of
"FVWM" are there just bec
in other
places soon.
> >* commands/Makefile.am:
> >* fvwm/Makefile.am:
> >* images/Makefile.am:
> >remove CVS Id Tags
>
> Why?
Because they just cause unnecessary diffs when comparing versions.
If you want to know which version you have you can always type
$ cvs status foo.c
or look at the information stored in CVS/Entries.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 09:45:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 08/08/07, Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Dominik Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > The standard convention is to spell acronyms in capitals.
> > >
> >
properly, including building a
distribution from the distribution.
* Take the responsibility to explain to the users why this was
done and why their config files are broken.
* Do it in a fashion so that there is no downtime of the current
repository and work can continue as usual.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 09/08/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think opinions have been exchanged by now. So, who of the
> > people who promote "FVWM" as fvwm's name is willing to do the
> > foll
is not true anymore, at least for some of them.
Never mind.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:02:35PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > The NEWS file is getting long, so I believe a new release would be
> > &g
security exposure.
> Some users might be reluctant to use it.
I don't use FvwmCommand because it's too slow. I wanted a solution
for displaying a clock and the process using the most cpu with as
little overhead as possible. I do not want to start an executable
every n seconds b
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> >>On 8/6/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:0
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:15:21AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> > > "seventh guardian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:14:58AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> > On 8/14/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:15:21AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0100,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> yOn Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I'll
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:06:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:14:58AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > By the way, I really don't understand why anybody considers
> > Lis
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>Most important: the generated man page is still broken. For
> >>example:
> >>
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:42:50AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
> >perl and tbl for building the docs.
>
> So, is everything ready for release?
This is still an
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >Yes. I'm now looking at the issues brought up by requiring sed,
> >perl and tbl for building the docs.
>
> So, is everything ready for release?
And is it really
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:26:30PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> >>On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >>>Yes. I'm now looking at the issues
n's funtionality: it updates some button titles
periodically. Strictly speaking it should even be spawned by a
particular instance of FvwmButtons.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that with wmsetbg, a tool that comes with the WindowMaker
> window manager.
It's easy to do with FvwmBacker:
Colorset 9 vgradient 100 red green
*FvwmBacker: Command (Desk *) colorset 9
AddToFunc StartFunction
+ I FvwmBacker
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vog
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a
> > couple of them.
>
> The only remaining table it the one in the description
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > On 8/18/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can you eliminate the use of tables then? I think we just have a
> > > cou
y do we need perl to build the documentation?
Because of the script doc/util/genAllCommands.pl. At the moment
I'm quite unhappy with it:
* It's the only part of fvwm that requires perl (except the perl
library, of course).
* It's not run automatically.
* It requires yet another file w
ctable.c (I'll do that later). But do you have an idea how to
format the big command list automatically, without any manual
editing?
> perl may not be the best tool for it though.
Oh, I am sure perl is perfectly suitable for the task, but many
proprietary UNIX-machines don't have perl.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:09PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On 8/19/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:09:46PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
> > > &
may run into the module
timeout repeatedly (but maybe not).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:57:40PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> With this minimal .fvwm2rc fvwm hangs in startup for many seconds.
>
> --- BEGIN .fvwm2rc ---
> ModuleSynchronous Timeout 5 FvwmTheme
> END .fvwm2rc
>
> I think s
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:42:08PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/21/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:57:40PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > With this minimal .fvwm2rc fvwm hangs in startup for many seconds.
> &g
Fixed.
Ciao
DOminik ^_^ ^_^
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
>
> * The documentation has a build error when building on a multi
>core machine with "-j 2".
>
> I think there are some dependencies m
f chnages
Isn't this page good enough?
http://fvwm.org/news/
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > By the way, there's another issue with the build process:
> > >
e executable, so the code is safe. But
instead of using macros we should rather have
Flocale.c
-
static const char *fft_fallback_font = FLOCALE_FFT_FALLBACK_FONT;
...
if (fn != fft_fallback_font)
...
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:12:25PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hum but now gcc complains about the const char * vs. char *:
> > >
> > > (...)
> > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
&g
101 - 200 of 650 matches
Mail list logo
